Associations of Identity Dimensions with Big Five Personality Domains and Facets

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo A. Klimstra ◽  
Koen Luyckx ◽  
Luc Goossens ◽  
Eveline Teppers ◽  
Filip De Fruyt
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Identity Formation ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Identity Work ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Exploration Process ◽  
Positive Side ◽  
Personality Facets ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Multidimensional Models

Personality is among the most important factors contributing to individual differences in identity formation. However, previous studies mainly focused on broad personality domains and neglected more specific facets. In addition, it has only recently been recognized that identity formation is guided by multiple types of commitment and exploration. The present study aimed to remedy these limitations by relating the 30 personality facets of the NEO–PI–3 to five identity dimensions. In general, identity formation was especially facilitated by high levels of Conscientiousness and, to a lesser extent, also by high levels of Extraversion and low levels of Neuroticism. Openness and Agreeableness predicted greater involvement in both the positive side (i.e. exploration in breadth and depth) and negative side (i.e. ruminative exploration) of the exploration process. Personality facets and their overarching domains, as well as facets underlying the same domain, were often differentially associated with identity dimensions. Additionally, we found that some personality facets both have bright and dark sides, as they predicted both proactive identity work and a weakened sense of identity. Overall, the present study underscores the utility of multidimensional models of identity formation and points to the benefits of considering personality facets in addition to broad domains. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

scholarly journals A meta-analysis on individual differences in primary emotional systems and Big Five personality traits

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Marengo ◽  
Kenneth L. Davis ◽  
Gökçe Özkarar Gradwohl ◽  
Christian Montag
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Big Five Personality Traits ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Affective Neuroscience ◽  
Emotional Systems

AbstractThe Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) were constructed as a self-report assessment to measure individual differences in Jaak Panksepp’s cross-species primary emotional systems: SEEKING, PLAY, CARE (positive emotions) and FEAR, SADNESS, ANGER (negative emotions). Beginning with the first published work on the ANPS in 2003, individual differences on the ANPS measures of these six primary emotional systems have been consistently linked to Big Five personality traits. From a theoretical perspective, these primary emotional systems arising from subcortical regions, shed light on the nature of the Big Five personality traits from an evolutionary perspective, because each of these primary emotional systems represent a tool for survival endowing mammalian species with inherited behavioral programs to react appropriately to complex environments. The present work revisited 21 available samples where both ANPS and Big Five measures have been administered. Our meta-analytical analysis provides solid evidence that high SEEKING relates to high Openness to Experience, high PLAY to high Extraversion, high CARE/low ANGER to high Agreeableness and high FEAR/SADNESS/ANGER to high Neuroticism. This seems to be true regardless of the ANPS inventory chosen, although much more work is needed in this area. Associations between primary emotional systems and Conscientiousness were in the lower effect size area across all six primary emotions, thereby supporting the idea that Conscientiousness rather seems to be less directly related with the subcortical primary emotions and likely is the most cognitive/cortical personality construct out of the Big Five. In sum, the present work underlines the idea that individual differences in primary emotional systems represent evolutionarily ancient foundations of human personality, given their a) meaningful links to the prominent Big Five model and b) their origins lying in subcortical areas of the human brain.

Mindfulness facets and Big Five personality facets in persons with recurrent depression in remission

2017 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Spinhoven ◽  
Marloes J. Huijbers ◽  
Yixia Zheng ◽  
Johan Ormel ◽  
Anne E.M. Speckens
Keyword(s):  
Big Five ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Recurrent Depression ◽  
Personality Facets ◽  
Mindfulness Facets

The Influence of Personality on Aesthetic Preferences

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viren Swami ◽  
Adrian Furnham
Keyword(s):  
Visual Arts ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Situational Factors ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Film And Television ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Personality Facets ◽  
Aesthetic Preferences

It is now widely agreed that, alongside stimulus and situational factors, person-centered factors can provide a fuller understanding of aesthetic preferences and experiences. Such person-centered factors are wide-ranging, but in this chapter we present an overview of the influence of personality on aesthetic preferences. In particular, we focus on Eysenck’s early studies on the K factor (which distinguishes between preferences for complex versus simple art forms) and more recent studies indicating that the Big Five personality facet of openness to experience is a core component of what has been described as an “artistic personality,” at least in terms of the visual arts. However, we highlight limiting issues with this research, such as the lack of focus on potentially mediating variables. Later in this chapter, we review the evidence of associations between the Big Five personality facets and nonvisual artistic preferences, i.e., related to musical preferences, reading preferences, and film and television preferences. To conclude, we assess the major challenges facing differential psychologists studying aesthetics and present some suggestions for future research directions.

The Generality of Personality Heritability

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Ekehammar ◽  
Nazar Akrami ◽  
Lars-Erik Hedlund ◽  
Kimio Yoshimura ◽  
Yutaka Ono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Time ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Potential Usefulness ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Behavioral Indicators ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Personality Facets ◽  
Heritability Estimates ◽  
The Relationship

The present research examined the relationship between heritability and response time for the Big Five personality facets in three samples of adults and adolescents. We predicted that the larger the heritability of a facet the faster is the response to the items of that facet. In support of our predictions, the results showed that heritability and response time were indeed negatively correlated. The effect size of the relationship was small but systematic and statistically significant across all samples. The findings underline the generality of personality heritability and highlight the link between heritability and behavioral indicators. The potential usefulness of both heritability estimates and response time in research on personality is discussed.

Transphobia and Gender Bashing in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: The Role of Individual Differences and Psychosocial Variables

2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412110021
Author(s):  
Cristian Cabrera ◽  
Jorge-Manuel Dueñas ◽  
Sandra Cosi ◽  
Fabia Morales-Vives
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Big Five Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Transgender People ◽  
Social Reputation ◽  
And Gender

Although research in recent years has revealed widespread discrimination against transgender people, few studies have addressed the attitudes of those who discriminate. In fact, although studies report that bullying is very common in adolescence, little is known about the attitudes of adolescents towards transgender people. This study aimed to determine the roles of social reputation, family socialisation, the big five personality traits and aggressiveness in transphobia and gender bashing among adolescents. The sample consisted of 479 students (50.1% boys) aged 14–19 (M = 15.04; SD = 1.06). The results revealed that transphobia and gender bashing were significantly related to the study variables. Specifically, the results showed that transphobia is largely predicted by variables of the type related to affect and personality, while gender bashing is largely related to variables of a social and reputational nature. Similarly, differences were found between genders, with boys having significantly higher scores than girls for transphobia and gender bashing, as well as specificity of predictors. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Evidence for a Heritable General Factor of Personality in Two Studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livia Veselka ◽  
Julie Aitken Schermer ◽  
K. V. Petrides ◽  
Philip Anthony Vernon
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Genetic Model ◽  
Model Fitting ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
General Factor Of Personality ◽  
Components Analysis ◽  
And Behavior

AbstractTwo studies were conducted to see whether a general factor of personality (GFP) could be extracted from different measures of personality. Using samples of twins in both studies also allowed an assessment of the extent to which genetic and/ or environmental factors contributed to individual differences in the GFPs that were found. In Study 1, principal components analysis of the Big Five personality traits in combination with four scales of mental toughness yielded a strong GFP and behavior genetic model-fitting showed that individual differences in this GFP were fully accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental factors. In Study 2, a GFP was extracted from the Big Five traits in combination with 15 facets of emotional intelligence. Individual differences in this GFP were also fully accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental factors. These studies add to the growing body of research demonstrating the existence of a GFP and replicate one previous report of its heritability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document