Theoretical Approach to the Policy Process: The Multiple Streams Framework

2017 ◽  
pp. 23-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Herweg
World Affairs ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-186
Author(s):  
Harry Noone

International relations scholars have struggled to adequately link domestic and international levels in theoretical models and causal analyses of foreign policy, despite widespread acknowledgment of the need to do so. This study elaborates on this challenge by assessing the utility of several policy process frameworks that have so far been underutilized in foreign policy analysis. The assumptions of one particularly fruitful method, the Two-Level Game, will be compared with those of three policy process frameworks: the Advocacy Coalition Framework, the Multiple Streams Framework, and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. When analyzing three specific concepts (the question of rationality, the dynamics of agenda setting, and the strategic action of relevant actors), it is apparent that the assumptions of the policy process frameworks largely clash with those of the Two-Level Game, raising the potential for their augmentation of the field of foreign policy analysis despite their relative underuse.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiying Su ◽  
Feng Feng

Policy change includes policy innovation, policy succession, policy maintenance and policy termination, which involves result-orientation and process-orientation. The former focuses on scope and direction of policy change itself, and the latter are those factors affecting policy change. Based on policy process theory, multiple streams framework describes the pre-decisive process; advocate coalition and policy network theories explain interactive process from ideas and interests of different actors. Taking “ban e-bike” policy in Guangzhou as a case, to analyze why it arrived on government agenda by multiple streams framework, and explore policy process integrated advocacy coalition with policy network theory, could explain why the policy was repeatedly prohibited, why this policy change process was from single “ban riding” to more stringent “five bans”. Results show the reasons for policy maintenance and continuation that policy is inconsistent with relevant criteria, relative closed policy community, difficult to reconcile different beliefs between support-coalition and opposition-coalition, and lack interaction among network actors for differences in resource and power.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pham Dinh Long ◽  
Nguyen Minh Doi ◽  
Do Sa Ky

In the policy process of higher education, the higher education institutions not only play a role in the policy making process, but also are directly affected by the policies toward building quality culture in their organizations. From this perspective, the paper uses the policy cycle model combined with the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) of Kingdon (1984) and the quality culture model of the European Union Association (EUA) in order to analyze, clarify and propose groups of solutions to enhance the critical role of higher education institutions in policy process. Keywords Policy entrepreneurs; quality culture; multiple streams framework References [1] Viennet, Romane, and Beatriz Pont. "Education Policy Implementation: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 162." OECD Publishing (2017). [2] Howells, J., R. Ramlogan, and S. L. Cheng, The role, context and typology of universities and higher education institutions in innovation systems: A UK perspective, Discussion Papers and Project Reports, Impact of Higher Education Institutions on Regional Economics: A Joint Research Initiative, 2008.[3] Dill, David D, and Maarja Soo, Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems, Higher education 49.4: 495-533, 2005.[4] Kraft, Michael E., and Scott R. Furlong. Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Sage, 2012.[5] Kingdon, John W, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edition, New York and London, Longman, 2003.[6] Weick, Karl E, The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed, New York, Random House, 1979.[7] Feldman, Martha S, Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Kaking, Vol. 231, Stanford University Press, 1989.[8] March, James G, Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Simon and Schuster, 1994.[9] Wilson, James Q, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, Basic Books, 1989.[10] Chow, Anthony, Understanding policy change: multiple streams and national education curriculum policy in Hong Kong, Journal of Public Administration and Governance 4.2 (2014) 49.[12] Zhou, Nan, and Feng Feng, Applying Multiple Streams Theoretical Framework to college matriculation policy reform for children of migrant workers in China, Public Policy and Administration Research 4.10 (2014) 1.[12] Ha, Bui Thi Thu, Tolib Mirzoev, and Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay, Shaping the health policy agenda: the case of safe motherhood policy in Vietnam, International journal of health policy and management 4.11 (2015) 741.[13] Kane, Sumit, The Health Policy Process in Vietnam: Going Beyond Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Theory: Comment on “Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam”, International journal of health policy and management 5.7 (2016) 435.[14] European University Association, Quality Culture in European Countries: A Bottom-Up Approach, EUA Publications, 2006. [15] Liên hiệp các hội khoa học và kỹ thuật Việt Nam, Bản kiến nghị đề xuất một số biện pháp nhằm tiến tới cải cách triệt để và toàn diện nền giáo dục VN, 2005.[16] Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O'Leary, The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government, Public Administration Review 65.5 (2005) 547.


Author(s):  
Arwanto Arwanto ◽  
Wike Anggraini

ABSTRACT Understanding policy process involves many distinctive approaches. The most common are institutional, groups or networks, exogenous factors, rational actors, and idea-based approach. This paper discussed the idea-based approach to explain policy process, in this case policy change. It aims to analyse how ideas could assist people to understand policy change. What role do they play and why are they considered as fundamental element? It considers that ideas are belong to every policy actor, whether it is individual or institution. In order to answer these questions, this paper adopts Kingdon’s multi streams approach to analyse academic literatures. Through this approach, the relationship between ideas and policy change can be seen clearer. Ideas only can affect in policy change if it is agreed and accepted by policy makers. Therefore the receptivity of ideas plays significant role and it emerges policy entrepreneurs. They promote ideas (through problem framing, timing, and narrative construction) and manipulate in order to ensure the receptivity of ideas. Although policy entrepreneurs play significant role, political aspects remains the most important element in the policy process. Keywords: policy change, ideas, idea-based approach, Kingdon’s multiple streams, policy entrepreneurs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bastian Widyatama

Kingdon’s Multiple Streams, a framework to analyze agenda-setting process is widely considered as a ‘universal’ theoretical framework because of its flexibility to be applied. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the validity of this ‘universal’ term. By using the case of the establishment of Law No.13 of 2012 concerning the Privilege of Yogyakarta Special Region, this research aims to apply and examine the Kingdon’s framework. The research has been done by using the qualitative method. Interviewing key persons and interpreting written documents are main techniques in data collection process. As the result, this framework remains applicable in the Yogyakarta case. There are 3 factors that brought Yogyakarta issues into the central government’s agenda encompass problem, policy, and politics. Politics is the most dominant factor indicated by Yogyakartans strong political movement and Sultanate of Yogyakarta’s political approach. In addition, Sultanate of Yogyakarta can also be discussed as a policy entrepreneur. As the conclusion, this research has a significant contribution to Kingdon’s multiple streams framework which is still able to explain social phenomena in policy making studies although there are some concerns that need to be explored further, particularly regarding the role of media and policy entrepreneur. Keywords: Agenda setting, policy, Law No.13 of 2012, Sultanate of Yogyakarta


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
Linda J. Allen

AbstractContemporary policy process theories are used to explain important aspects of the policy process, including the emergence or change of policies over time. However, these theories vary notably in their composition, such as their scope of analytical space, key concepts and assumptions, models of individual decision-making, and relationships between process-relevant factors and actors. There is little guidance on which theory may be best suited for explaining particular policy outcomes or how the different elements of the theories influence their analytical power. To begin to address this gap in the literature, a comparative analysis applied four established policy process theories to explain the emergence of the same policy outcome, a set of environmental policies associated with the North American Free Trade Agreement, while varying the analytical space or “field of vision” spatially and temporally. Overall, each theory demonstrated strong explanatory power but within analytical spaces of different scales, which indicates that the dimensionality aspects aspects the analytical space of policy process theories may contribute to a convergence in shared knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document