Ventricular arrhythmia risk is associated with myocardial scar but not with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1391-1400
Author(s):  
Markus Linhart ◽  
Adelina Doltra ◽  
Juan Acosta ◽  
Roger Borràs ◽  
Beatriz Jáuregui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Arrhythmia ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Scar ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Aims Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk estimation in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. By CRT-mediated improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), many patients loose indication for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Increasing evidence shows the importance of myocardial scar for risk prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of myocardial scar depending on the echocardiographic response in patients undergoing CRT. Methods and results Patients with indication for CRT were prospectively enrolled. Decision about ICD or pacemaker implantation was based on clinical criteria. All patients underwent delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Median follow-up duration was 45 (24–75) months. Primary outcome was a composite of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, appropriate ICD therapy, or SCD. A total of 218 patients with LVEF 25.5 ± 6.6% were analysed [158 (73%) male, 64.9 ± 10.7 years]. Myocardial scar was observed in 73 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (95% of ICM patients); in 62 with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (45% of these patients); and in all but 1 of 36 (17%) patients who reached the primary outcome. Myocardial scar was the only significant predictor of primary outcome [odds ratio 27.7 (3.8–202.7)], independent of echocardiographic CRT response. A total of 55 (25%) patients died from any cause or received heart transplant. For overall survival, only a combination of the absence of myocardial scar with CRT response was associated with favourable outcome. Conclusion Malignant arrhythmic events and SCD depend on the presence of myocardial scar but not on CRT response. All-cause mortality improved only with the combined absence of myocardial scar and CRT response.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: selection of candidates

2015 ◽  
pp. 405-419
Author(s):  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
Jeroen J. Bax
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Myocardial Scar ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Venous Anatomy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Mechanics ◽  
Selection Of

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment, with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and QRS complex with left bundle branch block morphology or duration ≥150 ms. Non-invasive imaging modalities contribute in the evaluation and selection of patients who are candidates for CRT. Evaluation of left ventricular mechanics and dyssynchrony, extent and location of myocardial scar and cardiac venous anatomy are important to estimate the likelihood of favourable response to CRT. This chapter will review the ‘why and how’ to assess cardiac dyssynchrony, myocardial scar, and cardiac venous anatomy, prior to CRT implantation.

scholarly journals What Are the Expectations for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy? A Validation of Two Response Definitions

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Toshiko Nakai ◽  
Yukitoshi Ikeya ◽  
Rikitake Kogawa ◽  
Naoto Otsuka ◽  
Yuji Wakamatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Functional Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Crt Response

Background: The definition of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies across clinical trials. There are two main definitions, i.e., echocardiographic response and functional response. We assessed which definition was more reasonable. Methods: In this study of 260 patients who had undergone CRT, an echocardiographic response was defined as a reduction in a left ventricular end-systolic volume of greater than or equal to 15% or an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction of greater than or equal to 5%. A functional response was defined as an improvement of at least one class category in the New York Heart Association functional classification. We assessed the response to CRT at 6 months after device implantation, based on each definition, and investigated the relationship between response and clinical outcomes. Results: The echocardiographic response rate was 74.2%. The functional response rate was 86.9%. Non-responder status, based on both definitions, was associated with higher all-cause mortality. Cardiac death was only associated with functional non-responder status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19–5.46, p = 0.0186) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 2.78, 95% CI, 1.29–5.26, p = 0.0111). Conclusion: After CRT implantation, the functional response definition of CRT response is associated with a higher response rate and better clinical outcomes than that of the echocardiographic response definition, and therefore it is reasonable to use the functional definition to assess CRT response.

scholarly journals Importance of systematic right ventricular assessment in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates: a machine-learning approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Galli ◽  
V Le Rolle ◽  
OA Smiseth ◽  
J Duchenne ◽  
JM Aalen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Despite having all a systolic heart failure and broad QRS, patients proposed for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are highly heterogeneous and it remains extremely complicated to predict the impact of the device on left ventricular (LV) function and outcomes. Objectives We sought to evaluate the relative impact of clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data on the left ventricular (LV) remodeling and prognosis of CRT-candidates by the application of machine learning (ML) approaches. Methods 193 patients with systolic heart failure undergoing CRT according to current recommendations were prospectively included in this multicentre study. We used a combination of the Boruta algorithm and random forest methods to identify features predicting both CRT volumetric response and prognosis (Figure 1). The model performance was tested by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). We also applied the K-medoid method to identify clusters of phenotypically-similar patients. Results From 28 clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic-derived variables, 16 features were predictive of CRT-response; 11 features were predictive of prognosis. Among the predictors of CRT-response, 7 variables (44%) pertained to right ventricular (RV) size or function. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was the main feature associated with prognosis. The selected features were associated with a very good prediction of both CRT response (AUC 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.87) and outcomes (AUC 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93) (Figure 1, Supervised Machine Learning Panel). An unsupervised ML approach allowed the identifications of two phenogroups of patients who differed significantly in clinical and parameters, biventricular size and RV function. The two phenogroups had significant different prognosis (HR 4.70, 95% CI: 2.1-10.0, p &lt; 0.0001; log –rank p &lt; 0.0001; Figure 1, Unsupervised Machine Learning Panel). Conclusions Machine learning can reliably identify clinical and echocardiographic features associated with CRT-response and prognosis. The evaluation of both RV-size and function parameters has pivotal importance for the risk stratification of CRT-candidates and should be systematically assessed in patients undergoing CRT. Abstract Figure 1

scholarly journals The use of mechanical dyssynchrony for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Saushkin ◽  
YV Varlamova ◽  
AI Mishkina ◽  
DI Lebedev ◽  
SV Popov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Gated Spect ◽  
Mechanical Dyssynchrony ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Aim/Introduction: Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy for predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Materials and Methods  We examined 32 patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy before and six months after CRT.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and contractility were assessed for all patients by myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT. The phase standard deviation (PSD), histogram bandwidth (HBW), phase histogram skewness (S) and phase histogram kurtosis (K) were used as an indicator of mechanical dyssynchrony for the both ventricles.  Results  Mechanical dyssynchrony of both ventricles before CRT was increased in all patients. Median value PSD 53°(41-61°), HBW 176°(136-202°), S 1,62(1,21-1,89), K 2,81(1,21-3,49). Six months after CRT 22(68%) respondents were identified. We divided the patients into two groups (responders and non-responders) and compared phase parameters. It was found that the PSD (44°(35-54°)) and HBW (158°(118-179°) in the responders were significantly lower than in the non-responders (PSD (68°(58-72°); HBW (205°(199-249°)). The value of phase histogram skewness and kurtosis in responders were significantly higher (Responders: S 1,77(1,62-2,02); K 3,03(2,60-3,58). Non-responders: S 1,21(0,93-1,31); K 1,21(0,19-1,46)).  We found that all four indicators of mechanical dyssynchrony can predict CRT response according to the results of univariate logistic regression analysis. Moreover, It was found that only phase histogram kurtosis (OR = 1.196, 95% CI 1.04-1.37) is an independent predictor of CRT response according to multivariate logistic regression. Conclusion  Radionuclide assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony may be the optimal diagnostic method for selecting patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy on CRT.

scholarly journals His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmytro Volkov ◽  
Dmytro Lopin ◽  
Stanislav Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmytro Skoryi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an option for treatment for chronic heart failure (HF) associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients with HF and right bundle branch block (RBBB) have potentially worse outcomes in comparison to LBBB. Traditional CRT in RBBB can increase mortality and HF deterioration rates over native disease progression. His bundle pacing may improve the results of CRT in those patients. Furthermore, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging in patients with previously implanted leads in His region. Case summary  We report the case of 74-year-old gentleman with a 5-year history of HF, permanent AF with a rapid ventricular response, and RBBB. He was admitted to the hospital with complaints of severe weakness and shortness of breath. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased (41%), right ventricle (RV) was dilated (41 mm), and QRS was prolonged (200 ms) with RBBB morphology. The patient underwent His-optimized CRT with further left-sided AVNA. As a result, LVEF increased to 51%, RV dimensions decreased to 35 mm with an improvement of the clinical status during a 6-month follow-up. Discussion  Patients with AF, RBBB, and HF represent the least evaluated clinical subgroup of individuals with less beneficial clinical outcomes according to CRT studies. Achieving the most effective resynchronization could require pacing fusion from sites beyond traditional with the intention to recruit intrinsic conduction pathways. This approach can be favourable for reducing RV dilatation, improving LVEF, and maximizing electrical resynchronization.

scholarly journals Non-invasive myocardial workiIndices derived from left ventricular pressure-strain loops in predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R Zhu ◽  
X Shu ◽  
H.Y Chen ◽  
Y.N Wang ◽  
Y.F Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Volume ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Work Distribution ◽  
Constructive Work ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Background Non-invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loops (PSLs) which generated by combining LV longitudinal strain with brachial artery blood pressure, provide a novel method of quantifying global and segmental myocardial work (MW) indices with potential advantages over conventional echocardiographic strain which is load-dependent. The method has been introduced in echocardiographic software recently, making MW calculations more effectively and rapidly. The aim was to evaluate the role of non-invasive MW indices derived from LV PSLs in the prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Methods 106 heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for CRT were included for MW analysis. Global and segmental (septal and lateral at the mid-ventricular level) MW indices were accessed before CRT. Response to CRT was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6-month follow-up in comparison with baseline value. Results CRT response was observed in 78 (74%) patients. At baseline, global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were significant higher in CRT responders than in non-responders (both P&lt;0.05). Besides, responders exhibited a significantly higher Mid Lateral MW and Mid Lateral constructive work (CW) (both P&lt;0.001) but a significantly lower Mid Septal MW and Mid Septal myocardial work efficiency (MWE), as well as a significantly higher Mid Septal wasted work (WW) than non-responders (all P&lt;0.01). Baseline Mid Septal MWE (OR 0.975, 95% CI 0.959–0.990, P=0.002) and Mid Lateral MW (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002–1.004, P&lt;0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate regression analysis. Mid Septal MWE ≤42% combined with Mid Lateral MW ≥740 mm Hg% predicted CRT response with the optimal sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 82% (AUC = 0.830, P&lt;0.001). Conclusion Mid Septal MWE and Mid Lateral MW can successfully predict response to CRT, and their combination can further improve the prediction accuracy. Assessment of MW indices before CRT could identify the marked misbalance in LV myocardial work distribution and has the potential to be widely used as a reliable complementary tool for guiding patient selection in clinical practice. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 14932: Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients by Revascularization Procedures in MADIT-CRT

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Husaini ◽  
Yitschak Biton ◽  
Scott McNitt ◽  
Wojciech Zareba ◽  
Arthur J Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Revascularization Procedures

Background: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) showed that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) had similar reductions in clinical events with implanted CRT-D vs. ICD-only when compared to patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Frequency of revascularizations may serve as a surrogate for severity of coronary artery disease in patients with ICM and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, it is unknown whether the number of revascularizations plays a role in clinical outcomes in ICM patients implanted with CRT-D vs. ICD-only. Methods: Using a multivariable analysis of MADIT-CRT data, we evaluated the effect of CRT-D vs. ICD-only on combined heart failure (HF) or death and combined ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) or death in ICM patients by the number of pre-enrollment revascularizations (1 or ≥ 2 revascularizations) compared to those with no need for revascularization. Follow-up over a median period of 5.6 years for HF/death and 4.0 years for VT/VF/death was assessed among 1374 ICM patients with a Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB). Results: There was a significant and similar risk reduction with CRT-D vs. ICD-only in HF/death in all three sub-groups: ICM with no need for revascularization (HR 0.45 [0.26-0.80]; p < 0.006), ICM with one revascularization (HR 0.46 [0.31-0.69]; p <0.001), and ICM with 2 or more revascularization (HR 0.50 [0.30-0.84]; p = 0.008). However, significant risk reduction of VT/VF/death with CRT-D vs. ICD-only was only observed in patients with no need for revascularization (HR 0.52 [0.30-0.89]; p = 0.017), less so in those with ICM with one revascularization (HR 0.72 [0.49-1.06]; p = 0.10), and no reduction was seen in those with ICM with 2 or more revascularization (HR 0.94 [0.54-1.62]; p = 0.81). Conclusions: In ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, CRT-D vs. ICD-only is associated with a significant risk reduction in heart failure events or death irrespective of the frequency of pre-enrollment revascularization procedures; however, the benefit of CRT-D vs. ICD-only to reduce ventricular tachyarrhythmias is attenuated with the increasing number of revascularization procedures.

scholarly journals Narrower QRS may be enough to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy in lightweight patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 835-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiko Nakai ◽  
Hiroaki Mano ◽  
Yukitoshi Ikeya ◽  
Yoshihiro Aizawa ◽  
Sayaka Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Conduction Disturbances ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Crt Response

AbstractA prolonged QRS duration (QRSd) is promising for a response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The variation in human body sizes may affect the QRSd. We hypothesized that conduction disturbances may exist in Japanese even with a narrow (< 130 ms)-QRS complex; such patients could be CRT candidates. We investigated the relationships between QRSd and sex and body size in Japanese. We retrospectively analyzed the values of 338 patients without heart failure (HF) (controls) and 199 CRT patients: 12-lead electrocardiographically determined QRSd, left ventricular diastolic and systolic diameters (LVDd and LVDs), body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and LVEF. We investigated the relationships between the QRSd and BSA, BMI, and LVD. The men’s and women’s BSA values were 1.74 m2 and 1.48 m2 in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 1.70 m2 and 1.41 m2 in the CRT patients (p < 0.0001). The men’s and women’s QRSd values were 96.1 ms and 87.4 ms in the controls (p < 0.0001), and 147.8 ms and 143.9 ms in the CRT group (p = 0.4633). In the controls, all body size and LVD variables were positively associated with QRSd. The CRT response rate did not differ significantly among narrow-, mid-, and wide-QRS groups (83.6%, 91.3%, 92.4%). An analysis of the ROC curve provided a QRS cutoff value of 114 ms for CRT responder. The QRSd appears to depend somewhat on body size in patients without HF. The CRT response rate was better than reported values even in patients with a narrow QRSd (< 130 ms). When patients are considered for CRT, a QRSd > 130 ms may not be necessary, and the current JCS guidelines appear to be appropriate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document