Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: The Importance of FISH and Cytogenetics

2008 ◽  
pp. 57-76
Author(s):  
Esteban Braggio ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Rafael Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Cytogenetic Abnormalities of Undetermined Clinical Sinigicance Correlate with Poor Prognosic Factors in Multiple Myeloma

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. e106
Author(s):  
Y.K. Lee ◽  
M. Kim ◽  
E.J. Lee ◽  
H.J. Kang ◽  
H.-S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities

scholarly journals Development and Analysis of a Weighed Prognostic Model in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Xue-Han Mao ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Yuting Yan ◽  
Jiahui Liu ◽  
Huishou Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Total Score Range ◽  
Prognosis Model

Background and Objective: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized with significant cytogenetic changes and complex tumor microenvironment, thus patient survival is extremely heterogeneous. Various disease-related or patient-related factors affect the prognosis of patients. This study tried to analyze the prognostic indicators of patients with newly-treated MM, especially explored the prognosis of multiple cytogenetic abnormalities and the ratio of lymphocytes to monocytes (LMR). Additionally, we established a comprehensive prognostic model to help determine the patient prognosis. Methods: After screening, 603 patients of untreated MM from January 2008 to June 2017, with complete baseline indicators were enrolled into the study. By univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, risk factors related to the prognosis of patients were evaluated, and a weighted prognosis model was established to compare the survival differences of patients in each risk stratification. Result: Optimal thresholds of ALC, LWR, NLR and LMR were determined by ROC curve and Youdex index: ALC = 1.415, LWR = 0.325, NLR = 1.935, LMR = 2.95. Survival analysis showed that patients with LMR ≤ 2.95, ALC ≥ 1.415 and LWR ≥ 0.325 had significantly better survival compared with their respective control groups. Cox multivariate analysis showed that among the four indicators, only LMR≤2.95 was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS)(Figure 1A). 17p deletion, 1q21 amplification, t (4; 14) / t (14; 16) were define as high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA). Of the 603 patients, about 60% were associated with at least one high-risk cytogenetic event. Among them, the occurrence of cumulative 0, 1, 2, and 3 HRA were 39.6% (239/603), 42.5% (256/603), 16.6% (100/603), and 1.3% (8/603), respectively. There was no significant difference in survival among patients with same number of HRAs. The median OS of patients with 0, 1 and ≥ 2 HRA were not reached, 62.1 months (95% CI, 49.3-74.9) and 30.4 months (95% CI, 24.5-36.3), respectively (p <0.001)(Figure 1B).Final Cox regression model showed that age 65 ~ 74 (HR=1.77, 95%CI, 1.24-2.51, p=0.001), age ≥75 (HR=2.46, 95%CI, 1.69-3.58, p < 0.001), LDH≥247 U/L (HR =1.65, 95%CI, 1.07-2.51, p=0.023), ISS stage III (HR=1.76, 95%CI, 1.24-2.50, p=0.002), LMR≤2.95 (HR=1.53, 95%CI, 1.08-2.18, p=0.017), 1 HRA (HR=1.87, 95%CI, 1.27-2.75, p=0.002) and ≥2 HRA (HR=3.48, 95%CI, 2.22-5.45, p<0.001) are independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. Then weighted risk factors were summed to establish a comprehensive prognosis model, with a total score range of 0-6 points. Accordingly, the whole cohort was divided into low risk (0-1 points, 45.4%), intermediate risk (2 points, 27.9%), high risk (3 points, 19.2%) and ultra-high risk (4-6 points, 7.5 %) groups. The median OS of the four risk groups were 85.8 months (67.1-104.5), 49.0 months (44.7-53.3), 35.4 months (31.3-39.5), and 23.2 months (18.8-27.6), respectively (p<0.001). The C-statistics of this prognostic model is 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71), which is significantly better than the D-S stage (C-statistics = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.50-0.55, p <0.001), ISS (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.64, p <0.001) and R-ISS stage (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.63, p <0.001). Bootstrap resampling and calibration curve showed that the model has an accurate predictive effect on both short-term and long-term prognosis of patients(Figure 1C). Conclusion: In our analysis, ALC, LWR, LMR were associated with poor prognosis in NDMM patients, while NLR had no significant prognostic significance. Among the four indicators, LMR≤2.95 was the only independent prognostic factor. In NDMM patients, survival of patients with the same number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were comparable with each other, regardless of whichever combination of HRA. Higher number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with worse prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed that, old age (65-74 years old, ≥75 years old), increased LDH (≥247 U/L), decreased LMR (≤2.95), ISS III, 1 HRA and ≥ 2 HRA were independent adverse prognostic factors that affect the OS of MM patients. 4. A comprehensive weighted prognostic model was established with the above factors, which was proved to effectively distinguish different prognosis of patients. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Relationship of Bone Marrow Plasma Cell Morphology with Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Narang ◽  
Maneet Luthra ◽  
Avantika Garg ◽  
Amit Dhiman ◽  
Neena Sood
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Morphological Pattern ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Cytogenetic Studies ◽  
Chi Square Test

Introduction: Cytogenetics has become an integral part of Multiple Myeloma (MM) diagnosis and prognostication. A combination of conventional cytogenetics and interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) is currently used to stratify tumours into high, intermediate and standard risk disease. Aim: To compare the morphological details of plasma cells with cytogenetic abnormalities. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective cross sectional study was conducted at Department of Pathology Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana in three and a half year duration (1st January 2014 to 30th June 2017). All the diagnosed MM patients in whom cytogenetic was available were included and descriptive analysis was done using Chi-Square test and relevant statistical analysis using SPSS 21 version. Correlation was done with various morphological pattern (plasmacytic, plasma blastic). Results: Cytogenetic studies were performed on 42 cases using FISH technique (n=31, 81.6%) and GTG (Giemsa) banding (n=4, 10.5%). Three (7.9%) patients were tested with both methods. In the present study, all the patients (n=2,100%) with plasmablastic morphology who got tested with cytogenetics had del13q14.3 and none of the patients with normal genome (n=22) had plasmablastic morphology. Conclusion: Morphologic patterns of plasma cells and cytogenetic studies correlate well and can together help in better prognostication of MM patients.

scholarly journals Metaphase Cytogenetics for Risk Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4396-4396
Author(s):  
Patrick Mellors ◽  
Moritz Binder ◽  
Rhett P. Ketterling ◽  
Patricia Griepp ◽  
Linda B Baughn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Risk Modeling ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Improve Risk Stratification

Introduction: Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics are associated with inferior survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). These abnormalities are only detected in one third of cases due to the low proliferative rate of plasma cells. It is unknown if metaphase cytogenetics improve risk stratification when using contemporary prognostic models such as the revised international staging system (R-ISS), which incorporates interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Aims: The aims of this study were to 1) characterize the association between abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed MM treated with novel agents and 2) evaluate whether the addition of metaphase cytogenetics to R-ISS, age, and plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) improves model discrimination with respect to OS. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 483 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with proteasome inhibitors (PI) and/or immunomodulators (IMID) who had metaphase cytogenetics performed prior to initiation of therapy. Abnormal metaphase cytogenetics were defined as MM specific abnormalities, while normal metaphase cytogenetics included constitutional cytogenetic variants, age-related Y chromosome loss, and normal metaphase karyotypes. Multivariable adjusted proportional hazards regression models were fit for the association between known prognostic factors and OS. Covariates associated with inferior OS on multivariable analysis included R-ISS stage, age ≥ 70, PCLI ≥ 2, and abnormal metaphase cytogenetics. We devised a risk scoring system weighted by their respective hazard ratios (R-ISS II +1, R-ISS III + 2, age ≥ 70 +2, PCLI ≥ 2 +1, metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities + 1). Low (LR), intermediate (IR), and high risk (HR) groups were established based on risk scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 in modeling without metaphase cytogenetics, and scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-6 in modeling incorporating metaphase cytogenetics, respectively. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival analysis was stratified by LR, IR, and HR groups in models 1) excluding metaphase cytogenetics 2) including metaphase cytogenetics and 3) including metaphase cytogenetics, with IR stratified by presence and absence of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities. Survival estimates were compared between groups using the log-rank test. Harrell's C was used to compare the predictive power of risk modeling with and without metaphase cytogenetics. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 66 (31-95), 281 patients (58%) were men, median follow up was 5.5 years (0.04-14.4), and median OS was 6.4 years (95% CI 5.7-6.8). Ninety-seven patients (20%) were R-ISS stage I, 318 (66%) stage II, and 68 (14%) stage III. One-hundred and fourteen patients (24%) had high-risk abnormalities by FISH, and 115 (24%) had abnormal metaphase cytogenetics. Three-hundred and thirteen patients (65%) received an IMID, 119 (25%) a PI, 51 (10%) received IMID and PI, and 137 (28%) underwent upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). On multivariable analysis, R-ISS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.29-1.97, p < 0.001), age ≥ 70 (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.83-2.93, p < 0.001), PCLI ≥ 2, (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-2.00, p=0.002) and abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.75, p=0.019) were associated with inferior OS. IR and HR groups experienced significantly worse survival compared to LR groups in models excluding (Figure 1A) and including (Figure 1B) the effect of metaphase cytogenetics (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). However, the inclusion of metaphase cytogenetics did not improve discrimination. Likewise, subgroup analysis of IR patients by the presence or absence of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities did not improve risk stratification (Figure 1C) (p < 0.001). The addition of metaphase cytogenetics to risk modeling with R-ISS stage, age ≥ 70, and PCLI ≥ 2 did not improve prognostic performance when evaluated by Harrell's C (c=0.636 without cytogenetics, c=0.642 with cytogenetics, absolute difference 0.005, 95% CI 0.002-0.012, p=0.142). Conclusions: Abnormalities on metaphase cytogenetics at diagnosis are associated with inferior OS in MM when accounting for the effects of R-ISS, age, and PCLI. However, the addition of metaphase cytogenetics to prognostic modeling incorporating these covariates did not significantly improve risk stratification. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Akcea: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding. Leung:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Continuous absence of metaphase-defined cytogenetic abnormalities, especially of chromosome 13 and hypodiploidy, ensures long-term survival in multiple myeloma treated with Total Therapy I: interpretation in the context of global gene expression

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 3849-3856 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Shaughnessy ◽  
Joth Jacobson ◽  
Jeff Sawyer ◽  
Jason McCoy ◽  
Athanasios Fassas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Global Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle Gene ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Chromosome 13 ◽  
Prognostic Implications ◽  
Total Therapy

Abstract Metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs), especially of chromosome 13 (CA 13), confer a grave prognosis in multiple myeloma even with tandem autotransplantations as applied in Total Therapy I, which enrolled 231 patients between 1989 and 1994. With a median follow-up of almost 9 years, the prognostic implications of all individual CAs, detected prior to treatment and at relapse, were investigated. Among all CAs and standard prognostic factors examined prior to therapy, only hypodiploidy and CA 13 (hypo–13 CA), alone or in combination, were associated with shortest event-free survival and overall survival (OS). The shortest postrelapse OS was observed with hypo–13 CA, which was newly detected in 18 of all 28 patients presenting with this abnormality at relapse. Superior prognosis was associated with the absence of any CA at both diagnosis and relapse (10-year OS, 40%). The lack of independent prognostic implications of other CAs points to a uniquely aggressive behavior of hypo–13 CA (present in 16% of patients at diagnosis). With the use of microarray data in 146 patients enrolled in Total Therapy II, overexpression of cell cycle genes distinguished CA from no CA, especially in cases of del(13) detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH 13, resulting in a haploinsufficiency of RB1 and other genes mapping to chromosome 13, as well as activation of IGF1R, appears to have an amplifying effect on cell cycle gene expression, thus providing a molecular explanation for the dire outcome of patients with CA 13 compared with those with other CAs.

Up-Front Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (THAL) and Double Autologous Transplantation (Double TX) for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison with Double TX without Added Thalidomide and Prognostic Implications of Chromosome 13 Deletion and Translocation t(4;14).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Nicoletta Testoni ◽  
Carolina Terragna ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Chromosome 13 ◽  
Prognostic Implications ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Aim of the present sudy was to evaluate the benefit of novel agents combined with conventional therapies in multiple myeloma (MM), with particular emphasis on patients (pts) carrying adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. For this purpose, we analyzed a series of 142 pts who received thalidomide-dexamethasone (thal-dex) and double autologous transplantation (double Tx). By study design, thal-dex was administered from the outset until the second autologous Tx. On an intent-to-treat basis, stringently defined (immumofixation negative) complete remission (CR) rate following double Tx and thal-dex was 54%. This value was significantly higher (P=0.0009) compared to the 33% observed in a comparable series of 129 pts who received double Tx without thal-dex. In comparison with these latter patients, addition of thal-dex to double Tx significantly prolonged PFS (median: 31 vs 42 months; P=0.04) and did not adversely affect survival after post-transplant relapse (P=0.7). All 142 pts included in the study were investigated at baseline for the presence of chromosome 13 deletion [del(13)] by FISH analysis and of t(4;14) using a RT-PCR assay. An analysis on an intent-to-treat basis performed according to the presence or absence of these cytogenetic abnormalities revealed that the probability to respond (more than 90% reduction in M protein concentration) to primary therapy with thal-dex for 94 pts who carried both del(13) and t(4;14) was significantly lower compared to that of 69 pts with del(13) alone (12% vs 41%, respectively; P=0.012) and of 18 pts with t(4;14) alone (12% vs 50%, respectively; P=0.006). The lower probability of response to first-line thal-dex therapy conferred by the presence of both del(13) and t(4;14) was completely offset by subsequent application of double Tx and thal-dex. Indeed, on an intent-to-treat basis, the probability to attain a very good partial response or CR for pts with both del(13) and t(4;14) positivity was 68% compared to 80% for pts with both del(13) and t(4;14) negativity (P=0.1). With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 3-year projected probabilities of OS and PFS were 80% and 59%, respectively (intent-to-treat). The presence or absence of t(4;14) had no significant impact on the 3-year projected probability of OS (80.12% vs 80.42%, respectively; P=0.3). Furthermore, an analysis of pts who actually received thal-dex and double Tx showed that curves of OS and EFS were almost superimposable among pts who carried or lacked both del(13) and t(4;14). Indeed, the 3-year projected probability of OS for pts with both these cytogenetic abnormalities was 92% compared to 88% for pts who were negative for both del(13) and t(4;14); (P=0.7); the corresponding figures for EFS were 70% vs 77%, respectively (P=0.9). These results suggest that thal-dex combined with double Tx may overcome the unfavourable prognosis conferred by del(13) and t(4;14). A longer follow-up is required before definite conclusions can be drawn.

Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib (VELCADE™) in 104 Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least Two Previous Lines of Therapy: Impact of Cytogenetics on Response from a Canadian Cohort.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5118-5118
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Deepa Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE™) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to be safe and efficacious in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) using a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 & 11 of a 21-day cycle. Certain cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis in MM, including deletion 13, t(4;14) and the p53 deletion.(Stewart et al, JCO2005; 23(26):6339–44). Bortezomib has demonstrated the ability to overcome the poor prognosis associated with deletion 13 (Jagannath, JCO2005; 23(16S) 6501). The impact of bortezomib on a broader range of cytogenetic abnormalities, such as t(4;14) has yet to be determined. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, non-randomized, phase 3b study, pts with MM across 13 centres in Canada, who had received at least 2 previous lines of therapy and who were refractory to or had relapsed after their last therapy were enrolled. Pts received up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8 & 11. Dexamethasone 20 mg PO was administered on each day of and day after bortezomib administration if the pts either experienced progressive disease after receiving at least 2 treatment cycles of bortezomib or had no change in disease status from baseline after receiving at least 4 treatment cycles of bortezomib. Results: 104 pts were enrolled; the mean age in this cohort was 60.7 years, and 65 (62.5%) were male. Approximately 30% of pts had a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or less at baseline. 71 pts (68.3%) had received prior thalidomide therapy, 32 (30.8%) had received a prior autotransplant and 4 (3.8%) had received prior bortezomib treatment. 74 (71.2%) received 3 or more lines of prior MM therapy. During the study, mean number of bortezomib cycles completed was 4.6 (range, 0–11 cycles), and the number of pts that completed 8 cycles of therapy was 36 (34.6%). 15.2% of pts received dexamethasone at cycle 3 and 19.2% at cycle 5. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on approximately half of the pts. Response data for cycle 5 is currently available for 69/99 (69.7%) of evaluable pts (see Table 1). Overall, 76.9% of the pts experienced Grade 3 & 4 adverse events. Safety profile observed is similar to past trial results with bortezomib. Conclusion: In this large Canadian cohort of extensively pre-treated patients with mulitple myeloma, bortezomib demonstrated good response, consistent with previous studies. Analysis correlating cytogenetic profile and response rate is ongoing and will be available at the time of conference. In addition, a detailed safety analysis and impact of prior treatment on response will be analyzed and made available at the time of conference. Table 1. Response to Bortezomib Category of Response* No. of Patients (%) *Modified SWOG: CR 100% M-protein reduction; R 75–99%; PR 50–74%; MR 25–49%; SD<25%, PD increasing M-protein Any Response (CR + VGPR + PR + MR) 47 (68.1) ---Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) ---22 (31.9) ---Partial Response (PR) + Minimal Response (MR) ---25 (36.2) Stable Disease 10 (14.5) Progressive Disease 12 (17.4)

CYTOGENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1169-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Lionel J.A. Coignet ◽  
Gordon W. Dewald
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document