Deep body and surface temperature responses to hot and cold environments in the zebra finch

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 102776
Author(s):  
Paulina Anna Szafrańska ◽  
Fredrik Andreasson ◽  
Andreas Nord ◽  
Jan-Åke Nilsson
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Zebra Finch ◽  
Cold Environments ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Deep Body

scholarly journals Modeling the Temperature Field in the Ground with an Installed Slinky-Coil Heat Exchanger

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
pp. 4010
Author(s):  
Monika Gwadera ◽  
Krzysztof Kupiec
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Field ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Heat Sources ◽  
Ground Surface Temperature ◽  
Coil Heat Exchanger ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Coil Heat

In order to find the temperature field in the ground with a heat exchanger, it is necessary to determine temperature responses of the ground caused by heat sources and the influence of the environment. To determine the latter, a new model of heat transfer in the ground under natural conditions was developed. The heat flux of the evaporation of moisture from the ground was described by the relationship taking into account the annual amount of rainfall. The analytical solution for the equations of this model is presented. Under the conditions for which the calculations were performed, the following data were obtained: the average ground surface temperature Tsm = 10.67 °C, the ground surface temperature amplitude As = 13.88 K, and the phase angle Ps = 0.202 rad. This method makes it possible to easily determine the undisturbed ground temperature at any depth and at any time. This solution was used to find the temperature field in the ground with an installed slinky-coil heat exchanger that consisted of 63 coils. The results of calculations according to the presented model were compared with the results of measurements from the literature. The 3D model for the ground with an installed heat exchanger enables the analysis of the influence of miscellaneous parameters of the process of extracting or supplying heat from/to the ground on its temperature field.

scholarly journals How Asian aerosols impact regional surface temperatures across the globe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonas Merikanto ◽  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Petri Räisänen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Declan O'Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Effects ◽  
Energy Transport ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Atmospheric Energy ◽  
Atmospheric Energy Transport ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Global Surface

Abstract. South and East Asian anthropogenic aerosols mostly reside in an air mass extending from the Indian Ocean to the North Pacific. Yet the surface temperature effects of Asian aerosols spread across the whole globe. Here, we remove Asian anthropogenic aerosols from two independent climate models (ECHAM6.1 and NorESM1) using the same representation of aerosols via MACv2-SP (a simple plume implementation of the 2nd version of the Max Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology). We then robustly decompose the global distribution of surface temperature responses into contributions from atmospheric energy flux changes. We find that the horizontal atmospheric energy transport strongly moderates the surface temperature response over the regions where Asian aerosols reside. Atmospheric energy transport and changes in clear-sky longwave radiation redistribute the temperature effects efficiently across the Northern hemisphere, and to a lesser extent also over the Southern hemisphere. The model-mean global surface temperature response to Asian anthropogenic aerosol removal is 0.26 ± 0.04 °C (0.22 ± 0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.30 ± 0.03 °C for NorESM1) of warming. Model-to-model differences in global surface temperature response mainly arise from differences in longwave cloud (0.01 ± 0.01 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.05 ± 0.01 °C for NorESM1) and shortwave cloud (0.03 ± 0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.07 ± 0.02 °C for NorESM1) responses. The differences in cloud responses between the models also dominate the differences in regional temperature responses. In both models, the Northern hemispheric surface warming amplifies towards the Arctic, where the total temperature response is highly seasonal and weakest during the Arctic summer. We estimate that under a strong Asian aerosol mitigation policy tied with strong climate mitigation (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 1-1.9) the Asian aerosol reductions can add around 8 years' worth of current day global warming during the next few decades.

scholarly journals Assessment of body surface temperature in cetaceans: an iterative approach

2004 ◽  
Vol 64 (3b) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Silva
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Body Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Marine Mammals ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Iterative Approach ◽  
Ambient Water ◽  
Deep Body Temperature ◽  
Body Surface Temperature ◽  
Deep Body

Heat transfer from skin surface to ambient water is probably the most important aspect of thermal balance in marine mammals, but the respective calculations depend on knowing the surface temperature (T S), the direct measurement of which in free animals is very difficult. An indirect iterative method is proposed for T S prediction in free cetaceans from deep body temperature, swimming speed, and temperature and thermodynamic properties of the water.

Decomposing local and remote surface temperature impacts of Asian aerosols

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonas Merikanto ◽  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Petri Räisänen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Declan O'Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Energy Transport ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosol ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Temperature Responses

<p>We investigate how a regionally confined radiative forcing of South and East Asian aerosols translate into local and remote surface temperature responses across the globe. To do so, we carry out equilibrium climate simulations with and without modern day South and East Asian anthropogenic aerosols in two climate models with independent development histories (ECHAM6.1 and NorESM1).  We run the models with the same anthropogenic aerosol representations via MACv2-SP (a simple plume implementation of the 2<sup>nd</sup> version of the Max Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology). This leads to a near identical change in instantaneous direct and indirect aerosol forcing due to removal of Asian aerosols in the two models. We then robustly decompose and compare the energetic pathways that give rise to the global and regional surface temperature effects in the models by a novel temperature response decomposition method, which translated the changes in atmospheric and surface energy fluxes into surface temperature responses by using a concept of planetary emissivity.  </p><p>We find that the removal of South and East Asian anthropogenic aerosols leads to strong local warming  response from increased clear-sky shortwave radiation over the region, combined with opposing warming and cooling responses due to changes in cloud longwave and shortwave radiation. However, the local warming response is strongly modulated by the changes in horizontal atmospheric energy transport. Atmospheric energy transport and changes in clear-sky longwave radiation redistribute the surface temperature responses efficiently across the Northern hemisphere, and to a lesser extent also over the Southern hemisphere. The model-mean global surface temperature response to Asian anthropogenic aerosol removal is 0.26±0.04 °C (0.22±0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.30±0.03 °C for NorESM1) of warming. Model-to-model differences in global surface temperature response mainly arise from differences in longwave cloud (0.01±0.01 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.05±0.01 °C for NorESM1) and shortwave cloud (0.03±0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.07±0.02 °C for NorESM1) responses. The differences in cloud responses between the models also dominate the differences in regional temperature responses. In both models, the Northern hemispheric surface warming amplifies towards the Arctic, where the total temperature response is highly seasonal and modulated by seasonal changes in oceanic heat exchange and clear-sky longwave radiation.</p><p>We estimate that under a strong Asian aerosol mitigation policy tied with strong greenhouse gas mitigation (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 1-1.9) the Asian aerosol reductions can add around 8 years’ worth of current day global warming during the next few decades.</p>

scholarly journals Monitoring Deep Body Temperature Responses of Broilers Using Biotelemetry

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt Lacey ◽  
Takoi K. Hamrita ◽  
Michael P. Lacy ◽  
Garrett V. Van Wicklen ◽  
Mike Czarick
Keyword(s):  
Body Temperature ◽  
Deep Body Temperature ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Deep Body

scholarly journals Distinct roles of land cover in regulating spatial variabilities of temperature responses to radiative effects of aerosols and clouds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linyi Wei ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Shu Liu ◽  
Guang J. Zhang ◽  
Bin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surface Energy Budget ◽  
Radiative Effects ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosol ◽  
Temperature Responses

Abstract Surface temperature responses to aerosol and cloud radiative perturbations are complicated by the underlying land surface processes. To disentangle this complexity, this study investigates the role of land surfaces in the radiative effects of aerosols and clouds on surface temperature from a terrestrial surface energy budget perspective using the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model version 1.2.1 (CESM1.2.1). It is found that land cover enhances the spatial variation of the temperature response to aerosol direct radiative effects (DRE) and cloud radiative effects (CRE) during daytime and nighttime respectively while it reduces that of the temperature response to CRE during the daytime by collocation of local surface climate sensitivity and aerosol DRE and CRE. With identical anthropogenic aerosol emissions over eight major emission regions in the past, present and future projections including Brazil, China, East Africa, India, Indonesia, South Africa, the United States and Western Europe, local temperature responses to aerosol DRE (CRE) are more strongly regulated by land cover in the daytime (nighttime).

scholarly journals How Asian aerosols impact regional surface temperatures across the globe

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 5865-5881
Author(s):  
Joonas Merikanto ◽  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Petri Räisänen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Declan O'Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Temperature Effects ◽  
Energy Transport ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Atmospheric Energy ◽  
Atmospheric Energy Transport ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Global Surface

Abstract. South and East Asian anthropogenic aerosols mostly reside in an air mass extending from the Indian Ocean to the North Pacific. Yet the surface temperature effects of Asian aerosols spread across the whole globe. Here, we remove Asian anthropogenic aerosols from two independent climate models (ECHAM6.1 and NorESM1) using the same representation of aerosols via MACv2-SP (a simple plume implementation of the second version of the Max Planck Institute Aerosol Climatology). We then robustly decompose the global distribution of surface temperature responses into contributions from atmospheric energy flux changes. We find that the horizontal atmospheric energy transport strongly moderates the surface temperature response over the regions where Asian aerosols reside. Atmospheric energy transport and changes in clear-sky longwave radiation redistribute the temperature effects efficiently across the Northern Hemisphere and to a lesser extent also over the Southern Hemisphere. The model-mean global surface temperature response to Asian anthropogenic aerosol removal is 0.26±0.04 ∘C (0.22±0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.30±0.03 ∘C for NorESM1) of warming. Model-to-model differences in global surface temperature response mainly arise from differences in longwave cloud (0.01±0.01 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.05±0.01 ∘C for NorESM1) and shortwave cloud (0.03±0.03 for ECHAM6.1 and 0.07±0.02 ∘C for NorESM1) responses. The differences in cloud responses between the models also dominate the differences in regional temperature responses. In both models, the northern-hemispheric surface warming amplifies towards the Arctic, where the total temperature response is highly seasonal and weakest during the Arctic summer. We estimate that under a strong Asian aerosol mitigation policy tied with strong climate mitigation (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 1-1.9) the Asian aerosol reductions can add around 8 years' worth of current-day global warming during the next few decades.

scholarly journals Understanding the surface temperature response and its uncertainty to CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, black carbon, and sulfate

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 14941-14958
Author(s):  
Kalle Nordling ◽  
Hannele Korhonen ◽  
Jouni Räisänen ◽  
Antti-Ilari Partanen ◽  
Bjørn H. Samset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Black Carbon ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Regional Model ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Temperature Responses ◽  
Global Surface

Abstract. Understanding the regional surface temperature responses to different anthropogenic climate forcing agents, such as greenhouse gases and aerosols, is crucial for understanding past and future regional climate changes. In modern climate models, the regional temperature responses vary greatly for all major forcing agents, but the causes of this variability are poorly understood. Here, we analyze how changes in atmospheric and oceanic energy fluxes due to perturbations in different anthropogenic climate forcing agents lead to changes in global and regional surface temperatures. We use climate model data on idealized perturbations in four major anthropogenic climate forcing agents (CO2, CH4, sulfate, and black carbon aerosols) from Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP) climate experiments for six climate models (CanESM2, HadGEM2-ES, NCAR-CESM1-CAM4, NorESM1, MIROC-SPRINTARS, GISS-E2). Particularly, we decompose the regional energy budget contributions to the surface temperature responses due to changes in longwave and shortwave fluxes under clear-sky and cloudy conditions, surface albedo changes, and oceanic and atmospheric energy transport. We also analyze the regional model-to-model temperature response spread due to each of these components. The global surface temperature response stems from changes in longwave emissivity for greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) and mainly from changes in shortwave clear-sky fluxes for aerosols (sulfate and black carbon). The global surface temperature response normalized by effective radiative forcing is nearly the same for all forcing agents (0.63, 0.54, 0.57, 0.61 K W−1 m2). While the main physical processes driving global temperature responses vary between forcing agents, for all forcing agents the model-to-model spread in temperature responses is dominated by differences in modeled changes in longwave clear-sky emissivity. Furthermore, in polar regions for all forcing agents the differences in surface albedo change is a key contributor to temperature responses and its spread. For black carbon, the modeled differences in temperature response due to shortwave clear-sky radiation are also important in the Arctic. Regional model-to-model differences due to changes in shortwave and longwave cloud radiative effect strongly modulate each other. For aerosols, clouds play a major role in the model spread of regional surface temperature responses. In regions with strong aerosol forcing, the model-to-model differences arise from shortwave clear-sky responses and are strongly modulated by combined temperature responses to oceanic and atmospheric heat transport in the models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document