scholarly journals Changes in monocyte subsets are associated with clinical outcomes in severe malarial anaemia and cerebral malaria

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jade Royo ◽  
Mouna Rahabi ◽  
Claire Kamaliddin ◽  
Sem Ezinmegnon ◽  
David Olagnier ◽  
...  

AbstractMonocytes are plastic heterogeneous immune cells involved in host-parasite interactions critical for malaria pathogenesis. Human monocytes have been subdivided into three populations based on surface expression of CD14 and CD16. We hypothesised that proportions and phenotypes of circulating monocyte subsets can be markers of severity or fatality in children with malaria. To address this question, we compared monocytes sampled in children with uncomplicated malaria, severe malarial anaemia, or cerebral malaria. Flow cytometry was used to distinguish and phenotype monocyte subsets through CD14, CD16, CD36 and TLR2 expression. Data were first analysed by univariate analysis to evaluate their link to severity and death. Second, multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the specific effect of monocyte proportions and phenotypes on severity and death, after adjustments for other variables unrelated to monocytes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that decreased percentages of non-classical monocytes were associated with death, suggesting that this monocyte subset has a role in resolving malaria. Using univariate analysis, we also showed that the role of non-classical monocytes involves a mostly anti-inflammatory profile and the expression of CD16. Further studies are needed to decipher the functions of this sub-population during severe malaria episodes, and understand the underlying mechanisms.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (23) ◽  
pp. 3618-3626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothée Selimoglu-Buet ◽  
Orianne Wagner-Ballon ◽  
Véronique Saada ◽  
Valérie Bardet ◽  
Raphaël Itzykson ◽  
...  

Key Points An increase in the classical monocyte subset to >94% of total monocytes discriminates CMML from other monocytoses with high specificity. This characteristic increase in classical monocytes disappears in CMML patients who respond to hypomethylating agents.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Marie Rundgren ◽  
Elisabeth Ersvær ◽  
Aymen Bushra Ahmed ◽  
Anita Ryningen ◽  
Øystein Bruserud

Abstract Background Induction therapy of multiple myeloma patients prior to autologous stem cell transplantation has changed from conventional chemotherapy to treatment based on proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory drugs. We used flow cytometry to analyze total monocyte and monocyte subset (classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes) peripheral blood levels before and following auto-transplantation for a consecutive group of myeloma patients who had received the presently used induction therapy. Results The patients showed normal total monocyte concentrations after induction/stem cell mobilization, but the concentrations of classical monocytes were increased compared with healthy controls. Melphalan conditioning reduced the levels of total CD14+ as well as classical and non-classical monocytes, whereas intermediate monocytes were not affected. Thus, melphalan has a non-random effect on monocyte subsets. Melphalan had a stronger effect on total and classical monocyte concentrations for those patients who had received induction therapy including immunomodulatory drugs. Total monocytes and monocyte subset concentrations decreased during the period of pancytopenia, but monocyte reconstitution occurred before hematopoietic reconstitution. However, the fractions of various monocyte subsets varied considerably between patients. Conclusions The total level of circulating monocytes is normalized early after auto-transplantation for multiple myeloma, but pre- and post-transplant levels of various monocyte subsets show considerable variation between patients.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2009-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chetasi Talati ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Ghada Shaheen ◽  
Andrew Kuykendall ◽  
Markus Ball ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The WHO requires a sustained peripheral monocytosis (≥1x109cells/L) for the diagnosis of CMML. However, a peripheral monocytosis is not pathognomonic because monocytosis is observed in other hematologic neoplasms and benign reactive conditions. A recent study demonstrated that CMML is uniquely represented by the expansion of classical monocytes (CD14+/CD16-) (Selimoglu-Buet et al, Blood 20151). Further, measuring the relative fraction of classical monocytes, by itself, was capable of distinguishing CMML from reactive conditions and a mixed cohort of hematologic neoplasms. In this study, we aimed to validate these findings in a clinical and genetically annotated cohort of CMML and other hematologic malignancies with a focus on MDS, and normal age-matched controls. Methods: We profiled monocyte subsets in patients with a suspected diagnosis of CMML or MDS as previously described1 after obtaining institutional review board approval. Clinical demographics and genotyping of patient samples (52 gene TruSight panel, Illumina) were collected via retrospective chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical demographics, genotyping, and their association to classical monocytosis (CM). Receiver Operator Curves (ROC) were generated to test the sensitivity and specificity of the monocyte analysis and all calculated p-values were two-sided. Results: From October 2015 to May 2016 monocyte subsets were profiled in 159 genetically defined cases. The diagnosis of patients in our cohort included CMML (n=29), MDS (n=86), other myeloid malignancies (n=26), and reactive conditions (n=18). Within CMML cases the median age at diagnosis was 70 years, median hemoglobin, platelets, and monocyte counts were 10.9 g/dL, 102x109cells/L, and 2.05x109cells/L, respectively. As previously reported, CM was evident in all CMML cases and was capable of distinguishing CMML from normal age-matched controls. ROC analysis confirmed that the assay was capable of differentiating between these groups (AUC of 0.9592, p<0.001) (Figure 1A). Further, CM was also capable of discriminating CMML from MDS (AUC 0.8793, p <0.0001 (Figure 1B). However, no difference in CM was evident between French American British or WHO-defined CMML subtypes. There were also no differences in CM between lower and higher risk disease as defined by established cytogenetic risk stratification or prognostic scoring systems validated in CMML. Exposure to hypomethylating agent did not affect the pattern of CM. When comparing cases based on the presence of splicing gene mutations, DNA methylation gene mutations, ASXL1 or signaling gene mutations, no difference in classical monocytes was identified. To explore the impact of CM in MDS, we identified 24 MDS cases that had "CMML-like" CM (CM ≥ 94%) and 60 MDS cases with normal monocyte subsets (Figure 2). There were no differences in age, hemoglobin, platelets, or presence of splenomegaly. However, CMML-like MDS cases were associated with an increased WBC (3.815x109 cells/L vs. 2.34x109 cells/L), increased neutrophils (1.73x109 cells/L vs. 1.07x109 cells/L, p=0.02), and increased absolute monocyte counts (355X109 cells/L vs. 120x109 cells/L, p=0.02) (Figure 2). Furthermore, the MDS cohort without classical monocytosis was more frequently associated with poor risk cytogenetics (Odds ratio (OR) 3.429, 95% CI 1.032-10.08, p=0.04) and was more likely to be higher-risk as defined by the IPSS-R (OR 8.767, 95% CI 1.088-70.69, p=0.0174). Analysis of mutated genes identified SF3B1 to be present at greater frequency in the CMML-like MDS subgroup (OR 3.457, 95% CI 1.074-11.21, p=0.0486) while the frequency of other commonly mutated genes in CMML were not significantly different (Figure 2). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that classical monocytes can discriminate CMML from normal age-matched controls, validating a previous study. We additionally demonstrate that CM is capable of discriminating CMML from a large MDS cohort. Further, we identified two MDS subgroups that can be differentiated by the fraction of classical monocytes and are clinically distinguished by a favorable prognosis and higher frequency of SF3B1 mutation. Our data suggest that analysis of monocyte subsets should be incorporated in the diagnostic algorithm of CMML and that the clinical significance of CM in MDS merits further investigation. Disclosures Lancet: ERYtech: Consultancy; Biopath Holdings: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo Bios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Quantum First: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Komrokji:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Padron:KALOBIOS: Research Funding; CTI: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 2523-2542
Author(s):  
Tabitha Turner-Stokes ◽  
Ana Garcia Diaz ◽  
Damilola Pinheiro ◽  
Maria Prendecki ◽  
Stephen P. McAdoo ◽  
...  

BackgroundImmune complexes within glomerular capillary walls cause crescentic GN (CrGN). Monocytes and macrophages are important in mediating CrGN, but little work has been done to phenotype the subpopulations involved and determine their respective contributions to glomerular inflammation.MethodsLive glomerular imaging using confocal microscopy monitored intravascular monocyte subset behavior during nephrotoxic nephritis (NTN) in a novel WKY-hCD68-GFP monocyte/macrophage reporter rat strain. Flow cytometry and qPCR further analyzed ex vivo the glomerular leukocyte infiltrate during NTN.ResultsNon-classical monocytes surveyed the glomerular endothelium via lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) in the steady state. During NTN, non-classical monocytes were recruited first, but subsequent recruitment and retention of classical monocytes was associated with glomerular damage. Monocytes recruited to the glomerular vasculature did not undergo transendothelial migration. This finding suggests that inflammation in immune complex-mediated CrGN is predominantly intravascular, driven by dynamic interactions between intravascular blood monocytes and the endothelium. Glomerular endothelium and non-classical monocytes overexpressed a distinct chemokine axis, which may orchestrate inflammatory myeloid cell recruitment and expression of damage mediators. Reduced classical monocyte recruitment in Lewis rats during NTN confirmed a role for CD16 in mediating glomerular damage.ConclusionsMonocyte subsets with distinct phenotypes and effector functions may be important in driving inflammation in experimental CrGN resulting from immune complexes formed within the glomerular capillary wall. LFA-1–dependent endothelial surveillance by non-classical monocytes may detect immune complexes through CD16, orchestrating the inflammatory response through intravascular retention of classical monocytes, which results in glomerular damage and proteinuria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noemi Cifani ◽  
Maria Proietta ◽  
Maurizio Taurino ◽  
Luigi Tritapepe ◽  
Flavia Del Porto

Monocytes are a heterogeneous cell population distinguished into three subsets with distinctive phenotypic and functional properties: “classical” (CD14++CD16-), “intermediate” (CD14++CD16+), and “nonclassical” (CD14+CD16++). Monocyte subsets play a pivotal role in many inflammatory systemic diseases including atherosclerosis (ATS). Only a low number of studies evaluated monocyte behavior in patients affected by cardiovascular diseases, and data about their role in acute aortic dissection (AAD) are lacking. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate CD14++CD16-, CD14++CD16+, and CD14+CD16++ cells in patients with Stanford-A AAD and in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS).Methods. 20 patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS group), 17 patients with Stanford-A AAD (AAD group), and 17 subjects with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (RF group) were enrolled. Monocyte subset frequency was determined by flow cytometry.Results. Classical monocytes were significantly increased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups, whereas intermediate monocytes were significantly decreased in the AAD group versus CAS and RF groups.Conclusions. Results of this study identify in AAD patients a peculiar monocyte array that can partly explain depletion of T CD4+ lymphocyte subpopulations observed in patients affected by AAD.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 464-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Tak ◽  
Roger van Groenendael ◽  
Peter Pickkers ◽  
Leo Koenderman

Three human monocyte subsets are recognized with different functions in the immune system: CD14++/CD16- classical monocytes (CM), CD14++/CD16+ intermediate monocytes (IM) and CD14+/CD16++ non-classical monocytes (NCM). Increased IM and NCM percentages have been reported under inflammatory conditions, yet little is known about monocyte subsets at the onset of inflammation. The human endotoxemia model is uniquely capable of studying the first phases of acute inflammation induced by intravenous injection of 2 ng/kg bodyweight lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into healthy volunteers. After that, monocyte subset counts, activation/differentiation status and chemokine levels were studied over 24 h. The numbers of all subsets were decreased by >95% after LPS injection. CM numbers recovered first (3- 6 h), followed by IM (6-8 h) and NCM numbers (8-24 h). Similarly, increased monocyte counts were observed first in CM (8 h), followed by IM and NCM (24 h). Monocytes did not display a clear activated phenotype (minor increase in CD11b and CD38 expression). Plasma levels of CCL2, CCL4 and CX3CL1 closely resembled the cell numbers of CM, IM and NCM, respectively. Our study provides critical insights into the earliest stages of acute inflammation and emphasizes the necessity to stain for different monocyte subsets when studying the role of monocytes in disease, as neither function nor kinetics of the subsets overlap.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5437-5437
Author(s):  
Xavier Calvo ◽  
Ivonne Parraga ◽  
Nieves Garcia-Gisbert ◽  
Lourdes Florensa ◽  
Sara Montesdeoca ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION The diagnosis of CMML according to WHO 2017 requires the presence of ≥1x109/L and ≥10% of monocytes in peripheral blood (PB). Establishing an accurate diagnostic is difficult since many clinical situations present persistent monocytosis. The presence of dysplasia is frequent but not always present and cytogenetic aberrations are infrequent in this disease (20-25% of cases). Although 85-90% of CMML patients present ≥1 mutation in TET2, SRSF2 or ASXL1, the use of NGS panels is not widespread. The study of PB monocyte subsets by flow cytometry (FC) has gained interest for CMML diagnosis. The increase of classical monocytes (Mo1) upper 94% presents a high sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for CMML diagnosis (Sn 90.6, Sp 95.1; Selimoglu-Buet et al, Blood 2015). The 94% threshold was validated in two studies (Talati C et al, Blood 2017; Tarfi S et al, Blood Cancer J 2018). However, some controversies have recently appeared in the literature. Picot T detected the 95% cutoff as the one with the best Sn (100%) and Sp (97%) (Picot T et al, Front Oncol 2018). Hudson CA found that the presence of < 1.13% (Sn 100, Sp 96) of non-classical monocytes (Mo3) was the best predictor for CMML diagnosis (Hudson CA et al, Am J Clin Pathol 2018). With the exception of the study of Tarfi S, based on 47 CMML, the rest presented a very low number of patients (Talati C: 29; Picot T: 15; Hudson CA: 16) and therefore a bias could be expected specially when studying the Sn of the proposed methods. Moreover, the different series assessing the "monocyte assay" have no molecular data and therefore this could diminish the accuracy of the results since some patients may have received misdiagnoses. The aim of our study was to assess the Sn and Sp of different thresholds of Mo1 and Mo3 in a large series with well-annotated clinical, cytogenetic and molecular data. Moreover, we assessed whether the study of CD2 and CD56 monocyte expression in combination with the %Mo1 >94 test improves the detection of the disease. METHODS 50 CMML, 12 MDS, 11 MPN with ≥1x109/L monocytes and 79 reactive monocytosis with ≥1x109/L monocytes (N = 152) were prospectively studied from 02/2016 to 07/2019. We studied PB monocyte subsets by FC: Mo1 (CD14bright/CD16-), Mo2 (CD14bright/CD16+) and Mo3 (CD14dim or -/CD16bright). In addition, we assessed the expression of CD56 and CD2 in monocytes (positivity ≥ 20%). Finally, targeted NGS of the entire exonic sequence of 25 genes recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies was performed (VAF sensitivity: 2%). Chi-Square or Fisher exact tests were used as appropriate. ROC curves were developed to explore optimal cutoffs in terms of sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp). Moreover, we plotted the AUC of the subset of Mo1 and Mo3. Finally, the Youden index (YI) was used to detect the threshold of Mo1 and Mo3 with the best balance between Sn and Sp. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The Sn and Sp of the Mo1>94% test in our series were similar to those reported by the French group (GFM). Our Sn and Sp were 90% and 92% respectively with a YI of 82. The Sn and Sp of the Mo1>93% were 94% and 84% with a YI of 78. Finally, the 95% cutoff proposed by Picot T et al showed a Sn of 81% and a Sp of 96% with a YI of 77. Therefore, the 94% cutoff presented the best balance between Sn and SP of the different thresholds assessed. The Mo3 threshold of 1.13% proposed by Hudson CA et al showed a Sn of 67% and a Sp of 95% with a YI of 62. The best Mo3 cutoff in our series was established in 3.18% with a Sn of 90% and Sp of 83%. The YI of this threshold was 73. The AUC for the percentage (%) of Mo1 (0.937, IC 95%: 0.89-0.99) was better than the AUC of the % of Mo3 (0.924, IC 95%: 0.88-0.97) reinforcing the use of %Mo1 as the item with the best discriminative power for CMML diagnosis. The AUC of the percentage of Mo1 population was similar to that reported by the GFM (Figure 1). The Sn and Sp for CD56 expression in monocytes was 67% and 91% respectively, while CD2 expression showed a Sn of 38% and a Sp of 99%. Finally, the presence of at least one of the following: Mo1 >94%, CD56+ or CD2+ presented the highest Sn (98%) and a Sp of 84%. This method may be a very good screening test due to the low false negative rate expected. This combined approach showed the best balance between Sn and Sp (YI: 82). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the utility of the Mo1 >94% test as the best flow cytometry assay for establishing accurate diagnoses in CMML. The combined assay of Mo1, CD56 and CD2 may be of high utility as a screening test. Figure 1 Disclosures Bellosillo: Qiagen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; TermoFisher Scientific: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Oh ◽  
Muzi Na ◽  
Connie Rogers

Introduction: Monocytes play a crucial role in the pathology of atherosclerosis, a major cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Previous studies in preclinical models report that monocyte subsets (i.e. classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes) may differently contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. However, changes in the distribution and the role of each monocyte subset in cardiometabolic disorders (overweight/obesity, metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolemia, and type 2 diabetes) and CVD in humans is less clear. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between the monocyte subset distribution and cardiometabolic disorders/CVD in humans. Methods: Articles were systematically searched in CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed until April 2020. A total of 1592 articles were independently screened by 2 reviewers. A total of 25 studies were selected for qualitative analyses. Among them, 6 studies reported the percentage of each monocyte subset and were included in the meta-analyses. For the meta-analyses, a random-effects model was used to generate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) between subjects with cardiometabolic disorders and healthy controls. Results: In total, sample size ranged from 22 to 135, and mean age of subjects ranged from 22 to 70 years. The percentage of classical monocytes was lower [SMD = -1.21; 95% CI (-1.92, -0.50); P < 0.001; I 2 = 91%] in subjects with cardiometabolic disorders compared to healthy controls. However, the percentage of intermediate [SMD = 0.56; 95% CI (0.23, 0.88); P < 0.001; I 2 = 65%] and non-classical monocytes [SMD = 1.39; 95% CI (0.59, 2.19); P < 0.001; I 2 = 93%] was higher in subjects with cardiometabolic disorders compared to healthy controls. Conclusions: There may be a shift in the distribution of monocytes from classical to intermediate and non-classical monocytes in individuals with cardiometabolic disorders. This shift may be an underlying cause of chronic low-grade inflammation, exacerbate atherosclerotic risk, and contribute to the development of CVD based on preclinical studies. However, additional mechanistic studies are needed in humans to evaluate this question.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133
Author(s):  
Dorothee Selimoglu-Buet ◽  
Julie Riviere ◽  
Margot Morabito ◽  
Catherine Lacout ◽  
Aurelie Chauveau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Monocytes are a heterogeneous population of peripheral blood leukocytes. The expression of CD14 and CD16 distinguishes CD14+/CD16- classical from CD14+/CD16+ intermediate and CD14low/CD16+ non-classical monocytes. We have shown (Selimoglu-Buet D et al, Blood 2015) that monocytes that accumulate in the peripheral blood of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are predominantly CD14+/CD16- classical monocytes that typically represent more than 94% of total blood monocytes. Strikingly, this phenotypic signature efficiently distinguishes CMML from a reactive monocytosis. Importantly, the CMML-associated increase in classical monocyte fraction disappears in patients who respond to hypomethylating drugs. Whereas in the mouse, the transcription factor Nr4a1 is required for the development of the Ly6Clowmonocytes, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the formation of the three human monocyte populations remain poorly understood. Analysis of the classical monocytes accumulation in CMML may provide insights into the regulation of monocyte subset differentiation. Methods. A microarray screen of miRNA expression was performed in monocytes sorted from 33 CMML and 5 healthy donor blood samples. Validation was performed by qRT-PCR, in monocytes of a cohort of 160 CMML patients and 20 controls, and in CD34+ cells from 44 CMML patients and 19 controls. A mouse model of MIR150-knock-out (Mir150-/-) was used to examine the consequences of the miRNA down-regulation. Multi-color flow cytometry assays were designed to explore mouse and human monocyte subsets. Results. Microarray analyses and validation experiments identified a decreased expression of miR150 in monocytes and CD34+cells from CMML patients compared to controls. Mir150-/- mouse model does not generate monocytosis even in ageing animals. However, an increase in Ly6Chigh inflammatory monocyte fraction at the expense of Ly6Clowpatrolling monocytes was observed in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, leading to further explore the link between MIR150 and monocyte populations. The abnormal repartition of monocyte populations in Mir150-/- mice is a cell-autonomous phenotype as wild-type (WT) mice receiving bone marrow from Mir150-/-mice demonstrated a reduced fraction of Ly6Clow monocytes. This phenotype was rescued by re-expression of MIR150 in LIN- cells of Mir150-/-mice before engraftment. The number of myeloid progenitors was normal in Mir150-/-mice, and the remaining Ly6Clow monocytes did not demonstrate an increased sensitivity to apoptosis. Competitive reconstitution experiments combining WT and Mir150-/-LIN- cells did not identify any significant fitness advantage to Mir150-/-cells, but Mir150-/-donor cells developed reduced numbers of Ly6Clow monocytes than cells from WT donors. These data suggest that MIR150 is involved during late stages of monocyte development and has a key role in the generation of Ly6Clowmonocytes. Finally, TET2 is the main gene mutated in CMML, and Tet2-/- animals develop a monocytosis. Mir150-/- crossed with Tet2-/-mice developed a CMML-like phenotype. In human, the expression of MIR150 decreases along myeloid differentiation and is low in classical compared to intermediate and non-classical monocytes. Depletion or overexpression of MIR150 in human CD34+ cells alters the repartition of CD14+/CD16- and CD14+/CD16+ cells generated in culture. In CMML patients who respond to hypomethylating agents, the normalization of monocyte subset repartition correlates with an increased expression of MIR150, suggesting an epigenetic regulation. MIR150 has several promoters. By combining ChIP-Seq and DNA methylation analyses, a differentially methylated region was detected in one of the MIR150 promoters in CMML patients compared to controls. Using monocyte differentiation conditions, RNA Sequencing performed in CD34+cells overexpressing MIR150, identified ID1 gene as a potential MIR150 target. Conclusion: We demonstrate a role for MIR150 in the generation of intermediate and non-classical monocyte subsets, and its down-regulation in CMML accounts for the characteristic accumulation of classical monocytes. Disclosures Fenaux: Celgene, Janssen,Novartis, Astex, Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (04) ◽  
pp. 619-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Denecke ◽  
André Rostalsky ◽  
Mihail Hristov ◽  
Thomas A. Koeppel ◽  
Kiril Bidzhekov ◽  
...  

SummarySmall non-coding microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged to play critical roles in cardiovascular biology. Monocytes critically drive atherosclerotic lesion formation, and can be subdivided into a classical and non-classical subset. Here we scrutinised the miRNA signature of human classical and non-classical monocytes, and compared miRNA expression profiles of atherosclerotic plaques from human carotid arteries and healthy arteries. We identified miRNAs to be differentially regulated with a two-fold or higher difference between classical and non-classical monocyte subsets. Moreover, comparing miRNA expression in atherosclerotic plaques compared to healthy arteries, we observed several miRNAs to be aberrantly expressed, with the majority of miRNAs displaying a two-fold or higher increase in plaques and only few miRNAs being decreased. To elucidate similarities in miRNA signatures between monocyte subsets and atherosclerotic plaque, expression of miRNAs highly abundant in monocytes and plaque tissues were compared. Several miRNAs were found in atherosclerotic plaques but not in healthy vessels or either monocyte subset. However, we could identify miRNAs co-expressed in plaque tissue and classical monocytes (miR-99b, miR-152), or non-classical monocytes (miR-422a), or in both monocytes subsets. We thus unravelled candidate miRNAs, which may facilitate our understanding of monocyte recruitment and fate during atherosclerosis, and may serve as therapeutic targets for treating inflammatory vascular diseases.Note: The editorial process for this article was fully handled by Prof. G. Y. H. Lip, Editor-in-Chief.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document