scholarly journals Evaluation of Initial Outcomes of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Nonprofit Hospital in Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s228-s229
Author(s):  
Adelino Freire Junior ◽  
Fernando Fagundes ◽  
Mozar Castro Neto ◽  
Carine Barbosa ◽  
Thais Alves
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
World Health ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Microbial Resistance ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: One of the main global public health challenges is the fight against microbial resistance, according to the World Health Organization. Inadequate use of antimicrobials is considered one of the main factors related to the phenomenon and is quite common in the hospital environment. Managing the use of antimicrobials in hospitals has become a necessity and has shown positive results in many ways, such as maximizing the effects of pharmacotherapy, preventing the emergence of resistant microorganisms, and reducing healthcare costs. Methods: The prescriptions for patients admitted to a 380-bed nonprofit private hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil were monitored from January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019, with a monthly average of 251 patients followed by the antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team (1 infectious diseases doctor and 2 clinical pharmacists). Patients selected for follow-up and intervention were those submitted to intravenous, intramuscular, and/or oral antibiotic therapy with the following antimicrobial agents: piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenem, polymyxin B, tigecycline, vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, quinolone, and aminoglycosides. Patients on prophylactic or antimicrobial treatment not mentioned above were excluded from surveillance. Interventions were dose adjustments, drug adjustment by culture results, intravenous to oral treatment switch, and discontinuation of therapy. Results: There were 318 interventions, and 64.82% of the interventions performed by the AMS team were accepted by prescribers. The interventions provided a total savings of BR$ 119,706 (~US$30,000) in direct antimicrobial spending. Correlating the interventions with the defined daily dose (DDD) measurement and comparing data from the same period in 2018, we detected a reductions in the consumption of several antimicrobials: ceftriaxone (25.6%), ciprofloxacin (45.7%), meropenem (34%), piperacillin/tazobactam (12.7%), teicoplanin (18.8%), vancomycin (20.6%), cefepime (23.9%) and polymyxin B (26%). We also detected reductions in days of therapy (DOT) for most of these drugs, such as polymyxin B, with an average reduction of 2 DOT. Conclusions: Reducing antimicrobial use is one of the key strategies for avoiding unnecessary exposure and selective pressure leading to the emergence of resistant microorganisms. The measured data point to a favorable trend in the rational use of antimicrobials in our institution with simple interventions. The results presented were used to reaffirm the importance of the AMS team in our institution. More data on length of stay, indirect costs, reduction of side effects, mortality, and occurrence of microbial resistance should be made.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Impact of a pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship program in a private hospital in Costa Rica

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
José Pablo Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Eugenia Cordero-García ◽  
José Miguel Chaverri-Fernández ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Josué Murillo-Cubero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To measure the impact generated by the implementation of the pharmacy-driven antimicrobial stewardship program of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study that evaluates the consumption of antibiotics for the periods before and during implementation of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program, calculated by means of defined daily dose per 1 000 patient-days and days of therapy per 1 000 patient-days. In addition, bacterial resistance patterns for the periods 2014–2015 and 2016–2017 were compared. Results. Consumption of most-used antibiotics was calculated, looking for trends that might be associated with the activities implemented by the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program. Comparing some of the antibiotics with the highest consumption in periods I and II, use of levofloxacin and ceftriaxone showed a decrease of 54.0% (p < 0.001) and 14.6% (p = 0.003), respectively, whereas there was an increase in the use of cefazolin of 4 539.3% (p < 0.001). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, in most bacterial isolates no statistically significant changes were observed between the two periods. Conclusions. A reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics has been achieved over time, most likely attributable to the antimicrobial stewardship program. However, this trend was not observed for all the antibiotics studied. The pattern of resistance among the commonly isolated microorganisms did not vary greatly between the periods studied, which suggests that either the antimicrobial stewardship program may have prevented an increase in bacterial resistance since its implementation, or that it is too soon to see impact on bacterial resistance.

scholarly journals Profile of Antimicrobial Use in the Pediatric Population of a University Hospital Centre, 2015/16 to 2018/19

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia R Rahem ◽  
Bénédicte Franck ◽  
Hélène Roy ◽  
Denis Lebel ◽  
Philippe Ovetchkine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Centre Hospitalier ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is a standard practice in health facilities to reduce both the misuse of antimicrobials and the risk of resistance. Objective: To determine the profile of antimicrobial use in the pediatric population of a university hospital centre from 2015/16 to 2018/19. Methods: In this retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study, the pharmacy information system was used to determine the number of days of therapy (DOTs) and the defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 patient-days (PDs) for each antimicrobial and for specified care units in each year of the study period. For each measure, the ratio of 2018/19 to 2015/16 values was also calculated (and expressed as a proportion); where the value of this proportion was ≤ 0.8 or ≥ 1.2 (indicating a substantial change over the study period), an explanatory rating was assigned by consensus. Results: Over the study period, 94 antimicrobial agents were available at the study hospital: 70 antibiotics (including antiparasitics and antituberculosis drugs), 14 antivirals, and 10 antifungals. The total number of DOTs per 1000 PDs declined from 904 in 2015/16 to 867 in 2018/19. The 5 most commonly used antimicrobials over the years, expressed as minimum/maximum DOTs per 1000 PDs, were piperacillin-tazobactam (78/105), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74/84), ampicillin (51/69), vancomycin (53/68), and cefotaxime (55/58). In the same period, the care units with the most antimicrobial use (expressed as minimum/ maximum DOTs per 1000 PDs) were hematology-oncology (2529/2723), pediatrics (1006/1408), and pediatric intensive care (1328/1717). Conclusions: This study showed generally stable consumption of antimicrobials from 2015/16 to 2018/19 in a Canadian mother-and-child university hospital centre. Although consumption was also stable within drug groups (antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals), there were important changes over time for some individual drugs. Several factors may explain these variations, including disruptions in supply, changes in practice, and changes in the prevalence of infections. Surveillance of antimicrobial use is an essential component of an antimicrobial stewardship program. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : La gestion des antimicrobiens est une pratique courante dans les centres hospitaliers afin de réduire l’utilisation inappropriée des antimicrobiens et le risque de résistance. Objectif : Décrire l’évolution de l’utilisation des antimicrobiens dans un centre hospitalier universitaire de 2015-16 à 2018-19. Méthodes : Dans cette étude rétrospective, descriptive et transversale, les dossiers pharmacologiques ont servi à déterminer le nombre de jours de traitement (NJT) et la dose définie journalière (DDD) par 1000 jours-présence (JP) pour chaque antimicrobien et pour chaque unité de soins par année de l’étude. Pour chaque mesure, on a également comparé le ratio de 2018-19 à celui de 2015-16, qui est exprimé en proportion; lorsque la valeur de cette proportion était ≤ 0,8 ou ≥ 1,2, ce qui indiquait un changement important durant la période de l’étude, une note explicative a été attribuée par consensus. Résultats : Durant la période à l’étude, 94 antimicrobiens ont été disponibles dans notre centre : 70 antibiotiques (dont les antiparasitaires et les antituberculeux), 14 antiviraux et 10 antifongiques. Le nombre total de NJT par 1000 JP a diminué de 904 en 2015-16 à 867 en 2018-19. Les cinq antimicrobiens utilisés le plus fréquemment et présentés en minimum / maximum de NJT par 1000 JP étaient les suivants : piperacilline-tazobactam (78/105), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74/84), ampicilline (51/69), vancomycine (53/68) et cefotaxime (55/58). Pendant la même période, les unités de soins qui faisaient la plus grande utilisation d’antimirobiens (exprimée en minimum / maximum de NJT par 1000 JP) étaient hématologie-oncologie (2529/2723), pédiatrie (1006/1408) et soins intensifs pédiatriques (1328/1717). Conclusions : Cette étude démontre une consommation stable d’antimicrobiens entre 2015-16 et 2018-19 dans un centre hospitalier universitaire mère-enfant canadien. Malgré le fait que la consommation entre les groupes d’antimicrobiens (antibiotiques, antiviraux, antifongiques) était stable, on a constaté d’importantes variations concernant certains médicaments individuels. Plusieurs facteurs peuvent expliquer cette variation, notamment des ruptures d’approvisionnement, des changements de pratique et des changements dans la prévalence d’infections. La surveillance de la consommation des antimicrobiens est une partie essentielle de tout programme d’antibiogouvernance.

scholarly journals 187. Significant Decline in Carbapenem Use with Multifaceted Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Interventions

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
Ashlesha Kaushik ◽  
Sandeep Gupta ◽  
Erin Lettow ◽  
Jenna Lundsgaard ◽  
Corey Thieman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Significant Decline ◽  
World Health ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Per World Health Organization, carbapenems should be key targets for antibiotic stewardship programs. Methods A multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) was implemented in January 2018 at a 160-bed tertiary care center serving the tristate area of Iowa, South Dakota and Nebraska. Carbapenem use during pre ASP intervention period (P1: 07/01/2016-12/31/2017) was compared with ASP intervention period (P2: 01/01/2018-06/30/2019). ASP interventions included: providing educational pearls in monthly physician newsletter; educational posters in high-traffic provider areas; suppression of carbapenem results on microbiology susceptibility reports; distributing monthly carbapenem use data to providers; provider counseling for appropriate ordering; creating carbapenem alternative alert in order-entry software; generating pharmacy decision-support software algorithms to aid in identifying intervention opportunities; removing carbapenems from order-sets where appropriate. Additional ASP pharmacist interventions: limiting double antibiotic coverage for pseudomonas/anaerobes; de-escalation recommendations. Results Carbapenem use declined significantly from a mean of 64.81 days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days during P1 to 8.91 DOT per 1000 patient days in P2 (p&lt; 0.001). All hospital units showed a significant decrease in carbapenem use, with intensive care step-down unit noting 85.7% reduction (p &lt; 0.00001); floors (medicine, pediatric, surgery) with 61.6% reduction (p&lt; 0.00001); and intensive care units with 52% reduction (p&lt; 0.00001) during P2 compared to P1. Defined daily doses per 1000 patient days decreased from 314.9 in P1 to 93.4 in P2 (p&lt; 0.00001). During P2, 58.3% (132/228) of carbapenem orders were found to be appropriate compared to 37.5% (190/506) in P1 (p&lt; 0.00001). Sensitivity profile for Pseudomonas aeruginosa improved from 86% carbapenem sensitivity during P1 to 89% in P2. No Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates were identified. Cost savings of $643 per 1000 patient days were recognized in P2 as a result of reduced carbapenem use. Conclusion There was a significant decline in total carbapenem utilization, an increase in proportion of appropriate use and considerable cost savings as a result of ASP interventions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D Robinson ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Lindsay E Donohue ◽  
Megan D Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. Results Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P &lt; .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P &lt; .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P &lt; .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Conclusions While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals Effects of a Paediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antimicrobial Use and Quality of Prescriptions in Patients with Appendix-Related Intraabdominal Infections

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Sílvia Simó ◽  
Eneritz Velasco-Arnaiz ◽  
María Ríos-Barnés ◽  
María Goretti López-Ramos ◽  
Manuel Monsonís ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Length Of Therapy ◽  
Intraabdominal Infections

The effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in reducing antimicrobial use (AU) in children has been proved. Many interventions have been described suitable for different institution sizes, priorities, and patients, with surgical wards being one of the areas that may benefit the most. We aimed to describe the results on AU and length of stay (LOS) in a pre-post study during the three years before (2014–2016) and the three years after (2017–2019) implementation of an ASP based on postprescription review with feedback in children and adolescents admitted for appendix-related intraabdominal infections (AR-IAI) in a European Referral Paediatric University Hospital. In the postintervention period, the quality of prescriptions (QP) was also evaluated. Overall, 2021 AR-IAIs admissions were included. Global AU, measured both as days of therapy/100 patient days (DOT/100PD) and length of therapy (LOT), and global LOS remained unchanged in the postintervention period. Phlegmonous appendicitis LOS (p = 0.003) and LOT (p < 0.001) significantly decreased, but not those of other AR-IAI diagnoses. The use of piperacillin–tazobactam decreased by 96% (p = 0.044), with no rebound in the use of other Gram-negative broad-spectrum antimicrobials. A quasisignificant (p = 0.052) increase in QP was observed upon ASP implementation. Readmission and case fatality rates remained stable. ASP interventions were safe, and they reduced LOS and LOT of phlegmonous appendicitis and the use of selected broad-spectrum antimicrobials, while increasing QP in children with AR-IAI.

scholarly journals 2044. An Assessment and Feedback Model Bringing Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Expertise to Long-Term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S687-S687
Author(s):  
Philip Chung ◽  
Kate Tyner ◽  
Scott Bergman ◽  
Teresa Micheels ◽  
Mark E Rupp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Background Long-term care facilities (LTCF) often struggle with implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) that meet all CDC core elements (CE). The CDC recommends partnership with infectious diseases (ID)/ASP experts to guide ASP implementation. The Nebraska Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment and Promotion Program (ASAP) is an initiative funded by NE DHHS via a CDC grant to assist healthcare facilities with ASP implementation. Methods ASAP performed on-site baseline evaluation of ASP in 5 LTCF (42–293 beds) in the spring of 2017 using a 64-item questionnaire based on CDC CE. After interviewing ASP members, ASAP provided prioritized facility-specific recommendations for ASP implementation. LTCF were periodically contacted in the next 12 months to provide implementation support and evaluate progress. The number of CE met, recommendations implemented, antibiotic starts (AS) and days of therapy (DOT)/1000 resident-days (RD), and incidence of facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infections (FO-CDI) were compared 6 to 12 months before and after on-site visits. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analyses. Results Multidisciplinary ASP existed in all 5 facilities at baseline with medical directors (n = 2) or directors of nursing (n = 3) designated as team leads. Median CE implemented increased from 3 at baseline to 6 at the end of follow-up (P = 0.06). No LTCF had all 7 CE at baseline. By the end of one year, 2 facilities implemented all 7 CE with the remaining implementing 6 CE. LTCF not meeting all CE were only deficient in reporting ASP metrics to providers and staff. Among the 38 recommendations provided by ASAP, 82% were partially or fully implemented. Mean AS/1000 RD reduced by 19% from 10.1 at baseline to 8.2 post-intervention (P = 0.37) and DOT/1000 RD decreased by 21% from 91.7 to 72.5 (P = 0.20). The average incidence of FO-CDI decreased by 75% from 0.53 to 0.13 cases/10,000 RD (P = 0.25). Conclusion Assessment of LTCF ASP along with feedback for improvement by ID/ASP experts resulted in more programs meeting all 7 CE. Favorable reductions in antimicrobial use and CDI rates were also observed. Moving forward, the availability of these services should be expanded to all LTCFs struggling with ASP implementation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Effects of a Remote Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antimicrobial Use in a Regional Hospital System

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Knight ◽  
Jessica Michal ◽  
Stephanie Milliken ◽  
Jenna Swindler
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Physician Review ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Implementation Time ◽  
Acceptance Rates

While antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are well established at most large medical centers, small or rural facilities often do not have the same resources; therefore, different methods must be developed to start or expand ASPs for these hospitals. The purpose of this quality improvement study was to describe the implementation of a pharmacist-led remote ASP and assess the effect on antimicrobial use. Antimicrobial use in days of therapy per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000 PD) was compared between the six months before and after remote ASP implementation. Changes in system-wide, facility-specific, and target antimicrobial use were evaluated. Pharmacist interventions, acceptance rates, and number of times infectious disease (ID) physician assistance was sought were also tracked. System-wide antimicrobial use was 4.6% less in the post-implementation time period than in the pre-implementation time period, with vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and fluoroquinolones having the greatest reductions in use. Ninety-one percent of interventions made during the post-implementation period were accepted. ID physician review was requested 38 times, and direct ID physician intervention was required six times. Remote ASPs delivered from a central facility to serve a larger system may reduce antimicrobial use, especially against targeted agents, with minimal increase in ID physician workload.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN PNEUMONIA PATIENTS AT TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SURAKARTA INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
HIDAYAH KARUNIAWATI ◽  
TRI YULIANTI ◽  
DEWI KUROTA AINI ◽  
FINISHIA ISNA NURWIENDA
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Method Show

Objective: Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem worldwide. One cause of antibacterial resistance is the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Thestudy of antibiotic use in hospitals found that 30–80% were not based on indications. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) was developed tocontrol antimicrobial resistance. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP in pneumonia patients qualitatively and quantitatively pre-post ASPapplied.Methods: This research is a non-experimental study. Data were taken from the medical records of pneumonia patients and analyzed qualitativelyusing the Gyssens method and quantitatively using the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) method. Sampling was conducted through purposive sampling andresults were described descriptively.Results: During the study period, 96 samples were obtained with 48 data pre-ASP and 48 data post-ASP. The results of the qualitative analysis usingthe Gyssens method show an increase in the prudent use of antibiotics from 31.25% to 62.5% pre-post ASP, respectively. Quantitative evaluationshows a decrease of antibiotic use pre-post ASP from 90.84 DDD/100 patients-days to 61.42 DDD/100 patients-days.Conclusion: The ASP can improve the quality of antibiotic use in pneumonia patients quantitatively and qualitatively.

scholarly journals Views of Community Pharmacists on Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Jordan: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doaa Saleh ◽  
Rana Abu Farha ◽  
Tareq Mukattash ◽  
Muna Barakat ◽  
Eman Alefishat
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
World Health ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Stewardship Program

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization issued a practical approach and Global Action Plan to control the threatening emerging antibacterial resistance. One of the main basis of this plan is the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASPs). This study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists&rsquo; awareness and perception towards antimicrobial resistance and ASPs in Jordan. Thus, a qualitative study was conducted through in-depth interviews with twenty community pharmacists. Convienience sampling was used in the study. Qualitative analysis of the data yielded four themes and eleven sub-themes. All the respondents showed good understanding about the causes of antimicrobial resistance. The most important causes reported by them was the non-restricted prescription of antimicrobials. Most of the pharmacists believed that they are competent to provide ASPs, however, they believed that there are several barriers against the implementation of ASPs in community pharmacies in Jordan. Barriers demonstrated by the pharmacists, including organizational obstacles, resources obstacles, and personal obstacles. As a conclusion, this study revealed several barriers against the implementation of ASPs in community pharmacies in Jordan. Incorporating ASPs in the community pharmacy settings requires proper pharmacist training, several academic disciplines team efforts, and good pharmacy practice of antimicrobial guidelines.

scholarly journals 101. Impact of an Integrated Tele-Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Rural Community Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S164-S165
Author(s):  
Sui Kwong Li ◽  
Erin K McCreary ◽  
Erin K McCreary ◽  
Tina Khadem ◽  
Nancy Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Material Support ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Small hospitals in the US may lack access to infectious diseases (ID) expertise despite similar rates of antimicrobial use and drug-resistant bacteria as larger hospitals. A tele-antimicrobial stewardship program (TASP) is a force multiplier, expanding access to specialty care, training, and guidance on appropriate resource utilization. Data on the impact of TASPs in community or rural inpatient settings is limited. Methods We established a TASP at a 160-bed hospital in Armstrong County, PA (population &lt; 5000) in September 2020. Tele-ID consult services were already being used (Figure 1). A non-local ID pharmacist or ID physician performed prospective audits and provided feedback with 1 local pharmacist on a 30-minute video conference call daily. At TASP implementation, all patients receiving intravenous (IV) fluoroquinolones, metronidazole, and azithromycin were reviewed. Figure 1 shows the additional support following TASP implementation, including addition of ceftriaxone, carbapenems, IV vancomycin, and tocilizumab to daily reviews. A patient monitoring form was developed to track interventions and the local pharmacists were trained in documentation. Table 1 lists other TASP features implemented. Figure 1. TASP Timeline Table 1. TASP Accomplishments Results From 09/01/2020 to 04/30/2021, 304 stewardship opportunities were identified and 77% of interventions were accepted. Recommending a duration of therapy was accepted most frequently (93.5%) and de-escalation of therapy least frequently (69.6%) (Table 2). Recommending an ID consultation or diagnostic testing was always accepted but only comprised 6.2% of all interventions. Daily calls involved an average of 5 patient reviews. Monthly antimicrobial use declined on average from 673 DOT (days of therapy)/1000 PD (patient days) to 638 DOT/1000 PD (Figure 2). Daily calls were cancelled on 31/166 weekdays (18.7%) due to staffing shortages. Table 2. TASP Interventions (9/2020 - 4/2021) Figure 2. Monthly Antimicrobial Use in Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1000 Patient Days (4/2019 - 5/2021) Conclusion Implementation of TASP in a community hospital resulted in a high percentage of accepted stewardship interventions and lower antimicrobial usage. Success is dependent on robust educational efforts, establishing strong relationships with local providers, and involvement of key stakeholders. Lack of dedicated stewardship time for local pharmacists is a very significant barrier. Disclosures Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)Entasis (Consultant)Ferring (Consultant)Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Other Financial or Material Support, Director of Stewardship Innovation)Merck (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Summit (Consultant) Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Cidara (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Ferring (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Director of Stewardship Innovation, Other Financial or Material Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Summit (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Tina Khadem, PharmD, Infectious Disease Connect, Inc. (Employee) Nancy Zimmerman, RN, BSN, I’d connect (Employee) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio, Inc. (Shareholder)Accelevir (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharma, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Infectious DIseases Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Employee, Director of Clinical Operations) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Chief Medical Officer, Other Financial or Material Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Shareholder J Ryan. Bariola, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, salary support)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document