Decision-making time in organizational buying behavior: An investigation of its antecedents

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby Roy Dholakia ◽  
Jean L. Johnson ◽  
Albert J. Della Bitta ◽  
Nikhilesh Dholakia
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Amin Wibowo

Up to now, organizational buying is still interesting topic discussed. There are divergences among the findings in organizational buying researches. Different perspectives, fenomena observed, research domains and methods caused the divergences. This paper will discusse organizational buying behavior based on literature review, focused on behavior of decision making unit mainly on equipment buying. From this review literatures, it would be theoritical foundation that is valid and reliable to develop propositions in organizational buying behavior. Based on review literature refferences, variables are classified into: purchase situation, member of decision making unit perception, conflict among the members, information search, influences among members of decision making unit. Integrated approach is used to develop propositions relating to: purchasing complexity, sharing responsibility among the members, conflict in decision making unit, information search, time pressure as moderating variable between sharing responsibility and conflict in decision making unit, the influence among the members inside decision making unit and decision making outcome


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Hutt ◽  
Thomas W. Speh

Strategic interdependencies exist between marketing and other functional areas in the industrial firm. The concept of the marketing strategy center is offered as an organizing framework for exploring the industrial marketer's interdisciplinary role in the development and implementation of marketing strategy. Parallels between organizational buying behavior research and studies of executive decision-making processes are explored. Key research and managerial implications are highlighted.


1972 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick E. Webster ◽  
Yoram Wind

The authors suggest a model of industrial and institutional buying behavior as an organizational decision-making process. The major dimensions of the model are defined and some implications for marketing strategy are developed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyria A. Kemp ◽  
Aberdeen Leila Borders ◽  
Nwamaka A. Anaza ◽  
Wesley J. Johnston

Purpose Organizational buying behavior has often been treated as a rational activity, even though humans are involved in the decision-making. Human decision-making often includes a complex cadre of emotions and rationalizations. Subsequently, organizational buyers may not only be driven by logic, testing and facts, but also by emotions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role that emotions play in organizational buying behavior. Design/methodology/approach In-depth interviews were conducted with marketing decision-makers for one of the most valuable brands in the world. The role that emotions play in the behavior of organizational buyers is elucidated from the perspective of these marketing professionals. Findings Emotions are prevalent at all stages in the organizational decision-making process and various discrete emotions fuel action tendencies among buyers. Efforts are made by marketers to strategically manage the emotions buyers experience. Practical implications Although organizational buyers must see the functional value of a product or brand, companies need to consider ways in which brands can connect with buyers on an emotional and personal level. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature by offering insights into which discrete or specific emotions are most prominent in organizational buying behavior and how the manifestation of these emotions impact decision-making at each stage in the buying cycle.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deni Saputra ◽  
Jhanghiz Syahrivar

The main purpose of this research is to investigate the main factors in organizational buying behavior for bolt products. The nature of this research is qualitative by presenting primary data collected through semi structured questionnaire and conducting interviews with five companies that regularly buy bolt products from PT. Komoda Indonesia. Based on the previous literatures, there are eight factors that influence organizational buying behavior in B2B system: Product Specification Factor, Supplier Factor, Buyer's Factor, Economic Factor, Market Factor, Relationship Factor, Decision Maker Factor, and Factor of Information Source. The result of this research suggests that there are three main factors in decision making of bolt product which are Product Specification Factor, Supplier Factor, and Company Factor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C. Schleper ◽  
Constantin Blome ◽  
Alina Stanczyk

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop taxonomy of sourcing decision-making (SDM) archetypes and explore how different contextual factors influence these archetypes when global sourcing of complex components is considered a viable option. Design/methodology/approach A multiple case study approach with five in-depth cases is employed. In total, 19 interviews as well as publicly available and internal data from large buying firms headquartered in Austria and Germany were collected and analyzed. Findings The results reveal three different SDM archetypes which are described in detail (i.e. “consensus,” “argumentation” and “cabal”). Furthermore, it is found that these archetypes are mainly influenced by three contextual factors: sourcing maturity, product complexity and leadership style. The final model comprises six propositions which illustrate how these contextual factors determine companies’ SDM archetypes. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to theory development at the intersection of organizational buying behavior and the (global) SDM literature. Thereby, it answers the call for more rigorous investigation of the influence of contextual factors on SDM processes. Practical implications The findings enable practitioners to better understand and consequently manage SDM processes and their outcomes. By supporting decision-makers in identifying SDM archetypes, this study allows sourcing managers and teams to make better decisions by avoiding problems that occur in situations in which the preferred decision-making type would result in suboptimal decisions. Originality/value The study provides a first step toward taxonomy of SDM archetypes and is among the first that explores their underlying contextual factors.


1979 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Spekman ◽  
Louis W. Stern

This research presents both a conceptual and a methodological framework for examining organizational buying behavior from a multiperson level of analysis. Focusing on those organizational members who participate in the procurement decision making process, this research investigates the buying group's adaptive structural configuration in response to varying levels of environmental uncertainty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
Putri Puji Astutik ◽  
Tutut Chusniyah ◽  
Diantini Ida Viatrie

College students are individuals who enter the transition from adolescence to adulthood. In this period, they have more opportunities to explore various values and lifestyles. Individuals are looking for experiences that will eventually form personalities. Personality can influence individuals who make risky decisions. Decision-making immediately without prior consideration can make them behave impulsively without thinking about the effect. This study aims to determine the effect of big five personalities on impulsive buying behavior on students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Surabaya. This study uses a quantitative approach, the collected data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. Based on the analysis results obtained three conclusions, 1) Most of the students of economics and business at Airlangga University Surabaya have big five personalities that tend to be dominant; 2) Most of the economics and business students of Airlangga University Surabaya have low impulsive buying behavior; 3) Big five personality influences impulsive buying behavior in economics and business students of Airlangga University Surabaya, conscientiousness has a greater influence than extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness to experience.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1521-1532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Anatolievich Bachkirov

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine, through the lens of the buying center concept, a theorized link between organizational buying behavior (OBB) and a national culture of collectivism, large power distance, particularism and a wasta practice. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative methodology was used to gain better understanding of OBB in an under-researched business environment of the Arabian Gulf. The data come from 41 organizational practitioners who reported on the industrial buying processes in their organizations with reference to the buying center framework. Findings The study developed a model of the buying center for the emerging markets governed by socio-political institutions. Research limitations/implications The data were obtained only from one culturally specific world region. Practical implications To attain efficacious results in culturally distant business environments, industrial marketers should complement home country experience with a thorough understanding of how national cultures affect the dynamics of OBB. Originality/value The study updates the conceptualization of the buying center’s organizational actors (OAs) for business contexts beyond traditional, mature markets. It reveals the typology of decisional influencers, introduces and defines the role of advisers and clarifies the role of the gatekeeping bureaucracy and differing perceptions thereof by OAs.


1985 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F. Anderson ◽  
Terry M. Chambers

A new model of the organizational buying process is presented. The ontological framework of the model is based on the assumption that organizational buying behavior is essentially a form of work behavior. The model is informed by expectancy theory and emphasizes the role of reward and measurement systems in motivating purchasing process participants. It is suggested that this approach can serve as the foundation of a research program that may eventually lead to a unified theory of the organizational dyad.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document