scholarly journals The Performance of Universal Adhesives on Orthodontic Bracket Bonding

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhittin Ugurlu ◽  
Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Adhesive Application

Abstract Objective This article aimed to assess the effects of double application of universal adhesives on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Method Seventy-five extracted human premolars were used. The teeth were randomly assigned into five groups based on the adhesive procedure (n = 15). The universal adhesives Scotchbond Universal (3M Oral Care) and Prime&Bond Universal (Dentsply) were used (following manufacturer’s instructions and double application). Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek) was employed as control. Following adhesive application, the brackets were bonded on the tooth surfaces. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C, the specimens were subjugated to the shear bond strength test under a universal testing machine (Autograph AGS-X; Shimadzu). Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference tests (p = 0.05). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined using a stereomicroscope (S4E; Leica Microsystems). Data of ARI scores were submitted to Pearson’s chi-square test. Results The highest shear bond strengths were acquired with Scotchbond Universal (p < 0.05). The double application of Scotchbond Universal did not impact the shear bond strength. The lowest shear bond strength was found in Prime&Bond Universal (p < 0.05). The double application of Prime&Bond Universal increased the shear bond strength (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in ARI scores among the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The universal adhesives may be an alternative for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. The double application of universal adhesives might improve the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets depending on the material.

scholarly journals The Impact of Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse on the Bond Strength of Polycarbonate Orthodontic Brackets

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukumaran Anil ◽  
Farouk Ahmed Hussein ◽  
Mohammed Ibrahim Hashem ◽  
Elna P Chalisserry
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mouth Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Objective The purpose of the current in-vivo study was to assess the effect of using 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) mouth rinse, before bonding, on shear bond strength of polycarbonate brackets bonded with composite adhesive. Subjects and methods Eighteen orthodontic patients with a mean age 21.41 ± 1.2 years, who were scheduled to have 2 or more first premolars extracted, were included in this study. Patients were referred for an oral prophylaxis program which included, in part, the use of a mouth rinse. Patients were divided into 2 groups, a test group of 9 patients who used 0.12% CHX gluconate mouth rinse twice daily and a control group of 9 patients who used a mouth rinse without CHX, but with same color. After 1 week, polycarbonate brackets were bonded to first premolars with Transbond XT composite adhesive. Premolars were extracted after 28 days and tested for shear bond strength on a universal testing machine. Student's t-test was used to compare shear bond strengths of both groups. Results No statistically significant difference was found in bond strengths’ values between both groups. The test group (with CHX) has mean shear bond strength of 14.21 ± 2.42 MPa whereas the control group (without CHX) revealed a mean strength of 14.52 ± 2.31 MPa. Conclusion The use of 0.12% CHX mouth rinse, for one week before bonding, did not affect the shear bond strength of polycarbonate brackets bonded with Transbond composite. Furthermore, these brackets showed clinically acceptable bond strength. How to cite this article Hussein FA, Hashem MI, Chalisserry EP, Anil S. The Impact of Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse on the Bond Strength of Polycarbonate Orthodontic Brackets. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(6):688-692.

scholarly journals Effects of adhesive systems at different temperatures on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
Serdar Akarsu ◽  
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk ◽  
Ahmet Serkan Kucukekenci
Keyword(s):  
Body Temperature ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
The Body ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Effect Of Temperature ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Different Temperatures

Background. The temperature might affect the physical and mechanical properties of adhesive materials by reducing the polymerization rate. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of temperature on the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets using various adhesive resin systems. Methods. Extracted human premolar teeth were randomly assigned to 8 groups (n=10) for bonding with the two available orthodontics adhesive systems (Transbond XT and NeoBond) at different temperatures: refrigeration temperature (4°C), room temperature (20°C), human body temperature (36°C) and high temperature (55°C). The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was assigned to the fractured orthodontic brackets. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests and independent t-test. Results. Transbond XT exhibited higher SBS values compared to Neobond at all the tested temperatures; however, a statistically significant difference was not observed (P>0.05). The SBS results were minimum at 4°C and maximum at 36°C in both the adhesive groups (P<0.05). Conclusion. Pre-heating orthodontic adhesives up to the body temperature prior to bonding the brackets in orthodontic treatment increased the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

scholarly journals Variations in orthodontic bracket retention related to base design. Comparison of foil mesh and anchor pylons brackets

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Gibas-Stanek ◽  
Stephen Williams ◽  
Wojciech I. Ryniewicz ◽  
Bartłomiej W. Loster
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bonding Properties ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Plastic Brackets ◽  
Bracket Base ◽  
Base Design

Aim of the study. To compare the shear bond strength of metal brackets with foil mesh (3M, Victory Series), one piece metal brackets (Cannon Ultra) and aesthetic plastic brackets (Cannon Ultra) and to evaluate the sandblasting effect on previously used metal bracket bases regarding their bonding ability. Materials and Methods.A total of seventy human third molars were divided into four groups, and brackets were bonded to the enamel using Transbond XT. After 24 hours of storage, brackets were debonded with Instron Universal Testing Machine® and shear bond strength was recorded. Metal brackets were sandblasted until all visible bonding material was removed from the bracket base and then the bonding procedure and shear bond testing were repeated. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check normal distribution. Student’s t-test was used to compare the shear bond strength. Results. The shear bond strength of one-piece metal brackets is significantly bigger (18.93MPa) than metal brackets with foil mesh (12.53MPa). Metal brackets in general demonstrate better bonding properties than aesthetic plastic brackets (8.61MPa). There is no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength between new and re-used sandblasted brackets. Conclusions. One-piece brackets with anchor pylons demonstrate better bonding properties but there is a higher risk of enamel damage during debonding of re-used sandblasted brackets.

Effect of Adhesive Boosters on Bond Strength of Bleached Teeth in Orthodontic Bonding

2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422110044
Author(s):  
I Ranganayakulu ◽  
D Praveen Kumar Varma ◽  
Padma Priya CV ◽  
RSVM Raghu Ram ◽  
K Anand Viswanadh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Carbamide Peroxide ◽  
Universal Testing Machine ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maxillary Premolars ◽  
And Control

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effect of adhesion boosters on shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets on bleached teeth. Materials and Methods: A sample of 90 extracted maxillary premolars was equally divided into 2 groups of bleached and non-bleached teeth. Twenty-two percent carbamide peroxide gel was used as an agent for bleaching. Each group was further divided equally into 3 subgroups depending on the type of adhesive booster used (Enhance LC, All-bond 2, and no adhesive booster [control]) and maxillary premolars brackets were bonded. Debonding was done with a universal testing machine, and the SBS was recorded. Results: The SBS of non-bleached teeth was highest for All-bond 2 (14.78 ± 2.47 MPa) followed by Enhance LC (13.15 ± 3.49 MPa) and control (10.30 ± 1.06 MPa). The SBS of bleached teeth was highest for All bond 2 (12.23 ± 1.41 MPa) followed by Enhance LC (11.76 ± 1.71 MPa) and control (9.63 ± 1.06 MPa). All subgroups showed a significant difference in SBS (P = .000) on bleached and non-bleached teeth. The SBS showed a significant difference between the bleached and non-bleached teeth in All-bond 2 group (P = .019). Conclusion: Adhesive boosters increased the SBS of both bleached and non-bleached teeth significantly. Among the two adhesive boosters used, All-bond 2 showed more SBS values.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Fixed with Remineralizing Adhesive Systems after Simulating One Year of Orthodontic Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Lima Bezerra ◽  
Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres ◽  
Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽  
Alvaro Henrique Borges ◽  
Milton Carlos Kuga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Thermomechanical Cycling ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

The objective of this study is to assess,in vitro, the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets fixed with remineralizing adhesive systems submitted to thermomechanical cycling, simulating one year of orthodontic treatment. Sixty-four bovine incisor teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n=16):XT: Transbond XT,QC: Quick Cure,OL: Ortholite Color, andSEP: Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer. The samples were submitted to thermomechanical cycling simulating one year of orthodontic treatment. Shear bond strength tests were carried out using a universal testing machine with a load cell of 50 KgF at 0.5 mm/minute. The samples were examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) in order to analyze enamel surface and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney (with Bonferroni correction) tests showed a significant difference between the studied groups (p<0.05). Groups XT, QC, and SEP presented the highest values of adhesive resistance and no statistical differences were found between them. The highest frequency of failures between enamel and adhesive was observed in groups XT, QC, and OL. Quick Cure (QC) remineralizing adhesive system presented average adhesive resistance values similar to conventional (XT) and self-etching (SEP) adhesives, while remineralizing system (OL) provided the lowest values of adhesive resistance.

scholarly journals Effects of Potassium Nitrate and Oxalate Desensitizer Agents on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1096-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Türkkahraman ◽  
Necdet Adanir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Potassium Nitrate ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of potassium nitrate and oxalate desensitizer agents on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human premolar teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 15 each. UltraEZ potassium nitrate desensitizer was applied on teeth in the first group, while BisBlock oxalate desensitizer was applied on teeth in the second group. The third group served as a control. Orthodontic brackets were bonded with a light cure composite resin and cured with a halogen light. After bonding, the shear bond strength of the brackets was tested with a universal testing machine. Results: The highest shear bond strengths were measured in Group III. The shear bond strength in Groups I and II was significantly lower than in Group III (P &lt; .001). Significant difference was also found between Group I and Group II (P &lt; .01). Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel treated with potassium nitrate and oxalate desensitizers showed significantly lower bond strengths than did brackets bonded to untreated enamel.

Shear Bond Strength and ARI Score of Chemically Cured Orthodontic Adhesive Resins

2017 ◽  
Vol 730 ◽  
pp. 148-154
Author(s):  
Pacharapilai Nidhiritdhikrai ◽  
Niwat Anuwongnukroh ◽  
Surachai Dechkunakorn ◽  
Wassana Wichai
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Multiple Comparison Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength and to evaluate Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) score among three chemically cured orthodontic adhesive resins, namely Unite (3M Unitek, USA), Rely-a-Bond (Reliance, USA) and Ortho-Force (China). Materials and methods: Ninety extracted human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups (30 teeth/group). Upper premolar metal brackets (Ormco, USA) were boned by using the following adhesive systems: Unite, Rely-a-Bond and Ortho-Force. After 24 hours, shear bond strength was tested by using a Universal Testing Machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. After debonding, all teeth and brackets were examined under 10-times magnification and scored by using Image-Pro Plus 7.0 software program. Results: One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey HSD multiple comparison test showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) difference among groups. Ortho-Force had the lowest shear bond strength (17.53±3.60 MPa) and demonstrated statistically significant difference (P<0.05) from the other groups. The difference between Unite (22.40±3.11 MPa) and Rely-a-Bond (20.67±2.70 MPa) was not statistically significant. The bond failure sites were categorized according to the ARI, and the Chi-square test showed significant differences in the ARI scores (P<0.05) among all sample groups. The ARI score of 3 was found to be the most prevalent in Ortho-force (73.33%), followed by Unite (66.67%), and Rely-a-Bond (0%). In Rely-a-Bond group, ARI score of 1 was the most prevalent (66.67%). Only Unite had no residual adhesive left on tooth surface after debonding (6.67%). Conclusions: Unite and Rely-a-Bond produced greater shear bond strength than Ortho-Force. According to ARI score, Unite and Ortho-Force had a high frequency of all the adhesive remained on the tooth surface but Rely-a-Bond had high frequency of less than half the adhesive remained on the tooth surface.

scholarly journals Effect of Cyclic Loading on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Moslem Imani ◽  
Farzaneh Aghajani ◽  
Nafiseh Momeni ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Objectives: In clinical conditions, orthodontic brackets are exposed to periodic stresses mainly induced by mastication and intraoral forces. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cyclic loading to simulate masticatory forces on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded to teeth using self-etch and total-etch bonding systems. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four caries- and crack-free bovine mandibular incisors were selected and randomly assigned to two groups based on the type of bonding system. After bonding, all samples were thermocycled (500 cycles) followed by cyclic loading of the half of the specimens in each group by applying 40 N load with 2 Hz frequency for 10,000 cycles. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was calculated subsequently. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, two-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney test. Results: The SBS was 10.09±3.78 MPa and 14.44±6.06 MPa for self-etch and total-etch bonding systems in cyclic loading group, respectively. The SBS was 9.43±5.3 MPa and 11.31±5.42 MPa in self-etch and total-etch groups without cyclic loading, respectively. Cyclic loading did not cause any significant difference in SBS (P>0.05). The ARI scores of the groups were significantly different (P<0.05). Conclusions: The present results demonstrated that low masticatory forces at 10,000 cycles did not have a significant impact on bracket-adhesive SBS; however, they significantly changed the ARI score. Even though the total-etch bonding system yielded higher SBS than the self-etch system, the performance of both was clinically acceptable.

scholarly journals Bond Strength and Microleakage of a Novel Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Silver Diamine Fluoride

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prim Auychai ◽  
Nichakorn Khumtrakoon ◽  
Chonticha Jitongart ◽  
Punnamas Daomanee ◽  
Arunee Laiteerapong
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Silver Diamine Fluoride ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract Objectives To investigate the shear bond strength and microleakage of glass ionomer cement (GIC) containing silver diamine fluoride (SDF). Materials and Methods Sound human permanent premolars were divided into the following three groups: 1) GIC (Fuji IX), 2) GICSDF-S: GIC + SDF (Saforide), and 3) GICSDF-T: GIC + SDF (Topamine). Shear bond strength (n = 14/group) was measured using a universal testing machine and compared between groups (one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD, p < 0.05). Microleakage (n = 15/group) at enamel and dentin margins was scored using a stereomicroscope (10x) and compared between groups (Chi-square, p < 0.05). Results There were significant differences in shear bond strength between the GIC and GICSDF-S groups and between the GIC and GICSDF-T groups. The GIC group had the lowest shear bond strength among the groups; however, there was no significant difference between the GICSDF-S and GICSDF-T groups. The microleakage test results were not significantly different between groups at the enamel margin or dentin margins. Although the GIC group demonstrated a higher dye penetration score at the enamel and dentin margins, the difference was not significant. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that incorporating SDF into GIC results in higher shear bond strength while not increasing microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins.

scholarly journals The Effect of Remineralizing Agents With/Without CO2 Laser Irradiation on Structural and Mechanical Properties of Enamel and its Shear Bond Strength to Orthodontic Brackets

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152
Author(s):  
Hannaneh Ghadirian ◽  
Allahyar Geramy ◽  
Waleed Shallal ◽  
Soolmaz Heidari ◽  
Nooshin Noshiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Beam Diameter ◽  
Demineralized Enamel ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Remineralizing agents may be used for the treatment of white spot lesions (WSLs) prior to bracket bonding. However, some concerns exist regarding their possible interference with the etching and bonding process, negatively affecting the bond strength. This study aimed to assess the effect of two remineralizing agents with/without CO2 laser irradiation on the mechanical properties and shear bond strength (SBS) of demineralized enamel to the orthodontic bracket. Methods: This study evaluated 60 premolar teeth in 6 groups (n=10) as follows: (I) sound enamel, (II) demineralized enamel, (III) Nupro remineralizing agent (N), (IV) Nupro and CO2 laser (N/L), (V) Teethmate remineralizing agent (T), and (VI) Teethmate and CO2 laser (T/L). The remineralizing agents were applied to the enamel surfaces after their immersion in a demineralizing solution for 5 days. In groups IV and VI, the CO2 laser with a 10.6 μm wavelength, 10 ms pulse duration, a 50 Hz repetition rate, 0.3 mm beam diameter and 0.7 W power was irradiated after applying the remineralizing agents. Brackets were bonded to the enamel surfaces and SBS was measured by a universal testing machine. For the assessment of enamel microhardness, 20 sections of molar teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=5; N, N/L, T, T/L) and their microhardness was measured before demineralization, after demineralization and after remineralization. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) were carried out to assess the formation of hydroxyapatite. The atomic percentages of the C, O, P, Ca, Na, Si, F and Ca/P ratio were determined by EDS analysis. Results: The SBS significantly decreased in group II (P<0.001). There was no significant difference among the groups I, III, IV, V and VI (P<0.05). This finding was similar to the microhardness results, which showed an increase in microhardness after remineralization (P<0.05), with no difference among the remineralizing agents. The Ca/P ratio was the highest in the Nupro group and the lowest in the demineralized group. Conclusion: Remineralizing agents can significantly improve the microhardness and structural properties of demineralized enamel to a level similar to that of sound enamel with no adverse effect on SBS to orthodontic brackets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document