Barriers to and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiology: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Whitelaw ◽  
D Pellegrini ◽  
H.G.C Van Spall
Keyword(s):  
Digital Health ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Clinical Workflow ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Use Of Technology

Abstract Background Digital health technology has the potential to revolutionize the quality and efficiency of healthcare delivery. However, the uptake of digital health technology has been low in clinical practice. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of digital health technology, particularly in cardiology, are unclear. Purpose We identified and synthesized the barriers to and facilitators of digital health technology uptake in cardiology, with a focus on provider- and patient- level barriers and facilitators. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases for studies published January 2000 - December 2019 that reported barriers to and/or facilitators of digital health technology adoption in cardiology. Two reviewers screened and extracted data independently. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify major themes pertaining to digital health technology uptake by both providers and patients. Results The search identified 3062 unique studies, of which 23 qualitative studies met eligibility criteria. Seventeen studies included semi-structured interviews and 6 included focus groups. Five (22%) studies reported provider-level facilitators, which included technology usability, integration into clinical workflow, and improved patient outcomes. Eighteen (78%) studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included ongoing technical support, improved access to healthcare services, and improved self-management. Six (26%) studies reported provider-level barriers, which included lack of integration into clinical workflow, increased healthcare costs, and lack of validation and reliability of technology. Finally, 19 (83%) studies reported patient-level barriers which included lack of knowledge about technology, limited internet access, and physical impairments making use of technology difficult. Conclusions Identifying barriers to and facilitators of digital health technology could help improve its uptake in cardiology. The findings of this study can be used to inform researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders who wish to develop and implement digital health technologies that meet the needs of providers and patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sera Whitelaw ◽  
Danielle M Pellegrini ◽  
Mamas A Mamas ◽  
Martin Cowie ◽  
Harriette G C Van Spall
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Support ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
User Friendliness ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Cardiovascular Care

Abstract Digital health technology (DHT) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery but its uptake has been low in clinical and research settings. The factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly in cardiovascular settings, are unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake from the perspective of patients, clinicians, and researchers. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published from inception to May 2020 that reported barriers and/or facilitators of DHT adoption in cardiovascular care. We extracted data on study design, setting, cardiovascular condition, and type of DHT. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify barriers and facilitators of DHT uptake. The search identified 3075 unique studies, of which 29 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies employed: qualitative methods (n = 13), which included interviews and focus groups; quantitative methods (n = 5), which included surveys; or a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (n = 11). Twenty-five studies reported patient-level barriers, most common of which were difficult-to-use technology (n = 7) and a poor internet connection (n = 7). Six studies reported clinician-level barriers, which included increased workload (n = 4) and a lack of integration with electronic medical records (n = 3).Twenty-four studies reported patient-level facilitators, which included improved communication with clinicians (n = 10) and personalized technology (n = 6). Four studies reported clinician-level facilitators, which included approval and organizational support from cardiology departments and/or hospitals (n = 3) and technologies that improved efficiency (n = 3). No studies reported researcher-level barriers or facilitators. In summary, internet access, user-friendliness, organizational support, workflow efficiency, and data integration were reported as important factors in the uptake of DHT by patients and clinicians. These factors can be considered when selecting and implementing DHTs in cardiovascular clinical settings.

scholarly journals A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianna Poli ◽  
Susanne Kelfve ◽  
Andreas Motel-Klingebiel
Keyword(s):  
Social Participation ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Survey Questionnaire ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Underrepresented Groups ◽  
Self Selection ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Digital Skills

Abstract Background Healthcare services are being increasingly digitalised in European countries. However, in studies evaluating digital health technology, some people are less likely to participate than others, e.g. those who are older, those with a lower level of education and those with poorer digital skills. Such non-participation in research – deriving from the processes of non-recruitment of targeted individuals and self-selection – can be a driver of old-age exclusion from new digital health technologies. We aim to introduce, discuss and test an instrument to measure non-participation in digital health studies, in particular, the process of self-selection. Methods Based on a review of the relevant literature, we designed an instrument – the NPART survey questionnaire – for the analysis of self-selection, covering five thematic areas: socioeconomic factors, self-rated health and subjective overall quality of life, social participation, time resources, and digital skills and use of technology. The instrument was piloted on 70 older study persons in Sweden, approached during the recruitment process for a trial study. Results Results indicated that participants, as compared to decliners, were on average slightly younger and more educated, and reported better memory, higher social participation, and higher familiarity with and greater use of digital technologies. Overall, the survey questionnaire was able to discriminate between participants and decliners on the key aspects investigated, along the lines of the relevant literature. Conclusions The NPART survey questionnaire can be applied to characterise non-participation in digital health research, in particular, the process of self-selection. It helps to identify underrepresented groups and their needs. Data generated from such an investigation, combined with hospital registry data on non-recruitment, allows for the implementation of improved sampling strategies, e.g. focused recruitment of underrepresented groups, and for the post hoc adjustment of results generated from biased samples, e.g. weighting procedures.

The Role of Health Technology in Transforming Healthcare Delivery and Enhancing Spending Efficiency ​

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyad S. Almalki ◽  
Duaa A. Simsim
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Spending ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Health Technologies

Objectives: Advances in technology are changing the way healthcare services are delivered. The adoption of different health technologies has significantly improved health access and efficiency. In addition, health-technology adoption can help immensely in improving health outcomes and enhancing public and private healthcare spending efficiency. However, the role of health technology in transforming healthcare delivery and enhancing spending efficiency is not well understood. In this paper, we reviewed the role of emerging technologies in delivering health services that promote health outcomes, improve productivity of the healthcare provider, and reduce healthcare costs. Methods: A narrative review was conducted of published articles as well as grey literature on application of technology in delivering medical care. Studies that met the following criteria were included: addressed a relevant aspect of technology in healthcare delivery; written in English; published between 1994 and June 2020; qualitative and quantitative study designs, systematic reviews, and primary and secondary research. Main results and conclusions: Utilizing technologies in delivering health services showed promise in improving health outcomes, enhancing healthcare productivity, and reducing overall healthcare costs. However, before these technologies are implemented, reimbursement and equity are two main issues that need to be addressed.

scholarly journals The role of economic, educational and social resources in supporting the use of digital health technologies by people with T2D: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Turnbull ◽  
Patricia J. Lucas ◽  
Alastair D. Hay ◽  
Christie Cabral
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Social Resources ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Digital Skills ◽  
Care Support

Abstract Background Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a common chronic disease, with socially patterned incidence and severity. Digital self-care interventions have the potential to reduce health disparities, by providing personalised low-cost reusable resources that can increase access to health interventions. However, if under-served groups are unable to access or use digital technologies, Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) might make no difference, or worse, exacerbate health inequity. Study aims To gain insights into how and why people with T2D access and use DHTs and how experiences vary between individuals and social groups. Methods A purposive sample of people with experience of using a DHT to help them self-care for T2D were recruited through diabetes and community groups. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person and over the phone. Data were analysed thematically. Results A diverse sample of 21 participants were interviewed. Health care practitioners were not viewed as a good source of information about DHTs that could support T2D. Instead participants relied on their digital skills and social networks to learn about what DHTs are available and helpful. The main barriers to accessing and using DHT described by the participants were availability of DHTs from the NHS, cost and technical proficiency. However, some participants described how they were able to draw on social resources such as their social networks and social status to overcome these barriers. Participants were motivated to use DHTs because they provided self-care support, a feeling of control over T2D, and personalised advice or feedback. The selection of technology was also guided by participants’ preferences and what they valued in relation to DHTs and self-care support, and these in turn were influenced by age and gender. Conclusion This research indicates that low levels of digital skills and high cost of digital health interventions can create barriers to the access and use of DHTs to support the self-care of T2D. However, social networks and social status can be leveraged to overcome some of these challenges. If digital interventions are to decrease rather than exacerbate health inequalities, these barriers and facilitators to access and use must be considered when DHTs are developed and implemented.

scholarly journals Views and experiences of family physicians about Syrian refugee patients in Turkey: a qualitative research

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duygu Ayhan Baser ◽  
Özge Mıhcı ◽  
Meltem Tugce Direk ◽  
Mustafa Cankurtaran
Keyword(s):  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Asylum Seekers ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Syrian Refugee

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes, views and solution proposals of family physicians (FPs) about primary healthcare problems of Syrian refugee patients. This study would be the very first study for Turkey that evaluates the attitudes, views and solution proposals of FPs about primary healthcare problems of Syrian refugee patients. Background: Following the anti-regime demonstrations that started in March 2011, the developments in Syria created one of the biggest humanitarian crises in the world and the largest number of asylum seekers continue to be hosted in Turkey. There are some studies evaluating asylum seekers’ access to healthcare services in Europe, and the common result is that refugees have free access to primary healthcare services in most countries; however, they face many obstacles when accessing primary healthcare services. While there are studies in the literature evaluating the situation of access to primary healthcare services from the perspective of asylum seekers; there are few studies evaluating the opinions/views of FPs. Methods: A qualitative methodology informed by the grounded theory was used to guide the research. A total of 20 FPs were interviewed face to face through semi-structured interviews, using 12 questions about their lived experience and views caring of refugee population. Interviews were analysed thematically. Finding: The following themes were revealed: Benefiting from Primary Health Care Services, Benefiting from Rights, Differences Between the Approach/Attitudes of Turkish Citizens and Refugees, Barriers to Healthcare Delivery, Training Needs of Physicians, Solution proposals. FPs reported that there is a need for support in primary care and a need for training them and refugees in this regard and they specified refugee healthcare centres are the best healthcare centres for refugees; however, the number of these and provided services should be increased.

scholarly journals Digi-HTA: Health technology assessment framework for digital healthcare services

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Haverinen ◽  
Niina Keränen ◽  
Petra Falkenbach ◽  
Anna Maijala ◽  
Timo Kolehmainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
The State ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Digital Healthcare ◽  
And Robotics

Health technology assessment (HTA) refers to the systematic evaluation of the properties, effects, and/or impacts of health technology. The main purpose of the assessment is to inform decisionmakers in order to better support the introduction of new health technologies. New digital healthcare solutions like mHealth, artificial intelligence (AI), and robotics have brought with them a great potential to further develop healthcare services, but their introduction should follow the same criteria as that of other healthcare methods. They must provide evidence-based benefits and be safe to use, and their impacts on patients and organizations need to be clarified. The first objective of this study was to describe the state-of-the-art HTA methods for mHealth, AI, and robotics. The second objective of this study was to evaluate the domains needed in the assessment. The final aim was to develop an HTA framework for digital healthcare services to support the introduction of novel technologies into Finnish healthcare. In this study, the state-of-the-art HTA methods were evaluated using a literature review and interviews. It was noted that some good practices already existed, but the overall picture showed that further development is still needed, especially in the AI and robotics fields. With the cooperation of professionals, key aspects and domains that should be taken into account to make fast but comprehensive assessments were identified. Based on this information, we created a new framework which supports the HTA process for digital healthcare services. The framework was named Digi-HTA.

OP348 Assessing The Potential Value Of Wearable Digital Health Technologies In Chronic Kidney Disease Using Early Health Technology Assessment Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Vijay S. Gc ◽  
Andrea Manca ◽  
Alexander J. Casson ◽  
Steven Antrobus ◽  
Cynthia Iglesias
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Early Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Early Health

IntroductionWearable digital health technologies (WDHTs) offer several solutions in terms of disease monitoring, management and delivery of specific interventions. In chronic conditions, WDHTs can be used to support individuals’ self-management efforts, potentially improving adherence to (and outcomes resulting from) interventions. Early health technology assessment (HTA) methods can inform considerations about the potential clinical and economic benefits of technology in the initial phases of the product's lifecycle, facilitating identification of those Research & Development (R&D) investments with the greatest potential stakeholders’ payoff. We report our experience of using early HTA methods to support R&D decisions relating to novel WDHT being designed to support self-management of chronic kidney disease (CKD).MethodsWe performed a literature review, focus-group interviews with patients, and qualitative interviews with the prototype development team to understand the relevant characteristics of WDHTs, quantify relevant clinical indications and existing technological constraints. An early economic evaluation was used to identify the key drivers of value for money, and a discrete choice experiment shed light onto patient preferences towards what key features the WDHT should have for the users to adopt it. Then a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken incorporating headroom analysis, return on investment, one-way sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses using data from secondary sources.ResultsThe review of the literature, focus groups with CKD patients, and qualitative interviews with technology developers helped to understand relevant characteristics of WDHT and user preferences helped inform the next R&D iteration. Compared to the standard care, WDHT that support stage ≥3 CKD patients self-management at home by measuring blood pressure and monitor mobility has the potential to be cost-effective at conventional cost-effectiveness threshold levels. From the headroom analysis, novel WDHT can be priced up to GBP280 (EUR315, USD360) and still be cost-effective compared to standard home blood pressure monitoring.ConclusionsOur study provides valuable information for the further development of the WDHT, such as defining a go/no-go decision, as well as providing a template for performing early HTA of Digital Health Interventions.

Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110434
Author(s):  
Alexander N. Klonoff ◽  
Wei-An (Andy) Lee ◽  
Nicole Y. Xu ◽  
Kevin T. Nguyen ◽  
Ashley DuBord ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Sensor Data ◽  
Communication Tools ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
The People ◽  
Key Questions

The digital health revolution is transforming the landscape of medicine through innovations in sensor data, software, and wireless communication tools. As one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the United States, diabetes is particularly impactful as a model disease for which to apply innovation. As with any other newly developed technologies, there are three key questions to consider: 1) How can the technology benefit people with diabetes?, 2) What barriers must be overcome to further advance the technology?, and 3) How will the technology be applied in the future?. In this article, we highlight six areas of innovation that have the potential to reduce the burden of diabetes for individuals living with the condition and their families as well as provide measurable benefits for all stakeholders involved in diabetes care. The six technologies which have the potential to transform diabetes care are (i) telehealth, (ii) incorporation of diabetes digital data into the electronic health record, (iii) qualitative hypoglycemia alarms, (iv) artificial intelligence, (v) cybersecurity of diabetes devices, and (vi) diabetes registries. To be successful, a new digital health technology must be accessible and affordable. Furthermore, the people and communities that would most likely benefit from the technology must be willing to use the innovation in their management of diabetes.

scholarly journals The Digital Health Revolution and People with Disabilities: Perspective from the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Jones ◽  
Frank DeRuyter ◽  
John Morris
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Mobile Health ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Wearable Sensors ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
The United States ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Health Technologies

This article serves as the introduction to this special issue on Mobile Health and Mobile Rehabilitation for People with Disabilities. Social, technological and policy trends are reviewed. Needs, opportunities and challenges for the emerging fields of mobile health (mHealth, aka eHealth) and mobile rehabilitation (mRehab) are discussed. Healthcare in the United States (U.S.) is at a critical juncture characterized by: (1) a growing need for healthcare and rehabilitation services; (2) maturing technological capabilities to support more effective and efficient health services; (3) evolving public policies designed, by turns, to contain cost and support new models of care; and (4) a growing need to ensure acceptance and usability of new health technologies by people with disabilities and chronic conditions, clinicians and health delivery systems. Discussion of demographic and population health data, healthcare service delivery and a public policy primarily focuses on the U.S. However, trends identified (aging populations, growing prevalence of chronic conditions and disability, labor shortages in healthcare) apply to most countries with advanced economies and others. Furthermore, technologies that enable mRehab (wearable sensors, in-home environmental monitors, cloud computing, artificial intelligence) transcend national boundaries. Remote and mobile healthcare delivery is needed and inevitable. Proactive engagement is critical to ensure acceptance and effectiveness for all stakeholders.

Digital Health Innovation Ecosystems

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Ejehiohen Iyawa ◽  
Marlien Herselman ◽  
Adele Botha
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Health Innovation ◽  
Innovation Ecosystems ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Key Participants

The purpose of this paper was to identify key participants, benefits, and challenges of a digital health innovation ecosystem in Namibia. The paper also aimed to identify strategies for implementing digital health innovation ecosystems in Namibia. This is a qualitative study that adopted semi-structured interviews in meeting the objectives of the study. The findings suggest that implementing digital health innovation ecosystems within the Namibian context will result in better processes of delivering healthcare services to patients. However, implementing such an ecosystem would require resources from both academic and governmental organizations. The need for skilled experts for managing the ecosystem would also be required. Hence, adopting the guidelines for implementing a digital health innovation ecosystem in developing countries, the study proposed guidelines which would make a digital health innovation ecosystem work for the Namibian context. The findings of this study can be used by healthcare managers within the Namibian context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document