scholarly journals c entrocortin RNA localization to centrosomes is regulated by FMRP and facilitates error-free mitosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pearl V. Ryder ◽  
Junnan Fang ◽  
Dorothy A. Lerit

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers required for error-free mitosis and embryonic development. The microtubule-nucleating activity of centrosomes is conferred by the pericentriolar material (PCM), a composite of numerous proteins subject to cell cycle–dependent oscillations in levels and organization. In diverse cell types, mRNAs localize to centrosomes and may contribute to changes in PCM abundance. Here, we investigate the regulation of mRNA localization to centrosomes in the rapidly cycling Drosophila melanogaster embryo. We find that RNA localization to centrosomes is regulated during the cell cycle and developmentally. We identify a novel role for the fragile-X mental retardation protein in the posttranscriptional regulation of a model centrosomal mRNA, centrocortin (cen). Further, mistargeting cen mRNA is sufficient to alter cognate protein localization to centrosomes and impair spindle morphogenesis and genome stability.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pearl V. Ryder ◽  
Junnan Fang ◽  
Dorothy A. Lerit

AbstractCentrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers required for error-free mitosis and embryonic development. The microtubule-nucleating activity of centrosomes is conferred by the pericentriolar material (PCM), a composite of numerous proteins subject to cell cycle-dependent oscillations in levels and organization. In diverse cell types, mRNAs localize to centrosomes and may contribute to changes in PCM abundance. Here, we investigate the regulation of mRNA localization to centrosomes in the rapidly cycling Drosophila melanogaster embryo. We find that RNA localization to centrosomes is regulated during the cell cycle and developmentally. We identify a novel role for the fragile-X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which localizes to pericentrosomal RNA granules, in the post-transcriptional regulation of centrosomal RNA. Further, the mis-targeting of a model centrosomal mRNA, centrocortin (cen), is sufficient to alter cognate protein localization to centrosomes and impair spindle morphogenesis and genome stability.


1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Chevrier ◽  
S. Komesli ◽  
A.C. Schmit ◽  
M. Vantard ◽  
A.M. Lambert ◽  
...  

We have used monoclonal antibodies raised against isolated native calf thymus centrosomes to probe the structure and composition of the pericentriolar material. To distinguish prospective antibodies as specific to conserved elements of this material, we screened clones by their identification of microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) in different animal and plant cells. Among the clonal antibodies that reacted with MTOCs in both plant and mammalian cells, we describe one (mAb 6C6) that was found to immunostain centrosomes in a variety of bovine and human cells. In cycling cells this signal persisted through the entire cell cycle. Microscopy showed that the mAb 6C6 antigen was a component of the pericentriolar material and this was confirmed by biochemical analysis of centrosomes. Using immunoblot analysis of protein fractions derived from purified components of centrosomes, we have characterized the mAb 6C6 antigen as a 180 kDa polypeptide. We conclude that we have identified a protein component permanently associated with the pericentriolar material. Surprisingly, monoclonal antibody 6C6 also stained other mitotic organelles in mammalian cells, in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. During prometaphase and metaphase the antibody stained both centrosomes and kinetochores. At the onset of anaphase the kinetochore-specific staining dissociated from chromosomes and was subsequently redistributed onto a newly characterized organelle, the telophase disc while the centrosomal stain remained intact. It is not known if the 180 kDa centrosomal protein itself redistributes during mitosis, or if the pattern observed represents other antigens with shared epitopes. The pericentriolar material is thought to be composed of conserved elements, which appeared very early during the evolution of eukaryotes. Our results strongly suggest that mAb 6C6 identifies one of these elements.


1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Roghi ◽  
R. Giet ◽  
R. Uzbekov ◽  
N. Morin ◽  
I. Chartrain ◽  
...  

By differential screening of a Xenopus laevis egg cDNA library, we have isolated a 2,111 bp cDNA which corresponds to a maternal mRNA specifically deadenylated after fertilisation. This cDNA, called Eg2, encodes a 407 amino acid protein kinase. The pEg2 sequence shows significant identity with members of a new protein kinase sub-family which includes Aurora from Drosophila and Ipl1 (increase in ploidy-1) from budding yeast, enzymes involved in centrosome migration and chromosome segregation, respectively. A single 46 kDa polypeptide, which corresponds to the deduced molecular mass of pEg2, is immunodetected in Xenopus oocyte and egg extracts, as well as in lysates of Xenopus XL2 cultured cells. In XL2 cells, pEg2 is immunodetected only in S, G2 and M phases of the cell cycle, where it always localises to the centrosomal region of the cell. In addition, pEg2 ‘invades’ the microtubules at the poles of the mitotic spindle in metaphase and anaphase. Immunoelectron microscopy experiments show that pEg2 is located precisely around the pericentriolar material in prophase and on the spindle microtubules in anaphase. We also demonstrate that pEg2 binds directly to taxol stabilised microtubules in vitro. In addition, we show that the presence of microtubules during mitosis is not necessary for an association between pEg2 and the centrosome. Finally we show that a catalytically inactive pEg2 kinase stops the assembly of bipolar mitotic spindles in Xenopus egg extracts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 129 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junnan Fang

Centrosomes, functioning as microtubule organizing centers, are composed of a proteinaceous matrix of pericentriolar material (PCM) that surrounds a pair of centrioles. Drosophila Pericentrin (Pcnt)-like protein (PLP) is a key component of the centrosome that serves as a scaffold for PCM assembly. The disruption of plp in Drosophila results in embryonic lethality, while the deregulation of Pcnt in humans is associated with MOPD II and Trisomy 21.We recently found plp mRNA localizes to Drosophila embryonic centrosomes. While RNA is known to associate with centrosomes in diverse cell types, the elements required for plp mRNA localization to centrosomes remains completely unknown. Additionally, how plp translation is regulated to accommodate rapid cell divisions during early embryogenesis is unclear. RNA localization coupled with translational control is a conserved mechanism that functions in diverse cellular processes. Control of mRNA localization and translation is mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). We find PLP protein expression is specifically promoted by an RNA-binding protein, Orb, during embryogenesis; moreover, plp mRNA interacts with Orb. Importantly, we find overexpression of full-length PLP can rescue cell division defects and embryonic lethality caused by orb depletion. We aim to uncover the mechanisms underlying embryonic plp mRNA localization and function and how Orb regulates plp translation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas K. Fischer ◽  
Akatsuki Saito ◽  
Christopher Kline ◽  
Romy Cohen ◽  
Simon C. Watkins ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe ability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to transduce nondividing cells is key to infecting terminally differentiated macrophages, which can serve as a long-term reservoir of HIV-1 infection. The mutation N57A in the viral CA protein renders HIV-1 cell cycle dependent, allowing examination of HIV-1 infection of nondividing cells. Here, we show that the N57A mutation confers a postentry infectivity defect that significantly differs in magnitude between the common lab-adapted molecular clones HIV-1NL4-3(>10-fold) and HIV-1LAI(2- to 5-fold) in multiple human cell lines and primary CD4+T cells. Capsid permeabilization and reverse transcription are altered when N57A is incorporated into HIV-1NL4-3but not HIV-1LAI. The N57A infectivity defect is significantly exacerbated in both virus strains in the presence of cyclosporine (CsA), indicating that N57A infectivity is dependent upon CA interacting with host factor cyclophilin A (CypA). Adaptation of N57A HIV-1LAIselected for a second CA mutation, G94D, which rescued the N57A infectivity defect in HIV-1LAIbut not HIV-1NL4-3. The rescue of N57A by G94D in HIV-1LAIis abrogated by CsA treatment in some cell types, demonstrating that this rescue is CypA dependent. An examination of over 40,000 HIV-1 CA sequences revealed that the four amino acids that differ between HIV-1NL4-3and HIV-1LAICA are polymorphic, and the residues at these positions in the two strains are widely prevalent in clinical isolates. Overall, a few polymorphic amino acid differences between two closely related HIV-1 molecular clones affect the phenotype of capsid mutants in different cell types.IMPORTANCEThe specific mechanisms by which HIV-1 infects nondividing cells are unclear. A mutation in the HIV-1 capsid protein abolishes the ability of the virus to infect nondividing cells, serving as a tool to examine cell cycle dependence of HIV-1 infection. We have shown that two widely used HIV-1 molecular clones exhibit significantly different N57A infectivity phenotypes due to fewer than a handful of CA amino acid differences and that these clones are both represented in HIV-infected individuals. As such minor differences in closely related HIV-1 strains may impart significant infectivity differences, careful consideration should be given to drawing conclusions from one particular HIV-1 clone. This study highlights the potential for significant variation in results with the use of multiple strains and possible unanticipated effects of natural polymorphisms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catarina Nabais ◽  
Delphine Pessoa ◽  
Jorge de-Carvalho ◽  
Thomas van Zanten ◽  
Paulo Duarte ◽  
...  

Centrioles form centrosomes and cilia. In most proliferating cells, centrioles assemble through canonical duplication, which is spatially, temporally, and numerically regulated by the cell cycle and the presence of mature centrioles. However, in certain cell types, centrioles assemble de novo, yet by poorly understood mechanisms. Herein, we established a controlled system to investigate de novo centriole biogenesis, using Drosophila melanogaster egg explants overexpressing Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4), a trigger for centriole biogenesis. We show that at a high Plk4 concentration, centrioles form de novo, mature, and duplicate, independently of cell cycle progression and of the presence of other centrioles. Plk4 concentration determines the temporal onset of centriole assembly. Moreover, our results suggest that distinct biochemical kinetics regulate de novo and canonical biogenesis. Finally, we investigated which other factors modulate de novo centriole assembly and found that proteins of the pericentriolar material (PCM), and in particular γ-tubulin, promote biogenesis, likely by locally concentrating critical components.


Author(s):  
Arantxa Agote-Arán ◽  
Junyan Lin ◽  
Izabela Sumara

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are embedded in the nuclear envelope (NE) where they ensure the transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. NPCs are built from nucleoporins (Nups) through a sequential assembly order taking place at two different stages during the cell cycle of mammalian cells: at the end of mitosis and during interphase. In addition, fragile X–related proteins (FXRPs) can interact with several cytoplasmic Nups and facilitate their localization to the NE during interphase likely through a microtubule-dependent mechanism. In the absence of FXRPs or microtubule-based transport, Nups aberrantly localize to the cytoplasm forming the so-called cytoplasmic nucleoporin granules (CNGs), compromising NPCs’ function on protein export. However, it remains unknown if Nup synthesis or degradation mechanisms are linked to the FXRP–Nup pathway and if and how the action of FXRPs on Nups is coordinated with the cell cycle progression. Here, we show that Nup localization defects observed in the absence of FXR1 are independent of active protein translation. CNGs are cleared in an autophagy- and proteasome-independent manner, and their presence is restricted to the early G1 phase of the cell cycle. Our results thus suggest that a pool of cytoplasmic Nups exists that contributes to the NPC assembly specifically during early G1 to ensure NPC homeostasis at a short transition from mitosis to the onset of interphase.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Abou Chakra ◽  
Ruth Isserlin ◽  
Thinh Tran ◽  
Gary D. Bader

AbstractCell cycle duration changes dramatically during development, starting out fast to generate cells quickly and slowing down over time as the organism matures. The cell cycle can also act as a transcriptional filter to control the expression of long genes which are partially transcribed in short cycles. Using mathematical simulations of cell proliferation, we identify an emergent property, that this filter can act as a tuning knob to control cell fate, cell diversity and the number and proportion of different cell types in a tissue. Our predictions are supported by comparison to single-cell RNA-seq data captured over embryonic development. Evolutionary genome analysis shows that fast developing organisms have a narrow genomic distribution of gene lengths while slower developers have an expanded number of long genes. Our results support the idea that cell cycle dynamics may be important across multicellular animals for controlling gene expression and cell fate.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin L. Armstrong ◽  
Souradip Das ◽  
Christina A. Hill ◽  
Robert J. Duronio ◽  
Jared T. Nordman

AbstractReplication initiation in eukaryotic cells occurs asynchronously throughout S phase, yielding early and late replicating regions of the genome, a process known as replication timing (RT). RT changes during development to ensure accurate genome duplication and maintain genome stability. To understand the relative contributions that cell lineage, cell cycle, and replication initiation regulators have on RT, we utilized the powerful developmental systems available in Drosophila melanogaster. We generated and compared RT profiles from mitotic cells of different tissues and from mitotic and endocycling cells of the same tissue. Our results demonstrate that cell lineage has the largest effect on RT, whereas switching from a mitotic to an endoreplicative cell cycle has little to no effect on RT. Additionally, we demonstrate that the RT differences we observed in all cases are largely independent of transcriptional differences. We also employed a genetic approach in these same cell types to understand the relative contribution the eukaryotic RT control factor, Rif1, has on RT control. Our results demonstrate that Rif1 can function in a tissue-specific manner to control RT. Importantly, the Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding motif of Rif1 is essential for Rif1 to regulate RT. Together, our data support a model in which the RT program is primarily driven by cell lineage and is further refined by Rif1/PP1 to ultimately generate tissue-specific RT programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document