Recent advances in the understanding of membrane protein assembly and structure

1999 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar von Heijne

1. Introduction 2862. Membrane protein assembly inE. coli2862.1. Role of the SRP 2872.2. YidC – a translocon component devoted to membrane proteins? 2872.3. The TAT pathway 2882.4. ‘Spontaneous’ membrane protein insertion 2883. Membrane protein assembly in the ER 2893.1. How TM segments exit the translocon 2893.2. Proteins with multiple topologies 2903.3. Stop-transfer effector sequences 2913.4. Non-hydrophobic TM segments? 2913.5. ‘Frustrated’ topologies 2913.6. N-tail translocation across the ER 2924. Membrane protein assembly in mitochondria 2924.1. The Oxa1p pathway 2924.2. The TIM22/54 pathway 2935. Evolution of membrane protein topology 2935.1. RnfA/RnfE – two homologous proteins with opposite topologies 2935.2. YrbG – duplicating an odd number of TMs 2946. Genome-wide analysis of membrane proteins 2956.1. Prediction methods 2956.2. How many membrane proteins are there? 2956.3. The positive-inside rule 2966.4. Dominant classes of membrane proteins 2967. The structure of transmembrane α-helices 2967.1. What TM helices look like 2977.2. The ‘helical hairpin’ 2977.3. Prolines in TM helices 2977.4. Charged residues in TM helices: the ‘snorkel’ effect 2987.5. The ‘aromatic belt’ 2988. Helix–helix packing in a membrane environment 2988.1. Lessons learnt from glycophorin A 2988.2. Genetic screens for helix–helix interactions 2998.3. Statistical studies 2998.4. Membrane protein folding 2999. Recent 3D structures 3009.1. KcsA – the first ion channel 3009.2. MscL – sensing lateral pressure changes 3009.3. The cytochrome bc 1 complex 3009.4. Fumarate reductase 3019.5. Bacteriorhodopsin – watching a membrane protein at work 30110. Concluding remarks 30111. Acknowledgements 30212. References 302For a variety of reasons – not the least biomedical importance – integral membrane proteins are now very much in focus in many areas of molecular biology, biochemistry, biophysics, and cell biology. Our understanding of the basic processes of membrane protein assembly, folding, and structure has grown significantly in recent times, both as a result of new methodological developments, more high-resolution structure data, and the possibility to analyze membrane proteins on a genome-wide scale.So what is new in the membrane protein field? Various aspects of membrane protein assembly and structure have been reviewed over the past few years (Cowan & Rosenbusch, 1994; Hegde & Lingappa, 1997; Lanyi, 1997; von Heijne, 1997; Bernstein, 1998); here, I will try to bring together a number of exciting recent developments. Particularly noteworthy are the discoveries related to the mechanisms of membrane protein assembly into the inner membrane of E. coli, the inner membrane of mitochondria, and the way transmembrane segments are handled by the ER translocon.Other advances include detailed studies of the interaction between transmembrane helices and the lipid bilayer, and of helix–helix packing interactions in the membrane environment. The availability of full genomic sequences have made it possible to study membrane proteins on a genome-wide scale. Finally, a handful of new high-resolution 3D structures have appeared.This review will deal only with helix bundle proteins, i.e. integral membrane proteins where the transmembrane segments form α-helices. For reviews on the other major class of integral membrane proteins – the β-barrel proteins – see Schirmer (1998) and Buchanan (1999). For readers who prefer a more ‘literary’ introduction to the membrane protein field, may I suggest von Heijne (1999).

Author(s):  
Kang Mo Lee ◽  
Seung-Hak Cho ◽  
Cheorl-Ho Kim ◽  
Jong Hyun Kim ◽  
Sung Soon Kim

Objectives: Lectin-like adhesins of enteric bacterial pathogens such as Escherichia coli are an attractive target for vaccine or drug development. Here, we have developed e-Membranome as a database of genome-wide putative adhesins in Escherichia coli (E. coli). Methods: The outer membrane adhesins were predicted from the annotated genes of Escherichia coli strains using the PSORTb program. Further analysis was performed using Interproscan and the String database. The candidate proteins can be investigated for homology modeling of the three-dimensional (3D) structure (I-TASSER version 5.1), epitope region (ABCpred), and the glycan array. Results: e-Membranome is implemented using the Django (version 2.2.5) framework. The Web Application Server Apache Tomcat 6.0 is integrated in the platform on Ubuntu Linux (version 16.04). MySQL database (version 5.7) is used as a database engine. The information of homology model of the 3D structure, epitope region, and affinity information from the glycan array will be stored in the e-Membranome database. As a case study, we performed a genome-wide screening of outer membrane-embedded proteins from the annotated genes of E. coli using the e-Membranome pipeline. Conclusion: This platform is expected to be a valuable resource for advancing research of outer membrane proteins for the construction of lectin-glycan interaction network of E. coli. In addition, the e-Membranome pipeline can be extended to other similar biological systems that need to address host-pathogen interactions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 395 (12) ◽  
pp. 1417-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Whitley ◽  
Ismael Mingarro

Abstract Most integral membrane proteins located within the endomembrane system of eukaryotic cells are first assembled co-translationally into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) before being sorted and trafficked to other organelles. The assembly of membrane proteins is mediated by the ER translocon, which allows passage of lumenal domains through and lateral integration of transmembrane (TM) domains into the ER membrane. It may be convenient to imagine multi-TM domain containing membrane proteins being assembled by inserting their first TM domain in the correct orientation, with subsequent TM domains inserting with alternating orientations. However a simple threading model of assembly, with sequential insertion of one TM domain into the membrane after another, does not universally stand up to scrutiny. In this article we review some of the literature illustrating the complexities of membrane protein assembly. We also present our own thoughts on aspects that we feel are poorly understood. In short we hope to convince the readers that threading of membrane proteins into membranes is ‘not sew simple’ and a topic that requires further investigation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar von Heijne

Membrane proteins currently receive a lot of attention, in large part thanks to a steady stream of high-resolution X-ray structures. Although the first few structures showed proteins composed of tightly packed bundles of very hydrophobic more or less straight transmembrane α-helices, we now know that helix-bundle membrane proteins can be both highly flexible and contain transmembrane segments that are neither very hydrophobic nor necessarily helical throughout their lengths. This raises questions regarding how membrane proteins are inserted into the membrane and fold in vivo, and also complicates life for bioinformaticians trying to predict membrane protein topology and structure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kingshuk Mukherjee ◽  
Massimiliano Rossi ◽  
Leena Salmela ◽  
Christina Boucher

AbstractGenome wide optical maps are high resolution restriction maps that give a unique numeric representation to a genome. They are produced by assembling hundreds of thousands of single molecule optical maps, which are called Rmaps. Unfortunately, there are very few choices for assembling Rmap data. There exists only one publicly-available non-proprietary method for assembly and one proprietary software that is available via an executable. Furthermore, the publicly-available method, by Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006), follows the overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) paradigm, and therefore, is unable to scale for relatively large genomes. The algorithm behind the proprietary method, Bionano Genomics’ Solve, is largely unknown. In this paper, we extend the definition of bi-labels in the paired de Bruijn graph to the context of optical mapping data, and present the first de Bruijn graph based method for Rmap assembly. We implement our approach, which we refer to as rmapper, and compare its performance against the assembler of Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006) and Solve by Bionano Genomics on data from three genomes: E. coli, human, and climbing perch fish (Anabas Testudineus). Our method was able to successfully run on all three genomes. The method of Valouev et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15770–15775, 2006) only successfully ran on E. coli. Moreover, on the human genome rmapper was at least 130 times faster than Bionano Solve, used five times less memory and produced the highest genome fraction with zero mis-assemblies. Our software, rmapper is written in C++ and is publicly available under GNU General Public License at https://github.com/kingufl/Rmapper.


Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1154
Author(s):  
Min Jeong Hong ◽  
Jin-Baek Kim ◽  
Yong Weon Seo ◽  
Dae Yeon Kim

Genes of the F-box family play specific roles in protein degradation by post-translational modification in several biological processes, including flowering, the regulation of circadian rhythms, photomorphogenesis, seed development, leaf senescence, and hormone signaling. F-box genes have not been previously investigated on a genome-wide scale; however, the establishment of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) reference genome sequence enabled a genome-based examination of the F-box genes to be conducted in the present study. In total, 1796 F-box genes were detected in the wheat genome and classified into various subgroups based on their functional C-terminal domain. The F-box genes were distributed among 21 chromosomes and most showed high sequence homology with F-box genes located on the homoeologous chromosomes because of allohexaploidy in the wheat genome. Additionally, a synteny analysis of wheat F-box genes was conducted in rice and Brachypodium distachyon. Transcriptome analysis during various wheat developmental stages and expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR revealed that some F-box genes were specifically expressed in the vegetative and/or seed developmental stages. A genome-based examination and classification of F-box genes provide an opportunity to elucidate the biological functions of F-box genes in wheat.


1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 429-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Kühlbrandt

As recently as 10 years ago, the prospect of solving the structure of any membrane protein by X-ray crystallography seemed remote. Since then, the threedimensional (3-D) structures of two membrane protein complexes, the bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres of Rhodopseudomonas viridis (Deisenhofer et al. 1984, 1985) and of Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Allen et al. 1986, 1987 a, 6; Chang et al. 1986) have been determined at high resolution. This astonishing progress would not have been possible without the pioneering work of Michel and Garavito who first succeeded in growing 3-D crystals of the membrane proteins bacteriorhodopsin (Michel & Oesterhelt, 1980) and matrix porin (Garavito & Rosenbusch, 1980). X-ray crystallography is still the only routine method for determining the 3-D structures of biological macromolecules at high resolution and well-ordered 3-D crystals of sufficient size are the essential prerequisite.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1419-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Ching Lin ◽  
Jen-Kou Lin ◽  
Chien-Hsing Lin ◽  
Hung-Hsin Lin ◽  
Shung-Haur Yang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 9838-9853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Kaboli ◽  
Takuya Yamakawa ◽  
Keisuke Sunada ◽  
Tao Takagaki ◽  
Yu Sasano ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite systematic approaches to mapping networks of genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, exploration of genetic interactions on a genome-wide scale has been limited. The S. cerevisiae haploid genome has 110 regions that are longer than 10 kb but harbor only non-essential genes. Here, we attempted to delete these regions by PCR-mediated chromosomal deletion technology (PCD), which enables chromosomal segments to be deleted by a one-step transformation. Thirty-three of the 110 regions could be deleted, but the remaining 77 regions could not. To determine whether the 77 undeletable regions are essential, we successfully converted 67 of them to mini-chromosomes marked with URA3 using PCR-mediated chromosome splitting technology and conducted a mitotic loss assay of the mini-chromosomes. Fifty-six of the 67 regions were found to be essential for cell growth, and 49 of these carried co-lethal gene pair(s) that were not previously been detected by synthetic genetic array analysis. This result implies that regions harboring only non-essential genes contain unidentified synthetic lethal combinations at an unexpectedly high frequency, revealing a novel landscape of genetic interactions in the S. cerevisiae genome. Furthermore, this study indicates that segmental deletion might be exploited for not only revealing genome function but also breeding stress-tolerant strains.


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas R. Sandoval ◽  
Tirzah Y. Mills ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Ryan T. Gill
Keyword(s):  
E Coli ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document