A Comparison of Preterm Birth Rate and Growth from Birth to 18 Years Old between in Vitro Fertilization and Spontaneous Conception of Twins

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-233
Author(s):  
Yali Zhang ◽  
Xuanming Hong ◽  
Wenjing Gao ◽  
Jun Lv ◽  
Canqing Yu ◽  
...  

AbstractThe aim of the present study was to compare the rate of preterm birth (PTB) and growth from birth to 18 years between twins conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and twins conceived by spontaneous conception (SC) in mainland China. The retrospective cohort study included 1164 twins resulting from IVF and 25,654 twins conceived spontaneously, of which 494 from IVF and 6338 from SC were opposite-sex twins. PTB and low birth weight (LBW), and growth, including length/height and weight, were compared between the two groups at five stages: infancy (0 year), toddler period (1–2 years), preschool (3–5 years), primary or elementary school (6–11 years), and adolescence (10–18 years). Few statistically significant differences were found for LBW and growth between the two groups after adjusting for PTB and other confounders. Twins born by IVF faced an increased risk of PTB compared with those born by SC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] [3.19, 21.13], p < .001 in all twins and aOR 10.12, 95% CI [2.32, 44.04], p = .002 in opposite-sex twins). Twins born by IVF experienced a similar growth at five stages (0–18 years old) when compared with those born by SC. PTB risk, however, is significantly higher for twins conceived by IVF than those conceived by SC.

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-415
Author(s):  
Jelena Ivandić ◽  
Isaac Blickstein ◽  
Ana-Maria Šopić Rahelić ◽  
Eduard Eškinja ◽  
Tea Štimac

AbstractObjectiveLittle information exists related to the contribution of assisted reproductive technology (ART) twins to the preterm and very preterm birth rate. We sought to examine this contribution over a period of more than two decades in a tertiary perinatal center.MethodsWe identified all preterm births from 1993 to 2017, born at <37 or <32 weeks’ gestation, by mode of conception [in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. non-IVF pregnancies]. We generated trend lines of the annual change of the dependent variable (% preterm birth).ResultsWe evaluated 74,299 births, including 3934 (5.3%) preterm births at <37 and 826 (1.1%) at <32 weeks’ gestation. In this period, 1019 (1.4%) twin pairs were born including 475 (46.6%) and 80 (7.8%) at <37 and <32 weeks, respectively. There were 213 (5.4%) IVF pregnancies among the preterm births at <37 weeks, including 88 (41.3%) twins. Fifteen (1.8%) births of all IVF gestations were at <32 weeks, and all were twins. Whereas the annual rate of spontaneous twins did not change, a significant increase over time exists for IVF twins (P < 0.05, R2 = 0.6). We demonstrated an increase in IVF twin births at <37 weeks but not for spontaneously conceived twins. Whereas the twin birth rate at <32 weeks did not change over time, all preterm births at <32 weeks following IVF were twins.ConclusionThe risk of twins after ART increasingly contributes to preterm births at <37 weeks and ART twins are at significant risk for preterm births at <32 weeks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Monfort ◽  
Carmen Orellana ◽  
Silvestre Oltra ◽  
Mónica Rosello ◽  
Alfonso Caro-Llopis ◽  
...  

AbstractDevelopment of assisted reproductive technologies to address infertility has favored the birth of many children in the last years. The majority of children born with these treatments are healthy, but some concerns remain on the safety of these medical procedures. We have retrospectively analyzed both the fertilization method and the microarray results in all those children born between 2010 and 2019 with multiple congenital anomalies, developmental delay and/or autistic spectrum disorder (n = 486) referred for array study in our center. This analysis showed a significant excess of pathogenic copy number variants among those patients conceived after in vitro fertilization with donor oocyte with respect to those patients conceived by natural fertilization (p = 0.0001). On the other hand, no significant excess of pathogenic copy number variants was observed among patients born by autologous oocyte in vitro fertilization. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results and in order to identify the factors that may contribute to an increased risk of genomic rearrangements, as well as consider the screening for genomic alterations after oocyte donation in prenatal diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica N Sanders ◽  
Sara E Simonsen ◽  
Christina A Porucznik ◽  
Ahmad O Hammoud ◽  
Ken Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In vitro fertilization (IVF) births contribute to a considerable proportion of preterm birth (PTB) each year. However, there is no formal surveillance of adverse perinatal outcomes for less invasive fertility treatments. The study objective was to determine the effect of fertility treatment (in vitro fertilization, intrauterine insemination, usually with ovulation drugs (IUI), or ovulation drugs alone) on preterm birth, compared to no treatment in subfertile women.Methods: The Fertility Experiences Study (FES) is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the University of Utah between April 2010 and September 2012. Women with a history of primary subfertility self-reported treatment data via survey and interviews. Participant data were linked to birth certificates and fetal death records to asses for perinatal outcomes, particularly preterm birth.Results: A total 487 birth certificates and 3 fetal death records were linked as first births for study participants who completed questionnaires. Among linked births, 19% had a PTB. After adjustment for maternal age, paternal age, maternal education, annual income, religious affiliation, female or male fertility diagnosis, and duration of subfertility, the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for PTB were 2.17 (CI: 0.99, 4.75) for births conceived using ovulation drugs, 3.17 (CI: 1.4, 7.19) for neonates conceived using IUI and 4.24 (CI: 2.05, 8.77) for neonates conceived by IVF, compared to women with subfertility who used no treatment during the month of conception. A reported diagnosis of female factor infertility increased the adjusted odds of having a PTB 2.99 (CI: 1.5, 5.97). Duration of pregnancy attempt was not independently associated with PTB. In restricting analyses to singleton gestation, odds ratios remained elevated but were not significant for any type of treatment.Conclusion: IVF, IUI, and ovulation drugs were all associated with a higher incidence of preterm birth and low birth weight, predominantly related to multiple gestation births.


Author(s):  
Allakhyarov D.Z. ◽  
Petrov Yu.A. ◽  
Palieva N.V.

This article presents reviews of literature sources on the issue of assessing the risk of developing gynecological cancer in women after an in vitro fertilization program. Infertility and infertile marriages have now become quite a big problem of modern medicine. Against the background of the unfavorable demographic situation in the Russian Federation, this problem is becoming quite urgent. The main way to solve this situation is assisted reproductive technologies, among which the most common is in vitro fertilization. The in vitro fertilization program is accompanied by a hormonal ovulation stimulation procedure to obtain a female germ cell capable of fertilization. Against the background of the active use of the in vitro fertilization procedure, many patients had concerns related to the risk of developing gynecological cancer after the IVF procedure, which is due to the use of hormonal drugs to stimulate the ovaries. Also of concern is the fact that certain types of cancer, including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer and breast cancer, are hormone-dependent. In this regard, multiple large-scale studies were conducted, which showed that the risk of developing gynecological cancer is really increased in patients after the in vitro fertilization program. In particular, breast cancer in women after the in vitro fertilization program is more common by 10%, and in women without a history of pregnancy and over the age of 40, it is more common by 31%. The increased risk may be due to age-related vulnerability to the effects of hormones or higher doses of hormones during the IVF procedure. Ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer are also more common in patients after IVF. According to the research results, it is suggested that it is not the IVF procedure itself that causes the development of cancer, but excessive hormonal load of the body, which leads to the launch of carcinogenesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sermondade ◽  
C Sonigo ◽  
M Pasquier ◽  
N Yata-Ahdad ◽  
E Fraison ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question To investigate the relationship between the number of oocytes and both the live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer and the cumulative live birth rate. Summary answer Above a 15-oocyte threshold, live birth rate (LBR) following fresh transfer plateaus, whereas a continuous increase in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) is observed. What is known already Several lines of evidence indicate that number of oocytes represents a key point for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. However, consensus is lacking regarding the optimal number of oocytes for expecting a live birth. This is a key question because it might impact the way practitioners initiate and adjust COS regimens. Study design, size, duration A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 01, 2004, and August 31, 2019 using the search terms: “(intracytoplasmic sperm injection or icsi or ivf or in vitro fertilization or fertility preservation)” and “(oocyte and number)” and “(live birth)”. Participants/materials, setting, methods Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, quality assessment using the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales, bias assessment using ROBIN-1 tools, and data extraction according to Cochrane methods. Independent analyses were performed according to the outcome (LBR and CLBR). The mean-weighted threshold of optimal oocyte number was estimated from documented thresholds, followed by a one-stage meta-analysis on articles with documented or estimable relative risks. Main results and the role of chance After reviewing 843 records, 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 36 studies were available for quantitative syntheses. Twenty-one and 18 studies were included in the meta-analyses evaluating the relationship between the number of retrieved oocytes and LBR or CLBR, respectively. Given the limited number of investigations considering mature oocytes, association between the number of metaphase II oocytes and IVF outcomes could not be investigated. Concerning LBR, 7 (35.0%) studies reported a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 14.4 oocytes. The pooled dose-response association between the number of oocytes and LBR showed a non-linear relationship, with a plateau beyond 15 oocytes. For CLBR, 4 (19.0%) studies showed a plateau effect, corresponding to a weighted mean of 19.3 oocytes. The meta-analysis of the relationship between the number of oocytes and CLBR found a non-linear relationship, with a continuous increase in CLBR, including for high oocyte yields. Limitations, reasons for caution Statistical models show a high degree of deviance, especially for high numbers of oocytes. Further investigations are needed to assess the generalization of those results to frozen mature oocytes, especially in a fertility preservation context, and to evaluate the impact of female age. Wider implications of the findings Above a 15-oocyte threshold, LBR following fresh transfer plateaus, suggesting that the freeze-all strategy should probably be performed. In contrast, the continuous increase in CLBR suggests that high numbers of oocytes could be offered to improve the chances of cumulative live births, after evaluating the benefit–risk balance. Trial registration number Not applicable


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document