Increased risk of bloodstream and urinary infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared with patients fitting ICU admission criteria treated in regular wards

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) colonizes the gastrointestinal tract of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and CRPA colonization puts patients at increased risk of CRPA infection. Prior studies have not examined relationships between the microbiota, medications, and CRPA colonization acquisition. Methods Data and perirectal swabs were obtained from a cohort of ICU patients at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Patients (N = 109) were classified into 3 groups by CRPA colonization-acquisition status and antimicrobial exposure. We conducted 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing of an ICU admission swab and ≥1 additional swab and evaluated associations between patient characteristics, medications, the gastrointestinal microbiota, and CRPA colonization acquisition. Results ICU patients had low levels of diversity and high relative abundances of pathobionts. Piperacillin-tazobactam was prescribed more frequently to patients with CRPA colonization acquisition than those without. Piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with low abundance of potentially protective taxa (eg, Lactobacillus and Clostridiales) and increased risk of Enterococcus domination (odds ratio [OR], 5.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03–14.92). Opioids were associated with dysbiosis in patients who did not receive antibiotics; potentially protective Blautia and Lactobacillus were higher in patients who did not receive opioids. Several correlated taxa, identified at ICU admission, were associated with lower risk of CRPA colonization acquisition (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, .38–.87). Conclusions Antibiotics differed in their impact on the microbiota, with piperacillin-tazobactam being particularly damaging. Certain bacterial taxa (eg, Clostridiales) were negatively associated with CRPA colonization acquisition. These taxa may be markers of risk for CRPA colonization acquisition and/or serve a protective role.

Download Full-text

Intensive Care Admissions and Associated Severity of Influenza B Versus A During Influenza B Vaccine–mismatched Seasons

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciz053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 69 (6) ◽

pp. 1049-1052 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Maya Korem ◽

Efrat Orenbuch-Harroch ◽

Eli Ben-Chetrit ◽

Sarah Israel ◽

Matan J Cohen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Disease Severity ◽

Influenza B ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Severe Influenza ◽

Trivalent Vaccine ◽

Quadrivalent Vaccines

Abstract Patients admitted to hospital with influenza B and A in Jerusalem, Israel, during the 2015–2016 and 2017–2018 influenza seasons demonstrated similar rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and associated disease severity. Most (63%) influenza B ICU patients received influenza B–mismatched trivalent vaccine. These findings call into question the equivalence of trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in preventing severe influenza B.

Download Full-text

Low 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels on Admission to the Intensive Care Unit May Predispose COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients to a Higher 28-Day Mortality Risk: A Pilot Study on a Greek ICU Cohort

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu12123773 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (12) ◽

pp. 3773

Author(s):

Alice G. Vassiliou ◽

Edison Jahaj ◽

Maria Pratikaki ◽

Stylianos E. Orfanos ◽

Ioanna Dimopoulou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Vitamin D ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Mortality Risk ◽

Rank Test ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Hydroxyvitamin D ◽

Increased Risk ◽

25 Hydroxyvitamin D

We aimed to examine whether low intensive care unit (ICU) admission 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels are associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia. This was a prospective observational study of SARS-CoV2 positive critically ill patients treated in a multidisciplinary ICU. Thirty (30) Greek patients were included, in whom 25(OH)D was measured on ICU admission. Eighty (80%) percent of patients had vitamin D deficiency, and the remaining insufficiency. Based on 25(OH)D levels, patients were stratified in two groups: higher and lower than the median value of the cohort (15.2 ng/mL). The two groups did not differ in their demographic or clinical characteristics. All patients who died within 28 days belonged to the low vitamin D group. Survival analysis showed that the low vitamin D group had a higher 28-day survival absence probability (log-rank test, p = 0.01). Critically ill COVID-19 patients who died in the ICU within 28 days appeared to have lower ICU admission 25(OH)D levels compared to survivors. When the cohort was divided at the median 25(OH)D value, the low vitamin D group had an increased risk of 28-day mortality. It seems plausible, therefore, that low 25(OH)D levels may predispose COVID-19 patients to an increased 28-day mortality risk.

Download Full-text

Factors Associated with Risk and Prognosis of Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123254 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4783-4783

Author(s):

Cecilie Velsoe Maeng ◽

Christian Fynbo Christiansen ◽

Kathleen Dori Liu ◽

Lene Sofie Granfeldt Oestgaard

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care ◽

High Risk ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Risk Group ◽

Remission Induction ◽

First Year ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Acute Myeloid

Significance Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk of critical illness requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to both disease- and treatment-related complications. A better understanding of risk factors for ICU admission and prognosis may help with prevention of life-threatening complications and informed decision-making when treating AML patients. Methods This study included all adult Danish AML patients, who received remission-induction chemotherapy alone or in combination with allogeneic stem cell transplantation from 2005 to 2016. The cohort was identified using the Danish Acute Leukemia Registry (DNLR) and information on ICU admission was obtained from the Danish Intensive Care Database. We examined risk of ICU admission within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis considering competing risk of death and investigated a number of possible risk factors for ICU admission. We computed 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality from time of ICU admission and in the matched non-ICU comparison group using a risk set matching (1:1) on time since diagnosis, sex, and age. Finally, we used the pseudo-value approach to compute the relative risk (RR) of death in the ICU admitted cohort compared to the matched cohort. We adjusted for ECOG/WHO performance status (PS), year of diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, number of comorbidities, and secondary/therapy-related AML. Results A total of 1383 AML patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 1.65 (IQR: 0.60-4.36) years. The risk of ICU admission within 1 year of AML diagnosis was 22.7%, and the risk within 3 years was 28.1%. Median time to ICU was 59 (IQR: 15-272) days. Male sex was associated with increased risk of ICU admission after 1 year (adjusted RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.57) and PS >1 was associated with an increased risk after both 1 year (adjusted RR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.33-1.30) and 3 years (adjusted RR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.22-1.96). Other factors listed in Table 1 (age, comorbidity, cytogenetic risk group, secondary or therapy-related AML, and year of diagnosis) were not associated with increased risk of ICU admission. In AML patients admitted to the ICU, the 1-year mortality from time of ICU admission was 69.2%, compared to a 1-year mortality rate of 31.0% in the matched non-ICU patients (adjusted RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 2.56-4.12). Long-term mortality was increased in ICU patients; 3-year mortality was 82.1% compared to 49.7% (adjusted RR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.97-3.01), and the 5-year mortality was 83.1% compared to 60.6%, (adjusted RR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.70-2.66). Conclusion In this national population-based cohort study, more than one fourth of AML patients treated with remission-induction chemotherapy were admitted to an ICU within 3 years of diagnosis with the majority of ICU admissions occurring within the first year. ICU admission was associated with high mortality, especially within the first year after admission. The risk of mortality decreased over time but remained increased 3 and 5 years after admission compared to the matched cohort. Early monitoring and management of high-risk patients may be effective in preventing ICU admissions and PS may serve as a possible tool to identify patients at high risk of ICU admission. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

The Use Of Platelet Transfusions In The Intensive Care Unit and Impact On Platelet Count: A 30,000 Patient Registry Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1154.1154 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1154-1154

Author(s):

Shuoyan Ning ◽

Rebecca Barty, MLT ◽

Yang Liu ◽

Nancy Heddle ◽

Donald Arnold

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Large Cohort ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Platelet Transfusions

Abstract Background Thrombocytopenia is a common complication of critical illness and an independent risk factor for bleeding and death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Platelet transfusions are commonly used to improve platelet counts; however, the expected platelet increment from a transfusion in this setting has not been established. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of platelet transfusion administration and their effect on platelet count increments in a large cohort of non-oncology critically ill adults. Methods We performed an analysis of a registry database, which was developed to capture clinical and laboratory data on all blood transfusions administered in 3 academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. We included all patients ≥18 years who received one or more platelet transfusion during an ICU admission. Data validation was done by integrity checks with medical records and laboratory information system performed by a biostatistician. Non-transfused ICU patients were used as controls. The absolute increment in platelet count was calculated for each single platelet transfusion using the closest platelet count taken within 24 hours before the transfusion and 4-24 hours after the transfusion. Results Between April 2006 and October 2012, 33,222 patients were admitted to ICU, including 29,511 (88.8%) who did not have a diagnosis of cancer. Of those, 4,502 (15.3%) received one or more platelet transfusion during any ICU admission (n=4,690); 31.9% were female and median age at the time of first admission was 69 years (IQR 59-77). Among the 25,009 non-transfused patients admitted to ICU during the same period, 38.1% were female and the median age was 65 years (IQR 52–76). Median pre-transfusion platelet count was 87 x109/L (IQR 59-131) and a single platelet transfusion resulted in a median platelet count increment of 21 x109/L (IQR 6-40) as measured 6.7 hours (IQR 5.1-9.8) after the transfusion. There were 277 (25.4%) transfusions that yielded a platelet count increment of 5 x109/L or less. ICU mortality was 562/4,690 (12.4%) for patients who received a platelet transfusion, compared with 2,251/33,033(6.8%) for patients who were not transfused during their ICU stay. Summary/Conclusion Among this large cohort of non-oncology ICU patients, platelet transfusions were commonly administered for thrombocytopenia that was generally mild. In this setting one platelet transfusion resulted in a median platelet count rise of 21 x109/L. Many transfusion episodes yielded no appreciable increase in platelet count. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical effects of platelet transfusion in this setting controlling for confounding. Disclosures: Heddle: CIHR: Research Funding; Canadian Blood Services: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Health Canada: Research Funding; Macopharma: Consultancy; ASH: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors Associated With Resistance to Ciprofloxacin in Clinical Bacterial Isolates From Intensive Care Unit Patients

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/511701 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 28 (3) ◽

pp. 331-336 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Phillip D. Levin ◽

Robert A. Fowler ◽

Cameron Guest ◽

William J. Sibbald ◽

Alex Kiss ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Prior Treatment ◽

Bacterial Isolates ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Ciprofloxacin Resistance

Objective.To determine risk factors and outcomes associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical bacterial isolates from intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.Twenty-bed medical-surgical ICU in a Canadian tertiary care teaching hospital.Patients.All patients admitted to the ICU with a stay of at least 72 hours between January 1 and December 31, 2003.Methods.Prospective surveillance to determine patient comorbidities, use of medical devices, nosocomial infections, use of antimicrobials, and outcomes. Characteristics of patients with a ciprofloxacin-resistant gram-negative bacterial organism were compared with characteristics of patients without these pathogens.Results.Ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms were recovered from 20 (6%) of 338 ICU patients, representing 38 (21%) of 178 nonduplicate isolates of gram-negative bacilli. Forty-nine percent ofPseudomonas aeruginosaisolates and 29% ofEscherichia coliisolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. In a multivariate analysis, independent risk factors associated with the recovery of a ciprofloxacin-resistant organism included duration of prior treatment with ciprofloxacin (relative risk [RR], 1.15 per day [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.08-1.23];P< .001), duration of prior treatment with levofloxacin (RR, 1.39 per day [95% CI, 1.01-1.91];P= .04), and length of hospital stay prior to ICU admission (RR, 1.02 per day [95% CI, 1.01-1.03];P= .005). Neither ICU mortality (15% of patients with a ciprofloxacin-resistant isolate vs 23% of patients with a ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolate;P= .58 ) nor in-hospital mortality (30% vs 34%;P= .81 ) were statistically significantly associated with ciprofloxacin resistance.Conclusions.ICU patients are at risk of developing infections due to ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms. Variables associated with ciprofloxacin resistance include prior use of fluoroquinolones and duration of hospitalization prior to ICU admission. Recognition of these risk factors may influence antibiotic treatment decisions.

Download Full-text

Staphylococcus aureusNasal Colonization and Subsequent Infection in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Does Methicillin Resistance Matter?

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/652530 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 31 (6) ◽

pp. 584-591 ◽

Cited By ~ 72

Author(s):

Hitoshi Honda ◽

Melissa J. Krauss ◽

Craig M. Coopersmith ◽

Marin H. Kollef ◽

Amy M. Richmond ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Confidence Interval ◽

Methicillin Resistance ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽

Patient Specific ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Icu Admission

Background.Staphylococcus aureusis an important cause of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Colonization with methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) is a risk factor for subsequentS. aureusinfection. However, MRSA-colonized patients may have more comorbidities than methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus(MSSA)-colonized or noncolonized patients and therefore may be more susceptible to infection on that basis.Objective.To determine whether MRSA-colonized patients who are admitted to medical and surgical ICUs are more likely to develop anyS. aureusinfection in the ICU, compared with patients colonized with MSSA or not colonized withS. aureus,independent of predisposing patient risk factors.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.A 24-bed surgical ICU and a 19-bed medical ICU of a 1,252-bed, academic hospital.Patients.A total of 9,523 patients for whom nasal swab samples were cultured forS. aureusat ICU admission during the period from December 2002 through August 2007.Methods.Patients in the ICU for more than 48 hours were examined for an ICU-acquired S.aureusinfection, defined as development ofS. aureusinfection more than 48 hours after ICU admission.Results.S. aureuscolonization was present at admission for 1,433 (27.8%) of 5,161 patients (674 [47.0%] with MRSA and 759 [53.0%] with MSSA). An ICU-acquiredS. aureusinfection developed in 113 (2.19%) patients, of whom 75 (66.4%) had an infection due to MRSA. Risk factors associated with an ICU-acquiredS. aureusinfection included MRSA colonization at admission (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.70 [95% confidence interval, 3.07-7.21]) and MSSA colonization at admission (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.47 [95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.01]).Conclusion.ICU patients colonized with S.aureuswere at greater risk of developing aS. aureusinfection in the ICU. Even after adjusting for patient-specific risk factors, MRSA-colonized patients were more likely to developS. aureusinfection, compared with MSSA-colonized or noncolonized patients.

Download Full-text

The Epidemiology of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Colonization in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/502199 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 257-263 ◽

Cited By ~ 35

Author(s):

David K. Warren ◽

Marin H. Kollef ◽

Sondra M. Seiler ◽

Scott K. Fridkin ◽

Victoria J. Fraser

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Control Measures ◽

Icu Patients ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Contact Precautions ◽

Icu Stay ◽

Vancomycin Resistant

AbstractObjective:To determine the epidemiology of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) among intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Design:Ten-month prospective cohort study.Setting:A 19-bed medical ICU of a 1,440-bed teaching hospital.Methods:Patients admitted to the ICU had rectal swab cultures for VRE on admission and weekly thereafter. VRE-positive patients were cared for using contact precautions. Clinical data, including microbiology reports, were collected prospectively during the ICU stay.Results:Of 519 patients who had admission stool cultures, 127 (25%) had cultures that were positive for VRE. Risk factors for VRE colonization identified by multiple logistic regression analysis were hospital stay greater than 3 days prior to ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 2.3 to 5.7), chronic dialysis (AOR, 2.4; CI95, 1.2 to 4.5), and having been admitted to the study hospital one to two times (AOR, 2.3; CI95,1.4 to 3.8) or more than two times (AOR, 6.5; CI95, 3.7 to 11.6) within the past 12 months. Of the 352 VRE-negative patients who had one or more follow-up cultures, 74 (21%) became VRE positive during their ICU stay (27 cases per 1,000 patient-ICU days).Conclusion:The prevalence of VRE culture positivity on ICU admission was high and a sizable fraction of ICU patients became VRE positive during their ICU stay despite contact precautions for VRE-positive patients. This was likely due in large part to prior VRE exposures in the rest of the hospital where these control measures were not being used.

Download Full-text

Vitamin D Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes

Frontiers in Public Health ◽

10.3389/fpubh.2021.736665 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

Author(s):

Iacopo Chiodini ◽

Davide Gatti ◽

Davide Soranna ◽

Daniela Merlotti ◽

Christian Mingiano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Vitamin D ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Vitamin D Status ◽

Icu Admission ◽

Primary Endpoints ◽

Severe Deficiency ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Vitamin D Levels

Background: Several studies suggest an association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and the outcomes of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, in particular Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) related severity and mortality. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate whether vitamin D status is associated with the COVID-19 severity, defined as ARDS requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or mortality (primary endpoints) and with the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19-related hospitalization (secondary endpoints).Methods: A search in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, and preprints repositories was performed until March 31th 2021 to identify all original observational studies reporting association measures, or enough data to calculate them, between Vitamin D status (insufficiency <75, deficiency <50, or severe deficiency <25 nmol/L) and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, ICU admission, or death during COVID-19 hospitalization.Findings: Fifty-four studies (49 as fully-printed and 5 as pre-print publications) were included for a total of 1,403,715 individuals. The association between vitamin D status and SARS-CoV2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalization, COVID-19 related ICU admission, and COVID-19 related mortality was reported in 17, 9, 27, and 35 studies, respectively. Severe deficiency, deficiency and insufficiency of vitamin D were all associated with ICU admission (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence intervals [95%CIs]: 2.63, 1.45–4.77; 2.16, 1.43–3.26; 2.83, 1.74–4.61, respectively), mortality (OR, 95%CIs: 2.60, 1.93–3.49; 1.84, 1.26–2.69; 4.15, 1.76–9.77, respectively), SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR, 95%CIs: 1.68, 1.32–2.13; 1.83, 1.43–2.33; 1.49, 1.16–1.91, respectively) and COVID-19 hospitalization (OR, 95%CIs 2.51, 1.63–3.85; 2.38, 1.56–3.63; 1.82, 1.43–2.33). Considering specific subgroups (i.e., Caucasian patients, high quality studies, and studies reporting adjusted association estimates) the results of primary endpoints did not change.Interpretations: Patients with low vitamin D levels present an increased risk of ARDS requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and a higher susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and related hospitalization.

Download Full-text

Drug-Induced QTc-Interval Prolongation in the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence and Predictors

Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/0897190009356549 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

pp. 19-24 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Tien M. H. Ng ◽

Keith M. Olsen ◽

Megan A. McCartan ◽

Susan E. Puumala ◽

Katie M. Speidel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Beta Blockers ◽

Qtc Interval ◽

Qtc Prolongation ◽

Drug Induced ◽

Icu Patients ◽

End Point ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Qtc Interval Prolongation

There is a paucity of information regarding QTc prolongation in critically ill patients. A prospective observational study was conducted to assess the incidence and predictors of QTc prolongation associated with medications in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Consecutive adult patients prescribed prespecified QTc-prolonging medications were assessed for development of the combined incidence of QTc >500 ms at anytime and QTc increase >60 ms above baseline. Over 3 months, 200 consecutive patients (63 ± 18 years; 52% female; 73% Caucasian; baseline QTc 447.3 ± 51.5 ms) were evaluated. The primary end point occurred in 48% of the patients (QTc >500 ms 40%, QTc increase >60 ms 29%). The majority of patients experienced a QTc >470 or 450 ms (60.5%). Mean increase in QTc at 48 hours was 20 ± 35 ms. Upon multivariate analysis, length of stay [odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval (1.15, 1.47)] and baseline QTc [1.01 (1.01, 1.02)] were associated with an increased risk for the primary end point, while beta-blockers [0.41 (0.20, 0.81)] were associated with a risk reduction. In conclusion, increased risk of proarrhythmia, as assessed by QTc prolongation, occurs in the majority of ICU patients when prescribed medications with electrophysiologic properties. Increased vigilance is warranted. The possible protective effect of beta-blockers requires confirmation.

Download Full-text