Stereotypes at Work

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katina Sawyer ◽  
Judith A. Clair
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Central Concern ◽  
Workplace Fairness

Stereotypes are a central concern in society and in the workplace. Stereotypes are cognitions that drive what individuals know, believe, and expect from others as a result of their social identities. Stereotypes predict how individuals view and treat one another at work, often resulting in inaccurate generalizations about individuals based on their group membership. As such, it’s important to break down and combat the use of stereotypes in decision-making at work. If stereotypes can be overcome in the workplace, fairness and equity in organizations becomes more likely.

scholarly journals Legacies of war: Syrian narratives of conflict and visions of peace

2021 ◽  
pp. 001083672110326
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bachleitner
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
War Memory ◽  
Political Ideas ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Group Belonging

This article is interested in the formation of war legacies and how they interact with social identities. It suggests a bottom-up approach towards examining the societal processes in which individuals create a legacy of war. It posits that through their narratives of conflict, by remembering what happened to them as a group, they mould the meaning and boundaries of how the group will be membered post-conflict. The validity of the theorised link between war memory and group membership is then tested in the case of Syria. In 200 interviews, Syrians provided their narratives of the conflict and their vision of a future Syrian state and society. The findings show that most respondents’ narratives follow a civic rationale, forming a society around civil rights and political ideas rather than around ethnic/sectarian divides. With this, the article contributes a new route for international relations scholars to understand the formation of war legacies through individuals’ narratives of conflict and explains their effects on ties of group belonging while also offering a glimpse into the Syrian ‘we’ amid the ongoing war in Syria.

Altering distance and defining authority

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna Nevala
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Altering Distance ◽  
The Social ◽  
Person Reference ◽  
Social Deixis ◽  
Late Modern ◽  
Common Function

This article studies the use of nominal terms and pronouns as a means to refer to a third party, as well as to the writer him/herself and the addressee in written interaction. The purpose is to discuss the concepts of person reference and social deixis by looking at how the interactants’ social identities and interpersonal relationships are encoded in the use of referential terms in Late Modern English letters and journals. The results show that the term friend may be used when the writer has something to gain from it: an actual favour, a reciprocal act of solidarity, or an access to the addressee’s/referent’s in-group. In general, shifting between in-group/out-group membership appears to be a common function for the use of friend. The use of addressee- and self-oriented reference is in turn determined by the social and contextual aspects of appearance, attitude, and authority.

Social Identity

Philosophy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari Mikkola
Keyword(s):  
Social Identity ◽  
Identity Formation ◽  
Identity Politics ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Self And Other ◽  
Political Struggles ◽  
Symbolic Meanings ◽  
Identity Crises ◽  
Philosophical Debates

Many political struggles for emancipation seemingly presuppose identity politics: a form of political mobilization based on social kind membership, where some shared experiences or traits delimit “belonging.” This is because social and political philosophers typically hold that contemporary injustices such as oppression and discrimination are structural, systematic, and social. In being structural, they have their causes in norms, habits, symbolic meanings, and assumptions unquestionably embedded in and underlying institutional and social arrangements. In being systematic, social injustices exist throughout a society and usually over a period of time, so that societal institutions come to form interlocking webs that maintain and reinforce injustices experienced. And in being social, contemporary injustices are grounded in socially salient self- and other-directed identifications, where such identifications typically fix social group membership. Social injustice is not incidental and individual but targets members of certain groups due to their group membership: typically, due to individuals’ gender/sex, sexuality, race, ethnicity, ability, and/or class. Elucidating the nature of social identities then appears to be necessary in order to understand contemporary social injustices. We may face oppression due to membership in a collective, where others impose such membership upon us; or we may personally and voluntarily identify with an oppressed collective for which we seek political recognition. Thus, the expression “social identity” can denote either a group-based or an individual phenomenon, which needs disambiguating. We can ask on what basis are, for example, all women as women bound together (what constitutes their collective kind identity)? Or is gender identity essential to a person qua that person (are certain social classifications part of our individual identity)? Additionally, there are different modes by which social identifications and identity formation can take place: this may be voluntary (we choose certain identifications), or ascriptive (certain identities are attributed to us by others). However, elucidating particular social identities is riddled with difficulties, and this has generated various so-called identity crises. Identity politics presumes the existence of social kinds founded on some category-wide common traits or experiences. But as many have argued, no such transcultural/transhistorical commonality exists because our axes of identity (gender, race, ability, class) are intertwined and inseparable. In an attempt to unlock this impasse, the past few decades have witnessed lively philosophical debates about the nature of social identity more generally, and about the character of particular social identities.

Interactional Justice-related Bias and Its Impact on Appraiser’s Decision-making Process: An Experimental Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-203
Author(s):  
Rachana Chattopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Dynamics ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Interactional Justice ◽  
Religious Group ◽  
Performance Rating ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Postgraduate Students ◽  
Maximum Benefit ◽  
Before And After

Interactional justice refers to the fairness in interpersonal treatment received by an individual both before and after the decision-making. Violation of interactional justice leads to the negative consequences. Literature on organizational justice has already identified the influence of gender on interactional justice. Current research is based on Indian context, where numerous intergroup relations create a different group dynamics. In India, apart from gender, religious stereotyping also plays a significant role in social context. The present experimental study investigates how appraiser’s decision on performance rating and reward recommendation is influenced by interactional justice-related stereotype. This study was conducted on Hindu (240) and Muslim (240) postgraduate students of Indian universities in two experimentations. Result reveals the influence of gender and religious bias on appraiser’s decision-making on performance-based reward system. It has been observed that if there is a violation of interactional justice, female employees sharing the same religious group membership with the appraiser are subjected to the most unfavorable performance rating and reward recommendation. Again, in case of interactional justice adherence, this group is rewarded with the maximum benefit. The whole analysis reveals that performance evaluators expect interactional justice from female employee of their own religious group membership. If there is a violation, this group will be the maximum sufferer.

scholarly journals Cabinet Composition, Collegiality, and Collectivity: Examining Patterns in Cabinet Committee Structure

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Kenny William Ie
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Policy Influence ◽  
Parliamentary Government ◽  
Specific Policy ◽  
Central Concern ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract This article examines one arena of decision-making in cabinet government: cabinet committees. It assesses the relationship between the composition of cabinets – their party make-up – and the structure of cabinet committees. Cabinet committees are groups of ministers tasked with specific policy or coordination responsibilities and can be important mechanisms of policymaking and cabinet management. Thus, the structure of committees informs our understanding of how cabinets differ in their distributions of policy influence among ministers and parties, a central concern in parliamentary government. We investigate two such dimensions: collegiality – interaction among ministers – and collectivity, the (de)centralization of influence. We find that cabinet committees in coalitions are significantly more collegial, on average, than single-party cabinets, though this is driven by minority coalitions. At the same time, influence within cabinet committees is less collectively distributed in most types of coalitions than in single-party cabinets.

scholarly journals Life Beyond the Home: Nutritional, Occupational, Social and Environmental Predictors of Common Mental Disorders Among Indian Mothers with 6- to 23-Month-old Infants (P11-026-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Scott ◽  
Alejandra Arrieta ◽  
Neha Kumar ◽  
Purnima Menon ◽  
Agnes Quisumbing
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Food Insecurity ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Wellbeing ◽  
Indian States ◽  
Agricultural Work ◽  
Self Reporting Questionnaire

Abstract Objectives The mental wellbeing of mothers with young children has been shown to positively affect child development. Little, however, is known about which factors are related to optimal maternal mental health in high poverty rural contexts where women face a broad array of challenges at multiple levels daily. Methods Data were from 1644 mother-infant pairs in five Indian states as part of the Women Improving Nutrition through Group-based Strategies study. Common mental disorders (CMD) were assessed through the 20-item Self Reporting Questionnaire. We report on factors spanning nutritional (women's weight, fertility, food security, child illness), occupational (self-reported type of work, time spent in labor, domestic and caretaking activities), social (group membership, decision-making, gender attitudes, household dependents) and environmental (shocks, water, sanitation) aspects of life. Logistic regression models with district controls were used to examine associations between these factors and CMD. Results On average, women were 26 years old and their children were 15 months old. CMD was present in 262 (16%) of the mothers. Risk factors for CMD included having a failed pregnancy (AOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.93), and food insecurity (1.13, 1.07-1.20). Protective factors included being engaged in agricultural labor as a main occupation relative to being a housewife (0.20, 0.11-0.35) more time working (AOR associated with 1 more hour of work: 0.88, 0.81-0.97), higher decision-making (0.91, 0.86-0.96), group membership (non-significant trend; 0.76, 0.56-1.02), and having an improved toilet (0.51, 0.35-0.73). Conclusions In a sample of rural and mostly tribal Indian households, we found a moderate prevalence of poor mental wellbeing among mothers with young children. We also found that the determinants span a range of factors. Future research should aim to better understand the ways in which working outside the home, albeit in rigorous agricultural work, appears to protect the wellbeing of women in this context. It is plausible that agricultural work mitigates food insecurity, connects women with others and generates income, but these pathways need empirical and ethnographic examination. Funding Sources Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health.

scholarly journals Stereotypic morality: The influence of group membership on moral foundations

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 710-725
Author(s):  
Jeremy R. Winget ◽  
R. Scott Tindale
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Moral Foundations Theory ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content

Today’s modern world affords many benefits, one of which is the ability to have near-instantaneous interactions with groups and cultures other than our own. Though advantageous in many situations, one challenge for these groups is navigating what they perceive to be right and wrong in a cooperative manner despite having different modes of morality. Moral foundations theory holds groups use the same moral foundations to guide their judgments and decision making, but there has been little research on how the perception of these foundations differs within and between groups. Thus, the current study examined how moral foundations operate from a group perspective and potential outgroup moderators of moral foundations. Participants rated the extent to which various groups used moral foundations in one of two conditions. Each condition contained an ingroup and three outgroups that conformed to the quadrants of the stereotype content model. Results showed significant differences in the harm, fairness, and loyalty foundations between ingroups and outgroups. Moreover, the type of outgroup significantly influenced moral foundations scores. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering moral foundations at the group level.

Decision-making in large groups; Group membership and post-decision consolidation

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Torun Lindholm ◽  
Emma Back ◽  
Ola Svenson ◽  
Mikael Gilljam ◽  
Peter Esaiasson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Large Groups

Professional adventure tourists: Producing and selling stories of ‘authentic’ identity

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J Kane
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Role Model ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Study Tour ◽  
Authentic Identity

The ability to experience distinctive adventure appears limited today in comparison to the accounts of past exploring heroes. Even with these perceived limitations, there is continued growth in remote adventure tours. Guided by a Bourdieusian lens, this article examines the negotiation of authenticity, distinction and identity in the websites and blogs of companies and tourists during the 2010 spring Mt Everest climbing season. The interpretation suggests company blogs offer tourists an experience framed in mountaineering myth. The mountaineering guides’ capital derived from skill, experience and decision making ability make this experience possible. The tourists’ blogs offer authentically, recognisable environments, practices, and emotions disguising their limited mountaineering abilities. Tourist’s existential stories seek to transcend and appropriate mountaineering capital. For the females in this study, tour experience has supported careers based on mountaineering adventurer social identities. The companies’ tourism products facilitate the professional adventure tourist’s role model claims to ‘authentic’ adventurer identities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document