Use of platelet-rich plasma for knee OA not supported by RCT results

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Onuora
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Knee Oa

scholarly journals In vitro responses to platelet-rich-plasma are associated with variable clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Zahir ◽  
Bijan Dehghani ◽  
Xiaoning Yuan ◽  
Yurii Chinenov ◽  
Christine Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Treatment Comparisons

AbstractAutologous blood-derived products such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are widely used to treat musculoskeletal conditions, including knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the clinical outcomes after PRP administration are often variable, and there is limited information about the specific characteristics of PRP that impact bioactivity and clinical responses. In this study, we aimed to develop an integrative workflow to evaluate responses to PRP in vitro, and to assess if the in vitro responses to PRP are associated with the PRP composition and clinical outcomes in patients with knee OA. To do this, we used a coculture system of macrophages and fibroblasts paired with transcriptomic analyses to comprehensively characterize the modulation of inflammatory responses by PRP in vitro. Relying on patient-reported outcomes and achievement of minimal clinically important differences in OA patients receiving PRP injections, we identified responders and non-responders to the treatment. Comparisons of PRP from these patient groups allowed us to identify differences in the composition and in vitro activity of PRP. We believe that our integrative workflow may enable the development of targeted approaches that rely on PRP and other orthobiologics to treat musculoskeletal pathologies.

scholarly journals Assessment of human cartilage regeneration in a patient with knee osteoarthritis using autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells and Platelet-rich plasma: a case study

2020 ◽  
pp. 73-78
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Cartilage Regeneration ◽  
Adipose Derived Stem Cells ◽  
Human Cartilage ◽  
Percutaneous Injection ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Mri Scans

Cartilage regenerative medicine has been met with much interest due to their ability to inhibit disease progression of osteoarthritis (OA). The use of adipose-derived stem cells has been suggested as a reliable method for OA treatment because of their potential to differentiate into a variety of cell lines and their potent capability to self-renewal and repair. The aim of this study is to assess adipose-derived stem cells in combination with PRP ability in treating a patient with knee OA. A 53-year- old man with osteoarthritis was selected for this treatment. Human abdominal subcutaneous adipose sample was obtained from a patient with knee OA. Stem cells were obtained from adipose tissue of abdominal origin by digesting lipoaspirate tissue with collagenase. ADSCs cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Also, ADSCs expanded and characterized by flow cytometry. These stem cells, along with platelet-rich plasma and calcium chloride, were injected into the right knee. Pre-treatment and post-treatment MRI scans, physical therapy, and pain score data were then analyzed. The MRI data for the patient demonstrated significant positive changes. Probable cartilage regeneration was sensible in the patient. Along with MRI evidence, the measured physical therapy outcomes, subjective pain, and functional status all improved. Autologous adipose-derived stem cell injection, in conjunction with platelet-rich plasma is a promising minimally invasive therapy for osteoarthritis of human knees. The present clinical case report demonstrated that a combination of percutaneous injection of autologous ADSCs and PRPmay be able to regenerate cartilage in human knee OA.

scholarly journals Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Pathogenesis and State-Of-The-Art Non-Operative Therapeutic Considerations

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 854
Author(s):  
Dragan Primorac ◽  
Vilim Molnar ◽  
Eduard Rod ◽  
Željko Jeleč ◽  
Fabijan Čukelj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Stromal Vascular Fraction ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
The Moment ◽  
And Function ◽  
Orthopedic Patients

Being the most common musculoskeletal progressive condition, osteoarthritis is an interesting target for research. It is estimated that the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) among adults 60 years of age or older is approximately 10% in men and 13% in women, making knee OA one of the leading causes of disability in elderly population. Today, we know that osteoarthritis is not a disease characterized by loss of cartilage due to mechanical loading only, but a condition that affects all of the tissues in the joint, causing detectable changes in tissue architecture, its metabolism and function. All of these changes are mediated by a complex and not yet fully researched interplay of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and adipokines, all of which can be measured in the serum, synovium and histological samples, potentially serving as biomarkers of disease stage and progression. Another key aspect of disease progression is the epigenome that regulates all the genetic expression through DNA methylation, histone modifications, and mRNA interference. A lot of work has been put into developing non-surgical treatment options to slow down the natural course of osteoarthritis to postpone, or maybe even replace extensive surgeries such as total knee arthroplasty. At the moment, biological treatments such as platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and autologous microfragmented adipose tissue containing stromal vascular fraction are ordinarily used. Furthermore, the latter two mentioned cell-based treatment options seem to be the only methods so far that increase the quality of cartilage in osteoarthritis patients. Yet, in the future, gene therapy could potentially become an option for orthopedic patients. In the following review, we summarized all of the latest and most important research in basic sciences, pathogenesis, and non-operative treatment.

What Is the Price and Claimed Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States?

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (09) ◽  
pp. 879-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas S. Piuzzi ◽  
Mitchell Ng ◽  
Ariel Kantor ◽  
Kenneth Ng ◽  
Stephanie Kha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
The Mean

AbstractPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are often used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), despite clinical value and cost-effectiveness not being definitely established. PRP injections are considered as a potential means of reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee OA, in the hope of delaying or avoiding the need for surgical intervention. Centers that offer PRP injections usually charge patients out of pocket and directly market services. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the current (1) prices and (2) marketed clinical efficacy of autologous PRP injections for knee OA. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed based on 286 centers identified in the United States offering PRP injections for knee OA. A total of 179 (73.4%) centers were successfully contacted via e-mail or phone, using a simulated 52-year-old male patient with knee OA. Scripted questions were asked by the simulated patient to determine the current marketed prices and clinical efficacy, either reported as “good results” or “symptomatic improvement,” claimed by each treating center. The mean price for a single unilateral knee same-day PRP injection was $714 with a standard deviation of $144 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $691–737, n = 153). The mean claim of clinical efficacy was 76% with a standard deviation of 11% (95% CI: 73.5–78.3%, n = 84). Out of the 84 clinics, 10 claimed “90 to 100% efficacy,” 27 claimed “80 to 90%,” 29 claimed “70 to 80%,” 9 claimed “60 to 70%,” 8 claimed “50 to 60%,” and 1 claimed “40 to 60%.” These findings provide a unique perspective on the PRP market for the treatment of knee OA that is valuable to physicians and health care providers in providing better education to patients on the associated costs and purported clinical benefits of PRP injections.

scholarly journals Platelet-Rich plasma Injection Management for Ankle osteoarthritis study (PRIMA): protocol of a Dutch multicentre, stratified, block-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e030961
Author(s):  
LDA Paget ◽  
SMA Bierma-Zeinstra ◽  
S Goedegebuure ◽  
GMMJ Kerkhoffs ◽  
R Krips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Pain Subscale ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potentially efficacious treatment for ankle osteoarthritis (OA), but its use has not been examined in high-quality studies. Systematic reviews show that PRP injections significantly decrease pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Ankle OA is more common than hip or knee OA in the young active population; with a prevalence of 3.4%.PRP injections in ankle OA are shown to be safe and improve quality of life over time, but no randomised controlled trial has been conducted. Our randomised controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of PRP injections for symptom reduction and functional improvement, compared with placebo, in the treatment of ankle (talocrural) OA.Methods and analysisWe will conduct the Platelet-Rich plasma Injection Management for Ankle OA study: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. One hundred patients suffering from ankle OA will be randomised into two treatment groups: PRP injection or placebo (saline) injection. Both groups will receive two injections of PRP or placebo at an interval of 6 weeks. Primary outcome is the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes determined at several follow-up moments up to 5 years, include Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, pain subscale of (0–40), Visual Analogue Scale score (0–100), Ankle Activity Score (0–10), subjective patient satisfaction Short Form Health Survey-36, Global Attainment Scaling and the EuroQol-5 dimensions-3 levels utility score. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed at 1 year.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee Amsterdam Medical Center, the Netherlands (ABR 2018–042, approved 23 July 2018) and registered in the Netherlands trial register (NTR7261). Results and new knowledge will be disseminated through the Dutch Arthritis Association (ReumaNederland), Dutch patient federation, conferences and published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNTR7261.

scholarly journals Intra-articular Implantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Part 1

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711668081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
Justin J. Mitchell ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Eric C. McCarty ◽  
Cecilia Pascual-Garrido
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Mesenchymal Stem Cells ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Induced Pluripotent

Osteoarthritis (OA) after a partial or total meniscectomy procedure is a common pathology. Because of the high incidence of meniscectomy in the general population, as well as the significant burden of knee OA, there is increasing interest in determining methods for delaying postmeniscectomy OA. Biological therapies, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), have been proposed as possible therapies that could delay OA in this and other settings. Several studies in various animal models have evaluated the effect of injecting MSCs into the knee joints of animals with OA induced either by meniscal excision with or without anterior cruciate ligament transection. When compared with control groups receiving injections without progenitor cells, short-term benefits in the experimental groups have been reported. In human subjects, there are limited data to determine the effect of biological therapies for use in delaying or preventing the onset of OA after a meniscectomy procedure. The purpose of this review is to highlight the findings in the presently available literature on the use of intra-articular implantation of MSCs postmeniscectomy and to offer suggestions for future research with the goal of delaying or treating early OA postmeniscectomy with MSCs.

scholarly journals Injections in the osteoarthritic knee: a review of current treatment options

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-509
Author(s):  
Gerardo Fusco ◽  
Francesco M. Gambaro ◽  
Berardo Di Matteo ◽  
Elizaveta Kon
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Symptomatic Relief ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cartilage Degradation ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Molecular Approaches

Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition characterized by progressive cartilage degradation, subchondral damage, and bone remodelling. Among the approaches implemented to achieve symptomatic and functional improvements, injection treatments have gained increasing attention due to the possibility of intra-articular delivery with reduced side effects compared to systemic therapies. In addition to well-established treatment options such as hyaluronic acid (HA), cortico-steroids (CS) and oxygen-ozone therapy, many other promising products have been employed in the last decades such as polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Moreover, ultrasound-guided intra-meniscal injection and X-ray-guided subchondral injection techniques have been introduced into clinical practice. Even when not supported by high evidence consensus, intra-articular CS and HA injections have gained precise indications for symptomatic relief and clinical improvement in OA. Biological products are strongly supported by in vitro evidence but there is still a lack of robust clinical evidence. PRP and MSCs seem to relieve OA symptoms through a regulation of the joint homeostasis, even if their capability to restore articular cartilage is still to be proved in vivo. Due to increasing interest in the subchondral bone pathology, subchondral injections have been developed with promising results in delaying joint replacement. Nevertheless, due to their recent development and the heterogeneity of the injected products (biologic agents or calcium phosphate), this approach still lacks strong enough evidence to be fully endorsed. Combined biological treatments, nano-molecular approaches, monoclonal antibodies and ‘personalized’ target therapies are currently under development or under investigation with the aim of expanding our armamentarium against knee OA. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:501-509. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210026

A single intraarticular platelet-rich plasma improves pain and function for patients with early knee osteoarthritis: Analyses by radiographic severity and age

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shu-Fen Sun ◽  
Chien-Wei Hsu ◽  
Huey-Shyan Lin ◽  
I-Hsiu Liou ◽  
Yi-Chun Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Radiographic Severity ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Function

BACKGROUND: Most studies use platelet-rich plasma (PRP) requiring multiple intraarticular injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of a single intraarticular PRP injection for patients with early knee OA and consider subgroup analyses of radiographic severity and age, respectively. METHODS: Forty-one patients with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1–2) received a single PRP injection into the target knee and were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postinjection. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain (0–100 mm) at 6 months postinjection. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, single leg stance test (SLS), use of rescue analgesics and patients’ satisfaction. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. The mean pain VAS decreased significantly from 45.6 ± 13.0 mm at baseline to 16.9 ± 13.4 mm, 14.0 ± 13.1 mm and 15.5 ± 14.0 mm at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-ups (p< 0.001 for all). Significant improvements in WOMAC, Lequesne index, SLS and consumption of analgesics from baseline (p< 0.001 for all) were noted at each follow-up. Patients’ satisfaction was high. No serious adverse events occurred. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with grade 1 OA showed significantly greater VAS pain reduction at 3 months (p= 0.006) and 6 months (p= 0.005) than patients with grade 2 OA. The older-age group (age > 60) showed significantly greater improvements in VAS pain, WOMAC function subscale scores and total scores at 6-month postinjection, compared with the younger age-group (age ≤ 60). The younger-age group reported better satisfaction at 1 and 3-month postinjection. CONCLUSIONS: One injection of PRP improved pain and function for 6 months for patients with early knee OA. This study supports putting the one-injection regimen into clinical practice. Further research is needed for more definite conclusions.

scholarly journals How to Choose Platelet-Rich Plasma or Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Overweight or Obese Patients: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Pan Luo ◽  
Zhencheng Xiong ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Lijun Shi ◽  
Fuqiang Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Better Than

Objective. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was better than hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in overweight or obese patients. Design. Two reviewers independently used the keywords combined with free words to search English-based electronic databases according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane library. The pooled data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Results. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1096 patients were included. During the first two months of follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups. At the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of follow-up, the pooled analysis showed that PRP was better than HA for the treatment of knee OA in overweight or obese patients. There were significant differences between the two groups at Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (3 months: MD = −1.35, [95% CI: −2.19 to −0.50], P=0.002, I2 = 0%; 6 months: MD = −7.62, [95% CI: −13.51 to −1.72], P=0.01, I2 = 88%; 12 months: MD = −12.11, [95% CI: −20.21 to −4.01], P=0.003, I2 = 94%). Conclusions. For overweight or obese patients with knee OA, intra-articular injection of PRP in a short time was not necessarily superior to HA, but long-term use was better than HA in pain and functional relief.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document