Cannabis use and age of diagnosis of schizophrenia

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Sugranyes ◽  
Itziar Flamarique ◽  
Eduard Parellada ◽  
Immaculada Baeza ◽  
Javier Goti ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and objectivesObservational studies have reported earlier onset of psychosis in schizophrenic patients with a history of cannabis use. Earlier age of onset of schizophrenia has been associated with a poorer outcome. We aimed to examine whether cannabis use determined an earlier onset of schizophrenia in a sample of first episode patients, in an area with one of Europe's highest rates of cannabis use.Methods116 subjects with first episode psychosis and subsequent diagnosis of schizophrenia (after a 12-month follow-up) were included Age at first antipsychotic treatment (A1T) was used as proxy for age of psychosis onset, and acted as dependent variable for the statistical analysis. Cannabis use was evaluated retrospectively, and divided into three groups according to peak frequency (never, sporadic/frequent, daily).Results46 (39.7%) subjects had never used cannabis, 23 (19.9%) had done so sporadically/frequently, and 47 (40.5%) daily. A1T differed between the three groups (mean, in years and [SD]: 27.0 [4.94]; 25.7 [4.44] and 24.5 [4.36]; p = 0.033) and diminished as cannabis use increased (linear tendency; p = 0.009). Post-hoc analysis showed that cannabis use (irrespective of frequency) was significantly associated with decrease in A1T (p = 0.033), as shown by the first contrast [1 −1/2 −1/2]. Post-hoc contrast showed that cannabis users had a significantly lower age of onset of psychosis (mean decrease, in years: 1.93; CI (confidence interval) 95%: 0.17–3.70; p = 0.033).ConclusionsCannabis use was significantly associated with a decrease in age of onset of schizophrenia. Age of onset of the disease correlated with frequency of cannabis use.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Blair Thies ◽  
Pamela DeRosse ◽  
Deepak K Sarpal ◽  
Miklos Argyelan ◽  
Christina L Fales ◽  
...  

Abstract Antipsychotic (AP) medications are the mainstay for the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), but their efficacy is unpredictable and widely variable. Substantial efforts have been made to identify prognostic biomarkers that can be used to guide optimal prescription strategies for individual patients. Striatal regions involved in salience and reward processing are disrupted as a result of both SSD and cannabis use, and research demonstrates that striatal circuitry may be integral to response to AP drugs. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the relationship between a history of cannabis use disorder (CUD) and a striatal connectivity index (SCI), a previously developed neural biomarker for AP treatment response in SSD. Patients were part of a 12-week randomized, double-blind controlled treatment study of AP drugs. A sample of 48 first-episode SSD patients with no more than 2 weeks of lifetime exposure to AP medications, underwent a resting-state fMRI scan pretreatment. Treatment response was defined a priori as a binary (response/nonresponse) variable, and a SCI was calculated in each patient. We examined whether there was an interaction between lifetime CUD history and the SCI in relation to treatment response. We found that CUD history moderated the relationship between SCI and treatment response, such that it had little predictive value in SSD patients with a CUD history. In sum, our findings highlight that biomarker development can be critically impacted by patient behaviors that influence neurobiology, such as a history of CUD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ferraro ◽  
Caterina La Cascia ◽  
Diego Quattrone ◽  
Lucia Sideli ◽  
Domenica Matranga ◽  
...  

Abstract Psychotic patients with a lifetime history of cannabis use generally show better cognitive functioning than other psychotic patients. Some authors suggest that cannabis-using patients may have been less cognitively impaired and less socially withdrawn in their premorbid life. Using a dataset comprising 948 patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and 1313 population controls across 6 countries, we examined the extent to which IQ and both early academic (Academic Factor [AF]) and social adjustment (Social Factor [SF]) are related to the lifetime frequency of cannabis use in both patients and controls. We expected a higher IQ and a better premorbid social adjustment in psychotic patients who had ever used cannabis compared to patients without any history of use. We did not expect such differences in controls. In both patients and controls, IQ was 3 points higher among occasional-users than in never-users (mean difference [Mdiff] = 2.9, 95% CI = [1.2, 4.7]). Both cases and control daily-users had lower AF compared to occasional (Mdiff = −0.3, 95% CI = [−0.5; −0.2]) and never-users (Mdiff = −0.4, 95% CI = [−0.6; −0.2]). Finally, patient occasional (Mdiff = 0.3, 95% CI = [0.1; 0.5]) and daily-users (Mdiff = 0.4, 95% CI = [0.2; 0.6]) had better SF than their never-using counterparts. This difference was not present in controls (Fgroup*frequency(2, 2205) = 4.995, P = .007). Our findings suggest that the better premorbid social functioning of FEP with a history of cannabis use may have contributed to their likelihood to begin using cannabis, exposing them to its reported risk-increasing effects for Psychotic Disorders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Fabiana Corsi-Zuelli ◽  
Leonardo Marques ◽  
Daiane Leite da Roza ◽  
Camila Marcelino Loureiro ◽  
Rosana Shuhama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cannabis consumption is a modifiable risk factor associated with psychosis, but not all cannabis users develop psychosis. Animal studies suggest that an antecedent active immune system interacts with subsequent cannabis exposure and moderates the cannabis–psychosis association, supporting the two-hit hypothesis. The clinical investigations are few, and it is unclear if the immune system is a biological candidate moderating the cannabis–psychosis association or whether cannabis increases inflammation, which in turn, augments psychosis likelihood. Methods We explored the mediating and moderating role of blood inflammation using PROCESS macro. We used data from a cross-sectional study, including 153 first-episode psychosis patients and 256 community-based controls. Participants answered the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire (cannabis frequency, age of onset, and duration), and plasma cytokines were measured [interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-4, IL-10, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β); multiplex]. We computed an inflammatory composite score (ICS) to represent the systemic inflammatory state. Confounders included sex, age, ethnicity, educational level, body mass index, tobacco smoking, lifetime use of other drugs, and antipsychotic treatment. Results Mediation: Cannabis consumption was not associated with increased inflammation, thus not supporting a mediating effect of inflammation. Moderation: Daily use and age of onset <17 interacted significantly with the ICS to increase the odds of psychosis beyond their individual effects and were only associated with psychosis among those scoring medium–high in the ICS. Conclusions Immune dysregulation might be part of the pathophysiology of psychosis, not explained by cannabis use or other confounders. We provide the first and initial evidence that immune dysregulation modifies the cannabis–psychosis association, in line with a two-hit hypothesis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S275-S275
Author(s):  
M. Pardo ◽  
J. Matalí ◽  
A. Butjosa ◽  
V. Regina ◽  
M. Dolz ◽  
...  

IntroductionThere is a wide range of studies focusing on the use of cannabis in first episode psychosis (PEP). Literature using child and adolescent samples is scarce.Objectives and aimsTo determine the prevalence and clinical differences between cannabis users and non-cannabis users of early onset first episode psychosis (EOP), and adult onset first episode psychosis (AOP).MethodOne hundred and forty patients were recruited in adult (AOP subsample, n = 69) and child and adolescent (EOP subsample, n = 71) mental health services. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was used for psychotic symptoms and the Calgary Scale for affective symptoms. The Chi2 test analysed clinical differences between users and nonusers within subsamples, and in the total sample a Pearson correlation was used for the relationship between age at cannabis use and PEP.ResultsThe prevalence of lifetime use of cannabis and the average age at first use were 48% and 13.82 years (± 1.15) in the EOP subsample, and 58% and 17.78 years (± 3.93) in the AOP subsample. Within EOP, cannabis users were older (P = .001), had fewer negative symptoms (P = .045) and less depressive symptoms (P = .005). Within AOP, cannabis users were younger (P = .018) and had greater severity of positive symptoms (P = .021). Age at first cannabis use and age at PEP were positively correlated.ConclusionsCannabis use is prevalent in adult and early onset psychosis. Cannabis users differ clinically from non-users, and the earlier the use of cannabis, the earlier the onset of psychosis.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S70-S71
Author(s):  
Manuel Duran-Cutilla ◽  
Elisa Rodriguez Toscano ◽  
David Fraguas ◽  
Gonzalo Lopez ◽  
Marta Rapado-Castro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Substance use may be a risk factor for the onset of schizophrenia. Almost 50 % of people with first episode psychosis (FEP) have a history of cannabis or alcohol use. Smaller but significant proportions of this population have a history of psychostimulants (PS) use. Cross-sectional studies have shown a link between recreational and regular use of PS and psychotic symptoms, particularly among individuals with PS dependence, that usually revert after drug withdrawal. Nevertheless, some PS users suffer not just spontaneous relapse of the symptoms but also persistent psychosis in the absence of the drug. European data are not available for a large sample of the prevalence of consumption and its relation to the severity of symptoms in FEP. For this purpose, we described the differences in patterns of use of PS current and lifetime between FEP and healthy controls (HC) and their impact on the severity of the clinical symptomatology. Methods This analysis is based on data from the case-control study work package of the EUropean network of national schizophrenia networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI), which took part between 2010 and 2015 across six countries. 901 FEP patients (M age=30.76, SD= 10.51; 38.1% females) and 1235 HC (M=36.15, SD=13.30; 53% females) were included in the present case-control study. Data related to amphetamine use were obtained through CEQEU-GEI. To assess psychopathology the OPerational CRITeria (OPCRIT) system was used. Group comparisons were made using t-test or Chi square, and ANCOVA or logistic regression controlling for age, sex and cannabis use when appropriate. Results FEP subjects displayed a trend for higher use of PS in the last year (B=-0.18, p= 0.055: 81 (9%) FEP and 56 (4.5%)) and a significant higher lifetime use (Chi2= 37.33, p&lt;0.001: 196 (21.8%) FEP and 149 (12.1%) HC) than HC, but the frequency of PS use did not differ between groups. Lifetime FEP PS-users showed higher scores, thus is, more severe symptoms in the Mania (t= -3.69, p&lt; 0.001) and the general (t= -3.47, p= 0.001) factors compared to FEP non-PS-users. Current FEP PS-users showed higher scores in the Mania factor (t= -2.52, p= 0.012) than FEP non-PS-users. However, these results were not significant when the comparisons were adjusted for age, sex and cannabis use. FEP PS-users displayed lower scores than the non-users in the negative factor both in the last year (t= 2.10, p= 0.038 and: F1,866= 4.27, p= 0.039 when adjusted for age, sex and cannabis use) and lifetime (t= 1.99, p= 0.046 and F1,869= 1.37, p= 0.243 when adjusted for age, sex and cannabis use). Discussion As previous studies, we confirmed the higher rates of PS use in FEP than HC in a European study with a big sample. PS use was related to severity of clinical symptomatology. PS-users presented more severe general symptoms and, specifically, in the mania factor. Otherwise, FEP non-PS-user showed higher scores in the negative factor which might be related to the usual course of the psychosis without exposure to PS use.


Author(s):  
Valerio Ricci ◽  
Giovanni Martinotti ◽  
Franca Ceci ◽  
Stefania Chiappini ◽  
Francesco Di Carlo ◽  
...  

Background: The Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) is the time between the first-episode psychosis (FEP) and the initiation of antipsychotic treatment. It is an important predictor of several disease-related outcomes in psychotic disorders. The aim of this manuscript is investigating the influence of cannabis on the DUP and its clinical correlates. Methods: During years 2014–2019, sixty-two FEP patients with and without cannabis use disorder (CUD) were recruited from several Italian psychiatric hospitals. The subjects were then divided into two groups based on the duration of the DUP and assessed at the beginning of the antipsychotic treatment and after 3 and 6 months, using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, and the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II). Results: As expected, a longer DUP was associated with worse symptoms and cannabis use did not seem to affect the DUP, but both were related with more dissociative symptoms at onset and over time. Discussion: According to our study, cannabis use can be a predictor of FEP and DUP, and of disease outcome. However, several factors might influence the relationship between cannabis use and DUP. Preventing cannabis use and early diagnosis of psychotic disorders might impact the disease by reducing the persistence of symptoms and limiting dissociative experiences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 273-276
Author(s):  
Prakash B. Behere ◽  
Aniruddh P. Behere ◽  
Debolina Chowdhury ◽  
Amit B. Nagdive ◽  
Richa Yadav

Marriage can be defined as the state of being united as spouses in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law. The general population generally believes marriage to be a solution to mental illnesses. It can be agreed that mental disorders and marital issues have some relation. Parents of patients with psychoses expect that marriage is the solution to the illness and often approach doctors and seek validation about the success of the marriage of their mentally ill child, which is a guarantee no doctor can give in even normal circumstances. Evidence on sexual functioning in patients of psychosis is limited and needs further understanding. Studies show about 60%–70% women of the schizophrenia spectrum and illness to experience sexual difficulties. Based on available information, sexual dysfunction in population with psychosis can be attributed to a variety of psychosocial factors, ranging from the psychotic symptoms in itself to social stigma and institutionalization and also due to the antipsychotic treatment. Despite the decline in sexual activity and quality of life in general, it is very rarely addressed by both the treating doctor and by the patient themselves hence creating a lacuna in the patient’s care and availability of information regarding the illness’ pathophysiology. Patients become noncompliant with medications due to this undesirable effect and hence it requires to be given more attention during treatment. It was also found that paranoid type of schizophrenia patient had lower chances of separation than patients with other types of schizophrenia. The risk of relapse in cases with later age of onset of the disease, lower education, a positive family history of psychosis or a lower income increased more than other populations.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 631
Author(s):  
Karin Alvarez ◽  
Alessandra Cassana ◽  
Marjorie De La Fuente ◽  
Tamara Canales ◽  
Mario Abedrapo ◽  
...  

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent neoplasm in Chile and its mortality rate is rising in all ages. However, studies characterizing CRC according to the age of onset are still lacking. This study aimed to identify clinical, pathological, and molecular features of CRC in Chilean patients according to the age of diagnosis: early- (≤50 years; EOCRC), intermediate- (51–69 years; IOCRC), and late-onset (≥70 years; LOCRC). The study included 426 CRC patients from Clinica Las Condes, between 2007 and 2019. A chi-square test was applied to explore associations between age of onset and clinicopathological characteristics. Body Mass Index (BMI) differences according to age of diagnosis was evaluated through t-test. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. We found significant differences between the age of onset, and gender, BMI, family history of cancer, TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors stage, OS, and CSS. EOCRC category was characterized by a family history of cancer, left-sided tumors with a more advanced stage of the disease but better survival at 10 years, and lower microsatellite instability (MSI), with predominant germline mutations. IOCRC has shown clinical similarities with the EOCRC and molecular similarities to the LOCRC, which agrees with other reports.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document