Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of the impact of posterior meniscus horn lesions on adjacent cartilage composition, patient-reported outcomes and gait biomechanics in subjects without radiographic osteoarthritis

IntroductionLittle is known about the impact of bladder cancer (BC) and its treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQL). To date, most work has been small in scale or restricted to subsets of patients. Life and bladder cancer is a cross-sectional and longitudinal study collecting patient-reported outcomes within two distinct cohorts.Methods and analysisA longitudinal study will collect patient-reported outcomes at 3-monthly intervals from newly diagnosed patients. Eligible cases will be identified by recruiting hospitals and surveyed at baseline, 6, 9 and 12 months postdiagnosis to explore changes in outcomes over time. A separate cross-sectional cohort of patients diagnosed within the last 10 years across Yorkshire will be identified through cancer registration systems and surveyed once to explore longer-term HRQL in BC survivors. A comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) has been developed using generic, cancer-specific and BC-specific instruments. The study will provide evidence about how useful these PROMs are in measuring BC patient HRQL. The outcome data will be linked with administrative health data (eg, treatment information from hospital data).Ethics and disseminationThe study has received the following approvals: Yorkshire and the Humber—South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee (17/YH/0095), Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (17/CAG/0054). Results will be made available to patients, funders, NHS Trusts, Clinical Commissioning Groups, Strategic Clinical Networks and other researchers.

Download Full-text

Patient reported outcomes in patients with desmoid type fibromatosis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.11574 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 11574-11574

Author(s):

VIKAS GARG ◽

Sameer Rastogi ◽

Adarsh Barwad ◽

Rambha Panday ◽

Sandeep Kumar Bhoriwal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Benign Neoplasm ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Appendicular Skeleton ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Symptom Scale ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

11574 Background: Desmoid type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare benign neoplasm with infiltrative growth and high local recurrences. Due to long disease course, unpredictable growth pattern, and low mortality, using only survival outcomes may be inappropriate. In this study we assessed the impact of DTF on health related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in patients with DTF. The study participants were asked to fill the EORTC QLQ-C30, GAD-7 and PHQ- 9 q uestionnaires to assess HRQoL, anxiety and depression . Outcomes were also compared with healthy controls. Results: 204 subjects (102 DTF patients and 102 healthy controls) were recruited. Study parameters have been summarized in Table. Appendicular skeleton (limbs + girdle) was most commonly involved in 59 % patients and abdominal wall or mesentery was involved in 22.5 %. Patients have received median of 2 lines of therapy. 54 % patients were currently on sorafenib and 41 % were under active surveillance. Mean global health status in DTF patient 65.58 ± 22.64, was significantly lower than healthy controls. Similarly, DTF patients scored low on all functional scales except cognitive functioning. Symptom scale showed significantly higher symptom burden of fatigue, pain, insomnia and financial difficulties. Anxiety & depression was observed in 39.22 % and 50 % of DTF patients respectively. DTF patients had higher rates of mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. No difference was observed based on site of disease. Conclusions: DTF patients have significant symptom burden, poor functioning, and heightened anxiety and depression. Patient reported outcomes should be routinely used to assess treatment efficacy in DTF patients.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Gastrointestinal Symptoms of and Psychosocial Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nursing-Led Cross-Sectional Study of Patients in Clinical Remission

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina56010045 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 56 (1) ◽

pp. 45 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Rosellina Margherita Mancina ◽

Raffaele Pagnotta ◽

Caterina Pagliuso ◽

Vincenzo Albi ◽

Daniela Bruno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Inflammatory Bowel ◽

The Impact

Background and Objectives: Nursing management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is focused on global patient care. Starting from basic knowledge of diagnostic and therapeutic management, nurses can assess the impact of IBD on patients’ quality of life not only at the physical level, but also at the psychological, social, and emotional levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gastrointestinal symptoms on psychosocial changes in IBD patients in remission through nursing-led Patient-Reported Outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 109 IBD patients in clinical and endoscopic remission. Specialist nurses invited patients to complete questionnaires on gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life through the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Results: We found that the gastrointestinal symptoms that the patients reported had a significant impact on the analyzed aspects of health. More specifically, belly pain, diarrhea, and bloating were associated with depressive symptoms (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), fatigue (p < 0.001), and sleep disturbances (p < 0.001). Moreover, these symptoms also significantly affected patients’ social dimension in terms of satisfaction with participation in social roles (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.001 for belly pain, diarrhea, and bloating, respectively) and physical functions (p < 0.001). The results were virtually the same in a multivariable analysis adjusted by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and disease duration. Conclusions: Even during remission, gastrointestinal symptoms are the main factors that influence quality of life in IBD patients. This exploratory study highlights the need to adopt validated questionnaires in clinical practice, and demonstrates that PROMIS is a valid, objective, and standardized instrument that can help nursing staff to better define the consequences of the disease in a patient’s daily life.

Download Full-text

Assessing the Impact of Multi-Morbidity and Related Constructs on Patient Reported Safety in Primary Care: Generalized Structural Equation Modelling of Observational Data

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10081782 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (8) ◽

pp. 1782

Author(s):

Ignacio Ricci-Cabello ◽

Aina María Yañez-Juan ◽

Maria A. Fiol-deRoque ◽

Alfonso Leiva ◽

Joan Llobera Canaves ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Patient Safety ◽

Structural Equation ◽

Structural Equation Models ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Morbidity Burden ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Patient Complexity ◽

Complex Relationships ◽

The Impact

We aimed to examine the complex relationships between patient safety processes and outcomes and multimorbidity using a comprehensive set of constructs: multimorbidity, polypharmacy, discordant comorbidity (diseases not sharing either pathogenesis nor management), morbidity burden and patient complexity. We used cross-sectional data from 4782 patients in 69 primary care centres in Spain. We constructed generalized structural equation models to examine the associations between multimorbidity constructs and patient-reported patient safety (PREOS-PC questionnaire). These associations were modelled through direct and indirect (mediated by increased interactions with healthcare) pathways. For women, a consistent association between higher levels of the multimorbidity constructs and lower levels of patient safety was observed via either pathway. The findings for men replicated these observations for polypharmacy, morbidity burden and patient complexity via indirect pathways. However, direct pathways showed unexpected associations between higher levels of multimorbidity and better safety. The consistent association between multimorbidity constructs and worse patient safety among women makes it advisable to target this group for the development of interventions, with particular attention to the role of comorbidity discordance. Further research, particularly qualitative research, is needed for clarifying the complex associations among men.

Download Full-text

Full, partial and modified permutations of the Mayo Score: Characterizing clinical and patient-reported outcomes in ulcerative colitis patients

Crohn's & Colitis 360 ◽

10.1093/crocol/otab007 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

April N Naegeli ◽

Theresa Hunter ◽

Yan Dong ◽

Ben Hoskin ◽

Chloe Middleton-Dalby ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ulcerative Colitis ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Assessment Scores ◽

Mayo Score ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Practice Trials ◽

Highly Correlated

Abstract Background Understanding ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity assessed via the full, modified or partial Mayo Score may help clinicians apply results from clinical trials to practice and facilitate interpretation of recent and older studies. Methods Mayo Score variables were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 2608 UC patients. Results Permutations of Mayo Scores were highly correlated, and models predicting the omitted variable from each permutation demonstrated significant agreement between predicted and observed values. Conclusions Partial/modified Mayo Scores may be used to predict endoscopic and Physician's Global Assessment scores, and serve as proxies for the full Mayo Score in clinical practice/trials.

Download Full-text

The impact of patient-reported outcomes on loss to follow-up care after bariatric surgery

Surgical Endoscopy ◽

10.1007/s00464-021-08352-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Alexandra Jacobs ◽

Paige Martinez ◽

Ellen Morrow ◽

Anna Ibele

Keyword(s):

Bariatric Surgery ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Loss To Follow Up ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Follow Up Care ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

PROMIS Scales for Assessment of Persistent Post-COVID Symptoms: A Cross Sectional Study

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health ◽

10.1177/21501327211030413 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 215013272110304

Author(s):

Ravindra Ganesh ◽

Aditya K. Ghosh ◽

Mark A. Nyman ◽

Ivana T. Croghan ◽

Stephanie L. Grach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Status ◽

Social Roles ◽

Disease Process ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Large Sample Size ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Data Set ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

Objective Persistent post-COVID symptoms are estimated to occur in up to 10% of patients who have had COVID-19. These lingering symptoms may persist for weeks to months after resolution of the acute illness. This study aimed to add insight into our understanding of certain post-acute conditions and clinical findings. The primary purpose was to determine the persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics by collecting post COVID illness data utilizing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The resulting measures were used to assess surveyed patients physical, mental, and social health status. Methods A cross-sectional study and 6-months Mayo Clinic COVID recovered registry data were used to evaluate continuing symptoms severity among the 817 positive tested patients surveyed between March and September 2020. The resulting PROMIS® data set was used to analyze patients post 30 days health status. The e-mailed questionnaires focused on fatigue, sleep, ability to participate in social roles, physical function, and pain. Results The large sample size (n = 817) represented post hospitalized and other managed outpatients. Persistent post COVID impairments prevalence and characteristics were determined to be demographically young (44 years), white (87%), and female (61%). Dysfunction as measured by the PROMIS® scales in patients recovered from acute COVID-19 was reported as significant in the following domains: ability to participate in social roles (43.2%), pain (17.8%), and fatigue (16.2%). Conclusion Patient response on the PROMIS® scales was similar to that seen in multiple other studies which used patient reported symptoms. As a result of this experience, we recommend utilizing standardized scales such as the PROMIS® to obtain comparable data across the patients’ clinical course and define the disease trajectory. This would further allow for effective comparison of data across studies to better define the disease process, risk factors, and assess the impact of future treatments.

Download Full-text

Objective and Subjective Outcomes in Patients with Hearing Aids: A Cross-Sectional, Comparative, Associational Study

Audiology and Neurotology ◽

10.1159/000516623 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Xunyi Wang ◽

Yun Zheng ◽

Gang Li ◽

Jingzhe Lu ◽

Yan Yin

Keyword(s):

Hearing Aids ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Objective Tests ◽

The Difference ◽

Potential Factors ◽

Positive Correlations ◽

The Relationship ◽

Subjective Outcomes

Introduction: Outcome assessment for hearing aids (HAs) is an essential part of HA fitting and validation. There is no consensus about the best or standard approach for evaluating HA outcomes. And, the relationship between objective and subjective measures is ambiguous. This study aimed to determine the outcomes after HA fitting, explore correlations between subjective benefit and acoustic gain improvement as well as objective audiologic tests, and investigate several variables that may improve patients’ perceived benefits. Methods: Eighty adults with bilateral symmetrical hearing loss using HAs for at least 1 month were included in this study. All subjects completed the pure tone average (PTA) threshold and word recognition score (WRS) tests in unaided and aided conditions. We also administered the Chinese version of International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), to measure participants’ subjective benefits. Objective HA benefit (acoustic gain improvement) was defined as the difference in thresholds or scores between aided and unaided conditions indicated with ΔPTA and ΔWRS. Thus, patients’ baseline hearing levels were taken into account. Correlations were assessed among objective audiologic tests (PTA and WRS), acoustic gain improvement (ΔPTA and ΔWRS), multiple potential factors, and IOI-HA overall scores. Results: PTA decreased significantly, but WRS did not increase when aided listening was compared to unaided listening. Negative correlations between PTAs and IOI-HA scores were significant but weak (r = −0.370 and r = −0.393, all p < 0.05). Significant weak positive correlations were found between WRSs and IOI-HA (r = 0.386 and r = 0.309, all p < 0.05). However, there was no correlation among ΔPTA, ΔWRS, and IOI-HA (r = 0.056 and r = −0.086, all p > 0.05). Moreover, 2 nonaudiological factors (age and daily use time) were significantly correlated with IOI-HA (r = −0.269 and r = 0.242, all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Correlations among objective audiologic tests, acoustic gain, and subjective patient-reported outcomes were weak or absent. Subjective questionnaires and objective tests do not reflect the same hearing capability. Therefore, it is advisable to evaluate both objective and subjective outcomes when analyzing HA benefits on a regular basis and pay equal attention to nonaudiological and audiological factors.

Download Full-text

Clinical evaluation of pulmonary hypertension using patient-reported outcomes: a cross-sectional study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12890-021-01416-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Miguel Ángel Amor-García ◽

Sara Ibáñez-García ◽

Xandra García-González ◽

Teresa Mombiela ◽

Cristina Villanueva-Bueno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Clinical Evaluation ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Specific Treatment ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Functional Class ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) have progressive and disabling symptoms, as well as a burden of treatments and a difficult clinical evaluation that make health-related quality of life a particularly relevant endpoint in this disease. The objective of the study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of patients receiving specific treatment for PH in a tertiary hospital using a specific questionnaire (Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review-CAMPHOR) in the pharmacy consultation. Methods A cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study was conducted. It included all patients receiving specific treatment for PH in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. The inclusion period comprised between August to December 2019. CAMPHOR questionnaires containing three domains: symptoms, activities and quality of life were completed by the patients at the pharmacy consultation. Demographic and clinical variables, including WHO Functional Class (WHO FC), PH-specific tests and hemodynamic parameters, were recorded. Non-parametric analyses to assess relations between variables and CAMPHOR domains were performed. Results Thirty-six patients consented to participate in the study and completed the questionnaire. Median scores for symptoms, activities, and quality of life domains were 5.5 (2.5–10), 8.0 (4.5–10.5) and 3.5 (1–7.5), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in the three domains when comparing by WHO FC, in the activities domain for 6-m walking test and in the quality of life domain for patients who had emergency visits or hospitalizations in the last year. Conclusions The CAMPHOR questionnaire could be useful as a complementary test to achieve an integrated evaluation of PH patients, who could complete it easily during their routine pharmacy visits.

Download Full-text

Overview of the Patient Perspective at OMERACT 10 — Conceptualizing Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes

The Journal of Rheumatology ◽

10.3899/jrheum.110388 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 38 (8) ◽

pp. 1699-1701 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

JOHN R. KIRWAN ◽

PETER S. TUGWELL

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Experimental Work ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Patient Perspective ◽

Methodological Issues ◽

Instrument Selection ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact ◽

Choice Of Instruments ◽

The Way

This overview draws out the main conclusions from the 4 workshops focused on incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment at the 10th Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT 10) conference. They raised methodological issues about the choice of outcome domains to include in clinical trials, the development or choice of instruments to measure these domains, and the way these instruments might capture the impact of a disease and its treatment. The need to develop a more rigorous conceptual model of quantifying the way conditions affect health, and the need to ensure patients are directly involved in the decisions about domains and instruments, emerged clearly. The OMERACT participants voted to develop guidelines for domain and instrument selection, and conceptual and experimental work will be brought forward to revise and upgrade the OMERACT Filter.

Download Full-text