scholarly journals Loss of the Sec1/Munc18-family proteins VPS-33.2 and VPS-33.1 bypasses a block in endosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3909-3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jachen A. Solinger ◽  
Anne Spang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Membrane Structures ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Transport Vesicle ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Endosome Maturation ◽  
Endosomal System

The end of the life of a transport vesicle requires a complex series of tethering, docking, and fusion events. Tethering complexes play a crucial role in the recognition of membrane entities and bringing them into close opposition, thereby coordinating and controlling cellular trafficking events. Here we provide a comprehensive RNA interference analysis of the CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes in metazoans. Knockdown of CORVET components promoted RAB-7 recruitment to subapical membranes, whereas in HOPS knockdowns, RAB-5 was found also on membrane structures close to the cell center, indicating the RAB conversion might be impaired in the absence of these tethering complexes. Unlike in yeast, metazoans have two VPS33 homologues, which are Sec1/Munc18 (SM)-family proteins involved in the regulation of membrane fusion. We assume that in wild type, each tethering complex contains a specific SM protein but that they may be able to substitute for each other in case of absence of the other. Of importance, knockdown of both SM proteins allowed bypass of the endosome maturation block in sand-1 mutants. We propose a model in which the SM proteins in tethering complexes are required for coordinated flux of material through the endosomal system.

scholarly journals Sec17 (α-SNAP) and Sec18 (NSF) restrict membrane fusion to R-SNAREs, Q-SNAREs, and SM proteins from identical compartments

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (47) ◽  
pp. 23573-23581
Author(s):  
Youngsoo Jun ◽  
William Wickner
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Negative Regulation ◽  
Rab Gtpases ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Rab Family ◽  
Sm Protein

Membrane fusion at each organelle requires conserved proteins: Rab-GTPases, effector tethering complexes, Sec1/Munc18 (SM)-family SNARE chaperones, SNAREs of the R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and the Sec17/α-SNAP and ATP-dependent Sec18/NSF SNARE chaperone system. The basis of organelle-specific fusion, which is essential for accurate protein compartmentation, has been elusive. Rab family GTPases, SM proteins, and R- and Q-SNAREs may contribute to this specificity. We now report that the fusion supported by SNAREs alone is both inefficient and promiscuous with respect to organelle identity and to stimulation by SM family proteins or complexes. SNARE-only fusion is abolished by the disassembly chaperones Sec17 and Sec18. Efficient fusion in the presence of Sec17 and Sec18 requires a tripartite match between the organellar identities of the R-SNARE, the Q-SNAREs, and the SM protein or complex. The functions of Sec17 and Sec18 are not simply negative regulation; they stimulate fusion with either vacuolar SNAREs and their SM protein complex HOPS or endoplasmic reticulum/cis-Golgi SNAREs and their SM protein Sly1. The fusion complex of each organelle is assembled from its own functionally matching pieces to engage Sec17/Sec18 for fusion stimulation rather than inhibition.

scholarly journals Munc18-1 catalyzes neuronal SNARE assembly by templating SNARE association

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyi Jiao ◽  
Mengze He ◽  
Sarah A Port ◽  
Richard W Baker ◽  
Yonggang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Force Spectroscopy ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy ◽  
Helix Bundle ◽  
Four Helix Bundle ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Template Complex

Sec1/Munc18-family (SM) proteins are required for SNARE-mediated membrane fusion, but their mechanism(s) of action remain controversial. Using single-molecule force spectroscopy, we found that the SM protein Munc18-1 catalyzes step-wise zippering of three synaptic SNAREs (syntaxin, VAMP2, and SNAP-25) into a four-helix bundle. Catalysis requires formation of an intermediate template complex in which Munc18-1 juxtaposes the N-terminal regions of the SNARE motifs of syntaxin and VAMP2, while keeping their C-terminal regions separated. SNAP-25 binds the templated SNAREs to induce full SNARE zippering. Munc18-1 mutations modulate the stability of the template complex in a manner consistent with their effects on membrane fusion, indicating that chaperoned SNARE assembly is essential for exocytosis. Two other SM proteins, Munc18-3 and Vps33, similarly chaperone SNARE assembly via a template complex, suggesting that SM protein mechanism is conserved.

scholarly journals The Sec1p/Munc18 (SM) protein, Vps45p, cycles on and off membranes during vesicle transport

2003 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nia J. Bryant ◽  
David E. James
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Vesicle Transport ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Transport Reaction ◽  
Specific Manner ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Mutant Cells

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1, Glc7p) functions in the final stage of SNARE-mediated vesicle transport between docking and fusion. During this process, trans-SNARE complexes, formed between molecules in opposing membranes, convert to cis-complexes, with all participants in the same lipid bilayer. Here, we show that glc7 mutant cells accumulate SNARE complexes. These complexes are clearly different from those found in either wild-type or sec18–1 cells as the Sec1p/Munc18 (SM) protein Vps45p does not bind to them. Given that PP1 controls fusion, the SNARE complexes that accumulate in glc7 mutants likely represent trans-SNARE complexes. Vps45p dissociates from the membrane in the absence of PP1 activity, but rapidly reassociates after its reactivation. These data reveal that SM proteins cycle on and off membranes in a stage-specific manner during the vesicle transport reaction, and suggest that protein phosphorylation plays a key role in the regulation of this cycle.

scholarly journals Topological arrangement of the intracellular membrane fusion machinery

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2612-2619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shailendra S. Rathore ◽  
Nilanjan Ghosh ◽  
Yan Ouyang ◽  
Jingshi Shen
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Intracellular Membrane ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Protein Receptors ◽  
Reconstituted System ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
First Time ◽  
Intracellular Membrane Fusion

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) form a four-helix coiled-coil bundle that juxtaposes two bilayers and drives a basal level of membrane fusion. The Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein binds to its cognate SNARE bundle and accelerates the basal fusion reaction. The question of how the topological arrangement of the SNARE helices affects the reactivity of the fusion proteins remains unanswered. Here we address the problem for the first time in a reconstituted system containing both SNAREs and SM proteins. We find that to be fusogenic a SNARE topology must support both basal fusion and SM stimulation. Certain topological combinations of exocytic SNAREs result in basal fusion but cannot support SM stimulation, whereas other topologies support SM stimulation without inducing basal fusion. It is striking that of all the possible topological combinations of exocytic SNARE helices, only one induces efficient fusion. Our results suggest that the intracellular membrane fusion complex is designed to fuse bilayers according to one genetically programmed topology.

scholarly journals Mso1p Regulates Membrane Fusion through Interactions with the Putative N-Peptide–binding Area in Sec1p Domain 1

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1362-1374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Weber ◽  
Konstantin Chernov ◽  
Hilkka Turakainen ◽  
Gerd Wohlfahrt ◽  
Maria Pajunen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Peptide Binding ◽  
Complex Function ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Targeted Mutagenesis ◽  
Rab Gtpase ◽  
Binding Modes ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Sm Protein

Sec1p/Munc18 (SM) family proteins regulate SNARE complex function in membrane fusion through their interactions with syntaxins. In addition to syntaxins, only a few SM protein interacting proteins are known and typically, their binding modes with SM proteins are poorly characterized. We previously identified Mso1p as a Sec1p-binding protein and showed that it is involved in membrane fusion regulation. Here we demonstrate that Mso1p and Sec1p interact at sites of exocytosis and that the Mso1p–Sec1p interaction site depends on a functional Rab GTPase Sec4p and its GEF Sec2p. Random and targeted mutagenesis of Sec1p, followed by analysis of protein interactions, indicates that Mso1p interacts with Sec1p domain 1 and that this interaction is important for membrane fusion. In many SM family proteins, domain 1 binds to a N-terminal peptide of a syntaxin family protein. The Sec1p-interacting syntaxins Sso1p and Sso2p lack the N-terminal peptide. We show that the putative N-peptide binding area in Sec1p domain 1 is important for Mso1p binding, and that Mso1p can interact with Sso1p and Sso2p. Our results suggest that Mso1p mimics N-peptide binding to facilitate membrane fusion.

scholarly journals SNARE zippering requires activation by SNARE-like peptides in Sec1/Munc18 proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (36) ◽  
pp. E8421-E8429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haijia Yu ◽  
Chong Shen ◽  
Yinghui Liu ◽  
Bridget L. Menasche ◽  
Yan Ouyang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Lipid Bilayers ◽  
Fusion Reaction ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Fusion Reactions ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Protein Receptors ◽  
Sm Protein

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) catalyze membrane fusion by forming coiled-coil bundles between membrane bilayers. The SNARE bundle zippers progressively toward the membranes, pulling the lipid bilayers into close proximity to fuse. In this work, we found that the +1 and +2 layers in the C-terminal domains (CTDs) of SNAREs are dispensable for reconstituted SNARE-mediated fusion reactions. By contrast, all CTD layers are required for fusion reactions activated by the cognate Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein or a synthetic Vc peptide derived from the vesicular (v-) SNARE, correlating with strong acceleration of fusion kinetics. These results suggest a similar mechanism underlying the stimulatory functions of SM proteins and Vc peptide in SNARE-dependent membrane fusion. Unexpectedly, we identified a conserved SNARE-like peptide (SLP) in SM proteins that structurally and functionally resembles Vc peptide. Like Vc peptide, SLP binds and activates target (t-) SNAREs, accelerating the fusion reaction. Disruption of the t-SNARE–SLP interaction inhibits exocytosis in vivo. Our findings demonstrated that a t-SNARE–SLP intermediate must form before SNAREs can drive efficient vesicle fusion.

scholarly journals SNARE bundle and syntaxin N-peptide constitute a minimal complement for Munc18-1 activation of membrane fusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingshi Shen ◽  
Shailendra S. Rathore ◽  
Lavan Khandan ◽  
James E. Rothman
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Membrane Bilayer ◽  
Core Domain ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Typical Configuration ◽  
Intracellular Membrane Fusion

Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins activate intracellular membrane fusion through binding to cognate SNAP receptor (SNARE) complexes. The synaptic target membrane SNARE syntaxin 1 contains a highly conserved Habc domain, which connects an N-peptide motif to the SNARE core domain and is thought to participate in the binding of Munc18-1 (the neuronal SM protein) to the SNARE complex. Unexpectedly, we found that mutation or complete removal of the Habc domain had no effect on Munc18-1 stimulation of fusion. The central cavity region of Munc18-1 is required to stimulate fusion but not through its binding to the syntaxin Habc domain. SNAP-25, another synaptic SNARE subunit, contains a flexible linker and exhibits an atypical conjoined Qbc configuration. We found that neither the linker nor the Qbc configuration is necessary for Munc18-1 promotion of fusion. As a result, Munc18-1 activates a SNARE complex with the typical configuration, in which each of the SNARE core domains is individually rooted in the membrane bilayer. Thus, the SNARE four-helix bundle and syntaxin N-peptide constitute a minimal complement for Munc18-1 activation of fusion.

scholarly journals Targeted Protein Degradation Tools: Overview and Future Perspectives

Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Yuri Prozzillo ◽  
Gaia Fattorini ◽  
Maria Virginia Santopietro ◽  
Luigi Suglia ◽  
Alessandra Ruggiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Protein Degradation ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
The Other ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Design And Optimization ◽  
Protein Inactivation ◽  
Target Effects

Targeted protein inactivation (TPI) is an elegant approach to investigate protein function and its role in the cellular landscape, overcoming limitations of genetic perturbation strategies. These systems act in a reversible manner and reduce off-target effects exceeding the limitations of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNA interference, respectively. Several TPI have been developed and wisely improved, including compartment delocalization tools and protein degradation systems. However, unlike chemical tools such as PROTACs (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras), which work in a wild-type genomic background, TPI technologies require adding an aminoacidic signal sequence (tag) to the protein of interest (POI). On the other hand, the design and optimization of PROTACs are very laborious and time-consuming. In this review, we focus on anchor-away, deGradFP, auxin-inducible degron (AID) and dTAG technologies and discuss their recent applications and advances. Finally, we propose nano-grad, a novel nanobody-based protein degradation tool, which specifically proteolyzes endogenous tag-free target protein.

Chaperoning SNARE Folding and Assembly

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongli Zhang ◽  
Frederick M. Hughson
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Snare Proteins ◽  
Annual Review ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Synaptic Vesicle Fusion

SNARE proteins and Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins constitute the core molecular engine that drives nearly all intracellular membrane fusion and exocytosis. While SNAREs are known to couple their folding and assembly to membrane fusion, the physiological pathways of SNARE assembly and the mechanistic roles of SM proteins have long been enigmatic. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the SNARE–SM fusion machinery with an emphasis on biochemical and biophysical studies of proteins that mediate synaptic vesicle fusion. We begin by discussing the energetics, pathways, and kinetics of SNARE folding and assembly in vitro. Then, we describe diverse interactions between SM and SNARE proteins and their potential impact on SNARE assembly in vivo. Recent work provides strong support for the idea that SM proteins function as chaperones, their essential role being to enable fast, accurate SNARE assembly. Finally, we review the evidence that SM proteins collaborate with other SNARE chaperones, especially Munc13-1, and briefly discuss some roles of SNARE and SM protein deficiencies in human disease. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biochemistry, Volume 90 is June 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

scholarly journals Munc18-1 catalyzes neuronal SNARE assembly by templating SNARE association

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyi Jiao ◽  
Mengze He ◽  
Sarah A. Port ◽  
Richard W. Baker ◽  
Yonggang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Force Spectroscopy ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy ◽  
Helix Bundle ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Template Complex

AbstractSec1/Munc18-family (SM) proteins are required for SNARE-mediated membrane fusion, but their mechanism(s) of action remain controversial. Using single-molecule force spectroscopy, we found that the SM protein Munc18-1 catalyzes step-wise zippering of three synaptic SNAREs (syntaxin, VAMP2, and SNAP-25) into a four-helix bundle. Catalysis requires formation of an intermediate template complex in which Munc18-1 juxtaposes the N-terminal regions of the SNARE motifs of syntaxin and VAMP2, while keeping their C-terminal regions separated. Next, SNAP-25 binds the templated SNAREs to form a partially-zippered SNARE complex. Finally, full zippering displaces Munc18-1. Munc18-1 mutations modulate the stability of the template complex in a manner consistent with their effects on membrane fusion, indicating that chaperoned SNARE assembly is essential for exocytosis. Two other SM proteins, Munc18-3 and Vps33, similarly chaperone SNARE assembly via a template complex, suggesting that SM protein mechanism is conserved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document