scholarly journals Navigating by Stars: Using CMS Star Ratings to Choose Hospitals for Complex Cancer Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna V Papageorge ◽  
Benjamin J Resio ◽  
Andres F Monsalve ◽  
Maureen Canavan ◽  
Ranjan Pathak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed risk-adjusted “Star Ratings,” which serve as a guide for patients to compare hospital quality (1 star = lowest, 5 stars = highest). Although star ratings are not based on surgical care, for many procedures, surgical outcomes are concordant with star ratings. In an effort to address variability in hospital mortality after complex cancer surgery, the use of CMS Star Ratings to identify the safest hospitals was evaluated. Methods Patients older than 65 years of age who underwent complex cancer surgery (lobectomy, colectomy, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy) were evaluated in CMS Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files (2013-2016). The impact of reassignment was modeled by applying adjusted mortality rates of patients treated at 5-star hospitals to those at 1-star hospitals (Peters-Belson method). Results There were 105 823 patients who underwent surgery at 3146 hospitals. The 90-day mortality decreased with increasing star rating (1 star = 10.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.8% to 11.1%; and 5 stars = 6.4%, 95% CI = 6.0% to 6.8%). Reassignment of patients from 1-star to 5-star hospitals (7.8% of patients) was predicted to save 84 Medicare beneficiaries each year. This impact varied by procedure (colectomy = 47 lives per year; gastrectomy = 5 lives per year). Overall, 2189 patients would have to change hospitals each year to improve outcomes (26 patients moved to save 1 life). Conclusions Mortality after complex cancer surgery is associated with CMS Star Rating. However, the use of CMS Star Ratings by patients to identify the safest hospitals for cancer surgery would be relatively inefficient and of only modest impact.

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuntao Wu ◽  
Andrew Koren ◽  
Jane Thammakhoune ◽  
Jasmanda Wu ◽  
Hayet Kechemir ◽  
...  

Background: When using inpatient claims data to identify hospitalizations in supplemental Medicare beneficiaries, e.g., in the MarketScan database, there is a concern that the coverage of hospitalizations in such inpatient claims may be incomplete. However, whether hospitalizations are covered by inpatient claims or not, they incur professional charges that are recorded in the professional claims data in the MarketScan Medicare database. In the context of identifying hospitalizations that might be related to heart failure (HF) in dronedarone users, we compared different approaches to identify such hospitalizations. Objective: To assess the impact of using professional claims in addition to inpatient claims on identifying hospitalizations that might be related to HF. Methods: A total of 20,834 dronedarone users who were supplemental Medicare beneficiaries between July 2009 (launch date in US) and December 2012 were identified in the MarketScan database. The hospitalizations that might be related to HF within 30 days prior to initiating dronedarone were identified by searching (1) inpatient claims and (2) both inpatient and professional claims using related ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for HF and Current Procedural Terminology codes for hospitalizations. Results: A total of 1,162 patients who had HF hospitalizations within 30 days prior to initiating dronedarone were identified by searching inpatient claims between July 2009 and December 2012. Supplementing with professional claims identified an additional 177 patients who had HF hospitalizations, increasing the total number to 1,339. Therefore, 13.2% (177/1,399) of the patients who had HF hospitalizations could only be identified in professional claims. Thus, the prevalence of hospitalizations that might be related to HF within 30 days prior to initiating dronedarone was 5.6% (1,162/20,834; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.3 - 5.9%) when hospitalizations were identified using inpatient claims alone. Adding professional claims in the search algorithm, the prevalence of HF hospitalizations was 6.4% (1,339/20,834, 95% CI: 6.1 - 6.8%). Conclusions: Using professional claims, in addition to inpatient claims, can improve the identification of hospitalizations that might be related to HF.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nino Mihatov ◽  
Robert W Yeh ◽  
Eunhee Choi ◽  
Changyu Shen ◽  
Sahil A Parikh ◽  
...  

Introduction: Contemporary in-hospital mortality rates for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS) remain as high as 50%. The impact of comorbid lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) is unknown. Hypothesis: LE-PAD is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with CS and AMI. Methods: Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with CS related to AMI from 10/2015-6/2017 were identified. PAD status was defined by the inpatient billing codes present in the year prior to presentation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, amputation, peripheral revascularization, and 6-month mortality. Adjusted regression models were used to evaluate outcomes. A subgroup analysis included patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Results: Among 45,144 patients, 5.9% (N=2,651) had LE-PAD. The average age was 77.8±7.9, 59.8% were male and 83.0% were white. Cumulative in-hospital mortality was 46.8%, with greater risk among LE-PAD patients (55.2% vs 46.3%; adjusted OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.65). LE-PAD patients also had greater adjusted risk of in-hospital amputation (1.5% vs 0.2%; OR 3.23, 95% CI: 2.16-4.83), peripheral revascularization rates (1.4% vs 0.4%; OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.06-2.23), and 6-month mortality (43.2% vs 23.7%; HR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.80-2.35). MCS was less frequently utilized in LE-PAD (20.1% vs. 38.1%, p<0.01). Adjusted in-hospital mortality, amputation and peripheral revascularization rates were comparable between LE-PAD and non-LE-PAD patients who received MCS. Non-MCS LE-PAD patients had a 2.28 fold higher adjusted 6-month mortality compared with MCS LE-PAD patients (95% CI 1.60-3.11; Figure). Conclusions: Comorbid PAD is associated with worse limb outcomes and mortality among patients with AMI and CS. Although MCS was less likely to be used in LE-PAD patients, in-hospital mortality and limb complication rates were comparable to non-LE-PAD MCS patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Ko-Chao Lee ◽  
Kuan-Chih Chung ◽  
Hong-Hwa Chen ◽  
Kung-Chuan Cheng ◽  
Kuen-Lin Wu ◽  
...  

Purpose. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of comorbid diabetes on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with stage I/II colon cancer after open colectomy. Methods. The data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database (2005-2010). Short-term surgical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay. Results. A total of 49,064 stage I/II colon cancer patients undergoing open surgery were included, with a mean age of 70.35 years. Of them, 21.94% had comorbid diabetes. Multivariable analyses revealed that comorbid diabetes was significantly associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications. Compared to patients without diabetes, patients with uncomplicated diabetes had lower percentages of in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications, but patients with complicated diabetes had a higher percentage of postoperative complications. In addition, patients with diabetes only, but not patients with diabetes and hypertension only, had a lower percentage of in-hospital mortality than patients without any comorbidity. Conclusion. The present results suggested the protective effects of uncomplicated diabetes on short-term surgical outcomes in stage I/II colon cancer patients after open colectomy. Further studies are warranted to confirm these unexpected findings and investigate the possible underlying mechanisms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 652-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipa Cordeiro ◽  
Pedro S Mateus ◽  
Alberto Ferreira ◽  
Silvia Leao ◽  
Miguel Moz ◽  
...  

Background: We sought to evaluate the impact of prior cerebrovascular and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Methods: From 1 October 2010 to 26 February 2016, 13,904 acute coronary syndrome patients were enrolled in a national multicentre registry. They were divided into four groups: prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack (stroke/TIA); prior PAD; prior stroke/TIA and PAD; none. The endpoints included in-hospital mortality and a composite endpoint of death, re-infarction and stroke during hospitalization. Results: 6.3% patients had prior stroke/TIA, 4.2% prior PAD and 1.4% prior stroke/TIA and PAD. Prior stroke/TIA and/or PAD patients were less likely to receive evidence-based medical therapies (dual antiplatelet therapy: stroke/TIA= 88.6%, PAD= 86.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 85.7%, none= 92.2%, p<0.001; β-blockers: stroke/TIA= 77.1%, PAD= 72.1%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 71.9%, none= 80.8%, p<0.001; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers: stroke/TIA= 86.3%, PAD= 83.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 83.2%, none= 87.1%, p=0.030) and to undergo percutaneous revascularization (stroke/TIA= 52.8%, PAD= 45.6%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 43.7%, none= 67.9%, p<0.001), despite more extensive coronary artery disease (three-vessel disease: stroke/TIA= 29.1%, PAD= 38.3%, stroke/TIA+PAD= 38.3%, none= 20.2%, p<0.001). In a multivariable analysis, prior stroke/TIA+PAD was a predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio= 2.828, 95% confidence interval 1.001–7.990) and prior stroke/TIA (odds ratio= 1.529, 95% confidence interval 1.056–2.211), prior PAD (odds ratio= 1.618, 95% confidence interval 1.034–2.533) and both conditions (odds ratio= 3.736, 95% confidence interval 2.002–6.974) were associated with the composite endpoint. Conclusion: A prior history of stroke/TIA and/or PAD was associated with lower use of medical therapy and coronary revascularization and with worst short-term prognosis. An individualized management may improve their poor prognosis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 261 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra L. Wong ◽  
ShaʼShonda L. Revels ◽  
Huiying Yin ◽  
Andrew K. Stewart ◽  
Andrea McVeigh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ali Solmaz ◽  
Osman Gülçiçek ◽  
Elif Binboğa ◽  
Aytaç Biricik ◽  
Candaş Erçetin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago de Araujo Cardoso ◽  
Cristian Roncada ◽  
Emerson Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Leonardo Araujo Pinto ◽  
Marcus Herbert Jones ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To present official longitudinal data on the impact of asthma in Brazil between 2008 and 2013. Methods: This was a descriptive study of data collected between 2008 and 2013 from an official Brazilian national database, including data on asthma-related number of hospitalizations, mortality, and hospitalization costs. A geographical subanalysis was also performed. Results: In 2013, 2,047 people died from asthma in Brazil (5 deaths/day), with more than 120,000 asthma-related hospitalizations. During the whole study period, the absolute number of asthma-related deaths and of hospitalizations decreased by 10% and 36%, respectively. However, the in-hospital mortality rate increased by approximately 25% in that period. The geographic subanalysis showed that the northern/northeastern and southeastern regions had the highest asthma-related hospitalization and in-hospital mortality rates, respectively. An analysis of the states representative of the regions of Brazil revealed discrepancies between the numbers of asthma-related hospitalizations and asthma-related in-hospital mortality rates. During the study period, the cost of asthma-related hospitalizations to the public health care system was US$ 170 million. Conclusions: Although the numbers of asthma-related deaths and hospital admissions in Brazil have been decreasing since 2009, the absolute numbers are still high, resulting in elevated direct and indirect costs for the society. This shows the relevance of the burden of asthma in middle-income countries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. e71-e79
Author(s):  
Michael A. Liu ◽  
Brianna R. Bakow ◽  
Tzu-Chun Hsu ◽  
Jia-Yu Chen ◽  
Ke-Ying Su ◽  
...  

Background Few population-based studies assess the impact of cancer on sepsis incidence and mortality. Objectives To evaluate epidemiological trends of sepsis in patients with cancer. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults (≥20 years old) identified using sepsis-indicator International Classification of Diseases codes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006-2014). A generalized linear model was used to trend incidence and mortality. Outcomes in patients with cancer and patients without cancer were compared using propensity score matching. Cox regression modeling was used to calculate hazard ratios for mortality rates. Results The study included 13 996 374 patients, 13.6% of whom had cancer. Gram-positive infections were most common, but the incidence of gram-negative infections increased at a greater rate. Compared with patients without cancer, those with cancer had significantly higher rates of lower respiratory tract (35.0% vs 31.6%), intra-abdominal (5.5% vs 4.6%), fungal (4.8% vs 2.9%), and anaerobic (1.2% vs 0.9%) infections. Sepsis incidence increased at a higher rate in patients with cancer than in those without cancer, but hospital mortality rates improved equally in both groups. After propensity score matching, hospital mortality was higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.26). Of patients with sepsis and cancer, those with lung cancer had the lowest survival (hazard ratio, 1.65) compared with those with breast cancer, who had the highest survival. Conclusions Cancer patients are at high risk for sepsis and associated mortality. Research is needed to guide sepsis monitoring and prevention in patients with cancer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Måns Muhrbeck ◽  
Zaher Osman ◽  
Johan Von Schreeb ◽  
Andreas Wladis ◽  
Peter Andersson

Abstract Background: In armed conflicts, civilian health care struggles to cope. Being able to predict what resources are needed is therefore vital. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) implemented in the 1990s the Red Cross Wound Score (RCWS) for assessment of penetrating injuries. It is unknown to what extent RCWS or the established trauma scores Kampala trauma Score (KTS) and revised trauma score (RTS) can be used to predict surgical resource consumption and in-hospital mortality. Methods: A retrospective study of routinely collected data on weapon-injured adults admitted to ICRC’s hospitals in Peshawar, 2009–2012 and Goma, 2012–2014. High resource consumption was defined as ≥3 surgical procedures, ≥3 blood-transfusions and/or amputation. The relationship between RCWS, KTS, RTS and resource consumption, in-hospital mortality was evaluated with logistic regression and adjusted receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The impact of missing data was assessed with imputation. Model fit was compared with Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: A total of 1564 patients were included, of these 834 patients had complete data. For high resource consumption AUC was significantly higher for RCWS (0.76) than for KTS (0.53) and RTS (0.51). Additionally, RCWS had lower AIC, indicating a better model fit. For in-hospital mortality AUC was significantly higher for RCWS (0.79) than for KTS (0.71) and RTS (0.70) for all patients, but not for patients with complete data. Conclusion: RCWS appears to predict surgical resource consumption better than KTS and RTS. RCWS may be a promising tool for planning and monitoring surgical care in resource-scarce conflict settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilal Khokhar ◽  
Linda Simoni-Wastila ◽  
Julia F. Slejko ◽  
Eleanor Perfetto ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
...  

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern for older adults. Small-scale human studies have suggested pre-TBI statin use is associated with decreased in-hospital mortality following TBI, highlighting the need for large-scale translational research. Objective: To investigate the relationship between pre-TBI statin use and in-hospital mortality following TBI. Methods: A retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries 65 and older hospitalized with a TBI during 2006 to 2010 was conducted to assess the impact of pre-TBI statin use on in-hospital mortality following TBI. Exposure of interest included atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin. Beneficiaries were classified as current, recent, past, and nonusers of statins prior to TBI. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing current, recent, and prior statin use to nonuse. Results: Most statin users were classified as current users (90%). Current atorvastatin (OR = 0.88; 95% = CI 0.82, 0.96), simvastatin (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.79, 0.91), and rosuvastatin (OR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.67, 0.94) use were associated with a significant decrease in the risk of in-hospital mortality following TBI. Conclusions: In addition to being the most used statins, current use of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin was associated with a significant decrease in in-hospital mortality following TBI among older adults. Future research must include clinical trials to help exclude the possibility of a healthy user effect in order to better understand the impact of statin use on in-hospital mortality following TBI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document