Self-Organization and Autopoiesis in the Development of Modern Science

1990 ◽  
pp. 195-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Stichweh
Keyword(s):  
Modern Science ◽  
Self Organization

Concept complexity W. Weawer differ from the modern scientists

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-22
Author(s):  
Журавлева ◽  
A. Zhuravleva ◽  
Еськов ◽  
V. Eskov ◽  
Гудкова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Stochastic Methods ◽  
Type I ◽  
The Third ◽  
Basic Model ◽  
Significant Difference

The present paper shows that the term “complexity” includes absolutely different notions than now it seems to be presented in modern science and philosophy. Postnon-classics has come to this new recognition too close, but, actually, it is a new recognition of uncertainty for systems of the third type (not deterministic and not stochastic). We introduce the interpretation of a type I uncertainty that implies that stochastic methods show systems identified, but methods of the theory of chaos and self-organization and neurocomputing show significant difference of target systems (processes). With specific examples presented uncertainty of type 1 and gives an idea of the uncertainty of type 2, when the distribution function f (x) for different samples are the same. At the same neuro-computers not only divides the sample, but also shows the order parameters. In this case, at the same time solve the problem of system synthesis, which in society is now very difficult to solve (the basic model of social relations now – it´s deterministic society).

An analysis of I.R. Prigogone and J.A. Wheeler’s views concerning emergency of biosystems from the perspective of the third paradigm

10.12737/7652 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 47-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Еськов ◽  
V. Eskov ◽  
Джумагалиева ◽  
L. Dzhumagalieva ◽  
Филатова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deterministic Chaos ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Main Property ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Living Systems ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Initial State ◽  
The Third ◽  
Emergent Systems

The main problem of modern science is pointed out: reality of specific three-type systems (TTS) that are usually presented as complexity, and simultaneously impossibility of a description of such systems by a traditional modern reducing approach. Studying properties of system elements cannot help in a description of a complex system itself – complexity (three-type systems, living systems). Hence there arises an acute need in creation of new theories which would operate with maximum uncertainty and unpredictability and provide modeling TTS. The first step in this direction was taken on the grounds of a creation of theory of chaos and self-organization (TCS), according to which complexity cannot repeat an initial state of a system (or a vector parameters x(t0)), measures are not invariant, autocorrelation functions do not converge to zero and Lyapunov exponents are not positive. Chaos of TTS differs from a deterministic chaos and statistical distribution functions f(x) are not appropriate to describe it, because they continuously change. Deterministic, stochastic and chaotic models cannot describe TTS. This is the main property of emergent systems (complexity, TTS), therefore they are described by quasi-attractors.

scholarly journals Synergetics – From Past to Future

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-31
Author(s):  
G. G. Malinetsky
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Book Series ◽  
The Past ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approaches ◽  
The World ◽  
The Future ◽  
High Technologies

We consider the meaning, the role and the prospects of interdisciplinary investigations in the world scientific knowledge. We discuss the theory of self-organization or the synergetics development and its reflection in the book series “Synergetics: From the Past to the Future”. We show that fundamental questions of the modern science and a number of key high technologies bounded with the future of the economy directly depend on the level of interdisciplinary works performed in the country. Synergetics talks now in terms of mathematical models. So their construction, investigation and use are the main way in the development of interdisciplinary approaches.

scholarly journals Leaders of local communities as attractors of the e cient social development

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
I. V. Рysmennyy
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Local Communities ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Social Self ◽  
Simple Task ◽  
Direct Transformation ◽  
Future System

The article formulates the basic list of abilities that leaders of local communities need to have as accractors of the e ective social development. It is substantiated that the heads of territorial communities, deputies, leaders of initiative groups of the community are entrusted with not simple task, which is to provide constructive social self-organization, based on permanent social dialogue and partnership with the community. According to synergetics methodology these individuals have to become the attractors for the e ective social development. The approaches to the understanding of an attractor in modern science are analyzed. The article a rms that the future system depends on leaders who direct transformation of the respective system. The most important aspects of leadership that are relevant at the level of local communities are analysed. It is substantiated that the self-organization of life in the local community begins with the establishment of the principles of corporatism.

scholarly journals Creative potential of a future music teacher: essense and content of phenomenon

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Datsenko Mariya
Keyword(s):  
Educational Policy ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Music Teacher ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Creative Potential ◽  
Guiding Principle ◽  
Self Development ◽  
Creative Self ◽  
Pedagogical Science

The paper defines the essence and content of the phenomenon of creative potential of a future music teacher. Humanisation of domestic pedagogical science and practice has become dominant in the strategy of educational policy today. The main educational guiding principle is respect for the dignity of a person and development of their potential directed at the future. Creative potential, which is defined by many scholars as the presence of hidden, unused reserves in a particular type of human activity, becomes a sort of «a core» of a person. A natural self-organization of the creative potential of a future music teacher at all levels of hierarchy of organization ensures the convergence of this system to a certain optimum of negentropic stability due to environment and results in the formulation of the principle of systematic and dynamic complementarity, Le Chatelier’s principle and G. Hilmi’s law. Thus, based on achievements of modern science, it can be stated that the creative potential of an individual is a dynamic integrative personal quality (in the complex of personal abilities, knowledge, skills, beliefs, attitudes, orientation), which determines the need, readiness and ability of creative self-realization and self-development.

scholarly journals Three foundations of self-organization or Montessori in the postnonclassical age

2020 ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Modekin
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Philosophical Foundations ◽  
System A ◽  
Self Organized ◽  
Montessori Method ◽  
Mixed Age

The article is devoted to the study of self-organization in the Montessori Elementary school. The topic of self-organization was previously discussed within different areas of science by P. Kropotkin, H. Haken, E. Sheval and others. M. Montessori described conditions required for the big groups of children to study independently and productively. These conditions can be discussed through the lens of the modern science. The article contains three groups of the self-organization foundations in the Elementary school: philosophical, psychological and pedagogical. The philosophical foundations are the elements of the self-organizing system, which are the following: an open system, a big amount of the elements and the energy coming to the system from the outside. Psychological foundations are the executive functions development, self-determination and flow. Pedagogical foundations of the self-organization are the key elements of the Montessori Method: a prepared environment, observation by the teacher and mixed age classroom. The theoretical analysis shows that a Montessori Elementary school creates all conditions for self-organized system in any classroom.

The complexity in I. Prigogine and H. Haken’s interpretation differs from the complexity of W. Weaver and TCS

10.12737/6723 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
Гудкова ◽  
S. Gudkova ◽  
Джумагалиева ◽  
L. Dzhumagalieva ◽  
Еськов ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Modern Science ◽  
Order Parameters ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Synthesis Problem ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Stochastic Methods ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
The Third ◽  
Significant Difference

The present paper shows that the term “complexity” includes absolutely different notions than now it seems to be presented in modern science and philosophy. V.S. Stepin’s postnon-classics has come to this new recognition too close, but, actually, it is a new recognition of uncertainty for systems of the third type (not deterministic and not stochastic). We introduce the interpretation of a type I uncertainty that implies that stochastic methods show systems identified, but methods of the theory of chaos and self-organization and neurocomputing show significant difference of target systems (processes). The concrete examples show the type I uncertainty and give an idea of a type II uncertainty, that implies the coincidence of distribution functions f(x) for different samplings. We prove that neurocomputing method not only differentiates samplings, but also identifies order parameters. In this case we also solve the system synthesis problem.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EVOLUTION OF CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL SCIENCE

2021 ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
N.V. Bryanik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Historical Science ◽  
Internal Time ◽  
Sequence Of Events ◽  
History Of ◽  
New Type ◽  
Scientific Laws ◽  
External Time

The relevance of the study of the mechanism of evolution is determined by the fact that the understanding of scientific laws is changing in modern science. From the microworld to the megaworld, the historical nature of the processes occurring in them is recognized, which should be reflected in the interpretation of laws. The author sets out to reveal the prerequisites of the idea of self-organization, which is a distinctive feature of evolutionary processes in the synergetic picture of the world of post-non-classical science. The idea of self-organization grows out of the concepts of evolution developed in the classical and non-classical periods of the development of modern science. The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the concepts of the evolution of these periods. The dominant approach in the modern philosophy of science is the history of science, so the author is guided by the methodology of historical and scientific research, when comparative analysis is implemented through finding out the similarities and differences of the stages of interest. The article substantiates the thesis that at this stage the concept of evolutionism is based on the recognition of the time parameter either in the form of an infinite sequence of events embodied in the present («external time»), or in the form of the principle of historicity («internal time»). The classical concept of evolution was a hypothesis. In non-classical science, the concept of evolution receives a scientific — empirical and theoretical — justification. To specify the principle of evolution in this period, the material from astrophysics, biology and historical science is given. The novelty of the obtained results is connected with the recognition of the hypothetical nature of the idea of evolution in the non-major non-rationalist branch of descriptive natural science of classical stage, the acquisition of scientific justification by it (the idea of evolution) at the non-classical stage, as well as with the transition from the concept of «external» to «internal» time. «Internal» time is the essence of the new concept of historicism, where evolution is interpreted as self-organization. A new concept of evolution and a new type of scientific laws set the prospect for further research. Key words: the concept of evolution, classical / non-classical science, time, the principle of historicism, V. I. Vernadsky, M. Foucault, sciences of inorganic / organic nature, historical science.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document