A thing made by man is a kind of coded message about him, the group which he lives in, and a thesis expression of their views on the world. According to the fair remark of Lotman, any such message is reasonable to perceive as superlingual organization (Lotman, 2004). It makes the reading of these messages a complicated process. We face texts that are not based on linguistic principles. If the archaeologist-interpreter expands the methodological horizon of the analysis to the level of semiot-ics, the objects-texts can demonstrate their linguistic specific. This is especially felt when working with paleo-ornaments. The corpus of sources characterizing the Chernoozersky ornamental tradition of the Paleolithic finale in the South of Western Siberia was formed in 19701972 (Gening, Petrin, 1985 Petrin, 1986). Attention to them declined significantly after the first presentations and further to the mid-80s. Much later attempts were made to semantic interpretation of the Chernoozersky dagger ornament in the key of paleocalendaristics (Shmidt, 2004 2005). The work in this direction had to be stopped due to the awareness of the complexity of the code and, despite the existing methods of verification, the lack of confidence in its relevance. At the moment, research is being conducted on the analysis of the collection objects, but in a broader semiotic way, focusing not on their content (which is the purpose of semantics), but on the order and features of the reading of these texts. The preliminary results of the research actualize the arguments about the intercultural (intergroup) dialogues of those distant times, the contextuality of the birth and the genesis of ornaments, to identify their territorial and local variability (Shmidt, 2017a 2017b). Lotman, Ju. M. (2004). Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB . Gening, V. F., Petrin, V. T. (1985). Pozdnepaleoliticheskaja jepoha na juge Zapadnoj Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Petrin, V. T. (1986). Paleoliticheskie pamjatniki Zapadno-Sibirskoj ravniny. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Shmidt, I. V. (2004). Predvaritelnoe soobshhenie ob informacionnyh vozmozhnostjah ornamenta chernoozerskogo kinzhala. In Shestye istoricheskie chtenija pamjati M.P. Grjaznova. Materialy vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii (pp. 152156). Omsk: OmGU. Ob informacionnom haraktere Chernoozerskogo ornamentа (na primere analiza zapisej kinzhala). Izvestija OGIK muzeja, Vyp. 11, 98105. Shmidt, I. V. (2017a). The chernoozersky ornamental pattern: Reconstruction of evolution. In Program of international Workshop and Conference Great shigir idol in the context of North Eurasia stone age art. Ekaterinburg, June 1216, 2017 (pp. 4344). Ekaterinburg. Shmidt, I. V. (2017b). Paleolithic ornaments of North Asia: Notes on iconography research. Universum Humanitarium, 2, 4555.