scholarly journals Platelet Rich Plasma Hybridized Adipose Transplant (PHAT) for the Treatment of Hair Loss: A Case Series

Author(s):  
Benjamin Talei ◽  
Orr Shauly ◽  
Daniel Gould
2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199801
Author(s):  
Michael R. Baria ◽  
W. Kelton Vasileff ◽  
James Borchers ◽  
Alex DiBartola ◽  
David C. Flanigan ◽  
...  

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis. The focus of previous studies has compared their efficacy against each other as monotherapy. However, a new trend of combining these 2 injections has emerged in an attempt to have a synergistic effect. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical literature examining the combined use of PRP + HA. Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed and Embase. The following search terms were used: knee osteoarthritis AND platelet rich plasma AND hyaluronic acid. The review was performed by 2 independent reviewers who applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria and independently extracted data, including methodologic scoring, PRP preparation technique, HA composition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results: A total of 431 articles were screened, 12 reviewed in full, and 8 included in the final analysis: 2 case series, 3 comparative, and 3 randomized studies. Average follow-up was 9 months. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was 38.13 ± 13.1 (mean ± SD). Combination therapy resulted in improved PROs in all studies. Of the comparative and randomized studies, 2 demonstrated that combination therapy was superior to HA alone. However, when PRP alone was used as the control arm (4 studies), combination therapy was not superior to PRP alone. Conclusion: Combination therapy with PRP + HA improves PROs and is superior to HA alone but is not superior to PRP alone.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110036
Author(s):  
Jonathan K. Ochoa ◽  
Christopher E. Gross ◽  
Robert B. Anderson ◽  
Andrew R. Hsu

Context: Injections are commonly used by health care practitioners to treat foot and ankle injuries in athletes despite ongoing questions regarding efficacy and safety. Evidence Acquisition: An extensive literature review was performed through MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost from database inception to 2021. Keywords searched were injections, athletes, sports, foot and ankle, corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and placental tissue. Search results included articles written in the English language and encompassed reviews, case series, empirical studies, and basic science articles. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Results: Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma/autologous blood, anesthetic, and placental tissue injections are commonly used in the treatment of foot and ankle injuries. Primary indications for injections in athletes include plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinosis, isolated syndesmotic injury, and ankle impingement with varying clinical results. Conclusions: Despite promising results from limited case series and comparative studies, the data for safety and efficacy of injections for foot and ankle injuries in athletes remain inconclusive.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samar A Salem ◽  
Rania M Elhusseiny ◽  
Haitham M Saleh

Abstract Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is the most common hair loss disorder in women. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) provides an option for patients recalcitrant to the currently approved therapies. As there are many methods for the preparation of PRP, the most suitable for AGA therapy is not yet clear. Aims To compare the efficacy between single and double spin PRP injections in treatment of FPHL and to assess the relationship between the concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the PRP preparation and the treatment results obtained. Patients and Methods 15 female patients with FPHL were enrolled. Each patient was subjected to intradermal injection of PRP (prepared by double-spin method) into the right half of the scalp, in addition to intradermal injection of PRP (prepared by singlespin method) into the left half of the scalp in the form of three treatment sessions three weeks apart. Evaluation of treatment response was done through comparing patients' global photographs, assessment of patients' satisfaction and folliscopic assessment before and after treatment. Results Our results showed clinically significant improvement by comparing patients' photographs in most of the treated patients. In addition, folliscopy revealed significant change of the terminal hair density in the right half of the scalp following treatment sessions.VEGF concentration didn't differ significantly between double-spin and single-spin prepared PRP, also it didn't differ significantly upon calcium activation. Conclusions PRP is an effective treatment modality for FPHL. Double-spin prepared PRP could yield better results in the treatment of FPHL than the single-spin method. However, adding Calcium gluconate prior to PRP injection is of no benefit as it didn't significantly increase the release of VEGF. Yet, further studies discussing different PRP preparation protocols and involving a larger number of cases are needed to minimize statistical errors and to detect the most accurate PRP preparation method with the greatest yield of growth factors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Sanjeewani Fonseka ◽  
Y.M.D.M Bandara ◽  
Brabaharan Subhani

Abstract Introduction. Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease-causing non-scarring alopecia. It is usually treated with immunosuppressive agents, to which some patients fail to respond adequately. Material and Methods. Three patients with AA refractory to standard therapy were treated with intra-dermal injection of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) every four weeks. Results. All three patients showed remarkable improvement after multiple sessions of PRP treatment. Conclusion. Autologous PRP is safe and effective in treatment-resistant forms of AA demonstrated in many case reports; therefore it deserves further study with randomized, placebo-controlled trials.


Author(s):  
Krishna Rajesh Kilaru ◽  
Suhasini Attada ◽  
Pooja Munnangi ◽  
Manogna Chowdary Kilaru

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common cause of hair loss in women characterized by a diffuse reduction in hair density over the crown and frontal scalp with retention of the frontal hairline. The underlying pathophysiology is multifactorial. There are no universally agreed treatment guidelines available. The objective of the study was to understand the diagnosis and treatment pattern of female pattern hair loss and the role of minoxidil topical formulation and its combination in the management of FPHL.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods: </strong>Predesigned questionnaire on FPHL was prepared based on review of literature and was filled by 80 consultant dermatologists. Recorded data was statistically analyzed.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results: </strong>Common age of onset of FPHL was between 20 to 30 years. Majority (96.25%) have reported FPHL in association with psychological morbidity. The most preferred treatment in mild and severe FPHL was minoxidil 5% and platelet rich plasma (PRP) plus minoxidil respectively. Most dermatologists (47.5%) treated with minoxidil for over 6 months. Majority (27.5%) reported flaking as the most common side effect with minoxidil followed by dryness, scalp irritation and itching. Majority (27.5%) observed that long treatment duration was contributing to non-compliance followed by medication cost and side effects. Majority of the dermatologists (90%) felt the need for treatment guidelines in the current Indian scenario.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minoxidil was the most common preferred treatment for mild and severe FPHL. PRP is the most common choice of combination therapy with minoxidil. Minimizing side effects, patient education and universal treatment guidelines can help manage FPHL better.  </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Anitua ◽  
Ander Pino ◽  
Pedro Jaén ◽  
Mª Rogelia Navarro

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edilson S Machado ◽  
Mary A Ambach ◽  
José MP Caldas ◽  
Jason J Wei ◽  
Markus Bredemeier

Aim: To evaluate the use of a multitarget platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection approach for the treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). Materials & Methods: Forty-six patients with more than 12 weeks of LBP who failed conservative treatments were injected with PRP into the facet joints, intervertebral discs, epidural space and/or paravertebral muscles. Visual analog pain scale and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores were measured at baseline and predefined intervals. Results: Mean visual analog pain scale was reduced from 8.48 to 5.17 and mean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire from 18.0 to 10.98 at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). These statistically significant improvements were sustained over 52 weeks. No adverse effects were observed. Conclusion: Our PRP approach demonstrated clinically favorable results and may be a promising treatment for chronic LBP.


Author(s):  
Rosita Pensato ◽  
Antonio Zaffiro ◽  
Barbara Hersant ◽  
Concetta Errico ◽  
Jean Paul Meningaud ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document