scholarly journals LESSONS LEARNED FROM SAVVY EXPRESS: A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A PSYCHODUCATIONAL INTERVENTION FOR CARE PARTNERS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S285-S286
Author(s):  
Maria P Aranda ◽  
Debra Cherry

Abstract An increasing number of families, funders, and community providers seek very brief psychosocial caregiver interventions, yet the evidence for such condensed interventions is not established. Based on the Savvy Caregiver Program, we explored the feasibility, acceptability, and outcome trends for a condensed 3-session version titled, Savvy Express. Based on a single-group, pre- and post-test intervention design, we examined post-intervention and 3-month data on 116 English-speaking racially and ethnically diverse care partners caring family members with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. 41% of the sample was non-Latino white and comprised of Latinas, African Americans and Asian American/API. Most care partners were either adult children or spouses caring for someone with AD or other dementia. Over 80% were college educated. Two of three participants completed all 3 classes. Our findings indicate significant improvements in caregiver levels of depressive symptomatology and anxiety, competence, management of the situation, reduction of expectations, making positive comparisons, and reactivity to the family member’s memory behavior. Upwards of 90% would recommend the program to other caregivers. Savvy Express is a brief caregiver intervention with high acceptability and feasibility. Improvements in care partner psychosocial outcomes signal a promising practice to reduce the burden of caregiving. A major focus of the paper focuses on barriers and facilitators to uptake of the study procedures and intervention with community-based partners. Future work is needed to establish the efficacy of Savvy Express across a longer observation period, and with less educated, low-income participants, and limited English-speaking families.

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie Kagawa-Singer ◽  
Liane Wong ◽  
Sara Shostak ◽  
Chantal Raymer Walsh ◽  
Rod Lew

Introduction: Early detection and screening are the most effective means to reduce cancer mortality in all populations. Asian American (AA) women have among the lowest rates in aggregate for use of early detection, and screening practices of all ethnic populations. The only nationally disaggregated populationbased data on these ethnic groups at the time of the study was the 1993-1994 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) of English speaking AA, but 70% of the AA population is non-English speaking. Our study presents heretofore unavailable data for cancer screening for monolingual AA women for a comparable time period in California between 1992 and 1994, prior to initiation of the state and Federal programs targeting this group of women. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of randomly selected medical records were conducted for the breast and cervical cancer screening practices of low-income, non-English speaking Chinese, Korean, and Thai women attending ethnic specific community-based health clinics. All women seen in the clinics between 1992-1994 who were within the appropriate screening age categories were eligible. Results: Asian American women utilizing ethnic specific clinics had equal to or better screening rates for mammography and Pap tests than mainstream services for English-speaking AA women in a national survey. These screening rates, however, were still well below nationally recommended screening rates for breast and cervical cancer according to Healthy People 2000 or 2010 goals. Conclusion: These data support the effectiveness of Community Based Clinics (CBOs) to reach these hard to reach women and address the call for the elimination of health disparities. In addition, we compare our findings with national data to highlight within group variations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-49
Author(s):  
Kelly Doran ◽  
Anahi Collado ◽  
Hailey Taylor ◽  
Julia W. Felton ◽  
Kayla N. Tormohlen ◽  
...  

Low-income and ethnic/racial minority adults do not often participate in research or may face unique barriers when participating in research, which delays and impedes medical advances for this vulnerable population. This article describes in detail the evidenced-based methods used to enhance recruitment, participation, and retention in a clinical trial at a center serving ethnic/racial minorities and low-income individuals. The article details the partnership with a community outreach center and describes the duties and impact of a community liaison to enhance recruitment, participation, and retention in a randomized controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up. Of the 246 individuals initially recruited for screening, 80 did not meet inclusion criteria with the most common reason for disqualification being meeting criteria for substance use disorder (n = 44). One hundred sixty-six participants qualified for participation. The majority of participants identified as African American (n = 127, 77.1%) and reported an annual individual income under $10,000 (n = 121 (74.2%). Forty-five percent of the sample completed the requested number of sessions (i.e., 12). Sixty-three percent of participants completed post intervention assessments and 42% completed 6-month follow-up data collection. The participation and retention numbers in this study appear higher than typical participation and retention rates in longitudinal studies with similar populations. The methods and lessons learned may be useful for other clinical trials that recruit vulnerable populations and wish to enhance participation, engagement, and retention.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuchang Kang ◽  
Carolyn M. Tucker ◽  
Guillermo M. Wippold ◽  
Michael Marsiske ◽  
Paige H. Wegener

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao S. Chen ◽  
Kaddy Y. Revolorio ◽  
Katie J. W. Baucom ◽  
Astrid Reina-Patton ◽  
Andrew Christensen

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL1) ◽  
pp. 1250-1254
Author(s):  
Kurvatteppa Halemani ◽  
Merlin Cheema ◽  
Shabana Khatun ◽  
Yadidya ◽  
Bhumika Singh ◽  
...  

The pandemic COVID-19 is a highly infected disease caused by a novel coronavirus or SARS-Cov-2. The virus was reported for the first time  December 2019 in, China's Wuhan province. Later the virus has broken down into the world and claimed millions of lives. In India, the disease was reported for the first time in Kerala on 30th January 2020. a cross-section one group pre-test & post-test research design was used among the 40 final year BSc nursing students, College of Nursing SGPGIMS, Lucknow India. Samples were selected based on purposive sampling technique and sample criteria. An instrument, the first tool included demographic characteristics Similarly, second instrument used for knowledge assessment. After pre-test assessment, a teaching session was held at the seminar room, college of nursing SGPGIMS Lucknow, India. Subsequently post assessment was held after intervention.  A total of 40 participants responded to the study. Demographic variables like 30(75%) participants had less than 22 years of age, 22(55%) were girls, 14(35%) families income found INR 10000-15000, and the majority of participants obtained COVID-19 related knowledge from news paper16(40%). A gender was found significant with pretest knowledge, and other variables weren't found significant (P=0.05). Knowledge mean & standard deviation in pre & post-intervention, 11.90±2.16 vs15.82±1.39. The mean difference was found in a pre-test & post-test-1 &post-test-2, 3.9, 5.02, & 1.1, respectively. The effectiveness of the training program was checked by paired t-test -10.20 & -13.93, P=0.00.  The study revealed that the teaching session was efficient in the COVID-19 program among BSc nursing students.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Yoo

The welfare reform law of August 1996 signed by President Bill Clinton put an end to immigrants’ eligibility of federal means tested entitlements. The rollbacks on welfare are the most drastic for older, low-income Asian immigrants who are on Supplemental Security Income. The article’s focus is in on national Asian American organizations who are involved in this political debate. The central question discuss is how did national Asian American organizations characterize and affect the 1996 federal welfare reform and immigrant debate. The selection of organizations that was studied and the findings of that investigation, along with the assessment of its effectiveness and the resources barriers they face are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Chow ◽  
Grace Yoo ◽  
Catherine Vu

The passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act (PRWORA) of 1996 has major implications for low-income Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the research currently examining the impact of welfare reform on AAPI recipients and the welfare-to-work services available to this population. This article highlights AAPI participation and their timing-out rates in California’s CalWORKs program and their barriers to transitioning to work. Four welfare-to-work program models and recommendations are presented to illustrate strategies that can be used to address the unique needs of AAPI in order to alleviate their high risk for timing-out: one-stop-shops, transitional jobs programs, providing comprehensive and family focused services, and additional research and evaluation of programs specific to assisting the AAPI population on CalWORKs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 135910452110275
Author(s):  
Heather Agazzi ◽  
Holland Hayford ◽  
Nicholas Thomas ◽  
Cristina Ortiz ◽  
Abraham Salinas-Miranda

Behavioral parent training (BPT) programs are the first-line interventions for childhood disruptive behaviors. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, adapting these programs to telehealth modalities is necessary to ensure continued services to children and families. This study evaluates the use of telehealth versus in-person modality to deliver the Helping Our Toddlers, Developing Our Children’s Skills (HOT DOCS) BPT. The study design was quasi-experimental with two nonequivalent groups: in-person HOT DOCS ( n = 152) and internet-HOT DOCS ( n = 46). Participants were caregivers of children ages 2–5 exhibiting disruptive behaviors. Pre- and post-intervention outcome measures were collected for child disruptive behavior and parenting stress and post-test only for consumer satisfaction. Multiple linear and Poisson regression models were performed to assess the effect of class modality on the outcomes. Child disruptive behavior and parenting stress post-test scores for in-person and telehealth groups were not significantly different, even after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Consumer satisfaction scores were significantly more positive for the in-person group. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence for the i-HOT DOCS modality as being as effective as the in-person program. Study findings may be beneficial to practitioners utilizing telehealth interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic and onward.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ijeoma S. Eze ◽  
Margaret Brady ◽  
Beth Keely

AbstractLatinos in the United States are disproportionately affected by Human Immunodeficiency Virus and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). They account for about 24 % of newly diagnosed AIDS cases each year and are two to three times more likely to develop STIs when compared with non-Latino whites. Limited knowledge of STIs has remained one of the contributing factors to the disparity. The purpose of this study was to implement an educational bundle and evaluate its effectiveness in increasing STI knowledge and consistent condom use among adult Latinos seen in an outpatient clinic that serves low income patients. A pre- and post-test design was used to evaluate changes in STI knowledge and consistency of condom use. The educational bundle consisted of YouTube STI-related videos, a pre-designed one to one educational session, provision of condoms and STI-related educational materials. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data at baseline and one week post implementation of the educational bundle. Forty-six Latinos (18 females and 28 males) ranging in ages 19 to 60 years participated in the project. The total mean STI knowledge and condom use frequency improved from pre-test (M = 1.67, M = 3.09) to post-test (M = 3.80, M = 5.33). Results of paired samples t-tests demonstrated statistically significant differences between total mean STI knowledge (t(45) = –15.48, p < 0.001) and condom use frequency (t(45) = –7.09, p < 0.001) at pre-test and post-testing. The educational bundle was effective in increasing STI knowledge and consistent condom use among adult Latinos in an outpatient clinic. Further study needs to be done to determine the long-term effect of this mode of education for this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document