Violent incidents within psychiatric settings

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S589-S589
Author(s):  
B. Motamedi ◽  
A. Mahmoudi ◽  
M. Motamedi
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Violent Behavior ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Psychiatric Units ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Complex Relationships ◽  
Patient Mix

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and types of aggressive and violent behaviors in acute psychiatric inpatient settings and potential interactions between staffing and patient mix and rates of the behaviours were explored.MethodsData on violent incidents were gathered prospectively in two acute psychiatric units in two general hospitals and two units in a psychiatric hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Staff recorded violent and aggressive incidents by using Morrison's hierarchy of aggressive and violent behavior. The classification ranged from level 1, inflicted serious harm to self or others requiring medical care, to level 8, exhibited low-grade hostility. They also completed weekly reports of staffing levels and patient mix. Regression analysis was used to calculate relative rates.ResultsA total of 400 violent incidents were recorded over a three-month period. Based on the scale, more than 50 percent of the incidents were serious. Seventy-eight percent were directed toward nursing staff. Complex relationships between staffing, patient mix, and violence were found. Relative risk increased with more nursing staff (of either sex), more non nursing staff on planned leave, more patients known to instigate violence, a greater number of disoriented patients, more patients detained compulsorily, and more use of seclusion. The relative risk decreased with more young staff (under 30 years old), more nursing staff with unplanned absenteeism, more admissions, and more patients with substance abuse or physical illness.ConclusionsViolent incidents within psychiatric facilities were frequent and serious, with great significance for occupational health. Some clues were found in the prediction of violence.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Change with the times exploring psychiatric inpatients’ attitudes towards physical restraint

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S565-S566
Author(s):  
Y. Spinzy ◽  
S. Maree ◽  
A. Segev ◽  
G. Cohen-Rappaport
Keyword(s):  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Violent Behavior ◽  
Physical Restraint ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatients ◽  
Social Discourse ◽  
Physical Restraints ◽  
Psychiatric Units ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
The Times ◽  
Restrictive Measures

IntroductionWhen other options fail, physical restraint is used in inpatient psychiatric units as a means to control violent behavior of agitated inpatients and to prevent them from harm. The professional and social discourse regarding the use of restrictive measures and the absence of the inpatients’ attitudes towards these measures is notable. Our research therefore tries to fill this gap by interviewing inpatients about these issues.Objectives and aimsTo assess the subjective experience and attitudes of inpatients who have undergone physical restraint.MethodsForty inpatients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders were interviewed by way of a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were conducted via use of SPSS statistical software.ResultsInpatients reported that physical restraint evoked an experience of loneliness (77.5%) and loss of autonomy (82.5%). Staff visits during times of physical restraint were reported as beneficial according to 73.6% of the inpatients interviewed. Two thirds of the inpatients viewed the use of physical restraints as justified when an inpatient was dangerous. Two thirds of the inpatients regarded physical restraint as the most aversive experience of their hospitalization.ConclusionsOur pilot study explored the subjective experience and attitudes of psychiatric inpatients towards the use of physical restraint. Inpatients viewed physical restraint as a practice that was sometimes justified but at the same time evoked negative subjective feelings. We conclude that listening to inpatients’ perspectives can help caregivers to evaluate these measures.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Cardiovascular risk assessment in psychiatric inpatient setting

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s281-s281
Author(s):  
E. Dahmer ◽  
N.C. Lokunarangoda ◽  
K. Romain ◽  
M. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Cardiac Risk ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Cardiac Health ◽  
Psychiatric Units ◽  
Acute Psychiatric Wards ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Clinically Significant

ObjectivesTo assess the general cardiac health of inpatients in acute psychiatric units and to evaluate the practice of ECG use in this setting.AimsOverall cardiac risk is assessed using QRISK2. Clinically significant ECG abnormality detection by psychiatric teams are compared with same by cardiologist.MethodsTen percent of patients (n = 113) admitted to five acute psychiatric wards during a period of 13 months across three hospital sites, covering a population of 1.1 million, were randomly selected. Electronic health care records were used to collect all data, in the form of typed entries and scanned notes. An experienced cardiologist, blind to the psychiatrist assessments, performed ECG analysis. The QRISK2 online calculator was used to calculate 10-year cardiovascular risk as recommended by NIHR, UK.ResultsA score of 10% or more indicates a need for further intervention to lower risk.13.5% of patients had a QRISK2 score of 10–20%, 5.2% had a score of 20–30%, and 1 patient had a QRISK2 score > 30%. In total, 19.7% had a QRISK2 of 10% or greater. A total of 2.9% had prolonged QTC interval (> 440 ms), with 2.9% having a borderline QTC (421–440). A total of 34.3% of ECGs were identified by the ward doctors as abnormal, with action being taken on 41.6% of these abnormal ECGs. Cardiologist analysis identified 57.1% of ECGs with abnormalities of potential clinical significance.ConclusionsOne in five patients admitted to psychiatry wards have poor cardiac health requiring interventions. Though QTC interval prolongation is rare, half of patients may have abnormal ECGs that require further analysis.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Psychiatric staff training in managing medical emergencies: re-audit

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S63-S63
Author(s):  
Sarah Abd El Sayed ◽  
Sudhir Salujha
Keyword(s):  
Physical Health ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Local Hospital ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Psychiatric Units ◽  
Psychiatric Staff ◽  
Level Of Training

AimsIn the UK, people with severe mental illness at a greater risk of poor physical health and have higher premature mortality than the general population, highlighting the importance of responding to physical health problems among patients suffering from psychiatric conditions. However, training for staff on inpatient psychiatric units to meet patients’ physical health needs is sometimes overlooked and has not always been effective.According to NICE Clinical Guideline 25 (2005) and NPSA Rapid Response Report (2008/RRR010), staff on any psychiatric inpatient setting must be capable of monitoring, measurement, and interpretation of vital signs. They must have both adequate information and skills to identify signs indicating worsening of patients’ health and respond effectively to severely ill patients.Hence, we aim to re-audit the results of a similar audit carried out in 2016 to review the level of medical emergency training (in terms of life support training) of clinical staff across the inpatient psychiatric wards at our local hospital - Stepping Hill Hospital- in Stockport.Our hypothesis is that there will be a gap in meeting the required standards for training.MethodA questionnaire including 6 questions (role of the staff member, level of their life support training, when was their training last updated, whether they know the location of the crash trolley, whether they know the local hospital emergency number and whether they should resuscitate the patient if their training is out of date) was given to staff on acute inpatient psychiatric units in Stepping Hill Hospital.ResultThe sample included 49 staff members from all the 3 wards included in the audit. The level of training of nursing staff on the 3 wards was meeting standards except for nursing staff who were new to the wards or coming back to work from prolonged leaves. There was also a gap identified in the level of training of other staff members on the ward as well as on the remaining standards measured by the audit.ConclusionA gap was identified in meeting the required standards of training on the inpatient psychiatric units. Reasons identified for this gap are mainly due to the fact that new or bank staff are asked to cover the wards without providing them with appropriate training and without orientating them about the location of different equipments and policies on the ward.

Patterns of Long Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Prescription During Criminal Acts in a Portuguese Psychiatric Hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S458-S458
Author(s):  
M.A. Duarte ◽  
F. Vieira ◽  
A. Ponte
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitals ◽  
The United States ◽  
Security Measures ◽  
Court Records ◽  
Psychiatric Units ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
History Of ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Long Acting

IntroductionUnder the Portuguese law, criminal offenders that are designated as non-criminal responsible – “inimputáveis”, similar those in the United States of America found “not guilty by reason of insanity”, are forced to be committed to inpatient forensic units either in psychiatric hospitals or prison hospitals for mandatory security measures.Objectives/aimsTo evaluate if patients committed in a regional forensic inpatient unit (RFIU) who had a psychiatric history preceding the crime, were under long acting injectable antipsychotic (LAIA) in during the period of the crime.MethodsDuring September/October 2015, patients committed to the RFIU in Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa were characterized using medical and court records regarding clinical and demographic variables. The type of crime and previous number of criminal acts were also accounted for.ResultsWe included 33 patients in the study. During time of the crime, 25 patients (75.8%) had history of previous psychiatric appointments, with an average of 3 commitments to the psychiatric inpatient units. The majority (n = 17; 68%) had a diagnose of “schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders” (F20–29; ICD 10) and committed “crimes against life” (n = 13; 52%). They had an average of 0.8 previous criminal acts. During the crime, 7 patients (28%) were taking LAIA. Those, 16% (n = 4) were doing an unknown antipsychotic and 12% (n = 3) were doing Haloperidol.ConclusionsDespite several studies showing the clinical and rehabilitative benefit of using LAIA early in the disease course, most of the patients in our study, who were already being followed in outpatient psychiatric units, did not benefit from them.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Pharmacotherapy of 1,044 inpatients with posttraumatic stress disorder: current status and trends in German-speaking countries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias A. Reinhard ◽  
Johanna Seifert ◽  
Timo Greiner ◽  
Sermin Toto ◽  
Stefan Bleich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Current Status ◽  
German Speaking ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Prescription Rates

AbstractPosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder with limited approved pharmacological treatment options and high symptom burden. Therefore, real-life prescription patterns may differ from guideline recommendations, especially in psychiatric inpatient settings. The European Drug Safety Program in Psychiatry (“Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie”, AMSP) collects inpatients’ prescription rates cross-sectionally twice a year in German-speaking psychiatric hospitals. For this study, the AMSP database was screened for psychiatric inpatients with a primary diagnosis of PTSD between 2001 and 2017. N = 1,044 patients with a primary diagnosis of PTSD were identified with 89.9% taking psychotropics. The average prescription rate was 2.4 (standard deviation: 1.5) psychotropics per patient with high rates of antidepressant drugs (72.0%), antipsychotics drugs (58.4%) and tranquilizing drugs (29.3%). The presence of psychiatric comorbidities was associated with higher rates of psychotropic drug use. The most often prescribed substances were quetiapine (24.1% of all patients), lorazepam (18.1%) and mirtazapine (15.0%). The use of drugs approved for PTSD was low (sertraline 11.1%; paroxetine 3.7%). Prescription rates of second-generation antipsychotic drugs increased, while the use of tranquilizing drugs declined over the years. High prescription rates and extensive use of sedative medication suggest a symptom-driven prescription (e.g., hyperarousal, insomnia) that can only be explained to a minor extent by existing comorbidities. The observed discrepancy with existing guidelines underlines the need for effective pharmacological and psychological treatment options in psychiatric inpatient settings.

What is the impact of staff wearing uniforms in psychiatric inpatient settings?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Collingwood ◽  
Laura McKenzie-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Ideal Self ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Mental Health Settings ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
The Impact

Background: Uniform has traditionally been worn in psychiatric inpatient and other mental health settings, but there has been a move to non-uniform in recent years. Some services have made the change back to uniform, raising questionsabout the potential impact on patients and staff.Aim: To review the impact of uniform within a psychiatric inpatient or mental health setting.Method: Databases were searched for articles exploring the impact of uniform use using specified search terms. Articles were assessed for suitability with inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically appraised, then analysed for themes using thematic analysis.Results: 17 papers were included in the review. Thematic analysis identified five main themes and 29 subthemes. Main themes were Attitudes and interactions, A freer environment, Are you both nurses?, The ‘ideal self’ and There are more important things. A critical appraisal of the articles suggested issues with validityand reliability, which are discussed.Discussion: Studies identified that wearing non-uniform facilitated positive changes in both patients and staff. This raises the potential negative impact of uniform on both patients and staff, and the role of power imbalance in these settings is discussed. Further themes around identification of staff out of uniform were considered.Implications for practice: The use of uniform in mental health and psychiatric inpatient settings should be considered carefully, due to the potential negative impact, whilst also recognising the importance of staff identification and supporting professional identity.

scholarly journals Aboriginal women have a higher risk of cervical abnormalities at screening; South Australia, 1993–2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-112
Author(s):  
Ming Li ◽  
David Roder ◽  
Lisa J Whop ◽  
Abbey Diaz ◽  
Peter D Baade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cervical Screening ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Aboriginal Women ◽  
Cytological Abnormality

Objective Cervical cancer mortality has halved in Australia since the national cervical screening program began in 1991, but elevated mortality rates persist for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women (referred to as Aboriginal women in this report). We investigated differences by Aboriginal status in abnormality rates predicted by cervical cytology and confirmed by histological diagnoses among screened women. Methods Using record linkage between cervical screening registry and public hospital records in South Australia, we obtained Aboriginal status of women aged 20–69 for 1993–2016 (this was not recorded by the registry). Differences in cytological abnormalities were investigated by Aboriginal status, using relative risk ratios from mixed effect multinomial logistic regression modelling. Odds ratios were calculated for histological high grade results for Aboriginal compared with non-Aboriginal women. Results Of 1,676,141 linkable cytology tests, 5.8% were abnormal. Abnormal results were more common for women who were younger, never married, and living in a major city or socioeconomically disadvantaged area. After adjusting for these factors and numbers of screening episodes, the relative risk of a low grade cytological abnormality compared with a normal test was 14% (95% confidence interval 5–24%) higher, and the relative risk of a high grade cytological abnormality was 61% (95% confidence interval 44–79%) higher, for Aboriginal women. The adjusted odds ratio of a histological high grade was 76% (95% confidence interval 46–113%) higher. Conclusions Ensuring that screen-detected abnormalities are followed up in a timely way by culturally acceptable services is important for reducing differences in cervical cancer rates between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women.

scholarly journals Presence and influence of trauma in inpatient psychiatric care

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Rachel B. Nowlin ◽  
Sarah K. Brown ◽  
Jessica R. Ingram ◽  
Amanda R. Drake ◽  
Johan R. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Psychiatric Inpatient ◽  
Ptsd Symptoms ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care ◽  
Psychiatric Setting ◽  
Trauma Informed Care ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Positive Correlations

Background: Previous research indicates traumatic exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occur at a higher rate in people with severe mental illness (SMI) than in the general population, and co-occurring PTSD symptoms can worsen outcomes for patients with SMI.Objective: This study assessed the presence and influence of PTSD symptoms in individuals with SMI in an inpatient psychiatric setting, and rates of PTSD diagnoses in this population.Methods: Retrospective analysis of demographic information and behavioral health outcomes, using a representative sample of adult and geriatric inpatient psychiatric patients (N = 4,126).Results: This study found elevated PTSD symptoms in over 65% of patients, and significant positive correlations between PTSD symptomatology and behavioral and emotional dysfunction. This study also explored differences in patients with PTSD symptoms who did and did not receive a PTSD diagnosis, finding associations for admission severity, race, and gender.Conclusions: Traumatization and PTSD symptoms were prevalent in psychiatric inpatient settings, and had an impact on behavioral health outcomes. Recommendations include the use of PTSD screening in behavioral healthcare admission processes, and the furtherance of trauma-informed care for inpatient psychiatric patients with SMI, due to the volume of traumatization and PTSD symptoms in the population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document