Source rock characterisation of under-explored regions of Queensland

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Troup ◽  
Sally Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Isotope Analysis ◽  
Predictive Modelling ◽  
Gas Analysis ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Pyrolysis Gas ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Rock Analysis

Historically, petroleum exploration in Queensland has focused on the Bowen-Surat and Cooper-Eromanga basins, with only cursory examination of other basins across the state. As part of the Queensland Industry Priorities Initiative, two projects (Round 1 and 2) were submitted to the Geological Survey of Queensland (GSQ) to examine the geochemical characteristics of potential petroleum source rocks throughout Queensland. The analysis conducted provides a better understanding of generative potential for petroleum, and predicts the timing, volume, composition, and physical state of hydrocarbons retained in and expelled from source rocks. It is an integral component to petroleum systems analysis used to identify the potential for undiscovered accumulations of petroleum from conventional and unconventional reservoirs. Of particular interest were the Georgina, Drummond, Eromanga, and Maryborough basins. Of these, the Georgina and Maryborough basins have known hydrocarbon shows identified through exploration drilling, though no commercial discoveries have yet been made. The Drummond Basin was targeted to identify a potential source for oil and gas shows encountered in drilling within the Galilee Basin. The Toolebuc Formation in the Eromanga Basin has been noted as having the potential for a shale oil play and this study is supporting further assessment to identify optimal areas for future exploration through predictive modelling. This report details the results from Round 1 of the study for samples taken from the Georgina Limestone and Scartwater, Ducabrook, Mount Hall, Toolebuc, and Maryborough formations, where limited analysis of source rock characteristics has historically been undertaken. Ninety-seven samples were chosen from nine wells and sent to Geos4 in Potsdam, Germany, for source rock analysis. All samples were screened for suitability of further analysis using Rock-Eval and TOC by LECO, with immature and organic-rich samples being preferentially selected for further testing. Screened samples were analysed using pyrolysis gas chromatography (n=27), thermovaporisation (n=23), bulk kinetics (n=5), compositional kinetics (n=4), late gas analysis (n=14), and biomarker and bulk isotope analysis (n=15). These results have been integrated with existing analyses to better understand the prospectivity of the under-explored basins of Queensland.

PETROLEUM SYSTEMS IN TASMANIA'S FRONTIER ONSHORE BASINS

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
M.R. Bendall C.F. Burrett ◽  
H.J. Askin
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Lower Permian ◽  
Peak Oil ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Upper Proterozoic ◽  
Oil Seep

Sedimentary successions belonging to three petroleum su persy stems can be recognised in and below the Late Carboniferous to Late Triassic onshore Tasmania Basin. These are the Centralian, Larapintine and Gondwanan. The oldest (Centralian) is poorly known and contains possible mature source rocks in Upper Proterozoic dolomites. The Larapintine 2 system is represented by rocks of the Devonian fold and thrust belt beneath the Tasmania Basin. Potential source rocks are micrites and shales within the 1.8 km-thick tropical Ordovician Gordon Group carbonates. Conodont CAI plots show that the Gordon Group lies in the oil and gas windows over most of central Tasmania and probably under much of the Tasmania Basin. Potential reservoirs are the upper reefal parts of the Gordon Group, paleokarsted surfaces within the Gordon Group and the overlying sandstones of the Siluro-Devonian Tiger Range and Eldon Groups. Seal rocks include shales within the Siluro-Devonian and Upper Carboniferous-Permian tillites and shales.The Gondwanan supersystem is the most promising supersystem for petroleum exploration within the onshore Tasmania Basin. It is divided into two petroleum systems— the Early Permian Gondwanan 1 system, and the Late Permian to Triassic Gondwanan 2 system. Excellent source rocks occur in the marine Tasmanite Oil Shale and other sections within the Lower Permian Woody Island and Quamby Formations of the Gondwanan 1 system and within coals and freshwater oil shales of the Gondwanan 2 system. These sources are within the oil and gas windows across most of the basin and probably reached peak oil generation at about 100 Ma. An oil seep, sourced from a Tasmanites-rich, anoxic shale, is found within Jurassic dolerite 40 km WSW of Hobart. Potential Gondwanan 1 reservoirs are the glaciofluvial Faulkner Group sandstones and sandstones and limestones within the overlying parts of the glaciomarine Permian sequence. The Upper Permian Ferntree Mudstone Formation provides an effective regional seal. Potential Gondwanan 2 reservoirs are the sandstones of the Upper Permian to Norian Upper Parmeener Supergroup. Traps consisting of domes, anticlines and faults were formed probably during the Early Cretaceous. Preliminary interpretation of a short AGSO seismic profile in the Tasmania Basin shows that, contrary to earlier belief, structures can be mapped beneath extensive and thick (300 m) sills of Jurassic dolerite. In addition, the total section of Gondwana to Upper Proterozoic to Triassic sediments appears to be in excess of 8,500 m. These recent studies, analysis of the oil seep and drilling results show that the Tasmanian source rocks have generated both oil and gas. The Tasmania Basin is considered prospective for both petroleum and helium and is comparable in size and stratigraphy to other glaciomarine-terrestrial Gondwanan basins such as the South Oman and Cooper Basins.

Prospectivity of the 2014 offshore acreage release areas for petroleum exploration

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Thomas Bernecker ◽  
Dianne Edwards ◽  
Tehani Kuske ◽  
Bridgette Lewis ◽  
Tegan Smith
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Northern Margin ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Northern Carnarvon Basin

The Australian Government formally releases new offshore exploration areas at the annual APPEA conference. Industry nominations provided guidance for the selection of gazettal areas, and in 2014 all 30 areas are supported by such nominations. The release areas are located across various offshore hydrocarbon provinces ranging from mature basins with ongoing oil and gas production to exploration frontiers. Work program bids are invited for two rounds closing on 2 October 2014 and 2 April 2015, while the closing date for four cash bid areas is 5 February 2015. Twenty-nine of the 2014 Release Areas are located along Australia’s northern margin within the Westralian Superbasin, which encompasses the rift-basins that extend from the Northern Carnarvon Basin to the Bonaparte Basin. Evolution during Gondwana break-up established a series of petroleum systems, many of which have been successfully explored, while others remain untapped. Only one area was nominated and approved for release on Australia’s southern margin. The 220 graticular blocks cover almost the entire Eyre Sub-basin of the Bight Basin. In the context of the recent commencement of large-scale exploration programs in the Ceduna and Duntroon sub-basins, this release area provides additional opportunities to explore an offshore frontier. Geoscience Australia’s new long-term petroleum program supports industry activities by engaging in petroleum geological studies that are aimed at the establishment of margin to basin-scale structural frameworks and comprehensive assessments of Australian source rocks underpinning all hydrocarbon prospectivity studies.

Research for the Upstream Petroleum Sector: The Crown Research Institute Concept

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 245-252
Author(s):  
J M Beggs
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Publicly Funded ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Oil And Gas Resources ◽  
Petroleum Sector ◽  
Geological Sciences ◽  
Research Institute

New Zealand's scientific institutions have been restructured so as to be more responsive to the needs of the economy. Exploration for and development of oil and gas resources depend heavily on the geological sciences. In New Zealand, these activities are favoured by a comprehensive, open-file database of the results of previous work, and by a historically publicly funded, in-depth knowledge base of the extensive sedimentary basins. This expertise is now only partially funded by government research contracts, and increasingly undertakes contract work in a range of scientific services to the upstream petroleum sector, both in New Zealand and overseas. By aligning government-funded research programmes with the industry's knowledge needs, there is maximum advantage in improving the understanding of the occurrence of oil and gas resources. A Crown Research Institute can serve as an interface between advances in fundamental geological sciences, and the practical needs of the industry. Current publicly funded programmes of the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences include a series of regional basin studies, nearing completion; and multi-disciplinary team studies related to the various elements of the petroleum systems of New Zealand: source rocks and their maturation, migration and entrapment as a function of basin structure and tectonics, and the distribution and configuration of reservoir systems.

scholarly journals Petroleum system analysis of the Mishrif reservoir in the Ratawi, Zubair, North and South Rumaila oil fields, southern Iraq

GeoArabia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamer K. Al-Ameri ◽  
Amer Jassim Al-Khafaji ◽  
John Zumberge
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Isotopic Analysis ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Core Samples ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Sulaiy Formation ◽  
Rock Analysis

ABSTRACT Five oil samples reservoired in the Cretaceous Mishrif Formation from the Ratawi, Zubair, Rumaila North and Rumaila South fields have been analysed using Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS). In addition, fifteen core samples from the Mishrif Formation and 81 core samples from the Lower Cretaceous and Upper Jurassic have been subjected to source rock analysis and palynological and petrographic description. These observations have been integrated with electric wireline log response. The reservoirs of the Mishrif Formation show measured porosities up to 28% and the oils are interpreted as being sourced from: (1) Type II carbonate rocks interbedded with shales and deposited in a reducing marine environment with low salinity based on biomarkers and isotopic analysis; (2) Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous age based on sterane ratios, analysis of isoprenoids and isotopes, and biomarkers, and (3) Thermally mature source rocks, based on the biomarker analysis. The geochemical analysis suggests that the Mishrif oils may have been sourced from the Upper Jurassic Najma or Sargelu formations or the Lower Cretaceous Sulaiy Formation. Visual kerogen assessment and source rock analysis show the Sulaiy Formation to be a good quality source rock with high total organic carbon (up to 8 wt% TOC) and rich in amorphogen. The Lower Cretaceous source rocks were deposited in a suboxic-anoxic basin and show good hydrogen indices. They are buried at depths in excess of 5,000 m and are likely to have charged Mishrif reservoirs during the Miocene. The migration from the source rock is likely to be largely vertical and possibly along faults before reaching the vuggy, highly permeable reservoirs of the Mishrif Formation. Structural traps in the Mishrif Formation reservoir are likely to have formed in the Late Cretaceous.

scholarly journals GEOCHEMICAL AND GEOSTATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF CRETACEOUS COALS AND SHALES IN SOME NIGERAIN SEDIMENTARY BASINS FOR THEIR HYDROCARBON PRONESS AND MATURITY LEVELS

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Good Source ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Limit Value ◽  
The Impact

The Rock–Eval pyrolysis and LECO analysis for 9 shale and 12 coal samples, as well as, geostatistical analysis have been used to investigate source rock characteristics, correlation between the assessed parameters (QI, BI, S1, S2, S3, HI, S1 + S2, OI, PI, TOC) and the impact of changes in the Tmax on the assessed parameters in the Cretaceous Sokoto, Anambra Basins and Middle Benue Trough of northwestern, southeastern and northcentral Nigeria respectively. The geochemical results point that about 97% of the samples have TOC values greater than the minimum limit value (0.5 wt %) required to induce hydrocarbon generation from source rocks. Meanwhile, the Dukamaje and Taloka shales and Lafia/Obi coal are found to be fair to good source rock for oil generation with slightly higher thermal maturation. The source rocks are generally immature through sub-mature to marginal mature with respect to the oil and gas window, while the potential source rocks from the Anambra Basin are generally sub-mature grading to mature within the oil window. The analyzed data were approached statistically to find some relations such as factors, and clusters concerning the examination of the source rocks. These factors were categorized into type of organic matter and organic richness, thermal maturity and hydrocarbon potency. In addendum, cluster analysis separated the source rocks in the study area into two groups. The source rocks characterized by HI >240 (mg/g), TOC from 58.89 to 66.43 wt %, S1 from 2.01 to 2.54 (mg/g) and S2 from 148.94 to 162.52 (mg/g) indicating good to excellent source rocks with kerogen of type II and type III and are capable of generating oil and gas. Followed by the Source rocks characterized by HI <240 (mg/g), TOC from 0.94 to 36.12 wt%, S1 from 0.14 to 0.72 (mg/g) and S2 from 0.14 to 20.38 (mg/g) indicating poor to good source rocks with kerogen of type III and are capable of generating gas. Howeverr, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis shows a significant positive correlation between TOC and S1, S2 and HI and no correlation between TOC and Tmax, highly negative correlation between TOC and OI and no correlation between Tmax and HI. Keywords- Cretaceous, Geochemical, Statistical, Cluster; Factor analyses.

Anabar-Lena Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, Northern East Siberia

2021 ◽  
pp. M57-2021-29
Author(s):  
A.K. Khudoley ◽  
S.V. Frolov ◽  
G.G. Akhmanov ◽  
E.A. Bakay ◽  
S.S. Drachev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Foreland Basin ◽  
Early Carboniferous ◽  
Passive Margin ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
East Siberia ◽  
Lena River ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Intracratonic Basin

AbstractAnabar-Lena Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element (AL CTSE) is located in the northern East Siberia extending for c. 700 km along the Laptev Sea coast between the Khatanga Bay and Lena River delta. AL CTSE consists of rocks from Mesoproterozoic to Late Cretaceous in age with total thickness reaching 14 km. It evolved through the following tectonic settings: (1) Meso-Early Neoproterozoic intracratonic basin, (2) Ediacaran - Early Devonian passive margin, (3) Middle Devonian - Early Carboniferous rift, (4) late Early Carboniferous - latest Jurassic passive margin, (5) Permian foreland basin, (6) Triassic to Jurassic continental platform basin and (7) latest Jurassic - earliest Late Cretaceous foreland basin. Proterozoic and lower-middle Paleozoic successions are composed mainly by carbonate rocks while siliciclastic rocks dominate upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic sections. Several petroleum systems are assumed in the AL CTSE. Permian source rocks and Triassic sandstone reservoirs are the most important play elements. Presence of several mature source rock units and abundant oil- and gas-shows (both in wells and in outcrops), including a giant Olenek Bitumen Field, suggest that further exploration in this area may result in economic discoveries.

About this title - Application of Analytical Techniques to Petroleum Systems

10.1144/sp484 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 484 (1) ◽  
pp. NP-NP
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Dowey ◽  
Mark Osborne ◽  
Herbert Volk
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Organic Geochemistry ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Sediment Provenance ◽  
Chemical Production ◽  
Petroleum Systems ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Cutting-edge techniques have always been utilized in petroleum exploration and production to reduce costs and improve efficiencies. The demand for petroleum in the form of oil and gas is expected to increase for electricity production, transport and chemical production, largely driven by an increase in energy consumption in the developing world. Innovations in analytical methods will continue to play a key role in the industry moving forwards as society shifts towards lower carbon energy systems and more advantaged oil and gas resources are targeted. This volume brings together new analytical approaches and describes how they can be applied to the study of petroleum systems. The papers within this volume cover a wide range of topics and case studies, in the fields of fluid and isotope geochemistry, organic geochemistry, imaging and sediment provenance. The work illustrates how the current, state-of-the-art technology can be effectively utilised to address ongoing challenges in petroleum geoscience.

Geochemical Inversion - A Modern Approach to Inferring Source-Rock Identity from Characteristics of Accumulated Oil and Gas

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 295-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K. Bissada ◽  
L.W. Elrod ◽  
C.R. Robison ◽  
L.M. Darnell ◽  
H.M. Szymczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Age Identity ◽  
Oil And Natural Gas ◽  
Architectural Constraints ◽  
Geologic Setting ◽  
Relative Migration

In recent years, petroleum geochemists have been re-focusing their efforts on developing practical means for inferring, from hydrocarbon chemistry and geologic constraints, the “provenance” of hydrocarbon accumulations, seeps or stains. This capability, referred to here as “Geochemical Inversion”, can be invaluable to the explorationist in deriving clues as to the character, age, identity, maturity and location of an accumulation's source rocks and evaluating a petroleum system's hydrocarbon supply volumetrics. Geochemical inversion is most useful where pertinent source-rock information may be absent because exploratory drilling focused strictly on structural highs and failed to penetrate the deeply buried, effective basinal source facies. Advances in chemical analysis technology over the last decade have facilitated the development of powerful geochemical methods for unravelling of complex chemistries of crude oil and natural gas at the molecular and subatomic levels to extract specific information on the hydrocarbons' source. Inferences on such factors as organic matter make-up, depositional environment, lithology, age and maturity of the source can frequently be drawn. These inferences, together with a sound analysis of the geologic and architectural constraints on the system, can supply clues as to the identity and location of the probable source sequence. This paper describes the principles underlying geochemical “inversion” and provides applications in exploration and exploitation settings. In addition, this paper demonstrates inversion of geochemical characteristics of migrated hydrocarbon fluids to specific attributes of the source. The paper also illustrates the use of systematic variations in fluid chemistry within a geologic setting to infer source location, degree of hydrocarbon mixing and relative migration distance.

NEW DIRECTIONS IN GEOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY FOR PETROLEUM EXPLORATION IN THE NEW AGE

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
T. L. Burnett
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Transport Processes ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Seismic Acquisition

As economics of the oil and gas industry become more restrictive, the need for new means of improving exploration risks and reducing expenses is becoming more acute. Partnerships between industry and academia are making significant improvements in four general areas: Seismic acquisition, reservoir characterisation, quantitative structural modelling, and geochemical inversion.In marine seismic acquisition the vertical cable concept utilises hydrophones suspended at fixed locations vertically within the water column by buoys. There are numerous advantages of vertical cable technology over conventional 3-D seismic acquisition. In a related methodology, 'Borehole Seismic', seismic energy is passed between wells and valuable information on reservoir geometry, porosity, lithology, and oil saturation is extracted from the P-wave and S-wave data.In association with seismic methods of determining the external geometry and the internal properties of a reservoir, 3-dimensional sedimentation-simulation models, based on physical, hydrologic, erosional and transport processes, are being utilised for stratigraphic analysis. In addition, powerful, 1-D, coupled reaction-transport models are being used to simulate diagenesis processes in reservoir rocks.At the regional scale, the bridging of quantitative structural concepts with seismic interpretation has led to breakthroughs in structural analysis, particularly in complex terrains. Such analyses are becoming more accurate and cost effective when tied to highly advanced, remote-sensing, multi-spectral data acquisition and image processing technology. Emerging technology in petroleum geochemistry, enables geoscientists to infer the character, age, maturity, identity and location of source rocks from crude oil characteristics ('Geochemical Inversion') and to better estimate hydrocarbon-supply volumetrics. This can be invaluable in understanding petroleum systems and in reducing exploration risks and associated expenses.

ACCURATE RECOGNITION OF SOURCE ROCK CHARACTER IN THE JURASSIC OF THE NORTH WEST SHELF, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 289 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Scott
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Organic Material ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Higher Plant ◽  
Pyrolysis Gas ◽  
Screening Analysis ◽  
North West ◽  
The North ◽  
Potential Source Rock ◽  
Rock Eval

The main potential source rock intervals are generally well defined on the North West Shelf by screening analysis such as Rock-Eval. The type of product from the source rocks is not well defined, owing to inadequacies in current screening analysis techniques. The implications of poor definition of source type in acreage assessment are obvious. The type of product is dependent on the level of organic maturity of the source rock, the ability of products to migrate out of the source rock and on the type of organic material present. The type of kerogen present is frequently determined by Rock-Eval pyrolysis. However, Rock-Eval has severe limitations in defining product type when there is a significant input of terrestrial organic material. This problem has been recognised in Australian terrestrial/continental sequences but also occurs where marine source rock facies contain terrestrially-derived higher plant material. Pyrolysis-gas chromatography as applied to source rock analysis provides, by molecular typing, a better method of estimating the type of products of the kerogen breakdown than bulk chemical analysis such as Rock-Eval pyrolysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document