scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection: A Case Series from a 12-Month Longitudinal Occupational Cohort

Author(s):  
Christina D Mack ◽  
Caroline Tai ◽  
Robby Sikka ◽  
Yonatan H Grad ◽  
Lisa L Maragakis ◽  
...  

Abstract Seven cases of COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 reinfection from the NBA 2020-2021 occupational testing cohort are described including clinical details, antibody test results, genomic sequencing, and longitudinal RT-PCR results. Reinfections were infrequent and varied in clinical presentation, viral dynamics, and immune response.

2004 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. WEIS ◽  
L. BERTHELSEN ◽  
H. WACHMANN ◽  
I. LIND

Based on 92537 blood samples received from 7365 patients with a request for a meningococcal antibody test (MAT) during a 10-year period (1986–1995), the usefulness of the test in the diagnosis of meningococcal disease was assessed. Of 635 patients with culture-confirmed meningococcal disease, 88% were seronegative on admittance to hospital and 90% were seropositive 10–15 days after onset of disease. The humoral immune response in children <2 years of age was weaker than in older children and adults. Among 893 MAT-positive patients without culture-confirmed meningococcal disease, 261 (29%) had been notified as cases of meningococcal disease. Among 228 patients notified as serologically confirmed the MAT results were consistent with the clinical diagnosis in 86%. MAT is a reliable tool for establishing a diagnosis in patients with suspected meningococcal disease. Key factors facilitating appropriate interpretation of negative as well as positive test results were: time(s) of sampling(s) after onset of disease, age of the patient and clinical features.


Author(s):  
NEERAJ SINHA ◽  
GALIT BALAYLA

ABSTRACT SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus which has proven to be highly contagious. Specific viral dynamics and immune response to the virus are yet to be fully defined and determining the sensitivity and specificity of the available testing methods is still a work in progress. This study examines the published information on the testing methods, and finds that yield of COVID-19 tests changes with specimen types and with time through course of illness. We propose a sequential battery of testing consisting of an epidemiologic survey, RT-PCR tests, serologic tests and chest CT on surgical candidates which may increase the negative predictive value, and facilitate surgical procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S849-S850
Author(s):  
David McCormick ◽  
Tracy Scott ◽  
Jesse Chavez ◽  
Kay Wilcox ◽  
Grace E Marx ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected people experiencing homelessness (PEH) residing in shelters. Initial and regular testing of PEH in communities with moderate or substantial SARS-CoV-2 transmission may limit spread in shelters. We analyzed factors associated with positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibody tests for PEH staying in shelters or encampments in Denver, Colorado. Methods In May 2020, Denver Public Health collaborated with local leaders to identify 4 homeless shelters and 3 outdoor encampments for voluntary, universal SARS-CoV-2 testing. At each testing event, a short questionnaire including sociodemographic factors and symptoms was administered to PEH who consented to testing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA testing by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs; antibody testing was performed on venous blood samples. PEH reporting a prior positive RT-PCR test were not retested but were eligible for antibody testing. Statistical calculations were performed with an α of 0.05; all tests were two-sided. Results From June 2–July 28, 2020, 931 PEH were approached. A total of 863 RT-PCR tests were performed at 14 testing events, and 334 antibody tests were performed at 5 testing events. Overall, 604 and 259 RT-PCR tests were conducted in 4 shelters and 3 encampments, respectively; 189 and 145 antibody tests were conducted in 3 shelters and 2 encampments, respectively. PEH tested in shelters were older, more often men, less often Native American, and less likely to report COVID-19 symptoms than those tested at encampments (Table 1). Overall, 9% of PEH tested in shelters tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to 3% of PEH tested in encampments (p=0.002); 8% of men had positive RT-PCR results compared to 2% of women (p=0.03) (Table 2). PEH tested at shelters had a higher percentage of detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies than those tested in encampments (24% vs 8%, p=0.0002; Table 3). Neither RT-PCR nor antibody test results differed significantly by race or ethnicity. Table 1. Demographics of participants residing in encampments compared with shelters in Denver, Colorado, May-July 2020 (n=931) Table 2. Comparison of participants testing positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR* by location and demographics, in Denver, Colorado, May-July 2020 Table 3. Comparison of participants testing positive or negative for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by location and demographics in Denver, Colorado, May-July 2020 Conclusion A greater percentage of PEH tested positive for both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antibodies at shelters than encampments, suggesting that continued assessment of mitigation strategies in shelters should be a priority. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorg Taubel ◽  
Samuel Thomas Cole ◽  
Christopher S. Spencer ◽  
Anne Freier ◽  
Dorothée Camilleri ◽  
...  

AbstractTo estimate the effectiveness of vaccines in development, a robust mechanism is required to understand immunity, risks of reinfection and measure the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and how this may change over time. This study is a longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 infection rates using PCR, membrane immunoassay and chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) diagnostic tests. Our data confirm that antibody levels wane in the three months after symptom onset. Comparison of the three methods used suggests that quantitative CMIA testing may exaggerate numbers of COVID-19 negative individuals.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaoqing Wen ◽  
Jianxue Xiong ◽  
Chang Sun ◽  
Barnaby Edward Young ◽  
David Chien Lye ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study is based on the a simple but robust model we developed urgently to accurately monitor and predict viral dynamics for each SARS-CoV-2-infected patient, given the limited number of RT-PCR tests and the complexity of each individual’s physical health situation. We used the mathematical model to monitor and predict the changes of viral loads from different nasal and throat swab of clinical specimens collected from diagnosed patients. We also tested this real-time model by using the data from the SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with different severity. By using this model (http://58.87.113.187:8080/), we can predict the viral dynamics of patients, minimize false-negative test results, and screen the patients who are at risk of testing positive again after recovery. We sincerely thank those who are on the front lines battling SARS-CoV-2 virus. We hope this model will be useful for SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
pp. 1453-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. ZHU ◽  
G. ZHANG ◽  
M. SHAO ◽  
Y. LEI ◽  
Y. JIANG ◽  
...  

SUMMARYThis study describes an outbreak of rabies in a flock of 110 sheep in Yangqu county, Shanxi province, China, in 2010. The flock, housed in a cave being used as a sheepfold, was attacked by a rabid dog, which resulted in 36 deaths over the following 2 days from the crushing and trampling caused by panic, and some 15 further deaths from rabies 2 weeks later. Rabies in the sheep was confirmed by the fluorescent antibody test (FAT) and RT–PCR. Rabies virus was isolated from the index dog brain and its N gene was partially sequenced (nucleotides 77-880). Results showed that the canine isolate (SXTYD01) was rabies virus with the N gene fragment 100% identical to that of the virus isolated from rabid sheep. This is the first confirmed sheep rabies outbreak in China. The clinical presentation of the disease is also described.


Author(s):  
İlker Kızıloglu ◽  
Aslı Şener ◽  
Neslihan Siliv

Introduction: In this study, it is planned to compare the RT-PCR test, which is the gold standard in the diagnosis of COVID-19, with Thorax computed tomography (CT) and rapid antibody test results. Methods: Patients who were admitted to the emergency service of İzmir Çiğli Training and Research Hospital between 01.04.2020 and 31.05.2020 and who were suspected of having COVID-19 infection were included in the study. The medical records of the patients were retrospectively analyzed through the hospital data processing database. Age, gender, hospitalization, status of home quarantine, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), thorax CT and rapid antibody test results of the patients were examined. The relationship between RT-PCR, thorax CT and rapid antibody test results were compared statistically. Results: A total of 181 patients, 115 (63.5%) male and 66 (36.5%) female, with an average age of 56.4 ± 18.06 years were included in the study. The nasopharyngeal swab PCR result obtained at the first admission of the patients to the emergency department was positive in 71 (39.2%) patients. Thorax CT was performed in 173 (95.6%) patients who applied to the emergency department, and 112 (64.7%) of them had findings that could be compatible with COVID-19. According to the thorax CT findings in patients, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting COVID-19 infection were respectively; 76.1%, 43.1%, 48.2% and 72.1% (ĸ: 0.176, p <0.001). In our study, the mortality rate for COVID-19 was found to be 2.8%. Conclusion: Rapid antibody test and thorax CT examinations were found to have low diagnostic value in patients who admitted to the emergency department of our hospital and whose first RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test was positive. Studies involving larger patient groups are needed for their use alone in diagnosis and screening.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Alcázar-Arroyo ◽  
José Portolés ◽  
Paula López-Sánchez ◽  
Felipe Zalamea ◽  
Karina Furaz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background COVID-19 patients on hemodialysis (HD) have high mortality. We investigated the value of RT-PCR and the dynamic changes of antibodies (ELISA IgM+IgA and IgG) in a large HD cohort. Methods Prospective observational study in ten Madrid HD centers. Infection rate, anti- SARS-CoV-2 body dynamics and the incidence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined by positive RT-PCR, IgM-IgA or IgG) were assessed. Results From March 1 to April 15, 2020, 136 (16.8%) of 808 HD patients were diagnosed of symptomatic COVID-19 by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR and 42/136 (31%) died. In the second fortnight of April, RT-PCR and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were assessed on 763 of the surviving patients. At this point, 69/91 (75,8%) symptomatic COVID-19 patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Four weeks later, 15.4% (10/65) of initially antibody positive patients had become negative. Among patients without prior symptomatic COVID-19, 9/672 (1.3%) were RT-PCR positive and 101/672 patients (15.0%) were antibody positive. Four weeks later, 6224/86 (72.1%) of initially antibody positive patients had become negative. Considering only IgG tittles, serology remained positive after four weeks in 90% (54/60) of patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and in 52.5% (21/40) of asymptomatic patients. The probability of an adequate serologic response (defined as the development of anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies that persisted at 4 weeks) was higher in patients who had symptomatic COVID-19 than in asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infection (OR 4.04 [2.04-7.99] corrected for age, Charlson score and time on HD. Living in a nursing home (5.9 [2.3-15.1]) was the main risk factors for SARS-CoV2 infection Conclusion The anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody immune response in HD patients depends on clinical presentation and the antibody titers decay earlier than previously reported for the general population. This inadequate immune response raises questions about the efficacy of future vaccines.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Maasoumy ◽  
B Bremer ◽  
R Raupach ◽  
P Lehmann ◽  
MP Manns ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Ricafranca Castillo ◽  
Gino Rei A. Quizon ◽  
Mario Joselito M. Juco ◽  
Arthur Dessi E. Roman ◽  
Donnah G De Leon ◽  
...  

 Treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) pneumonia remains empirical and the search for therapies that can improve outcomes continues. Melatonin has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immune-modulating effects that may address key pathophysiologic mechanisms in the development and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which has been implicated as the likely cause of death in COVID19. We aimed to describe the observable clinical outcomes and tolerability of high-dose melatonin (hdM) given as adjuvant therapy in patients admitted with COVID19 pneumonia. We conducted a retrospective descriptive case series of patients who: 1) were admitted to the Manila Doctors Hospital in Manila, Philippines, between March 5, 2020 and April 4, 2020; 2) presented with history of typical symptoms (fever, cough, sore throat, loss of smell and/or taste, myalgia, fatigue); 3) had admitting impression of atypical pneumonia; 4) had history and chest imaging findings highly suggestive of COVID19 pneumonia, and, 5) were given hdM as adjuvant therapy, in addition to standard and/or empirical therapy. One patient admitted to another hospital, who one of the authors helped co-manage, was included. He was the lone patient given hdM in that hospital during the treatment period. Main outcomes described were: time to clinical improvement, duration of hospital stay from hdM initiation, need for mechanical ventilation (MV) prior to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and final outcome (death or recovery/discharge). Of 10 patients given hdM at doses of 36-72mg/day per os (p.o.) in 4 divided doses as adjuvant therapy, 7 were confirmed COVID19 positive (+) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 3 tested negative  (-), which was deemed to be false (-) considering the patients’ typical history, symptomatology, chest imaging findings and elevated bio-inflammatory parameters.  In all 10 patients given hdM, clinical stabilization and/or improvement was noted within 4-5 days after initiation of hdM. All hdM patients, including 3 with moderately severe ARDS and 1 with mild ARDS, survived; none required MV. The 7 COVID19(+) patients were discharged at an average of 8.6 days after initiation of hdM. The 3 highly probable COVID19 patients on hdM were discharged at an average of 7.3 days after hdM initiation. Average hospital stay of those not given hdM (non-hdM) COVID19(+) patients who were admitted during the same period and recovered was 13 days. To provide perspective, although the groups are not comparable, 12 of the 34 (35.3%) COVID19(+) non-hdM patients admitted during the same period died, 7/34 (20.6%) required MV; while 6 of 15 (40%) non-hdM (-) by RT-PCR but highly probable COVID19 pneumonia patients also died, 4/15  (26.7%) required MV. No significant side-effects were noted with hdM except for sleepiness, which was deemed favorable by all patients, most of whom had anxiety- and symptom-related sleeping problems previously. HdM may have a beneficial role in patients treated for COVID19 pneumonia, in terms of shorter time to clinical improvement, less need for MV, shorter hospital stay, and possibly lower mortality. HdM was well tolerated. This is the first report describing the benefits of hdM in patients being treated for COVID19 pneumonia.  Being a commonly available and inexpensive sleep-aid supplement worldwide, melatonin may play a role as adjuvant therapy in the global war against COVID19. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document