Estimation of daily intake and risk assessment of organophosphorus pesticides based on biomonitoring data – The internal exposure approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 57-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Katsikantami ◽  
Claudio Colosio ◽  
Athanasios Alegakis ◽  
Manolis N. Tzatzarakis ◽  
Elena Vakonaki ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Maryam Zare Jeddi ◽  
Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji ◽  
Ivonne Rietjens ◽  
Jochem Louisse ◽  
Yuri Bruinen de Bruin ◽  
...  

This study aimed to estimate the exposure and related health risks of phthalates, and to assess the health risks from combined exposure to three of the phthalates sharing the same mode of action (anti-androgenicity) in children. We determined the internal exposure of 56 Iranian children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years by analyzing seven urinary metabolites of five phthalates. The estimated daily intake values derived from the biomonitoring data ranged from 0.01 µg/kg bw/day for butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), to 17.85 µg/kg bw/day for di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). The risk assessment revealed that not only the exposure to the individual phthalates, but also the combined exposure to the three anti-androgenic phthalates (DEHP, DBP, BBP) did not raise a safety concern (hazard index values averaged 0.2). The range of maximum cumulative ratio values varied from around 1 for most individuals to around 2 in some individuals, indicating that the combined exposures were dominated by one and in some cases by two of the three anti-androgenic phthalates, especially dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and/or DEHP. Based on biomonitoring data, the overall combined exposure of Iranian children to phthalates does not raise a concern, while reduction of exposure is best focused on DEHP and DBP that showed the highest hazard quotient.


Fluids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimosthenis Sarigiannis ◽  
Spyros Karakitsios

Physiology-Based BioKinetic (PBBK) models are of increasing interest in modern risk assessment, providing quantitative information regarding the absorption, metabolism, distribution, and excretion (ADME). They focus on the estimation of the effective dose at target sites, aiming at the identification of xenobiotic levels that are able to result in perturbations to the biological pathway that are potentially associated with adverse outcomes. The current study aims at the development of a lifetime PBBK model that covers a large chemical space, coupled with a framework for human biomonitoring (HBM) data assimilation. The methodology developed herein was demonstrated in the case of bisphenol A (BPA), where exposure analysis was based on European HBM data. Based on our calculations, it was found that current exposure levels in Europe are below the temporary Tolerable Daily Intake (t-TDI) of 4 μg/kg_bw/day proposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Taking into account age-dependent bioavailability differences, internal exposure was estimated and compared with the biologically effective dose (BED) resulting from translating the EFSA temporary total daily intake (t-TDI) into equivalent internal dose and an alternative internal exposure reference value, namely biological pathway altering dose (BPAD); the use of such a refined exposure metric, showed that environmentally relevant exposure levels are below the concentrations associated with the activation of biological pathways relevant to toxicity based on High Throughput Screening (HTS) in vitro studies.


1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 495-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Kalberlah ◽  
Martin Hassauer ◽  
Nicole Frijus-Plessen ◽  
Klaus Schneider

International bodies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and national governmental agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) use the same basic concept to derive acceptable daily intake (ADI) and reference dose (RfD). This customary concept is used in toxicological risk assessment of soil contaminants in Germany. It is used in the following ways: with extension to new substances not yet assessed by, for example, WHO or EPA; with reevaluations for substances with new toxicologically relevant input data; with explicitly stated absorption rates used to calculate internal exposure; its results are presented differently and are better suited to multipathway situations of exposure such as in contaminated sites; and with extensions in assessment by assigning quality criteria to unit risk quantifications to carcinogenic substances. The respective derived doses are called TRD (tolerable resorbiente dosis—tolerable absorbed dose) values, that is, reference values equivalent to a no observed adverse effect level in sensitive human subpopulations. TRD values are proposed for approximately 85 soil contaminants and 20 warfare substances with high priority in Germany up to now. The article outlines some of the specific problems in deriving TRD values and gives examples for comparison with ADI (WHO) or RfD (EPA) values.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-693
Author(s):  
Arushi Jain ◽  
Pulkit Mathur

Background: Sulphites added as preservatives in food have been associated with adverse health effects in humans. Objective: The present study was designed with an objective of assessing the risk of sulphite exposure through food in adolescents (12-16 years old) of Delhi, India. Methods: A total of 1030 adolescents selected from four private and four government schools of Delhi, were asked to record their food intake using a 24 hour food record, repeated on three days, for assessing exposure to sulphites. The risk was assessed using six different scenarios of exposure. Results: The actual intake for sulphites for average consumers was 0.15 ± 0.13 mg / kg b.w. / day which was 21.4% of acceptable daily intake (ADI). For high consumers (P95), it was 65% of the ADI. However, for 2 respondents, the actual intake exceeded the ADI. The major food contributors to sulphite intake were beverage concentrates (46%), ready to serve beverages (22%) followed by miscellaneous food items (16%), mainly ice creams and snowballs. Estimation of sulphite intake using different exposure scenarios revealed that for certain scenarios where the highest reported sulphite level or maximum permissible levels were considered for calculation, the high consumers exceeded the ADI, though, for average consumers, intake was well below the ADI. Conclusion: Actual intake of sulphite for average consumers was well below the ADI but for high consumers was approaching the ADI. People with sulphite sensitivity need to be aware of hidden food sources of sulphites.


2014 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
JONG SOO MOK ◽  
JI YOUNG KWON ◽  
KWANG TAE SON ◽  
WOO SEOK CHOI ◽  
SUNG RIM KANG ◽  
...  

The concentrations of the heavy metals cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), chromium, silver, nickel, copper, and zinc in the edible portions of 105 marine invertebrates representing 16 mollusk and crustacean species were accurately determined to evaluate their hazard for human consumption. The samples were collected in 2011 from major fish markets on the coast of Korea and analyzed for Hg using a direct Hg analyzer and for other metals using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Estimated dietary exposure (EDE) was determined, and a risk assessment was made of the heavy metals to provide information concerning consumer safety. The Cd concentrations, which were the highest for the three hazardous metals (Cd, Hg, and Pb), were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the bivalves and crabs than in the gastropods and cephalopods. However, the concentrations of these metals in all samples were within the regulatory limits set by Korea and other countries. The EDE was compared with the provisional tolerable daily intake (PTDI) adopted by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EDE of Cd, Hg, and Pb for each class of marine invertebrate were 0.07 to 2.64, 0.01 to 0.43, and 0.001 to 0.16% of the PTDI, respectively. The total EDE of Cd, Hg, and Pb for marine invertebrates accounted for 4.03, 0.96, and 0.21%, respectively, of the PTDI. The EDE of other metals in each class of marine invertebrate was less than 2% of the PTDI. The hazard index is a reasonable parameter for assessing the risk of heavy metal consumption associated with contaminated food. In the present study, the hazard index for all of the species was less than 1.0, which indicates that the intake of heavy metals from consumption of these marine invertebrates does not represent an appreciable hazard to humans.


1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1804-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Greim ◽  
G Csanády ◽  
J G Filser ◽  
P Kreuzer ◽  
L Schwarz ◽  
...  

Abstract Evaluation of occupational or environmental risk due to exposure to chemicals requires sufficient information on the toxic profiles, mechanisms of action, toxicokinetics, dose-response relation, exposure, and the target dose. Usually exposure is estimated by measuring concentrations of the agent in air, food, water, soil, dust, or other media with which a population or an individual is in contact. However, this external exposure is only a rough estimate for the internal exposure (agent dose or its metabolite at the critical target in the organism). Factors of influence are bioavailability of the chemicals, variations in concentrations and routes of exposure, physical activity, and individual variation in rates of metabolism, distribution, and excretion. All these affect the concentration of the toxic agent at the critical target, which is the most precise information for risk assessment. Thus, internal exposure is best measured by determining the concentration of the toxicant or its ultimate metabolite at the critical site in the target organ or by determining adducts with cellular macromolecules such as proteins, amino acids, DNA, or its bases. The latter are easily available in experimental toxicology from animal experiments but only occasionally from humans. For health surveillance such data usually are not available, because they require invasive procedures such as biopsies. Therefore, more accessible body fluids or tissue are used, such as blood, urine, or adipose tissue, or adducts with macromolecules such as albumin or hemoglobin in the blood, DNA adducts in peripheral lymphocytes, or altered DNA bases in urine such as 8-hydroxyguanine. All of these are indicators for exposure, whereas risk can only be estimated if the correlation between their deviations from normal and the dose-response at the critical target is known.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1110 ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Enric Pellicer-Castell ◽  
Carolina Belenguer-Sapiña ◽  
Pedro Amorós ◽  
Jamal El Haskouri ◽  
José Manuel Herrero-Martínez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document