scholarly journals Bioinformatic identification of genomic instability-associated lncRNAs signatures for improving the clinical outcome of cervical cancer by a prognostic model

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Nan Ding ◽  
Yongxing He ◽  
Chengbin Tao ◽  
Zhongzhen Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Training Set

AbstractThe research is executed to analyze the connection between genomic instability-associated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. We set a prognostic model up and explored different risk groups' features. The clinical datasets and gene expression profiles of 307 patients have been downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. We established a prognostic model that combined somatic mutation profiles and lncRNA expression profiles in a tumor genome and identified 35 genomic instability-associated lncRNAs in cervical cancer as a case study. We then stratified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups and were further checked in multiple independent patient cohorts. Patients were separated into two sets: the testing set and the training set. The prognostic model was built using three genomic instability-associated lncRNAs (AC107464.2, MIR100HG, and AP001527.2). Patients in the training set were divided into the high-risk group with shorter overall survival and the low-risk group with longer overall survival (p < 0.001); in the meantime, similar comparable results were found in the testing set (p = 0.046), whole set (p < 0.001). There are also significant differences in patients with histological grades, FIGO stages, and different ages (p < 0.05). The prognostic model focused on genomic instability-associated lncRNAs could predict the prognosis of cervical cancer patients, paving the way for further research into the function and resource of lncRNAs, as well as a key approach to customizing individual care decision-making.

scholarly journals A Prognostic Model Based on Immune-Related Long Non-Coding RNAs for Patients With Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peijie Chen ◽  
Yuting Gao ◽  
Si Ouyang ◽  
Li Wei ◽  
Min Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Validation Set ◽  
Immune Related Genes

Objectives: The study is performed to analyze the relationship between immune-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. We constructed a prognostic model and explored the immune characteristics of different risk groups.Methods: We downloaded the gene expression profiles and clinical data of 227 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and extracted immune-related lncRNAs. Cox regression analysis was used to pick out the predictive lncRNAs. The risk score of each patient was calculated based on the expression level of lncRNAs and regression coefficient (β), and a prognostic model was constructed. The overall survival (OS) of different risk groups was analyzed and compared by the Kaplan–Meier method. To analyze the distribution of immune-related genes in each group, principal component analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis were carried out. Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumors using Expression data was performed to explore the immune microenvironment.Results: Patients were divided into training set and validation set. Five immune-related lncRNAs (H1FX-AS1, AL441992.1, USP30-AS1, AP001527.2, and AL031123.2) were selected for the construction of the prognostic model. Patients in the training set were divided into high-risk group with longer OS and low-risk group with shorter OS (p = 0.004); meanwhile, similar result were found in validation set (p = 0.013), combination set (p &lt; 0.001) and patients with different tumor stages. This model was further confirmed in 56 cervical cancer tissues by Q-PCR. The distribution of immune-related genes was significantly different in each group. In addition, the immune score and the programmed death-ligand 1 expression of the low-risk group was higher.Conclusions: The prognostic model based on immune-related lncRNAs could predict the prognosis and immune status of cervical cancer patients which is conducive to clinical prognosis judgment and individual treatment.

scholarly journals Immune‐related Long Noncoding RNA Signature for Patients with Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Jinyi Tong ◽  
Benben Cao ◽  
Xia Zhang ◽  
Zheng Niu
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Score Model

Abstract Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is a common gynecological malignancy for which prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers are urgently needed. The signature based on immune‐related lncRNAs(IRLs) of CC has never been reported. This study aimed to establish an IRL signature for patients with CC.Methods: The RNA-seq dataset was obtained from the TCGA, GEO, and GTEx database. The immune scores（IS）based on single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) were calculated to identify the IRLs, which were then analyzed using univariate Cox regression analysis to identify significant prognostic IRLs. A risk score model was established to divide patients into low-risk and high-risk groups based on the median risk score of these IRLs. This was then validated by splitting TCGA dataset(n=304) into a training-set(n=152) and a valid-set(n=152). The fraction of 22 immune cell subpopulations was evaluated in each sample to identify the differences between low-risk and high-risk groups. Additionally, a ceRNA network associated with the IRLs was constructed.Results: A cohort of 326 CC and 21 normal tissue samples with corresponding clinical information was included in this study. Twenty-eight IRLs were collected according to the Pearson’s correlation analysis between immune score and lncRNA expression (P < 0.01). Four IRLs (BZRAP1-AS1, EMX2OS, ZNF667-AS1, and CTC-429P9.1) with the most significant prognostic values (P < 0.05) were identified which demonstrated an ability to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups by developing a risk score model. It was observed that patients in the low‐risk group showed longer overall survival (OS) than those in the high‐risk group in the training-set, valid-set, and total-set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for the four IRLs signature in predicting the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates were larger than 0.65. In addition, the low-risk and high-risk groups displayed different immune statuses in GSEA. These IRLs were also significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration. Conclusions: Our results showed that the IRL signature had a prognostic value for CC. Meanwhile, the specific mechanisms of the four-IRLs in the development of CC were ascertained preliminarily.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from the phase 3 prevail clinical trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5022-5022
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Ping Lin ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Multivariable Model ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Testing Set

5022 Background: Prognostic models require updating to reflect contemporary medical practice. In a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL trial (enzalutamide vs placebo), we identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in chemotherapy-naive men with mCRPC. Methods: Patients were randomly divided 2:1 into training (n = 1159) and testing (n = 550) sets. Using the training set, 23 predefined candidate prognostic factors (including treatment) were analyzed in a multivariable Cox model with stepwise procedures and in a penalized Cox proportional hazards model using the adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty (data cutoff June 1, 2014). A multivariable model predicting OS was developed using the training set; the predictive accuracy was assessed in the testing set using time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC). The testing set was stratified based on risk score tertiles (low, intermediate, high), and OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Demographics, disease characteristics, and OS were balanced between the training and testing sets; median OS was 32.7 months for both datasets. There were no enzalutamide treatment-prognostic factor interactions (predictors). The final multivariable model included 11 prognostic factors: prostate-specific antigen, treatment, hemoglobin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastases, time from diagnosis to randomization, lactate dehydrogenase, ≥ 10 bone metastases, pain, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase. The tAUC was 0.74 in the testing set. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (testing set) were not yet reached (NYR) (NYR–NYR), 34.2 months (31.5–NYR), and 21.1 months (17.5–25.0). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for OS in the low- and intermediate-risk groups vs the high-risk group were 0.20 (0.14–0.29) and 0.40 (0.30–0.53), respectively. Conclusions: Our validated prognostic model incorporates factors routinely collected in chemotherapy-naive men with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide and identifies subsets of men with widely differing survival times. Clinical trial information: NCT01212991.

Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in chemotherapy-naïve men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from the phase III PREVAIL clinical trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Ping Lin ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Multivariable Model ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Testing Set

138 Background: Prognostic models require updating to reflect contemporary medical practice. In a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL trial (enzalutamide vs placebo), we identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC. Methods: Patients were randomly divided 2:1 into training (n = 1159) and testing (n = 550) sets. Using the training set, 23 predefined candidate prognostic factors (including treatment) were analyzed in a multivariable Cox model with stepwise procedures and in a penalized Cox proportional hazards model using the adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalty (data cutoff June 1, 2014). A multivariable model predicting OS was developed using the training set; the predictive accuracy was assessed in the testing set using time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC). The testing set was stratified based on risk score tertiles (low, intermediate, high), and OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Demographics, disease characteristics, and OS were balanced between the training and testing sets; median OS was 32.7 months for both datasets. There were no enzalutamide treatment-prognostic factor interactions (predictors). The final multivariable model included 11 prognostic factors: prostate-specific antigen, treatment, hemoglobin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastases, time from diagnosis to randomization, lactate dehydrogenase, ≥ 10 bone metastases, pain, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase. The tAUC was 0.74 in the testing set. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (testing set) were not yet reached (NYR) (NYR–NYR), 34.2 months (31.5–NYR), and 21.1 months (17.5–25.0). The hazard ratios (95% CI) for OS in the low- and intermediate-risk groups vs the high-risk group were 0.20 (0.14–0.29) and 0.40 (0.30–0.53), respectively. Conclusions: Our validated prognostic model incorporates factors routinely collected in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide and identifies subsets of men with widely differing survival times.

Construction and Validation of Prognostic Markers of Liver Cancer Based on Autophagy Genes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawei Zhou ◽  
Junchen Wan ◽  
Jiang Luo ◽  
Yuhao Tao
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Background: Liver cancer is one of the most common diseases in the world. At present, the mechanism of autophagy genes in liver cancer is not very clear. Therefore, it is meaningful to study the role and prognostic value of autophagy genes in liver cancer. Objective: The purpose of this study is to conduct a bioinformatics analysis of autophagy genes related to primary liver cancer to establish a prognostic model of primary liver cancer based on autophagy genes. Results: Through difference analysis, 31 differential autophagy genes were screened out and then analyzed by GO and KEGG analysis. At the same time, we built a PPI network. To optimize the evaluation of the prognosis of liver cancer patients, we integrated multiple autophagy genes to establish a prognostic model. By using univariate cox regression analysis, 15 autophagy genes related to prognosis were screened out. Then we included these 15 genes into the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and performed multi-factor cox regression analysis on the 9 selected genes to construct a prognostic model. The risk score of each patient was calculated based on 4 genes(BIRC5, HSP8, SQSTM1, and TMEM74) which participated in the establishing of the model, then the patients were divided into high-risk groups and low-risk groups. In the multivariate cox regression analysis, the risk score was the independent prognostic factors (HR=1.872, 95%CI=1.544-2.196, P<0.001). Survival analysis showed that the survival time of the low-risk group was significantly longer than that of the high-risk group. Combining clinical characteristics and autophagy genes, we constructed a nomogram for predicting prognosis. The external dataset GSE14520 proved that the nomogram has a good prediction for individual patients with primary liver cancer. Conclusion: This study provided potential autophagy-related markers for liver cancer patients to predict their prognosis and revealed part of the molecular mechanism of liver cancer autophagy. At the same time, the certain gene pathways and protein pathways related to autophagy may provide some inspiration for the development of anticancer drugs.

scholarly journals A prognostic model based on seven immune-related genes predicts the overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Yan ◽  
Wenjiang Zheng ◽  
Boqing Wang ◽  
Baoqian Ye ◽  
Huiyan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Prognostic Performance ◽  
Immune Related Genes

Abstract Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease with a high incidence and a poor prognosis. Growing amounts of evidence have shown that the immune system plays a critical role in the biological processes of HCC such as progression, recurrence, and metastasis, and some have discussed using it as a weapon against a variety of cancers. However, the impact of immune-related genes (IRGs) on the prognosis of HCC remains unclear. Methods Based on The Cancer Gene Atlas (TCGA) and Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort) datasets, we integrated the ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing profiles of 424 HCC patients with IRGs to calculate immune-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Survival analysis was used to establish a prognostic model of survival- and immune-related DEGs. Based on genomic and clinicopathological data, we constructed a nomogram to predict the prognosis of HCC patients. Gene set enrichment analysis further clarified the signalling pathways of the high-risk and low-risk groups constructed based on the IRGs in HCC. Next, we evaluated the correlation between the risk score and the infiltration of immune cells, and finally, we validated the prognostic performance of this model in the GSE14520 dataset. Results A total of 100 immune-related DEGs were significantly associated with the clinical outcomes of patients with HCC. We performed univariate and multivariate least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression analyses on these genes to construct a prognostic model of seven IRGs (Fatty Acid Binding Protein 6 (FABP6), Microtubule-Associated Protein Tau (MAPT), Baculoviral IAP Repeat Containing 5 (BIRC5), Plexin-A1 (PLXNA1), Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), Stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) and Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 5 (CSPG5)), which showed better prognostic performance than the tumour/node/metastasis (TNM) staging system. Moreover, we constructed a regulatory network related to transcription factors (TFs) that further unravelled the regulatory mechanisms of these genes. According to the median value of the risk score, the entire TCGA cohort was divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, and the low-risk group had a better overall survival (OS) rate. To predict the OS rate of HCC, we established a gene- and clinical factor-related nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve showed that this model had moderate accuracy. The correlation analysis between the risk score and the infiltration of six common types of immune cells showed that the model could reflect the state of the immune microenvironment in HCC tumours. Conclusion Our IRG prognostic model was shown to have value in the monitoring, treatment, and prognostic assessment of HCC patients and could be used as a survival prediction tool in the near future.

scholarly journals Identification of prognostic gene signature associated with microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e8128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Yue ◽  
Hongtao Ma ◽  
Yubai Zhou
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Lasso Regression

Background Lung cancer has the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide, and lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) is the most common pathological subtype. Accumulating evidence suggests the tumor microenvironment (TME) is correlated with the tumor progress and the patient’s outcome. As the major components of TME, the tumor-infiltrated immune cells and stromal cells have attracted more and more attention. In this study, differentially expressed immune and stromal signature genes were used to construct a TME-related prognostic model for predicting the outcomes of LADC patients. Methods The expression profiles of LADC samples with clinical information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the TME of LADC were identified using TCGA dataset by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The prognostic effects of TME-related DEGs were analyzed using univariate Cox regression. Then, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed to reduce the overfit and the number of genes for further analysis. Next, the prognostic model was constructed by step multivariate Cox regression and risk score of each sample was calculated. Then, survival and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to validate the model using TCGA and GEO datasets, respectively. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis of gene signature was performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Finally, the overall immune status, tumor purity and the expression profiles of HLA genes of high- and low-risk samples was further analyzed to reveal the potential mechanisms of prognostic effects of the model. Results A total of 93 TME-related DEGs were identified, of which 23 DEGs were up-regulated and 70 DEGs were down-regulated. The univariate cox analysis indicated that 23 DEGs has the prognostic effects, the hazard ratio ranged from 0.65 to 1.25 (p < 0.05). Then, seven genes were screened out from the 23 DEGs by LASSO regression method and were further analyzed by step multivariate Cox regression. Finally, a three-gene (ADAM12, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK), ERG) signature was constructed, and ADAM12, BTK can be used as independent prognostic factors. The three-gene signature well stratified the LADC patients in both training (TCGA) and testing (GEO) datasets as high-risk and low-risk groups, the 3-year area under curve (AUC) of ROC curves of three GEO sets were 0.718 (GSE3141), 0.646 (GSE30219) and 0.643 (GSE50081). The GSEA analysis indicated that highly expressed ADAM12, BTK, ERG mainly correlated with the activation of pathways involving in focal adhesion, immune regulation. The immune analysis indicated that the low-risk group has more immune activities and higher expression of HLA genes than that of the high-risk group. In sum, we identified and constructed a three TME-related DEGs signature, which could be used to predict the prognosis of LADC patients.

scholarly journals Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis Reveals a New Survival Model for Prognostic Prediction in Ewing Sarcoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debao Li ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Guanghui Wang ◽  
Yaowen Yang ◽  
Weiyu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Lasso Regression ◽  
Survival Status

Abstract Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignant bone or soft-tissue cancer that mainly arises in children and young adults. However, the prognosis of Ewing sarcoma remains very poor, and there is no effective prediction method. The aim of our study was to identify a prognostic model for ES patients based on prognosis-associated mRNA expression profiles. Methods: The GSE17679 dataset was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differently expressed genes (DEGs) between ES and normal control were identified using R package “limma”. A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to screen gene modules associated with recurrence/metastasis and survival status based on DEGs. Results: The prognostic model was constructed based on genes in MEbrown module, which was most associated with recurrence/metastasis and survival status, using Kaplan-Meier survival and lasso regression analysis. Sixteen genes were screened to construct the prognostic model. ES patients were grouped into high- and low-risk groups based on the median of risk score calculated for each of them. ES patients in high-risk group have worse survival than patients in low-risk group. The AUCs (Area under the ROC curve) for 1-year, 3-year, and 6-year overall survival were 0.903, 0.995, 0.953. Conclusions: Taken together, our research constructed a prognostic model which has excellent prediction performance for overall survival of ES patients.

A Novel Risk Classification Model Predicts Overall Survival and Locoregional Surgery Benefit in Colorectal Patients with Distant Metastasis at the Initial Diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mo Chen ◽  
Tian-en Li ◽  
Pei-zhun Du ◽  
Junjie Pan ◽  
Zheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Intermediate Risk

Abstract Background and aims: In this research, we aimed to construct a risk classification model to predict overall survival (OS) and locoregional surgery benefit in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with distant metastasis.Methods: We selected a cohort consisting of 12741 CRC patients diagnosed with distant metastasis between 2010 and 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly assigned into training group and validation group at the ratio of 2:1. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to screen independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed and assessed by the Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. A novel risk classification model was further established based on the nomogram.Results: Ultimately 12 independent risk factors including race, age, marriage, tumor site, tumor size, grade, T stage, N stage, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, lung metastasis and liver metastasis were identified and adopted in the nomogram. The C-indexes of training and validation groups were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.81) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78), respectively. The risk classification model stratified patients into three risk groups (low-, intermediate- and high-risk) with divergent median OS (low-risk: 36.0 months, 95% CI 34.1-37.9; intermediate-risk: 18.0 months, 95% CI 17.4-18.6; high-risk: 6.0 months, 95% CI 5.3-6.7). Locoregional therapies including surgery and radiotherapy could prognostically benefit patients in the low-risk group (surgery: hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.71; radiotherapy: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98) and intermediate risk group (surgery: HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54-0.68; radiotherapy: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.95), but not in the high-risk group (surgery: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29; radiotherapy: HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31). And all risk groups could benefit from systemic therapy (low-risk: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.80; intermediate-risk: HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.47-0.54; high-risk: HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.53).Conclusion: A novel risk classification model predicting prognosis and locoregional surgery benefit of CRC patients with distant metastasis was established and validated. This predictive model could be further utilized by physicians and be of great significance for medical practice.

scholarly journals Immune-Related Four-lncRNA Signature for Patients with Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Benben Cao ◽  
Xia Zhang ◽  
Zheng Niu ◽  
Jinyi Tong
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gynecological Malignancy

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common gynecological malignancy for which prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers are urgently needed. The signature based on immune-related lncRNAs (IRLs) of CC has never been reported. This study is aimed at establishing an IRL signature for patients with CC. A cohort of 326 CC and 21 normal tissue samples with corresponding clinical information was included in this study. Twenty-eight IRLs were collected according to the Pearson correlation analysis between the immune score and lncRNA expression ( p < 0.01 ). Four IRLs (BZRAP1-AS1, EMX2OS, ZNF667-AS1, and CTC-429P9.1) with the most significant prognostic values ( p < 0.05 ) were identified which demonstrated an ability to stratify patients into the low-risk and high-risk groups by developing a risk score model. It was observed that patients in the low-risk group showed longer overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group in the training set, valid set, and total set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for the four-IRL signature in predicting the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates was larger than 0.65. In addition, the low-risk and high-risk groups displayed different immune statuses in GSEA. These IRLs were also significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration. Our results showed that the IRL signature had a prognostic value for CC. Meanwhile, the specific mechanisms of the four IRLs in the development of CC were ascertained preliminarily.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document