Impact of orthogeriatric management on the average length of stay of patients aged over seventy five years admitted to hospital after hip fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Sylvain Marcheix ◽  
Camille Collin ◽  
Jérémy Hardy ◽  
Christian Mabit ◽  
Achille Tchalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Hip fracture is a frequent and serious condition in the elderly. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to answer the following questions: (1) Could treatment in an orthogeriatric unit help to reduce the average length of stay for patients aged over 75 years admitted to hospital for the treatment of a hip fracture?; and (2) Could such treatment influence the post-operative outcomes of patients with hip fracture? Methods and materials Our study included 534 patients admitted to hospital between January 2017 and December 2018 for surgical treatment of a hip fracture. We compared 246 patients who received traditional orthopaedic care with 288 patients treated in an orthogeriatric unit. Results Our cohort included 410 women (77%). The average age was 87.5 ± six years, and 366 patients (68%) were living at home prior to the fracture. A statistically significant difference in median length of stay (from 10 to 9 days) was observed between patients who did and did not receive orthogeriatric unit treatment (groups 1 and 2; 95% CI: 0.64; 2.59; p = 0.001). There was no difference in pre-operative delay, intra-hospital mortality rate, place of recovery, rate of institutionalisation after six months, or the number of new fractures at 6 months between the groups. The mortality rate after six months was 23.6% and 21.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively; the difference was not significant. Discussion Orthogeriatric unit treatment reduced the median length of stay by one day, in line with most previous studies. According to Pablos-Hernandez et al., multifaceted orthogeriatric treatment is most effective. In our study, only 38% of the patients received surgical treatment within 48 hours, where early surgery is key for reducing the length of hospital stay. The intrahospital mortality rate was 2.6%, which is comparable to literature data. The discharge rate did not differ by orthogeriatric treatment status, which is also consistent with previous findings (e.g. Gregersen et al.). Lastly, the mortality rate after six months was slightly reduced by orthogeriatric care. In line with this, Boddaert et al. reported a difference in mortality rate after six months between groups who did and did not receive orthogeriatric treatment (15% vs. 24%).

scholarly journals Efficacy of a triage system to reduce length of hospital stay

2014 ◽  
Vol 204 (6) ◽  
pp. 480-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Williams ◽  
E. Csipke ◽  
D. Rose ◽  
L. Koeser ◽  
P. McCrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Triage System ◽  
Traditional System ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
Admission System ◽  
Novel Method

BackgroundAttempts have been made to improve the efficiency of in-patient acute care. A novel method has been the development of a ‘triage system’ in which patients are assessed on admission to develop plans for discharge or transfer to an in-patient ward.AimsTo compare a triage admission system with a traditional system.MethodLength of stay and readmission data for all admissions in a 1-year period between the two systems were compared using the participating trust's anonymised records.ResultsDespite reduced length of stay on the actual triage ward, the average length of stay was not reduced and the triage system did not lead to a greater number of readmissions. There was no significant difference in costs between the two systems.ConclusionsBased on our findings we cannot conclude that the triage system reduced length of stay, but we can conclude that it does not increase the number of readmissions as some have feared.

scholarly journals 55 A Review of Stroke Demographics and Outcomes at a Regional Hospital without a Stroke Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Lushen Pillay ◽  
Kushan Galav ◽  
Deeptish Tulsi ◽  
Joanna McGlynn ◽  
John Doherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Local Analysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Stroke Register

Abstract Background According to the 2017 National Stroke Register Report; 75% of strokes occur in patients aged 65 years and older. Within the audit 19 stroke units reported that 70.6% of stroke patients were admitted to a stroke unit and their median length of stay of 9 days. Numerous studies have shown better outcomes in patients admitted to a stroke unit versus a medical unit leading to national stroke networks and bypass protocols for patients. However, stroke patients can still be found in non-stroke unit hospitals such as our own. Methods Demographics from HIPE data was collected on all stroke patients admitted to our hospital between January 1st and December 31st 2017. Basic statistical methods were used to analyse the data. Results We analyzed 103 patient records. The average age at presentation was 73 years (range: 35-97) and 60.1% were males. The average length of hospital stay was 16.1 days (range 1- 130 days). Ischemic (77%) events were more common than haemorrhagic events (23%). The three most common co-morbidities were hypertension (45%), hyperlipidemia (30%) and atrial fibrillation (19%). Discharge destination was home (66%), nursing home (14%), national rehabilitation (2%) and an 18% mortality rate within 3 months. The mortality rate was higher in the hemorrhagic (42%) compared to ischemic (11%). Conclusion The average length of stay was 16.1 days, considerably higher than the national stroke unit average of 9. The overall mortality rate was 5% higher than the national of 13%. Limited rehabilitation services and time awaiting national rehabilitation beds contributed to the long LOS. There is a definite need for a dedicated stroke service at our hospital, local analysis suggests that 6 beds would meet the needs of our catchment area; and this would lead to better outcomes for stroke patients. A further locally dedicated stroke audit is needed.

Predicting the impact of new health technologies on average length of stay: Development of a prediction framework

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Simpson ◽  
Claire Packer ◽  
Andrew Stevens ◽  
James Raftery
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Average Length ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Admission Policies ◽  
Mechanism Of Impact ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a framework to predict the impact of new health technologies on average length of hospital stay.Methods: A literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Health Management Information Consortium databases was conducted to identify papers that discuss the impact of new technology on length of stay or report the impact with a proposed mechanism of impact of specific technologies on length of stay. The mechanisms of impact were categorized into those relating to patients, the technology, or the organization of health care and clinical practice.Results: New health technologies have a variable impact on length of stay. Technologies that lead to an increase in the proportion of sicker patients or increase the average age of patients remaining in the hospital lead to an increase in individual and average length of stay. Technologies that do not affect or improve the inpatient case mix, or reduce adverse effects and complications, or speed up the diagnostic or treatment process should lead to a reduction in individual length of stay and, if applied to all patients with the condition, will reduce average length of stay.Conclusions: The prediction framework we have developed will ensure that the characteristics of a new technology that may influence length of stay can be consistently taken into consideration by assessment agencies. It is recognized that the influence of technology on length of stay will change as a technology diffuses and that length of stay is highly sensitive to changes in admission policies and organization of care.

MINI-SUMMARIES FROM THE U.K. HTA PROGRAMME

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-266
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Local Conditions ◽  
Orthopedic Rehabilitation ◽  
The Impact

SUMMARY POINTS[bull ] Geriatric service interventions after hip fracture are complex and strongly influenced by local conditions. The effectiveness of rehabilitation programs is uncertain, and comparative studies comparing different treatments and strategies are of poor to moderate quality.[bull ] Based on the available evidence, geriatric hip fracture and early supported discharge programs are probably cost-effective since they appear to shorten the average length of hospital stay and are associated with significantly increased rates of return to previous residential status. Clinical pathways also appear to reduce total length of stay in hospital.[bull ] Geriatric orthopedic rehabilitation units are unlikely to be cost-effective, but some frailer patients may benefit in respect of reduced readmission rates and need for nursing home placement.[bull ] Length of stay may be reduced by the introduction of prospective payment systems, but these have led to increased use of nursing homes in the United States.[bull ] There is no evidence that any of the programs evaluated are associated with changes in mortality. However, there are insufficient data to assess the impact of any program on level of function, morbidity, quality of life, or impact on carers.

516 Mortality from Inhalation Injury in Oxygen Dependent Patients Exceeds Prediction from Prognostic Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S95-S96
Author(s):  
Kathleen Singer ◽  
Jalen Harvey ◽  
Elizabeth Dale
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Abstract Introduction The Boston Criteria and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) are two widely accepted models for predicting mortality in burn patients. We aimed to elucidate whether these models are able to accurately predict risk of mortality in patients who sustain burns while smoking on home oxygen given their overall clinical fragility. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 48 patients admitted to our burn center from November 2013 to September 2017 who sustained a burn while smoking on home oxygen. Yearlong mortality was the primary outcome of the investigation; secondary outcomes included discharge to facility, length of stay, and need for tracheostomy. We then calculated the expected mortality rate for each patient based on Boston Criteria and ABSI, respectively, and compared the mortality rate observed in our cohort. Results Patients in our cohort suffered a 54% mortality rate within a year of injury, compared to a 23.5% mortality predicted by Boston Criteria, which was found to be statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p < 0.05). ABSI predicted mortality was 19.7%. While the absolute value of difference in mortality was greater, this was not found to be significant on chi-square analysis due to the small sample size. Our secondary outcomes revealed 42% discharge to facility, average length of stay of 6.2 days, and 6.25% required tracheostomy. Patients in our cohort suffered a 54% mortality rate within a year of injury, compared to a 23.5% mortality predicted by Boston Criteria, which was found to be statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p < 0.05). ABSI predicted mortality was 19.7%. While the absolute value of difference in mortality was greater, this was not found to be significant on chi-square analysis due to the small sample size. Our secondary outcomes revealed 42% discharge to facility, average length of stay of 6.2 days, and 6.25% required tracheostomy. Conclusions Patients whose burns are attributable to smoking on home oxygen may have an increased risk of mortality than prognostication models, such as the Boston Criteria and ABSI, may suggest. This bears significant clinical impact, particularly regarding family and provider decision-making in pursuing aggressive management. Applicability of Research to Practice This data indicates that these injuries are direr than expected, which may have significant impact on family and provider decision-making.

OP5 Rapid analgesia for prehospital hip disruption (RAPID): findings from a randomised feasibility study

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. e2.3-e3
Author(s):  
Jenna Bulger ◽  
Alan Brown ◽  
Bridie Evans ◽  
Greg Fegan ◽  
Simon Ford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Adequate Pain Relief ◽  
Significant Difference

BackgroundAdequate pain relief in prehospital care is a major challenge in all acute traumas, especially for those with hip fractures, whose injuries are difficult to immobilise and whose long term outcomes may be adversely affected by administration of opiate analgesics. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) is routinely undertaken by clinicians in the emergency department for patients with hip fracture, but has not been fully evaluated for use by paramedics in prehospital care.We aimed to test whether FICB for hip fracture pain relief carried out by paramedics in prehospital care was feasible, safe and acceptable, and whether trial Methods were viable, so that we could decide whether to proceed to a fully-powered RCT to evaluate clinical and cost effectiveness.MethodsNineteen paramedics were trained to administer FICB. They randomly allocated eligible patients to FICB or usual care using audited scratchcards. Patients were followed up to assess availability of key outcomes including quality of life, length of hospital stay, pain scores, and adverse events. Findings were analysed against pre-specified feasibility criteria to determine whether it was appropriate to progress to a fully-powered trial.ResultsSeventy-one patients were randomised by paramedics between 28/6/16 and 31/7/17; 57 of these patients consented to follow up. The only outcome which reached a statistically significant difference between groups was the proportion of participants who received morphine (38% difference between groups 95% CI −61.88 to −15.79). There was a difference of approximately nine days in the length of stay between trial arms (mean difference 9.12 (95% CI −20.51 to 2.27).ConclusionsRAPID met its pre-specified progression criteria; a funding application for a fully-powered RCT will therefore be submitted. We will consider the use of length of stay as the primary outcome measure, as feasibility study findings indicated that there was a difference between groups without reaching statistical significance.

scholarly journals 295 Characteristics of Older Hip Fracture Adults Admitted to a Dublin Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Niamh Maher ◽  
Georgina Steen ◽  
Nessa Fallon ◽  
Claire O Carroll ◽  
Máire Rafferty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Dublin Hospital ◽  
Fracture Repair ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Bone Protection

Abstract Background Hip fractures are common in older adults and are associated with increased mortality and morbidity resulting in medical and socioeconomic burden for healthcare system and patient alike. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to a Dublin hospital for hip fracture repair between October 2018 and February 2019. Data on sociodemographic characteristics such as; gender; age; pre-admission residence; fracture history; bone protection medication use; pre-fracture mobility; discharge mobility and destination; length of stay and mortality rate was collected. Results 50 patients admitted between 01/10/19 and 31/01/2019. 2:1 female to male. Average age 78 ranging from 48-93. 88% admitted from home. 44% had previous fractures. Vertebral (36%), wrist (23%) and pelvic (23%) most common fractures. 27% of these were on bone protection medication on admission. 41% were taking Calcium and Vit D or Vitamin D only. 70% of participants were independently mobile pre-fracture. 94% required some form of mobility aid on discharge. The average length of stay was 32 days ranging from 2 to 160 days. 38% went home whilst 36% were discharged to rehabilitation. 88% were discharged on bone protection medication - 70% received IV Zoledronic acid as inpatients, 14% commenced Prolia 6 monthly injections and 4% on oral bisphosphonates. Mortality rate was 6% Conclusion Hip fractures have a negative effect on a person’s mobility. Whilst many guidelines for the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis recommend intervention be considered in men and women who have sustained a fragility fracture, it is clear from this study that an osteoporosis care gap exists and further work is required to better identify, assess and treat patients following their first fracture in the hope of reducing further fractures, particularly hip and vertebral fractures.

scholarly journals 1114 Getting it Right First Time: An Audit of Length of Hospital Stay for Mandibular Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Mitchell ◽  
J Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Mandible Fractures

Abstract Introduction GIRFT is a Department of Health programme, created to improve efficiency by providing data that gives departments a national standard to encourage reflection and service-improvement. The 2016 document in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, suggests the national average length of stay for isolated mandible fractures was 2 days, 1 day pre-operatively and 1 day post-operatively. This Audit aimed to investigate if all admissions in our trust met this standard, as a short stay reduces costs and improves patient experience. Method Data was collected for all isolated mandibular fracture admissions between January – September 2019, with 89 patients identified. Date of admission, surgery and discharge was recorded which allowed calculation of pre-operative, post-operative, and total stay. Results 78% of patients had surgery within 24 hours of admission. Admissions on a Saturday were most often delayed, with a mean pre-operative stay of 1.60 days and total stay of 2.55 days. Commonly the reason for delay was not recorded, or due to lack of theatre space. 92% of patients were discharged within 24 hours post-operatively. The average length of stay met the 2-day standard, with Monday admissions having the shortest average stay of 1.45 days. Conclusions Whilst the majority of patients are treated and discharged within 2 days, improvements and future audit would assist to get closer to the 100% target. Saturday saw the highest number of admissions, which also had the longest average length of stay. A dedicated weekend trauma list would reduce wait times but may be limited by staffing and theatre space.

scholarly journals Contribution of the BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel:

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Dack ◽  
Stephanie Pankow ◽  
Elizabeth Ablah ◽  
Rosey Zackula ◽  
Maha Assi
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Regional Medical ◽  
Regional Medical Center ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hospital Stay Duration

Introduction. Traditional evaluation of meningitis includes cerebrospinalfluid (CSF) culture and gram stain to pinpoint specific causalorganisms. The BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME)Panel has been implemented as a more timely evaluation method.This study sought to assess if the BioFire® ME Panel was associatedwith a decreased length of stay or decreased antimicrobial durationwhen used in the diagnosis of meningitis or encephalitis.Methods.xA case, historical-control, chart review was performed onpatients admitted to a regional medical center with CSF pleocytosisduring Cohort 1 (the year prior to BioFire® ME Panel implementation)and Cohort 2 (the year after BioFire® ME Panel implementation).Length of hospital stay, duration of antimicrobials, and BioFire® MEPanel result were gathered and analyzed.Results. Average length of stay for both cohorts was about fourhospital days. Approximately three-fourths of all patients receivedantibiotic/antiviral treatment with an average of three days duration.No significant differences were observed between groups. The mean(median) duration of antimicrobials in the year prior to and afterthe BioFire® ME Panel implementation was 3.6 (3) and 3.1 (2) days,respectively (p = 0.835). The mean (median) length of stay in the yearprior to and after the BioFire® ME Panel implementation was 5.8 (4)and 5.4 (4) days, respectively (p = 0.941). Among the patients admittedafter the implementation of the BioFire® ME Panel, 4.3 % (n =2) had a positive bacterial result, 38.3% (n = 18) had a positive viralresult, and 57.4% (n = 27) had a negative result. Of the 27 negativeresults, 77.8% (n = 21) were treated with antimicrobial medication.Conclusions. This study suggested there is no difference betweenlength of stay or antimicrobial duration in presumed meningitis casesassessed with traditional methods as compared to the BioFire® MEPanel. Kans J Med 2019;12(1):1-3.

THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY IN THE HOSPITAL OF INFANTS BORN PREMATURELY

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1948 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-69
Author(s):  
HELEN M. WALLACE ◽  
LEONA BAUMGARTNER ◽  
MOLLY L. PARK
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
American Literature ◽  
Premature Infants ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Private Agency ◽  
Pediatric Consultation ◽  
Basic Medical

Any public or private agency administering a medical care program needs certain basic medical data to plan its program. In the field of maternal and child health, one fact of importance is the average length of hospital stay of newly born premature infants. This basic data assists in planning for such budgetary items as: reimbursement for hospital care; payment for pediatric consultation service; and estimation of the number of beds(incubators, heated cribs and bassinets) needed to care for the total number of premature infants born annually in any community. A review of the American literature for the past twenty years reveals that there is relatively little information on the average length of stay of newly born premature infants in hospitals. Table I summarizes the information available. It will be seen from Table I that there is considerable variation in the method of reporting. Some authors do not include premature infants weighing more than 5 pounds at birth; others include premature infants weighing more than 5½ pounds. There is also variation as to whether a particular series includes the premature infants who die in the hospital, as well as those who are discharged alive. Table I shows that, for the series including only those infants who survived in the hospital, the average stay ranges from 17.3 to 28.8 days, with the majority falling between 24 and 28 days. For the series including both the premature infants who survived and those who died in the hospital, the average stay ranges from

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document