scholarly journals Predictors of Chronic Opioid Use: A Population-level Analysis of North Carolina Cancer Survivors Using Multi-Payer Claims

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon K Check ◽  
Christopher D Bagett ◽  
KyungSu Kim ◽  
Andrew W Roberts ◽  
Megan C Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Opioid Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use

Abstract Background No population-based studies have examined chronic opioid use among cancer survivors who are diverse with respect to diagnosis, age group, and insurance status. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using North Carolina (NC) cancer registry data linked with claims from public and private insurance (2006–2016). We included adults with non-metastatic cancer who had no prior chronic opioid use (N = 38,366). We used modified Poisson regression to assess the adjusted relative risk of chronic opioid use in survivorship (>90-day continuous supply of opioids in the 13–24 months following diagnosis) associated with patient characteristics. Results Only 3.0% of cancer survivors in our cohort used opioids chronically in survivorship. Predictors included younger age (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 50–59 vs 60–69 = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05–1.43), baseline depression (aRR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.06–1.41) or substance use (aRR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.15–1.78) and Medicaid (aRR vs Private = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.56–2.40). Survivors who used opioids intermittently (vs not at all) before diagnosis were twice as likely to use opioids chronically in early survivorship (aRR = 2.62, 95% CI = 2.28–3.02). Those who used opioids chronically (vs intermittently or not at all) during active treatment had a nearly 17-fold increased likelihood of chronic use in survivorship (aRR = 16.65, 95 CI = 14.30–19.40). Conclusions Younger and low-income survivors, those with baseline depression or substance use, and those who require chronic opioid therapy during treatment are at increased risk for chronic opioid use in survivorship. Our findings point to opportunities improve assessment of psychosocial histories and to engage patients in shared decision-making around long-term pain management, when chronic opioid therapy is required during treatment.

scholarly journals Trends in Opioid Use Among Older Survivors of Colorectal, Lung, and Breast Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1001-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talya Salz ◽  
Jessica A. Lavery ◽  
Allison N. Lipitz-Snyderman ◽  
Denise M. Boudreau ◽  
Natalie Moryl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Index Date ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Use

PURPOSE Cancer survivors may be at increased risk for opioid-related harms. Trends in opioid use over time since diagnosis are unknown. METHODS Using data from SEER and Medicare, we conducted multilevel logistic regression analyses to compare chronic opioid use (≥ 90 consecutive days) among opioid-naïve survivors of colorectal, lung, and breast cancers diagnosed from 2008 to 2013 and matched with noncancer controls. Among cases and controls with chronic use, we compared rates of high-dose opioid use (average ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents daily). RESULTS We included 46,789 survivors and 138,136 noncancer controls. In the first year after the index date (survivor’s diagnosis date), chronic use among colorectal and lung cancer survivors exceeded chronic use among controls (colorectal cancer: odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.47; lung cancer: odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.34 to 2.77). Differences in chronic use between survivors and controls declined each year after the index date. Chronic use among breast cancer survivors was less than that of controls each year after the index date. Survivors with chronic use were more likely to have a high daily dose than controls with chronic use in the first 3 to 5 years. CONCLUSION Among three large populations of older cancer survivors, chronic opioid use varied by cancer. However, by 6 years after diagnosis, survivors were no longer more likely to be chronic users than controls. Strategies for appropriate pain management during and after cancer treatment should take into account the risks associated with chronic high-dose opioid use.

Abstract 228: National Prevalence of Substance Use Disorders Among Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C Snow ◽  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Joseph A Ladapo ◽  
Donna L Washington ◽  
Katherine Hoggatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Native American ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Substance Use Disorders ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Drug Use Disorders ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Drug Use Disorder

Background: Several cardiotoxic substances contribute to the development of heart failure (HF). The burden of comorbid substance use disorders (SUD) among patients with HF is under-characterized. Objectives: To describe the national burden of comorbid SUD (tobacco, alcohol, or drug use disorders) among hospitalized HF patients in the U.S. Methods: We used data from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample to calculate the proportion of hospitalizations for a primary HF admission with tobacco, alcohol, or drug use disorder diagnoses, accounting for demographic factors. Drug use disorder analysis was further sub-divided into specific illicit substance categories. Results: There were a total of 989,080 HF hospitalizations of which 35.3% (n=348,995) had a documented SUD. Tobacco use disorder (TUD) was most common (n= 327,220, 33.1%) followed by drug use disorder (DUD) (n=34,600, 3.5%) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) (n=34,285, 3.5%). Female sex was associated with less TUD (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.58-0.60), AUD (OR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.22-0.25) or DUD (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.55-0.62). Tobacco, alcohol, cocaine, and opioid use disorders were highest among HF patients age 45 to 55, while cannabis and amphetamine use was highest in those <45 years. Native American race (versus White) was associated with increased risk of AUD (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.27-2.20). Black race was associated with increased risk of AUD (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.16) or DUD (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.53-1.74). Medicaid insurance (versus Medicare) was associated with greater TUD (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.23-1.32), AUD (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.62-1.87), and DUD (OR 2.15; 95% CI 2.01-2.30). Decreasing quartiles of median household income were associated with increasing SUD. Conclusions: Comorbid SUD disproportionately affects certain HF populations, including men, younger age groups, lower SES patients, and race/ethnic minorities. Further research on interventions to improve prevention and treatment of SUD among hospitalized HF patients are needed given the high rates of SUD in this population. Systematically screening hospitalized HF patients for SUD may reveal opportunities for treatment and secondary prevention.

scholarly journals Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement remediates anhedonia in chronic opioid use by enhancing neurophysiological responses during savoring of natural rewards

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Eric L. Garland ◽  
Spencer T. Fix ◽  
Justin P. Hudak ◽  
Edward M. Bernat ◽  
Yoshio Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Skin Conductance Level ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Natural Reward ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Natural Rewards ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Users

Abstract Background Neuropsychopharmacologic effects of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in the context of chronic pain may result in subjective anhedonia coupled with decreased attention to natural rewards. Yet, there are no known efficacious treatments for anhedonia and reward deficits associated with chronic opioid use. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE), a novel behavioral intervention combining training in mindfulness with savoring of natural rewards, may hold promise for treating anhedonia in LTOT. Methods Veterans receiving LTOT (N = 63) for chronic pain were randomized to 8 weeks of MORE or a supportive group (SG) psychotherapy control. Before and after the 8-week treatment groups, we assessed the effects of MORE on the late positive potential (LPP) of the electroencephalogram and skin conductance level (SCL) during viewing and up-regulating responses (i.e. savoring) to natural reward cues. We then examined whether these neurophysiological effects were associated with reductions in subjective anhedonia by 4-month follow-up. Results Patients treated with MORE demonstrated significantly increased LPP and SCL to natural reward cues and greater decreases in subjective anhedonia relative to those in the SG. The effect of MORE on reducing anhedonia was statistically mediated by increases in LPP response during savoring. Conclusions MORE enhances motivated attention to natural reward cues among chronic pain patients on LTOT, as evidenced by increased electrocortical and sympathetic nervous system responses. Given neurophysiological evidence of clinical target engagement, MORE may be an efficacious treatment for anhedonia among chronic opioid users, people with chronic pain, and those at risk for opioid use disorder.

Increased Risk of Chronic Opioid Use and Revision After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion in Patients with Prior Shoulder Arthroscopy

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. e202-e208
Author(s):  
Neill Y. Li ◽  
Shyam A. Patel ◽  
Wesley M. Durand ◽  
Lauren V. Ready ◽  
Brett D. Owens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroscopy ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use

scholarly journals A double-edged sword of using opioids and COVID-19: a toxicological view

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahshid Ataei ◽  
Farshad M. Shirazi ◽  
Roland J. Lamarine ◽  
Samaneh Nakhaee ◽  
Omid Mehrpour
Keyword(s):  
Organ Damage ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Inflammatory Phase ◽  
Clinical Support ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The World ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
High Doses ◽  
World Information

AbstractToday, COVID-19 is spreading around the world. Information about its mechanism, prognostic factors, and management is minimal. COVID-19, as a human disease, has several identifying phases. Physicians of patients with COVID-19 may be interested in knowing whether opioid use disorder may affect their patients’ course or prognosis. This information may be crucial when considering the opioid epidemic in the US and other parts of the world. Opioid use at high doses and over several months duration can mitigate the immune system’s function, which may complicate the course of COVID-19 disease. Potential suppression of parts of the immune response may be important in prevention, clinical support, and therapeutic use of medications in various phases of the COVID-19. Specifically, opioid use disorders via an inhalation route may enhance the “late hyper-inflammatory phase” or result in end-organ damage. It is well established that opioids decrease ventilation as their effect on the medullary respiratory centers increases the risk of pneumonia. This increased risk has been associated with immune-suppressive opioids. The ultimate role of opioids in COVID-19 is not clear. This paper endorses the need for clinical studies to decipher the role and impact of chronic opioid use on viral diseases such as COVID-19.

Trends in chronic opioid therapy among cancer survivors.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6584-6584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talya Salz ◽  
Jessica A. Lavery ◽  
Allison Nicole Lipitz Snyderman ◽  
Denise Boudreau ◽  
Natalie Moryl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Chronic Opioid Therapy

Chronic opioid therapy among a high-risk cancer survivor population.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19107-e19107
Author(s):  
Talya Salz ◽  
Jessica A. Lavery ◽  
Allison Lipitz-Snyderman ◽  
Denise Boudreau ◽  
Natalie Moryl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Chronic Opioid Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Difference ◽  
High Risk Cancer ◽  
And Function

e19107 Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors are at increased risk of opioid dependence, due to exposure to opioids during treatment, history of tobacco and alcohol use, and substantial pain after treatment. Chronic opioid therapy (COT) is a risk factor for dependence, and rates of COT vary widely between populations of cancer survivors. We hypothesized that COT use is greater among HNC survivors than among those who never had cancer. Methods: We used SEER-Medicare to identify adults ≥66 years diagnosed with HNC between 2008 and 2015. HNC survivors were matched 1:3 at date of diagnosis on age, sex, comorbidity, and region with cancer-free controls. Survivors and controls had complete coverage with fee-for-service Medicare Parts A, B, and D for each year after matching. Survivors and controls with no COT in the year prior to matching date and were followed for COT use through 2016. The presence of claims for opioid dispensings over ≥90 consecutive days (COT) was calculated for each year after cancer diagnosis among survivors alive at the start of each year and for controls. We computed odds ratios (OR) for COT use for HNC survivors compared to matched controls in each year after matching date, using a hierarchical logistic regression model accounting for matching and repeated measurements across years. Results: The population of HNC survivors declined from 5,107 in the year after diagnosis to 604 in Year 6. Among HNC survivors, COT use remained relatively steady each year after diagnosis. (Table). For the first 5 years after matching date, rates of COT among HNC survivors exceeded that of controls, with the difference between survivors and controls declining each year (OR 4.36 for Year 1, OR 2.60 for Year 2, OR 2.18 for Year 3, OR 1.85 for Year 4, and OR 1.35 for Year 5, all p-values < 0.05). By Year 6, rates of COT use did not differ between HNC cases and controls. Conclusions: In the first year after diagnosis, HNC survivors have more than 4 times the odds of COT use compared to cancer-free controls. Cancer-associated COT use declines over time. Strategies for appropriate pain management for HNC survivors should balance the risk of opioid dependence, particularly in the early years after diagnosis, with the benefit of improved comfort and function. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Chronic Opioid Therapy for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Review and Comparison of Treatment Guidelines

2014 ◽  
Vol 5;17 (5;9) ◽  
pp. 401-414
Author(s):  
Chi-Wai Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Drug Misuse ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Opioid Therapy

Background: Long-term opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain has increased substantially in recent years despite the paucity of strong supporting scientific data and concerns regarding adverse effects and potential misuse. Study Design: Review and summary of practice guidelines available on PubMed and Cochrane databases as well as on the Internet on chronic opioid therapy from June 2004 to June 2013. Objective: To review expert-developed practice guidelines on chronic opioid therapy, published in different countries over the past decade in order to reveal similar principles of therapy and to provide useful information and references for future development of opioid guidelines to identify adequately supported practice points and areas in need of further scientific evidence. Method: Seven guidelines were identified as pertaining specifically to the long-term use of opioids for general chronic non-cancer pain from an initial search of the PubMed/Medline and Cochrane databases using combinations of the search terms “opioid,” “chronic opioid therapy,” “chronic pain,” “chronic non-cancer pain,” “chronic non-malignant pain,” “guidelines,” “practice guidelines,” and “clinical practice guidelines,” filtered to include only articles on humans published in the English language over the past 10 years. Results: All guidelines espouse an individual approach to management, beginning with a comprehensive patient evaluation, with particular focus on eliciting factors that may indicate potential drug misuse and abuse, and a trial of therapy to determine the course of treatment. Goals of treatment should be adequately discussed with and consented to by the patient. Opioids are generally not recommended as first-line therapy but, when used, clinicians should closely monitor patients for loss of response, adverse effects or aberrant behavior, and revise the treatment plan accordingly. Urine drug testing (UDT) may be used as a tool to monitor for aberrant behavior or drug misuse; opioid rotation may be considered when loss of response or adverse effects are a concern, at a starting dose lower than the calculated equianalgesic dose. Limitations: Information on some African nations, countries in the Middle-East, and Pacific Islands is not available and therefore was not included in this review. Conclusion: There is a growing body of scientific evidence to support opioid use in chronic pain. Future work should focus on continuing to generate good-quality evidence on the longterm benefits of opioid therapy, as well as scientific data to guide drug choice and dosing for specific conditions, populations, and situations. Key words: Chronic pain, opioid, non-cancer pain, guidelines, opioid rotation, pain management, opioid therapy

scholarly journals Opioid Use Disorder and Overdose in Older Adults With Breast, Colorectal, or Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W Roberts ◽  
Samantha Eiffert ◽  
Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield ◽  
Stacie B Dusetzina ◽  
Devon K Check
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Medicare Data ◽  
End Results

Abstract Background Despite high rates of opioid therapy, evidence about the risk of preventable opioid harms among cancer survivors is underdeveloped. Our objective was to estimate the odds of opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose following breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2007-2014 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data for cancer survivors with a first cancer diagnosis of stage 0-III breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer at age 66-89 years between 2008 and 2013. Cancer survivors were matched to up to 2 noncancer controls on age, sex, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results region. Using Firth logistic regression, we estimated adjusted 1-year odds of OUD or nonfatal opioid overdose associated with a cancer diagnosis. We also estimated adjusted odds of OUD and overdose separately and by cancer stage, prior opioid use, and follow-up time. Results Among 69 889 cancer survivors and 125 007 controls, the unadjusted rates of OUD or nonfatal overdose were 25.2, 27.1, 38.9, and 12.4 events per 10 000 patients in the noncancer, breast, colorectal, and prostate samples, respectively. There was no association between cancer and OUD. Colorectal survivors had 2.3 times higher odds of opioid overdose compared with matched controls (adjusted odds ratio = 2.33, 95% confidence interval  = 1.49 to 3.67). Additionally, overdose risk was greater in those with more advanced disease, no prior opioid use, and preexisting mental health conditions. Conclusions Opioid overdose was a rare, but statistically significant, outcome following stage II-III colorectal cancer diagnosis, particularly among previously opioid-naïve patients. These patients may require heightened screening and intervention to prevent inadvertent adverse opioid harms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document