scholarly journals Comparative Genomic Integration Profiling of Sleeping Beauty Transposons Mobilized With High Efficacy From Integrase-defective Lentiviral Vectors in Primary Human Cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1499-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Moldt ◽  
Csaba Miskey ◽  
Nicklas Heine Staunstrup ◽  
Andreas Gogol-Döring ◽  
Rasmus O Bak ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Holst Wolff ◽  
Jakob Haldrup ◽  
Emil Aagaard Thomsen ◽  
Sofie Andersen ◽  
Jacob Giehm Mikkelsen

Prime editing is a novel genome editing technology that allows a wide range of tailored genomic alterations. Prime editing does not involve homologous recombination, but suffers from low efficacy. Here, we demonstrate piggyPrime, a transfected single-vector system based on piggyBac DNA transposition for genomic integration of all prime editing components in human cells allowing easy and effective transgenesis with prime editing efficacies up to 100% in cell lines.


2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 2249-2261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan K. Drexler ◽  
Philip Kong ◽  
Julia Inglis ◽  
Richard O. Williams ◽  
Cecilia Garlanda ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Shen ◽  
Songlei Xue ◽  
Shuheng Chan ◽  
Yatong Sang ◽  
Saisai Wang ◽  
...  

Although transposon-mediated enhancer trapping (ET) is successfully applied in diverse models, the efficiency of various transposon systems varies significantly, and little information is available regarding efficiency of enhancer trapping by various transposons in zebrafish. Most potential enhancers (Ens) still lack evidence of actual En activity. Here, we compared the differences in ET efficiency between sleeping beauty (SB), piggyBac (PB) and Tol2 transposons. Tol2 represented the highest germline transfer efficiencies at 55.56% (NF0 = 165), followed by SB (38.36%, NF0 = 151) and PB (32.65%, NF0 = 149). ET lines generated by the Tol2 transposon tended to produce offspring with a single expression pattern per line, while PB and SB tended to generate embryos with multiple expression patterns. In our tests, 10 putative Ens (En1–10) were identified by splinkerette PCR and comparative genomic analysis. Combining the GFP expression profiles and mRNA expression patterns revealed that En1 and En2 may be involved in regulation of the expression of dlx1a and dlx2a, while En6 may be involved in regulation of the expression of line TK4 transgene and rps26, and En7 may be involved in the regulation of the expression of wnt1 and wnt10b. Most identified Ens were found to be transcribed in zebrafish embryos, and their regulatory function may involve eRNAs.


Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Duvergé ◽  
Matteo Negroni

Delivering transgenes to human cells through transduction with viral vectors constitutes one of the most encouraging approaches in gene therapy. Lentivirus-derived vectors are among the most promising vectors for these approaches. When the genetic modification of the cell must be performed in vivo, efficient specific transduction of the cell targets of the therapy in the absence of off-targeting constitutes the Holy Grail of gene therapy. For viral therapy, this is largely determined by the characteristics of the surface proteins carried by the vector. In this regard, an important property of lentiviral vectors is the possibility of being pseudotyped by envelopes of other viruses, widening the panel of proteins with which they can be armed. Here, we discuss how this is achieved at the molecular level and what the properties and the potentialities of the different envelope proteins that can be used for pseudotyping these vectors are.


2012 ◽  
Vol 111 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Finoli ◽  
N Ostrowski ◽  
E Schmelzer ◽  
I Nettleship ◽  
J Gerlach

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 35-35
Author(s):  
Sara L. Seegers ◽  
Amanda Lance ◽  
Lawrence J Druhan ◽  
Belinda R Avalos

CSF3R, the receptors for granulocyte colony stimulating factor, is a critical regulator of neutrophil production. Multiple CSF3R mRNA transcripts have been identified and are annotated in Genbank. The expression and function of the different CSF3R proteins have not been fully elucidated. We generated antibodies specific for two of the identified and annotated isoforms, V3 and V4. CSF3R-V4 is a truncated variant of V1 with a unique C-terminal 34 amino acids and this variant confers enhanced growth signals. Changes in the ratio of V1:V4 isoforms have been implicated in chemotherapy resistance and relapse of AML. CSF3R-V3 is a variant of V1 with a 27 amino acid insertion between two conserved domains in the cytoplasmic portion of the receptor involved in JAK/STAT activation, termed the box 1 and box 2. CSF3R-V3 produces reduced proliferative signaling in response to G-CSF. When V3 is co-expressed with V1, proliferative signaling is reduced in a concentration dependent manner. In order to generate custom rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for CSF3R-V3 and CSF3R-V4 we used either a peptide that corresponds to a unique amino acid sequence present only in CSF3R-V3 or a peptide specific for a portion of the C-terminal amino acid sequence unique to the CSF3R-V4 isoform conjugated to an immunogenic carrier protein. These immunogens both produced robust immune responses, and the polyclonal antibodies were subsequently purified from bulk sera. Immunoblot analysis of lysates from Ba/F3 cells expressing CSF3R-V1 (V1), CSF3R-V3 (V3), or CSF3R-V4 (V4) demonstrated that both the custom generated anti-CSF3R-V3 and anti-CSF3R-V4 antibodies were very specific, recognizing only the appropriate CSF3R receptor isoform. All three CSF3R splice variants are recognized by commercially available anti-CSF3R (clone LMM741 to CD114), while the anti-CSF3R-V4 custom antibody and the custom anti-CSF3R-V3 antibody recognizes only the CSF3R-V4 and CSF3R-V3 isoforms, respectively. We next sought to detect the CSF3R receptor isoforms in primary human cells. Using our custom antibodies, we detected for the first time, both the CSF3R-V3 and CSF3R-V4 receptor forms in primary neutrophils isolated from healthy donors. Each of the CSF3R isoforms produce unique signaling, and we hypothesized that the observed differences in G-CSF-dependent signaling is produced by the expression level of each receptor isoform via both homodimerization and by heterodimerization of the receptor splice variant proteins. To investigate the potential for heterodimerization of the CSF3R-V1 with the V3 and V4 isoforms, we generated a CSF3R-V1 with a c-terminal epitope tag and co-expressed this construct with both CSF3R-V3 or CSF3R-V4. Immunoprecipitation with an antibody to the epitope tag (recognizing the V1 variant) followed by immunoblotting with the custom anti-V3 or anti-V4 antibodies demonstrated that both CSF3R-V3 and CSF3R-V4 co-immunoprecipitated with CSF3R-V1, in agreement with our hypothesis that the splice variants form receptor heterodimers. Of note, the CSF3R receptor heterodimers are detected even in the absence of G-CSF, thus demonstrating that CSF3R exist as a preformed receptor dimer in an inactive state. In conclusion, we have generated antibodies that specifically detect the CSF3R-V3 and the CSF3R-V4 receptor proteins. These are the first studies to demonstrate the expression of the CSF3R splice variants at the protein level, in both cell lines and primary human cells. In addition, these are the first studies to demonstrate the formation of heterodimers of the CSF3R splice variants, providing a mechanism for the observed alteration in ligand-dependent signaling produced under conditions of altered splice variant expression. Disclosures Avalos: Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Best Practice-Br Med J: Patents & Royalties: receives royalties from a coauthored article on evaluation of neutropenia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document