scholarly journals P65 Improving the experiance of teaching for foundation doctors in a busy general surgery department

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Condie ◽  
M A Quinn ◽  
N Arvind ◽  
Natalie Condie
Keyword(s):  
General Surgery ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Essential Element ◽  
Teaching Programme ◽  
Foundation Programme ◽  
Allied Healthcare ◽  
National Training ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Surgery Department ◽  
Surgical Unit

Abstract Introduction In the national training survey undertaken by the GMC in 2019 the general surgery teaching programme at North Bristol Trust scored 35.24 for local teaching; significantly lower than the national average. We aimed to introduce a teaching programme for foundation doctors on their general surgery rotations to help them meet the objectives set out by The UK Foundation Programme curriculum and gain further insight into general surgery and the roles of allied healthcare professionals. Methods A survey consisting of Likert scale and open ended questions was distributed to foundation doctors at the start and end of their foundation programme placements from August to December 2019. During this period a general surgery teaching programme was introduced consisting of once weekly sessions led by allied healthcare professionals and once weekly consultant led sessions. Results The number of foundation doctors agreeing with the statement ‘I think the General Surgical Unit is a good training and learning environment for foundation doctors rose by 33% (59% to 92%). There was an increase of 59% (24% to 83%) in the number of foundation doctors who felt they had good educational opportunities during their general surgical attachment. Conclusion The implementation of a general surgery teaching programme involving specific consultant-led sessions and sessions led by allied healthcare professionals (bariatric specialists, amputation counsellors, palliative care specialists) is invaluable to foundation doctors. It retains the interest of surgically and non-surgically inclined foundation doctors and is an essential element of a general surgical placement in a teaching hospital.

Use of Synthetic Protetic Materials in Surgical Abdominal Defects. Analysis of the Advantages and Lack of the Liechtenstein Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1740-1743
Author(s):  
Vlad Dumitru Baleanu ◽  
Denis Vlad Constantin ◽  
Anca Pascal ◽  
Dragos Ovidiu Alexandru ◽  
Simona Bobic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Prosthetic Material ◽  
Emergency Hospital ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Abdominal Interventions ◽  
Defects Analysis ◽  
Surgery Department

Liechtenstein procedure represents the most frequent technique used for surgical abdominal interventions. Although, it is a modern and inovative procedure, it still has a relative risk for complications. A number of 93 subjects were included in our research. We develop our study in General Surgery Department of County Emergency Hospital of Craiova, Romania between 1st July 2017-31th March 2018. From the total of 93 patients, 88% were men. Most of subjects had ages between 70 and 79 years old, were operated by Liechtenstein technique and they were coming from quite equal percent from rural and urban areas.The incidence for complications(seroma, hematoma, infection, abscess) was generally lower for the patients diagnosticated with Liechtenstein procedure comparing with the subjects operated by other technique. Liechtenstein procedureis recommended especially for its simplicity and efficiency, reproducibility and safety. It is very important to choose the perfect synthetic prosthetic material to have a good evolution of the disorder and a small recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Healthcare professionals’ views of the use of oral morphine and transmucosal diamorphine in the management of paediatric breakthrough pain and the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial: A focus group study (DIPPER)

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110087
Author(s):  
Liz Jamieson ◽  
Emily Harrop ◽  
Margaret Johnson ◽  
Christina Liossi ◽  
Christine Mott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Breakthrough Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Oral Route ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Framework Approach ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Uk

Background: Oral morphine is frequently used for breakthrough pain but the oral route is not always available and absorption is slow. Transmucosal diamorphine is administered by buccal, sublingual or intranasal routes, and rapidly absorbed. Aim: To explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals in the UK caring for children with life-limiting conditions concerning the assessment and management of breakthrough pain; prescribing and administration of transmucosal diamorphine compared with oral morphine; and the feasibility of a comparative clinical trial. Design/ participants: Three focus groups, analysed using a Framework approach. Doctors, nurses and pharmacists ( n = 28), caring for children with life-limiting illnesses receiving palliative care, participated. Results: Oral morphine is frequently used for breakthrough pain across all settings; with transmucosal diamorphine largely limited to use in hospices or given by community nurses, predominantly buccally. Perceived advantages of oral morphine included confidence in its use with no requirement for specific training; disadvantages included tolerability issues, slow onset, unpredictable response and unsuitability for patients with gastrointestinal failure. Perceived advantages of transmucosal diamorphine were quick onset and easy administration; barriers included lack of licensed preparations and prescribing guidance with fears over accountability of prescribers, and potential issues with availability, preparation and palatability. Factors potentially affecting recruitment to a trial were patient suitability and onerousness for families, trial design and logistics, staff time and clinician engagement. Conclusions: There were perceived advantages to transmucosal diamorphine, but there is a need for access to a safe preparation. A clinical trial would be feasible provided barriers were overcome.

scholarly journals ‘Should I Stay, or Should I Go?’ Psychological Distress Predicts Career Change Ideation among Intensive Care Staff in Lithuania and the UK Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2660
Author(s):  
Ieva Norkiene ◽  
Lina Jovarauskaite ◽  
Monika Kvedaraite ◽  
Encarl Uppal ◽  
Mandeep Kaur Phull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Career Change ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Psychological Well Being ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on healthcare globally. Additional pressure created by coronavirus adversely affected the mental health and psychological well-being of healthcare workers, leading many to question their desire and willingness to continue working in healthcare. This study aimed to identify predictors for career change ideation among healthcare professionals in two countries; Lithuania and the United Kingdom amid the coronavirus pandemic. In total, 610 healthcare professionals from Lithuania and the UK (285 and 325, respectively) participated in a survey from May to August 2020. Psychological distress and psychological well-being were measured using the self-report scales “DASS-21” and “WHO-5”. Almost half of the sample (49.2%), 59.6% and 40.0% in Lithuanian and the UK, respectively, exhibited career change ideation, the country effect was significant (AOR = 2.21, p < 0.001). Stronger ideation to leave healthcare was predicted by higher levels of depression (AOR = 1.10, p = 0.005), stress (AOR = 1.10, p = 0.007), anxiety surrounding inadequate personal protective equipment (AOR = 2.27, p = 0.009), and lower psychological well-being scores (AOR = 1.10, p = 0.007). We conclude that psychosocial support must be provided for healthcare professionals to prevent burnout and loss of staff amid the pandemic.

scholarly journals ‘Not just a piece of skin in front of you’—a qualitative exploration of the experiences of adolescents with eczema and psoriasis with healthcare professionals

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e041108
Author(s):  
Isabella Joy de Vere Hunt ◽  
Abigail McNiven ◽  
Amanda Roberts ◽  
Himesh Parmar ◽  
Tess McPherson
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Skin Disease ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Emotional Impact ◽  
Skin Conditions ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Qualitative Exploration

BackgroundThere is little qualitative research in the UK focussing on adolescents’ experience of their healthcare providers, and inflammatory skin conditions are a common heath problem in adolescence.AimTo explore the experiences of adolescents with eczema and psoriasis with healthcare professionals, and to distil the participants’ key messages for their healthcare providers.DesignThis is a secondary thematic analysis of interviews with adolescents with eczema or psoriasis.ParticipantsThere were a total of 41 text transcripts of interviews with young people with eczema or psoriasis who had given permission for secondary analysis; 23 of the participants had eczema, and 18 psoriasis. Participants were living in the UK at time of interview, and aged 15–24 years old.ResultsWe have distilled the following key messages from young people with eczema and psoriasis for healthcare providers: (1) address the emotional impact; (2) give more information, with the subtheme and (3) appreciate patient research. We identified the following eczema-specific themes: (ECZ-4) ‘It’s not taken seriously’; (ECZ-5) offer choice in treatment and (ECZ-6) lack of structure/conflicting advice. Two psoriasis-specific themes were identified: (PSO-4) feeling dehumanised/treat me as a person; and (PSO-5) think about how treatments will affect daily life.ConclusionThis qualitative data analysis highlights the need for greater recognition of the emotional impact of skin disease in adolescence, and for more comprehensive provision of information about the conditions. We call for greater sensitivity and flexibility in our approach to adolescents with skin disease, with important implications for healthcare delivery to this group.

scholarly journals Some issues regarding the Hungarian regulation of traditional Chinese medicine and possible solutions based on examples from the United Kingdom

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (15) ◽  
pp. 575-581
Author(s):  
Márk Oravecz ◽  
Judit Mészáros ◽  
Funian Yu ◽  
Ildikó Horváth
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Educational Background ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Factual Information ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Uk ◽  
New System

This paper aims to present factual information and to suggest possible solutions regarding some of the recent questions which have arisen regarding the regulation of traditional Chinese medicine in Hungary. According to current legislation “traditional Chinese doctors”, who are the most highly trained professionals in this field, are not allowed to practice Chinese medicine and acupuncture in Hungary. This situation cannot be explained by their educational background, as they receive thorough training in both Chinese medicine and modern medical sciences. Furthermore, this legislation is not supported by any EU standard: Traditional Chinese medicine professionals can practice Chinese medicine and acupuncture in a number of European countries within a legal and regulated framework. Different kinds of healthcare professionals may practice Chinese medicine and acupuncture in the UK – this could be a good example for Hungarian regulation. The five-year bachelor level traditional Chinese medicine training at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University and the increasing number of locally trained traditional Chinese medicine professionals could be a good basis for laying the groundwork of the new system. Orv., Hetil., 2014, 155(15), 575–581.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document