scholarly journals Impact of rate control in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
GF Romiti ◽  
M Proietti

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in patients with sepsis, and imposes a worse prognosis and challenging clinical management. Administration of antiarrhythmics is often needed, to achieve rate or rhythm control, especially in the occurrence of AF with rapid ventricular response; however, it is unclear whether different classes of antiarrhythmics are associated with better outcomes in patients with sepsis and AF. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA Guidelines. Pubmed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with sepsis and AF, according to the use of Beta-blockers (BBs), calcium-channel blockers (CCBs), digoxin and amiodarone. Random-effect models were used to provide pooled estimates; fixed-effect models were also performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results Among 4,166 studies, 2 articles were included from the literature search, and an additional 1 from the author’s knowledge, yielding a total of 40,593 patients with sepsis and AF included. According to the data available from the included studies, the meta-analysis was performed only for in-hospital mortality. BBs were associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality compared to amiodarone (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.46-0.58; I2 = 0%, Figure 1, Panel C), while no significant differences were observed for BBs. vs. CCBs (Figure 1, Panel A) and for BBs vs. digoxin (Figure 1, Panel B). In the pre-specified sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effect model, BBs resulted associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared with both CCBs and digoxin). Conclusion In patients with AF during sepsis, BBs were associated with reduced risk of in-hospital mortality, compared to amiodarone; inconclusive results emerged for the comparisons between BBs and CCBs or digoxin, although with a benefit of BBs observed in the fixed-effect models. Further studies are needed to provide definitive data and to guide physicians in the choice of the best rate control strategy in this clinical setting. Abstract Figure.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A348-A348
Author(s):  
Chenyu Sun ◽  
Ce Cheng ◽  
Keun Young Kim ◽  
Mubashir Ayaz Ahmed ◽  
Reveena Manem

Abstract Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading globally for more than half a year. Previous studies remain controversial regarding whether metformin is associated with reduced risk for COVID-19 diabetic patients. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed. Method: A comprehensive literature search on PubMed and Web of Science was conducted to identify all relevant studies published prior to October 2020 according to the established inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis was reported in conformity to the Preferred Reporting Project declared by the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The quality assessment was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between metformin use and mortality for COVID-19 patients. A random-effect or fixed-effect model was used based on heterogeneity significance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on in-hospital-use or home-use, and different sample sizes. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were also performed. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software (version 5.3; Cochrane library) and STATA 12.0 statistical software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX), and all P values were two-tailed, the test level was 0.05. Result: 97 articles were obtained from the database search, and 5 articles obtained from other sources. 8 articles involving 11,169 participants were included. Most studies were considered moderate quality. A statistically significant association between metformin use and decreased mortality of COVID-19 patients was found (OR 0.53, 95%CI: 0.34, 0.83, P=0.005, I2=77%). In the subgroup analyses, home-use of metformin was also associated with a reduced risk of mortality (OR 0.54, 95%CI: 0.35, 0.84, P=0.006, I2=66%), and one study reporting in-hospital use did not find reduced mortality among COVID-19 patients taking metformin (OR 1.65, 95%CI: 0.71, 3.86, P=0.247). For sample size >1,000, no statistically significant reduced risk of mortality (OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.57, 1.26, P=0.41, I2=73%) was found, however, for sample ≤1,000, a statistically significant reduced risk of mortality (OR 0.29, 95%CI: 0.19, 0.44 P<0.00001, I2=0%) was found. Sensitivity analysis by change fixed-effect models to random-effect models and by omitting each study at a time confirmed the relative stability of the result. Begg’s test (z=0.37, P=0.711) and Egger’s test (t=-1.98, P=0.096) did not detect a significant risk of publication bias. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that metformin use is associated with decreased mortality for COVID-19 diabetic patients. However, only one study investigating the in-hospital use of metformin. More high-quality original studies are needed to further explore the association between metformin use and mortality risk of COVID-19.


EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
GF Romiti ◽  
D Pastori ◽  
JM Rivera-Caravaca ◽  
WY Ding ◽  
YX Gue ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The ‘Atrial Fibrillation Better Care’ (ABC) pathway has been recently proposed as a holistic approach for the comprehensive management of patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF), standing on three main pillars: ‘A’ Avoid stroke (with Anticoagulants); ‘B’ Better symptom management; ‘C’ Cardiovascular and Comorbidity management. The ABC pathway is now recommended in several clinical guidelines, including the recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) AF management guidelines. We performed a systematic review of the current evidence for use of the ABC pathway on clinical outcomes. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA Guidelines. Pubmed and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting the prevalence of ABC pathway adherent management in AF patients, and its impact on clinical outcomes (all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, and major bleeding). Metanalysis of odds ratio (OR) was performed with random-effect models; subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to account for heterogeneity; a CHA2DS2-VASc-stratified sensitivity analysis was also performed. Results Among 2862 records retrieved from the literature search, 8 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of ABC adherent management was 21% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 13-34%), with a high grade of heterogeneity; in a multivariable meta-regression model, adherence to each criteria of the ABC pathway explained most part of the heterogeneity (R2 = 98.9%). Patients treated according to the ABC pathway showed a lower risk of all-cause death (OR:0.42, 95%CI 0.31-0.56), cardiovascular death (OR:0.37, 95%CI 0.23-0.58), stroke (OR:0.55, 95%CI 0.37-0.82) and major bleeding (OR:0.69, 95%CI 0.51-0.94), with moderate heterogeneity. Meta-regressions showed that the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure and history of stroke were associated with a reduced effectiveness of the ABC pathway for all-cause and cardiovascular death; each comorbidity was able to explain a significant proportion of heterogeneity at univariate meta-regression. Conversely, longer follow-up time was associated with more effectiveness of the ABC pathway for all outcomes. Adherence to ABC pathway was associated with a progressively greater reduction of the all-cause death risk amongst patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores; no difference in ABC pathway effectiveness was found across CHA2DS2-VASc strata for CV death and stroke occurrence. Conclusions Adherence to the ABC pathway was suboptimal, being adopted in 1 in every 5 patients. Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a reduction in the risk of major adverse outcomes. Our data supports extensive application of the ABC pathway for the management of AF. Abstract Figure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Corica ◽  
G.F Romiti ◽  
V Raparelli ◽  
R Cangemi ◽  
S Basili ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) imposes a careful balance between the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risks. An association between cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has already been described; however, conflicting evidence exist on the association with ischemic stroke (IS). Although CMBs are often observed in AF patients, the actual prevalence and the magnitude of the risk of adverse events in patients with CMBs is unclear. Purpose We aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of CMBs in patients with AF through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Additionally, we evaluated the risk of ICH and IS according to the presence and burden of CMBs. Methods We perform a systematic search on PubMed and EMBASE from inception to 6th March 2021. We included all studies reporting the prevalence of CMBs, the incidence of ICH and/or IS in AF by presence of CMBs. Pooled prevalence and odds ratios (OR), along with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), were computed using random-effect models; we also calculated 95% Prediction Intervals (PI) for each outcome investigated. Additionally, we performed subgroup analyses according to the number and localization of CMBs. Results We retrieved 562 records from the literature search, and 17 studies were finally included. Pooled prevalence of CMBs in AF population was 28.3% (95% CI: 23.8%-33.4%; 95% PI: 12.2%-52.9%, Figure 1). Individuals with CMBs showed a higher risk of both ICH (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.83–5.06) and IS (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.26–2.49). Moreover, patients with more than 5 CMBs, as well as patients with both lobar and mixed CMBs, showed a higher risk of ICH. Conclusions CMBs were found in 28.3% of AF patients, with 95% PIs indicating a potentially higher prevalence. Moreover, CMBs were associated with an increased risk of both ICH and IS, with the effect potentially modulated by their number and localization. CMBs may represent an important and often overlooked risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with AF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Prevalence of CMBs in patients with AF


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 744-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaivan Vaidya ◽  
Clare Arnott ◽  
Anne Russell ◽  
Philip Masson ◽  
Raymond W. Sy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-140432
Author(s):  
Yue Chen ◽  
Xingyu Cheng ◽  
Chenyu Sun ◽  
Na Hyun Kim ◽  
Sujatha Kailas ◽  
...  

ObjectivesStudies on the association between metformin use and the risk of oesophageal cancer (OC) have generated controversial findings. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to reassess the effects of metformin on OC.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was conducted to select relevant studies from origination to February 2021. Heterogeneity was evaluated through the Q test and I2 statistics. HRs and 95% CIs were pooled through either random-effect or fixed-effect models. Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and publication bias diagnosis were also performed.ResultsSeven studies with 5 426 343 subjects were included. Metformin use was associated with reduced risk of OC (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.87, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were relatively stable.ConclusionMetformin is associated with a reduced risk of OC. More well-designed studies are still needed to further elaborate on these associations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021237127.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bereket Duko ◽  
Dereje Wolde ◽  
Yonas Alemayehu

Abstract Background Postnatal depression is among the common mental health problems that occur during the postnatal period. However, it is left undiagnosed in low- and middle-income countries including Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically summarize the available evidence on the epidemiology of postnatal depression in Ethiopia and suggest recommendations for future clinical practice. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases for the relevant articles that assessed the prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia. We used a random-effect model to conduct a meta-analysis. We conducted a subgroup and sensitivity analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity. Cochrane Q- and the I2-test were used to check the heterogeneity of the included studies. The presence of publication bias was also checked by visual inspection of symmetry and Egger's test. Results The pooled estimated prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia was 20.1% (95% CI 12.7–30.2). The pooled prevalence of postnatal depression in the studies that were conducted in community settings and used the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess postnatal depression [16.6% (95% CI 8.90–28.99)] was lower than the prevalence in studies based in institutions and that used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [23.2% (95% CI 14.50–28.5)]. Further, in a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis the prevalence of postnatal depression ranges between 15.4% and 25.4%. Unplanned pregnancy [AOR = 3.46, 95% CI (2.37–5.04)], age between 15–24 years [AOR = 1.72, 95% CI (1.11–2.68)], marital problems [AOR = 3.07, 95% CI (2.36–3.99)], experiencing the death of infant [AOR = 3.41, 95% CI (1.91–6.09)] and history of substance use [AOR = 3.47, 95% CI (2.17–5.56)] were associated with the increased odds of postnatal depression in Ethiopia. Conclusion The prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia was high. Therefore, the concerned body should give due attention to improve reproductive health services through early detection of risk factors of postnatal depression.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Amir Hossein Faghfouri ◽  
Behzad Baradaran ◽  
Alireza Khabbazi ◽  
Yaser Khaje Bishak ◽  
Meysam Zarezadeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic inflammation has been considered as the main cause of chronic diseases. Zn has anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing the expression of inflammatory markers. The present systematic review and meta-analysis study aims to evaluate the impact of Zn supplementation on inflammation. Pubmed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched up to December 10th, 2020. Randomized placebo-controlled trials have investigated the effects of Zn supplementation on serum/plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in >15 years’ subjects were included. A pooled meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the robustness of the observed effect sizes. Potential causes of heterogeneity were determined using subgroup analyses. The relationship between effect size and co-variables was explored using meta-regression. In the cases of the presence of publication bias, trim and fill analysis was carried out. Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used for assessing the quality of the included studies. A total of 12 studies was included in meta-analysis. Zn could decrease IL-6 levels (SMD= -0.76 pg/ml; 95% CI: -1.28, -0.24; P= 0.004). There was no significant change in TNF-α (SMD= 0.42 pg/ml; 95% CI: -0.31, 1.16; P= 0.257) and IL-2 levels (SMD= 1.64 pg/ml; 95% CI: -1.31, 4.59; P= 0.277) following Zn supplementation. However, Zn could increase IL-2 significantly after deletion of one arm in sensitivity analysis (SMD= 2.96 pg/ml; 95% CI: 2.03, 3.88; P< 0.05). Conclusively, Zn supplementation can decrease the IL-6 level. Zn increased IL-2 level after sensitivity analysis. Zn supplementation has not ameliorative effects on TNF-α.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Qian ◽  
Yi-Dan Yan ◽  
Sheng-Yan Yang ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Wen-Yan Li ◽  
...  

Background: Low-dose prescription of rivaroxaban was common among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Asia. However, the benefits and harms of rivaroxaban at a low dosage in Asian patients with AF remains unclear. Accordingly, we aimed to collect and summarize all available evidence to fill this important knowledge gap.Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception until February 23, 2021. Eligible retrospective nationwide or health insurance database studies or prospective registration studies that reported efficacy (stroke/systemic embolism), safety (major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding), or other outcomes (myocardial infarction, death) of low-dose rivaroxaban in comparison with warfarin in AF patients were enrolled. Data extraction and study quality assessment were conducted by two authors independently. Low dosing of rivaroxaban (15/10 mg) was defined as the received dose lower than the recommended dose (20 mg) approved in most districts. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was pooled using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different dose regimens. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by sequential elimination of each study from the pool. Since potential effect modifiers (patient demographics, differences of each study, and others) may lead to bias in primacy outcomes, we performed a meta-regression analysis to explore the influence of these factors on the primary efficacy and safety outcomes.Results: Totally, 12 studies involving 292,815 Asian patients with AF were included. All studies were detected as low to moderate risk bias. Low-dose rivaroxaban treatment in Asian AF patients was associated with a reduced risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70–0.84, I2: 57.8%), major bleeding (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, I2: 81.5%), and all-cause death (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58–0.73, I2: 81.7%) when compared with warfarin. Furthermore, consistent results were observed among different dose regimens (10/15/20 mg) in all the clinical outcomes (Pinteraction &gt; 0.05 for each outcome). Meta-regression analysis failed to detect any potential confounding to impact the primacy outcomes.Conclusion: Insights from the present meta-analysis, we found that low-dose rivaroxaban, even at a dosage of 10 mg daily, was associated with a reduced risk of stroke/SE and bleeding than warfarin in Asian AF patients. However, owing to considerable heterogeneity among included studies, further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Masrul Masrul

The association between dietary fibre and colorectal cancer risk is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine fibre consumption reduced risk of colorectal cancer patients in western countries.The authors conducted a meta-analysis of published research articles on fibre consumption reduced risk of colorectal cancer patients in western countries published between January 2000 and January 2018 in the online article databases of PubMed, ProQuest and EBSCO. Pooled relative risk (PRR) were calculated with fixed and random-effect models. Data were processed using Stata version 14.2 (Stata Corporation). This study reviewed 405 articles. There are 7 studies conducted a systematic review and continued with Meta-analysis. The results showed fibre consumption reduced risk of colorectal cancer patients in western countries (RR = 0.83 [95% CI 0.75-0.93]). This analysis confirmed fibre consumption reduced risk of colorectal cancer patients in western countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document