Comparative assessment of quality and safety of minced meat
Abstract As a result of the examination of minced meat, it was found that the samples of industrial production (minced pork and minced beef), the packaging and completeness of the labeling corresponded to the requirements of Technical Regulations of the Customs Union 005/2011 and Technical Regulations of the Customs Union 022/2011, while the samples of mince of non-industrial production (minced pork and beef and minced beef) were packed at the point of retail sale in plastic bags without labeling indicating the type of minced meat. In terms of organoleptic indicators, minced meat samples No. 1, No. 2 and No. 4 met the requirements of GOST R 55365-2012 and were classified as “fresh” bouillon. During the determination of biochemical and bacterioscopic indicators for freshness, it was found that in the samples of industrial minced meat No. 2 and non-industrial production No. 3 there was an increased content of amino-ammonia nitrogen and pH. At the same time, in the sample in No. 3 a non-standard color was noted during the reaction with Nessler’s reagent: dirty green color. No. 2 had a weakly positive reaction to peroxidase during the reaction with the same reagent. Bacterioscopic examination of smears - minced meat imprints in samples No. 2 and No. 3 revealed no more than 30 gram-negative rods, which can be the food poisoning reasons. These results are typical for suspected meat. In terms of the content of heavy metals, the insignificant excess of the norm of cobalt in sample No. 1 and manganese in sample No. 2 was revealed. The content of toxic elements: lead and cadmium in all samples did not exceed the permissible level.