Response of Four Rice (Oryza sativa) Cultivars to Triclopyr

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Jordan ◽  
Dearl E. Sanders ◽  
Steven D. Linscombe ◽  
Bill J. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Rice Grain ◽  
Visible Injury ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Stages Of Growth ◽  
Standard Rate ◽  
Made In

Experiments were conducted from 1994 through 1996 to determine the response of the rice cultivars ‘Bengal,’ ‘Cypress,’ ‘Jodon,’ and ‘Kaybonnet’ to triclopyr at 0.42 (standard rate) and 0.84 kg ai/ha applied postemergence at the four-leaf and panicle initiation stages of growth. Applications at the four-leaf stage were made in close association with fertilization and flood establishment, which often increases the potential for triclopyr to injure rice. Visible injury from triclopyr was slightly higher for the cultivar Jodon than for the cultivars Bengal, Cypress, or Kaybonnet. Injury was 3% or less when triclopyr at 0.42 kg/ha was applied at panicle initiation regardless of the cultivar. Triclopyr at 0.42 and 0.84 kg/ha applied at the four-leaf growth stage injured rice 7% and 22%, respectively. Triclopyr at 0.84 kg/ha applied at the four-leaf stage of growth delayed days from seedling emergence to seed head emergence and rice grain yield, irrespective of cultivar.

scholarly journals Sensitivity and Recovery of Grain Sorghum to Simulated Drift Rates of Glyphosate, Glufosinate, and Paraquat

Agriculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Hale ◽  
Taghi Bararpour ◽  
Gurpreet Kaur ◽  
John Seale ◽  
Bhupinder Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Flag Leaf ◽  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Significant Yield ◽  
Glyphosate Drift ◽  
Herbicide Drift

A field experiment was conducted in 2017 and 2018 to evaluate the sensitivity and recovery of grain sorghum to the simulated drift of glufosinate, glyphosate, and paraquat at two application timings (V6 and flag leaf growth stage). Paraquat drift caused maximum injury to sorghum plants in both years, whereas the lowest injury was caused by glyphosate in 2017. Averaged over all herbicide treatments, injury to grain sorghum from the simulated herbicide drift was 5% greater when herbicides were applied at flag leaf stage, as compared to herbicide applications at the six-leaf stage in 2017. In 2018, injury from glyphosate drift was higher when applied at the six-leaf stage than at the flag leaf stage. Paraquat and glufosinate drift caused more injury when applied at flag leaf stage than at six-leaf stage at 14 days after application in 2018. About 21% to 29% of injury from the simulated drift of paraquat led to a 31% reduction in grain sorghum yield, as compared to a nontreated check in 2017. The simulated drift of glyphosate and glufosinate did not result in any significant yield reduction compared to the nontreated check in 2017, possibly due to the recovery of sorghum plants after herbicides’ drift application.

Common Waterplantain,Alisma plantago-aquatica, Control in Wild Rice,Zizania palustris, with MCPA and 2,4-D

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel K. Ransom ◽  
Ervin A. Oelke
Keyword(s):  
Wild Rice ◽  
Growth Stage ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Rice Yield ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Application Time ◽  
Flowering Stage ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Late Season ◽  
Treatment Stage

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of application time on common waterplantain control in wild rice with MCPA and 2,4-D. Common waterplantain control was greatest when MCPA or 2,4-D were applied at 1.1 or 1.7 kg ai/ha at the two-aerial leaf stage. The best late-season control was MCPA applied at the scape elongation growth stage. Common waterplantain was controlled adequately when 0.6 to 0.8 kg/ha of MCPA were applied at the scape elongation or early flowering stage. However, because of common water plantain interference and sensitivity of wild rice to late herbicide applications, the best treatment stage for wild rice yield was when MCPA was applied at 0.6 kg/ha to common waterplantain at the two-aerial leaf stage. Wild rice at this time is at the more tolerant one-aerial leaf growth stage.

scholarly journals 452 Stand Reduction and Foliage Damage Reduce Yield of Onion for Dehydration

HortScience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 471E-472
Author(s):  
George H. Clough
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Plant Growth Stages ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Stage Yield ◽  
Different Growth Stages ◽  
Production Characteristics

Field trials were conducted at Hermiston, Ore., from 1995 through 1998 to determine the impact of stand loss and plant damage at different growth stages on yield of onions grown for dehydration. The experiment was a complete factorial with four replications. Stand reduction (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%) and foliage damage (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%) treatments were applied at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-leaf onion growth stages. All average onion production characteristics decreased linearly as stand reduction increased (plant population decreased) at all plant growth stages except average bulb weight which increased as stand was reduced. Bulb weight was not changed by up to 100% foliage removal at the three-leaf stage of growth. At the 6- and 12-leaf stages, bulb weight was reduced when >50% of the foliage was removed. The most severe response occurred at the nine-leaf stage when bulb weights were reduced the most. At the three-leaf stage, yield was not affected by foliage damage. At the six-leaf growth stage, yield was reduced by 75% or more foliage loss, but at the 9- and 12-leaf stages, >50% foliage removal reduced expected yields. As with bulb weight, the impact of foliage removal on yield was most severe at the nine-leaf growth stage.

EFFECTS OF GROWTH STAGE ON TRANSLOCATION OF GLYPHOSATE IN QUACK GRASS

1974 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. RIOUX ◽  
J. D. BANDEEN ◽  
G. W. ANDERSON
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Toxic Metabolite ◽  
Main Shoot ◽  
Leaf Production ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Visual Symptoms ◽  
Glycine Transport ◽  
Agropyron Repens

Visual symptoms of toxicity (inhibition of leaf growth and bud germination) were used to study the influence of growth stage of quack grass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.) on glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl glycine) transport and efficiency. Glyphosate (or a toxic metabolite) moved in sufficient quantity from the point of application on the leaf within 1 day to significantly affect the regrowth and within 2 days to affect the regenerative potential of rhizomes. As quack grass plants developed to the four-leaf stage the effect of glyphosate treatment increased. When only one shoot was sprayed on a rhizome supporting two shoots at the same leaf stage, glyphosate inhibited leaf growth on the untreated shoot at the two-leaf stage but not at the four-leaf stage. Similarly, glyphosate inhibited leaf growth on tillers when only the main shoot was sprayed. However, when only the tiller was sprayed, leaf production was not affected on the main shoot suggesting that glyphosate is phloem mobile.

Protox-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) response to herbicides applied at different growth stages

Weed Science ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne S. Falk ◽  
Douglas E. Shoup ◽  
Kassim Al-Khatib ◽  
Dallas E. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase ◽  
Common Waterhemp ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Amaranthus Rudis ◽  
Dose Response Study ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted with a population of common waterhemp resistant to POST protoporphyrinogen oxidase (protox)-inhibiting herbicides to compare its response to PRE and POST applications of selected herbicides. In the greenhouse, a dose–response study of PRE applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen was conducted on protox-susceptible and -resistant common waterhemp. The protox-resistant biotype was approximately 6.3, 2.5, and 2.6 times more resistant than the susceptible biotype to acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen, respectively. In a separate study under field conditions, protox-resistant common waterhemp were treated with PRE and POST applications of acifluorfen, azafenidin, flumioxazin, fomesafen, lactofen, oxyfluorfen, or sulfentrazone. At 14 and 28 d after POST treatment (DAPT) in 2002 and 2004, all PRE applications of herbicides gave greater control than did POST applications. At 14 DAPT, oxyfluorfen had the greatest difference in PRE and POST control, with 85 and 10% control in 2002, respectively. An additional field study was conducted to determine the stage of growth at which resistance to protox-inhibiting herbicides becomes most prevalent. Protox-resistant common waterhemp were treated with herbicides at the 2-leaf, 4- to 6-leaf, and 8- to 10-leaf growth stage. Acifluorfen and fomesafen at 420 g ha−1gave greater than 90% control at the 2-leaf stage and 4- to 6-leaf stage, except in 2003 when control was 85% with acifluorfen. In 2003 and 2004, common waterhemp control at the 8- to 10-leaf stage ranged between 54 and 75% with acifluorfen or fomesafen. Results indicate that common waterhemp resistance to customary rates of POST protox-inhibiting herbicides becomes prevalent after the 4- to 6-leaf growth stage.

Physiological basis for cotton tolerance to flumioxazin applied postemergence directed

Weed Science ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Price ◽  
Wendy A. Pline ◽  
John W. Wilcut ◽  
John R. Cranmer ◽  
David Danehower
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Visible Injury ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Cotton Plants ◽  
Treated Leaf ◽  
Bright Field Microscopy ◽  
Rain Splash ◽  
Microscopy Techniques

Previous research has shown that flumioxazin, a herbicide being developed as a postemergence-directed spray (PDS) in cotton, has the potential to injure cotton less than 30 cm tall if the herbicide contacts green stem tissue by rain splash or misapplication. In response to this concern, five-leaf cotton plants with chlorophyllous stems and older cotton, 16-leaf cotton plants, with bark on the lower stem were treated with a PDS containing flumioxazin plus crop oil concentrate (COC) or nonionic surfactant (NIS). Stems of treated plants and untreated plants at the respective growth stage were cross-sectioned and then magnified and photographed using bright-field microscopy techniques. More visible injury consisting of necrosis and desiccation was evident in younger cotton. Also, there was a decrease in treated-stem diameter and an increase in visible injury with COC compared with NIS in younger cotton. The effects of plant growth stage and harvest time on absorption, translocation, and metabolism of14C-flumioxazin in cotton were also investigated. Total14C absorbed at 72 h after treatment (HAT) was 77, 76, and 94% of applied at 4-, 8-, and 12-leaf growth stages, respectively. Cotton at the 12-leaf stage absorbed more14C within 48 HAT than was absorbed by four- or eight-leaf cotton by 72 HAT. A majority (31 to 57%) of applied14C remained in the treated stem for all growth stages and harvest times. Treated cotton stems at all growth stages and harvest times contained higher concentrations (Bq g−1) of14C than any other tissues. Flumioxazin metabolites made up less than 5% of the radioactivity found in the treated stem. Because of the undetectable levels of metabolites in other tissues when flumioxazin was applied PDS, flumioxazin was foliar applied to determine whether flumioxazin transported to the leaves may have been metabolized. In foliar-treated cotton, flumioxazin metabolites in the treated leaf of four-leaf cotton totaled 4% of the recovered14C 72 HAT. Flumioxazin metabolites in the treated leaf of 12-leaf cotton totaled 35% of the recovered14C 48 HAT. These data suggest that differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism at various growth stages, as well as the development of a bark layer, are the bases for differential tolerances of cotton to flumioxazin applied PDS.

Sweet Corn (Zea mays) Cultivar Tolerance to Application Timing of Nicosulfuron

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 840-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren K. Robinson ◽  
David W. Monks ◽  
Jonathan R. Schultheis ◽  
A. Douglas Worsham
Keyword(s):  
Zea Mays ◽  
Plant Height ◽  
Sweet Corn ◽  
Yield Losses ◽  
Visible Injury ◽  
Application Timing ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Stages Of Growth ◽  
Stage Yield

'Silver Xtra Sweet’, ‘How Sweet It Is', ‘Zenith’ and 'Sweetie 76’ were evaluated for response to 0, 35, and 70 g/ha nicosulfuron applied POST at the 5- to 6- or 7- to 8-leaf stages of growth. Nicosulfuron (35 g/ha) caused 60 to 80% visible injury to Silver Xtra Sweet. How Sweet It Is and Zenith were moderately tolerant (< 20% visible injury) and Sweetie 76 was the most tolerant (10% visible injury). All cultivars were less tolerant when nicosulfuron was applied at the 7- to 8-leaf than the 5- to 6-leaf stage. Plant height of Silver Xtra Sweet was reduced 51% by 35 g/ha nicosulfuron applied at the 5- to 6-leaf stage and injury increased when nicosulfuron was applied at the 7- to 8-leaf stage. Yield losses of Silver Xtra Sweet occurred as a result of the nicosulfuron treatments.

scholarly journals Stand Reduction and Foliage Damage Reduce Yield of Dehydrating Onion

HortScience ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1005-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
George H. Clough
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Leaf Stage ◽  
Plant Growth Stages ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Stage Yield ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Field trials were conducted at Hermiston, Ore., from 1995 through 1998, to determine impact of stand loss and plant damage at different growth stages on yield of onions (Allium cepa) grown for dehydration. Stand reduction (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%) and foliage damage (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) treatments were applied at three-, six-, nine-, and twelve-leaf onion growth stages. Although average bulb weight increased as stand was reduced, marketable, cull, and total yields decreased as stand reduction increased (plant population decreased) at all plant growth stages. Bulb weight was not changed by up to 100% foliage removal at the three-leaf stage. At the six- and twelve-leaf stages, weight was reduced when ≥50% of the foliage was removed. The most severe response occurred at the nine-leaf stage. At the three-leaf stage, yield was not affected by foliage damage. At the six-leaf growth stage, yield was reduced by 75% or more foliage loss, but at the nine- and twelve-leaf stages, ≥50% foliage removal reduced expected yields. As with bulb weight, the impact of foliage removal on yield was most severe at the nine-leaf growth stage.

The case of motivprints: balancing entrepreneurial instinct with managerial approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Kedar Bhatt ◽  
Abhinava S. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
New Ventures ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Master's Level ◽  
Executive Development ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Academic Level ◽  
Permanent Staff ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activities ◽  
Made In

Learning outcomes After studying this case, the students/participants would be able to: discuss important personality traits of an entrepreneur; understand specific challenges faced by a venture as it moves toward higher growth stage; discuss the importance of strategic planning and managerial style as the ventures move from establishment stage to growth stage. Case overview/synopsis The case is about MotivPrints, a two years old venture, offering custom designing and commercial printing to businesses in Gujarat, India. MotivPrints was established by Himanshu Dhadnekar in 2016 and had 85 SME clients and 35 vendors by 2019. Himanshu, a young entrepreneur had been involved in entrepreneurial activities since his school days and was also involved in a couple of business ventures during his MBA. However, he had been flip-flopping as an employee and entrepreneur, as then. At MotivPrints, he handled key responsibilities of developing client networks, generating business, marketing and managing relationship with vendors. With limited support of a team of freelancer associates, no permanent staff for assistance and lack of funds made it imperative for Himanshu to plan for scaling up his venture for survival and growth. Could he envision MotivPrints as a larger entity? If yes, what changes, mandated by growth, were needed to be made in both – the entrepreneur and the organization? Complexity academic level The case can be discussed in the class of entrepreneurship at the master’s level. It can also be used in the entrepreneurship specialization course in the second year of post-graduation. The case can be also be used for young entrepreneurs in an executive development program focusing on new ventures. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS: 3 Entrepreneurship.

scholarly journals ANNUAL GRASSES CONTROL WITH TOPRAMEZONE IN MIXTURE WITH ALS-INHIBITING HERBICIDES

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. DAMALAS ◽  
T. K. GITSOPOULOS ◽  
S.D. KOUTROUBAS ◽  
I. GEORGOULAS
Keyword(s):  
Growth Stage ◽  
Leaf Growth ◽  
Foxtail Millet ◽  
Panicum Miliaceum ◽  
Species Sensitivity ◽  
Fresh Weight ◽  
Pot Trials ◽  
Annual Grasses ◽  
Potential Interactions ◽  
Selection Of

ABSTRACTPanicoid grasses are major weeds of maize and sugarcane as well as of several other important grains, including sorghum, pearl millet, and foxtail millet. Pot trials were conducted to study the activity and potential interactions of topramezone in mixture with recommended rates of rimsulfuron or nicosulfuron on three annual panicoid grasses (i.e. Echinochloa oryzoides,E.phyllopogon, and Panicum miliaceum). Target weeds were treated at the four- to five-leaf growth stage. On the basis of fresh weight reduction, topramezone alone provided 78% control of E.oryzoides, 68% control of E.phyllopogon, and 99% control of P.miliaceum. Topramezone plus rimsulfuron or nicosulfuron provided decreased control of both Echinochloa spp. compared with topramezone alone. The decreased control of E.oryzoidesand E.phyllopogon was more pronounced with rimsulfuron as a companion herbicide in the mixtures. Slightly decreased control of P.milaceum was observed with topramezone plus rimsulfuron compared with topramezone alone, but this was not the case for topramezone plus nicosulfuron. Increased topramezone rates mixed with rimsulfuron or nicosulfuron did not improve control of E.oryzoides and E.phyllopogon compared with the lowest topramezone rate. Also, increased topramezone rates mixed with rimsulfuron or nicosulfuron showed decreased control of both Echinochloa spp. when compared with either rimsulfuron or nicosulfuron alone, suggesting a two-way interaction between topramezone and the ALS-inhibiting herbicides. The above-mentioned interaction was not observed in P.miliaceum, probably related with species sensitivity to the herbicides tested. Newly introduced or naturalized panicoid grasses in maize fields may complicate selection of companion herbicides and rates for effective weed control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document