The Influences of Attribution, Context, and Heterosexual Self-Presentation on Perceived Appropriateness of Self-Disclosure in Same-Sex Male Friendships

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Bowman
1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Johnson ◽  
Larry R. Ridener

In small, same-sex, undergraduate discussion groups ( N = 23), self-disclosure was associated significantly with perceived group cohesiveness, but not participation. Only males' self-disclosure (Jourard's questionnaire) was associated with perceived cooperation, and only females' self-disclosure was associated significantly with perceived norms and influence. Contrary to expectation, participation was associated significantly only with males' perceived group cohesiveness including perceived cooperation, ideas, norms, liking, and influence.


1975 ◽  
Vol 37 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1167-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Lord ◽  
Wayne F. Velicer

Jourard's Self-disclosure Questionnaire (Jourard & Lasakow, 1958) was administered to 145 college students. Females were significantly more self-disclosing than males and both sexes disclosed more to friends than to siblings, with preference for disclosure to siblings of the same sex but no discrimination by sex in disclosure to friends.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-102
Author(s):  
Chris Tinker

Through an analysis of French mediated celebrity discourse this article examines how pop musicians negotiate same-sex desire and self-disclosure in contemporary France. Coverage of Eddy de Pretto and Emmanuel Moire in popular online magazine and newspaper articles is analyzed in terms of a framework that takes into account the context of dominant and normalizing discourses. Coverage exhibits a substantial range of shared and individual approaches, effectively combining normative and queer representations, French values of republicanism, filiation, and existential authenticity, as well as Anglo-American narratives of the closet and coming out.


Author(s):  
Norsiah Abdul Hamid ◽  
Mohd Sobhi Ishak ◽  
Syamsul Anuar Ismail ◽  
Siti Syamsul Nurin Mohmad Yazam

Social media are playing an increasing role in today’s living. The social media platforms allow users to search, create, share, collaborate, and organise contents among them, and at the same time provide virtual self-presentation and self-disclosure of oneself. Social media were also claimed to give implications to human beings with regards to personality, yet these variables have not much been emphasised in previous studies. Thus, it is important to highlight the implications of social media on users’ personality. Given the issues and challenges faced by the country in profiling the adoption of social media and its implications in view of the perspective of personality, it is timely and significantly important to undertake this research in Malaysia. The objective of this chapter is to discuss a research conducted recently to determine the relationships between social media and personality traits. The specific objectives of this study are to identify the profile of social media adoption among students in Malaysia, including duration, frequency of use, purpose, and person/s that introduced the social media, and to determine the relationships between social media and personality traits.


Author(s):  
Jennifer Thomson

This chapter focuses on Ruth Davidson’s position as a gay female political leader, looking at how gender and sexuality have figured in her media coverage, self-presentation and her own political positions from her election as leader of the Scottish Conservative Party in 2011 to her resignation in 2019. It moves chronologically from her election as leader to 2019, focusing on key moments – primarily the passage of same-sex marriage in Scotland; the Conservative-DUP confidence-and-supply arrangement following the 2017 general election; and the publication of Davidson’s 2018 book, Yes She Can. The chapter argues that Davidson can be seen as part of a broader trajectory within contemporary British conservatism concerning attitudes towards women in the party and politics on sexuality.


1971 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd W. West

The SDIA was administered to 80 adolescent Ss, with mother, father, friend of the same sex, and friend of the opposite sex as specified target-persons. Analogous data regarding the disclosure of Ss was independently collected from each target. Correlation coefficients between subject-derived data and target-derived data were computed and are reported herein. A comparison is made of the communication patterns resulting from these two sources of data. The effects of response set on self-disclosure questionnaires are discussed. The contextual specificity of self-disclosure and the consequent inappropriateness of many previous studies to assess the validity of self-disclosure questionnaires is also discussed.


Author(s):  
Barrie Gunter

This chapter, which investigates a range of evidence about online dating behaviour, and a synthesis of approaches to research in this area, also evaluates the nature of the market and the experiences of those who have engaged in online dating. Further issues linked with patterns of online self-disclosure and self-presentation, and concerns about deception in online dating, are then assessed. Corporate data have indicated that the online dating business is mostly on an upward trajectory. Data show greater age difference tolerance of online daters and a willingness to adopt a broader selection of partners compared with offline-only daters. Many online dating site users increasingly fail to be fully engaged by sites that offer search opportunities for partner matches using check-box profiling. The issues of deception and trust in relation to personal profiles have been regarded as problematic factors that could cause tension among online daters.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-132
Author(s):  
Лариса Киричук

The present paper focuses on the study of the communicative nature of self-disclosure as a technique of verbal influence on people. The phenomenon of self-disclosure is interpreted as the process of divulging private information to others. The aim of the study is to determine the specific features of self-disclosure in a public speaking context. The paper discusses the communicative conventions and parameters of the public speaking scenario as the factors that determine a certain manner of self-disclosing. The key assumption of the study is that public self-disclosure should be viewed as a tactic of self-presentation that promotes the speaker’s image building. In order to indicate the verbal forms that speakers use while disclosing private information in public the discourse and lexical-grammatical analyses of eight celebrity interview texts are conducted. The results of the research demonstrate that the speakers use recurrently certain verbal patterns which are identified as statements of self-description (it includes statements of self-confirmation, self-assurance, personal preferences and personal aspirations), self-narrative and attitude statements. The study also shows which types of the statements are used more frequently than the others, particularly, the statements of self-confirmation, personal aspirations and self-narratives are apparently preferred by the speakers as tactics of public self-disclosure. The paper highlights the fact that the self-disclosure tactics are employed by public speakers selectively and that their choice is motivated by the speakers’ strategic goal of impression management. References Altman, I., Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of InterpersonalRelationship. New York, NY: Holl, Rinehart & Winston. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. PsychologicalBulletin, 91, 3–26. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. R. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. CambridgeUniversity Press. Cozby, P.C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2),73–91. Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-Disclosure. NewburyPart, CA: Sage. Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory and Practice.London: Reutledge. Johnson, J.A. (1981). The ‘self-disclosure’ and ‘self-presentation’ views of item responsedynamics and personality scale validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40(4), 761–769. Jourard, S. (1971). The Transparent Self. (2nd ed.).New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-Presentation: Impression Management and InterpersonalBehavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark. Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-Presentation: Iimpression Management and InterpersonalBehavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Leary, M. R. (2012). Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. (6nd ed.). Boston:Pearson. Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review andtwo-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. Luft, J., Ingham, H. (1969). Of Human Interaction. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books. Rosenfeld, L. B. (2014). Overview of the ways privacy, secrecy, and disclosure arebalanced in today’s society. In: Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosure, (pp. 3 – 18).S. Petronio, (ed.). New York and London: Psychology Press. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: the self-concept, social identity, andinterpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Identity and self-identification. In: The self and social life, (pp.65–99). B.R.Schlenker, (ed.). New York: McGrow-Hill. Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In: Handbook of Self and Identity, (pp. 492–518). M. R.Leary, J. P.Tangney, (eds.). New York: Guilford. Sources J.K. Rolling meets Lauren Laverne, 2015. Oprah talks to Barack Obama, 2004. O, The Oprah magazine. Oprah talks to Daniel Pink, 2008. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Ellen De Generes, 2009. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Jay-Z, 2009. O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Tine Fey, 2009, O, The Oprah Magazine. Oprah talks to Thich Nhat Hanh, 2010.8.The ultimate O interview: Oprah answers all your questions, 2010. O, the Oprah magazine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document