scholarly journals STRENGTH IN AGE-FRIENDLY HEALTH SYSTEMS: AN INNOVATIVE INTEGRATED INTERPROFESSIONAL MODEL

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S829-S829
Author(s):  
Teri Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health System ◽  
Baby Boomers ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
The United States ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association

Abstract This paper presents an innovative conceptual approach to health care policy for older adults: the Age-Friendly Health Systems Integrated Interprofessional Model. In 2017, the John A. Hartford Foundation and Institute for Healthcare Improvement, in partnership with the American Hospital Association and Catholic Health Association of the United States, advanced the concept of an Age-Friendly Health System. This initiative is designed to respond to the needs of a burgeoning U.S. older adult population, expected to double from 2012 to 2050, largely due to the aging of Baby Boomers and increased life expectancy. These Baby Boomers will demand a well-coordinated, communicative health system responsive to their values and preferences. In an Age-Friendly Health System, all older adults receive the best possible care, without care-related harms, and with satisfaction of care received. Essential elements include what matters, mentation, mobility, and medications, with a focus on patient-directed, family-engaged care. While a solid framework for improving healthcare for older adults, this model is further strengthened by incorporating the essential elements of person-, family-, and community-centered approaches to care; interprofessional team-based competencies, and Quadruple Aim outcomes. This enhanced model, referred to as the Age-Friendly Health System Integrated Interprofessional Model, combines elements essential to quality healthcare within the framework of an Age-Friendly Health System. This paper will present the original Age-Friendly Health System framework, the proposed Age-Friendly Health System Integrated Interprofessional Model, then compare and contrast each model’s essential principles. Implications for adoption of this enhanced model for policy, education, and practice will be explored.

scholarly journals Polypharmacy in Older Adults Hospitalized for Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozan Unlu ◽  
Emily B. Levitan ◽  
Evgeniya Reshetnyak ◽  
Jerard Kneifati-Hayek ◽  
Ivan Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
The United States ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Annual Survey ◽  
Regards Study

Background: Despite potential harm that can result from polypharmacy, real-world data on polypharmacy in the setting of heart failure (HF) are limited. We sought to address this knowledge gap by studying older adults hospitalized for HF derived from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Methods: We examined 558 older adults aged ≥65 years with adjudicated HF hospitalizations from 380 hospitals across the United States. We collected and examined data from the REGARDS baseline assessment, medical charts from HF-adjudicated hospitalizations, the American Hospital Association annual survey database, and Medicare’s Hospital Compare website. We counted the number of medications taken at hospital admission and discharge; and classified each medication as HF-related, non-HF cardiovascular-related, or noncardiovascular-related. Results: The vast majority of participants (84% at admission and 95% at discharge) took ≥5 medications; and 42% at admission and 55% at discharge took ≥10 medications. The prevalence of taking ≥10 medications (polypharmacy) increased over the study period. As the number of total medications increased, the number of noncardiovascular medications increased more rapidly than the number of HF-related or non-HF cardiovascular medications. Conclusions: Defining polypharmacy as taking ≥10 medications might be more ideal in the HF population as most patients already take ≥5 medications. Polypharmacy is common both at admission and hospital discharge, and its prevalence is rising over time. The majority of medications taken by older adults with HF are noncardiovascular medications. There is a need to develop strategies that can mitigate the negative effects of polypharmacy among older adults with HF.

scholarly journals Creating Age-Friendly Health Systems: Age Matters

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 865-865
Author(s):  
Terry Fulmer
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Movement ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Healthcare Improvement ◽  
Health Association ◽  
Common Framework ◽  
Private And Public

Abstract Since 2015, The John A. Hartford Foundation has been funding strategies to create Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS). Led by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement, in partnership with the American Hospital Association and the Catholic Health Association, the AFHS movement is rapidly growing, with participation in all 50 states from over 450 sites, including the full continuum of care settings. Partnerships with private and public entities are accelerating the work. As one example, the Health Resources and Services Administration has embedded AFHS principles into the Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Program. This Kent Lecture will focus on the genesis and trajectory of the AFHS social movement and discuss how the effort will lead to an age-friendly ecosystem that transcends boundaries and cultures and leads to a common framework for the way we approach care, caregiving and communities for optimizing the lives and wellbeing of all older adults.

scholarly journals Engaging Isolated and Underserved Older Adults in 4Ms Care: Age-Friendly Care, PA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Diane Berish ◽  
Terry Fulmer
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Clinician Training ◽  
State College

Abstract Older adults, the largest segment of the US rural population, face significant disparities in health and healthcare compared to their non-rural peers, including more chronic health conditions, financial challenges, and social isolation. They have limited access to healthcare and social services for prevention, management and treatment of chronic conditions. Age-Friendly Care-PA, a partnership between Primary Health Network and Penn State College of Nursing, aims to reduce these disparities in care and services for rural older adults through co-designing their Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program. Age-Friendly Health Systems, an initiative of the John A Hartford Foundation and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, in partnership with the American Hospital Association and the Catholic Health Association of the United States, equips providers, older adults, and their care partners with the support necessary to address What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility. This symposium describes how the 4Ms are integrated into clinician training and competencies, older adult education, operations, care delivery, and quality improvement. Year two outcome data will be shared. Drs. Hupcey and Fick will provide an overview of the project and its reach. Dr. Berish will describe the process of engaging stakeholders in co-developing our 4M metrics and the data generated. Jenny Knecht, CRNP, will describe a pilot study to extend the reach and acceptability of telehealth to hard-to-reach older persons. Finally, Dr. Garrow will detail a new initiative focused on equity in care. Our discussant, Dr. Terry Fulmer will lead a discussion of this work as well as next steps and policy implications.

Interhospital Transfers of Maternal Patients: Cohort Analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2011

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
pp. 065-077
Author(s):  
Frank Morriss
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Perinatal Care ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
System Characteristics

Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the annual rate of interhospital transfers of pregnant and postpartum women in the United States and analyze associated patient and health system characteristics as measures of regionalized perinatal care performance. Methods Separate weighted univariate analyses of the 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were performed for all maternal discharges, in-hospital deaths, and transfers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses for transfer dispositions adjusted for health system characteristics, maternal demographics, and diagnoses were performed. Additional perinatal service characteristics were analyzed using NIS merged with the 2011 American Hospital Association Annual Survey database. Results An estimated 18,082 patients, 0.43% of maternal hospitalizations, were transferred to an acute care hospital; 81% occurred without childbirth delivery before transfer. Transfers were toward larger, urban teaching hospitals and hospitals with higher levels of obstetrical and neonatal care and were more likely in states with ≥4.0 maternal–fetal medicine specialists/10,000 live births. Blacks and Native Americans were more likely and Hispanics and Asians were less likely than white patients to be transferred. Privately insured women were less likely to be transferred than were others. Transfers were associated with life-threatening maternal diagnoses and fetal indications. Conclusion Transfers reflected a risk-based regionalized system of perinatal care, with racial and payer differences.

scholarly journals Telepsychiatry adoption across hospitals in the United States: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Li ◽  
Sayward E. Harrison ◽  
Xiaoming Li ◽  
Peiyin Hung
Keyword(s):  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Psychiatric Services ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Inpatient Psychiatric Care

Abstract Background Access to psychiatric care is critical for patients discharged from hospital psychiatric units to ensure continuity of care. When face-to-face follow-up is unavailable or undesirable, telepsychiatry becomes a promising alternative. This study aimed to investigate hospital- and county-level characteristics associated with telepsychiatry adoption. Methods Cross-sectional national data of 3475 acute care hospitals were derived from the 2017 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Generalized linear regression models were used to identify characteristics associated with telepsychiatry adoption. Results About one-sixth (548 [15.8%]) of hospitals reported having telepsychiatry with a wide variation across states. Rural noncore hospitals were less likely to adopt telepsychiatry (8.3%) than hospitals in rural micropolitan (13.6%) and urban counties (19.4%). Hospitals with both outpatient and inpatient psychiatric care services (marginal difference [95% CI]: 16.0% [12.1% to 19.9%]) and hospitals only with outpatient psychiatric services (6.5% [3.7% to 9.4%]) were more likely to have telepsychiatry than hospitals with neither psychiatric services. Federal hospitals (48.9% [32.5 to 65.3%]), system-affiliated hospitals (3.9% [1.2% to 6.6%]), hospitals with larger bed size (Quartile IV vs. I: 6.2% [0.7% to 11.6%]), and hospitals with greater ratio of Medicaid inpatient days to total inpatient days (Quartile IV vs. I: 4.9% [0.3% to 9.4%]) were more likely to have telepsychiatry than their counterparts. Private non-profit hospitals (− 6.9% [− 11.7% to − 2.0%]) and hospitals in counties designated as whole mental health professional shortage areas (− 6.6% [− 12.7% to − 0.5%]) were less likely to have telepsychiatry. Conclusions Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, telepsychiatry adoption in US hospitals was low with substantial variations by urban and rural status and by state in 2017. This raises concerns about access to psychiatric services and continuity of care for patients discharged from hospitals.

scholarly journals Person-Centered Health Care: An Approach That Integrates Acute and Long-Term Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 704-704
Author(s):  
Yuchi Young ◽  
Barbara Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
World Population ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Aged Society

Abstract The world population is aging. The proportion of the population over 60 will nearly double from 12% in 2015 to 22% in 2050. Global life expectancy has more than doubled from 31 years in 1900 to 72.6 years in 2019. The need for long-term care (LTC) services is expanding with the same rapidity. A comprehensive response is needed to address the needs of older adults. Learning from health systems in other countries enables health systems to incorporate best long-term care practices to fit each country and its culture. This symposium aims to compare long-term care policies and services in Taiwan, Singapore, and the USA where significant growth in aging populations is evidenced. In 2025, the aging population will be 20% in Taiwan, 20% in Singapore and 18 % in the USA. In the case of Taiwan, it has moved from aging society status to aged society, and to super-aged society in 27 years. Such accelerated rate of aging in Taiwan is unparalleled when compared to European countries and the United States. In response to this dramatic change, Taiwan has passed long-term care legislation that expands services to care for older adults, and developed person-centered health care that integrates acute and long-term care services. Some preliminary results related to access, care and patterns of utilization will be shared in the symposium. International Comparisons of Healthy Aging Interest Group Sponsored Symposium.

Valuing Diversity and Inclusion in Healthcare: Pathways to Equip Workforces in the Post-COVID-19 New Normal (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiban Khuntia ◽  
Xue Ning ◽  
Wayne Cascio ◽  
Rulon Stacey
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health System ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
New Normal ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Healthcare Workforce ◽  
The Us ◽  
Service Oriented

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic, with all its virus variants, remains a serious situation. Health systems across the United States are trying their best to respond. The healthcare workforce remains relatively homogenous, even though they are caring for a highly diverse array of patients (6-12). It is a perennial problem in the US healthcare workforce that has only been accentuated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical workers should reflect the variety of patients they care for and strive to understand their mindsets within the larger contexts of culture, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, and socioeconomic realities. Along with talent and skills, diversity and inclusion (D&I) are essential for maintaining a workforce that can treat the myriad needs and populations that health systems serve. Developing hiring strategies in a post-COVID-19 “new normal” that will help achieve greater workforce diversity remains a challenge for health system leaders. OBJECTIVE Our primary objectives are (1) to explore the characteristics and perceived benefits of US health systems that value D&I; (2) to examine the influence of a workforce strategy designed to balance talent and D&I; and (3) to explore three pathways to better equip workforces and their relative influences on business- and service-oriented benefits: (a) improving D&I among existing employees (IMPROVE), (b) using multiple channels to find and recruit a workforce (RECRUIT), and (c) collaborating with universities to find new talent and establish plans to train students (COLLABORATE). METHODS During February–March 2021, we surveyed 625 health system chief executive officers, in the United States, 135 (22%) of whom responded. We assessed workforce talent and diversity-relevant factors. We collected secondary data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) Compendium of the US. Health Systems, leading to a matched data set of 124 health systems for analysis. We first explored differences in talent and diversity benefits across the health systems. Then, we examined the relationship between IMPROVE, RECRUIT, and COLLABORATE pathways to equip the workforce. RESULTS Health system characteristics, such as size, location, ownership, teaching, and revenue, have varying influences on D&I and business and service outcomes. RECRUIT has the most substantial mediating effect on diversity-enabled business- and service-oriented outcomes of the three pathways. This is also true of talent-based workforce acquisitions. CONCLUSIONS Diversity and talent plans can be aligned to realize multiple desired benefits for health systems. However, a one-size-fits-all approach is not a viable strategy for improving D&I. Health systems need to follow a multipronged approach based on their characteristics. To get D&I right, proactive plans and genuine efforts are essential.

Hospital Care in the United States, Commission on Hospital Care, New York, The Commonwealth Fund

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-172
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Hospital Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Services ◽  
Source Book ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Commonwealth Fund ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Present Pattern

Many individuals and organizations have had a part in the making of this book. They have described influences and forces whose interaction has resulted in the present pattern of our hospital services, and documented their interpretations. The result is a source book of basic information which should be valuable for all students of hospital problems. The Commission was appointed by the American Hospital Association, and chosen to represent a wide range of those providing hospital, health and welfare services, as well as the consuming public.

Abstract 23: Incidence of Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias J Holmberg ◽  
Catherine Ross ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Jordan Duval-Arnould ◽  
Anne V Grossestreuer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
The United States ◽  
Annual Incidence ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Negative Binomial Regression Model ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Average Annual Incidence ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Current incidence estimates of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States are based on data from more than a decade ago, with an estimated 200,000 adult cases per year. The aim of this study was to estimate the contemporary incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest in adult patients, which may better inform the public health impact of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Methods: Using the Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry, we developed a negative binomial regression model to estimate the incidence of index in-hospital cardiac arrests in adult patients (>18 years) between 2008 and 2016 based on hospital-level characteristics. The model coefficients were then applied to all United States hospitals, using data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, to obtain national incidence estimates. Hospitals only providing care to pediatric patients were excluded from the analysis. Additional analyses were performed including both index and recurrent events. Results: There were 154,421 index cardiac arrests from 388 hospitals registered in the GWTG-R registry. A total of 6,808 hospitals were available in the American Hospital Association database, of which 6,285 hospitals provided care to adult patients. The average annual incidence was estimated to be 283,700 in-hospital cardiac arrests. When including both index and recurrent cardiac arrests, the average annual incidence was estimated to 344,800 cases. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that there are approximately 280,000 adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests per year in the United States. This estimate provides the contemporary annual incidence of the burden from in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States.

Are nurses still practicing coronary precautions? A national survey of nursing care of acute myocardial infarction patients

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Riegel ◽  
T Thomason ◽  
B Carlson ◽  
I Gocka
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Temperature Measurement ◽  
Rectal Temperature ◽  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
The United States ◽  
American Hospital ◽  
American Hospital Association ◽  
Survey Techniques ◽  
The 1960S

BACKGROUND: Coronary precautions were common when coronary care units were instituted in the 1960s. However, research has failed to provide evidence of the validity of most of these restrictions. Only the avoidance of the Valsalva maneuver is clearly indicated as a universal precaution in patients who have experienced acute myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES: To determine if nurses continue to restrict iced and hot fluids, caffeine, rectal temperature measurement, and vigorous back rubs, and to feed and mandate bedrest for acute myocardial infarction patients. METHODS: Survey techniques were used to describe practice patterns of nurses working in hospitals across the United States. Two sampling methods were used to access a random sample. The survey was mailed to members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses and nonmembers working in a hospital accredited by the American Hospital Association and with an intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of the 2549 mailed surveys, 882 were returned with usable data (34.8% response rate). Iced (28.1%) and hot (8.7%) fluids continued to be restricted by nurses. Most (85.6%) restricted stimulant beverages such as coffee. Rectal temperature measurement was avoided by 55.7%, and only 73.3% taught avoidance of the Valsalva maneuver. In terms of rest, 15.6% reported avoiding vigorous back rubs, 8.4% still fed patients, and 33.8% offered bedpans to pain-free patients on the first day after admission. A complete bedbath was offered by 19.8% of nurses to stable, pain-free patients even a day after admission. CONCLUSIONS: The data supporting liberalization of coronary precautions have not been adequately disseminated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document