scholarly journals FAX-RIC enables robust profiling of dynamic RNP complex formation in multicellular organisms in vivo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongwoo Na ◽  
Hyunjoon Kim ◽  
Yeon Choi ◽  
Sanghee Shin ◽  
Jae Hun Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Oocytes ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Rnp Complex ◽  
Multicellular Organisms

Abstract RNA–protein interaction is central to post-transcriptional gene regulation. Identification of RNA-binding proteins relies mainly on UV-induced crosslinking (UVX) followed by the enrichment of RNA–protein conjugates and LC-MS/MS analysis. However, UVX has limited applicability in tissues of multicellular organisms due to its low penetration depth. Here, we introduce formaldehyde crosslinking (FAX) as an alternative chemical crosslinking for RNA interactome capture (RIC). Mild FAX captures RNA–protein interaction with high specificity and efficiency in cell culture. Unlike UVX-RIC, FAX-RIC robustly detects proteins that bind to structured RNAs or uracil-poor RNAs (e.g. AGO1, STAU1, UPF1, NCBP2, EIF4E, YTHDF proteins and PABP), broadening the coverage. Applied to Xenopus laevis oocytes and embryos, FAX-RIC provided comprehensive and unbiased RNA interactome, revealing dynamic remodeling of RNA–protein complexes. Notably, translation machinery changes during oocyte-to-embryo transition, for instance, from canonical eIF4E to noncanonical eIF4E3. Furthermore, using Mus musculus liver, we demonstrate that FAX-RIC is applicable to mammalian tissue samples. Taken together, we report that FAX can extend the RNA interactome profiling into multicellular organisms.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals The Disease-Associated Proteins Drosophila Nab2 and Ataxin-2 Interact with Shared RNAs and Coregulate Neuronal Morphology

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Christopher Rounds ◽  
Edwin B Corgiat ◽  
Changtian Ye ◽  
Joseph A Behnke ◽  
Seth M Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Neuronal Morphology ◽  
Functional Protein ◽  
Specific Subset ◽  
Drosophila Brain ◽  
Ataxin 2

Abstract Nab2 encodes the Drosophila melanogaster member of a conserved family of zinc finger polyadenosine RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) linked to multiple steps in post-transcriptional regulation. Mutation of the Nab2 human ortholog ZC3H14 gives rise to an autosomal recessive intellectual disability but understanding of Nab2/ZC3H14 function in metazoan nervous systems is limited, in part because no comprehensive identification of metazoan Nab2/ZC3H14-associated RNA transcripts has yet been conducted. Moreover, many Nab2/ZC3H14 functional protein partnerships remain unidentified. Here, we present evidence that Nab2 genetically interacts with Ataxin-2 (Atx2), which encodes a neuronal translational regulator, and that these factors coordinately regulate neuronal morphology, circadian behavior, and adult viability. We then present the first high-throughput identifications of Nab2- and Atx2-associated RNAs in Drosophila brain neurons using RNA immunoprecipitation-sequencing (RIP-Seq). Critically, the RNA interactomes of each RBP overlap, and Nab2 exhibits high specificity in its RNA associations in neurons in vivo, associating with a small fraction of all polyadenylated RNAs. The identities of shared associated transcripts (e.g., drk, me31B, stai) and of transcripts specific to Nab2 or Atx2 (e.g., Arpc2 and tea) promise insight into neuronal functions of, and genetic interactions between, each RBP. Consistent with prior biochemical studies, Nab2-associated neuronal RNAs are overrepresented for internal A-rich motifs, suggesting these sequences may partially mediate Nab2 target selection. These data support a model where Nab2 functionally opposes Atx2 in neurons, demonstrate Nab2 shares associated neuronal RNAs with Atx2, and reveal Drosophila Nab2 associates with a more specific subset of polyadenylated mRNAs than its polyadenosine affinity alone may suggest.

scholarly journals RNA Proximity Labeling: A New Detection Tool for RNA–Protein Interactions

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2270
Author(s):  
Ronja Weissinger ◽  
Lisa Heinold ◽  
Saira Akram ◽  
Ralf-Peter Jansen ◽  
Orit Hermesh
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Cellular Compartments ◽  
Rna Protein Complexes

Multiple cellular functions are controlled by the interaction of RNAs and proteins. Together with the RNAs they control, RNA interacting proteins form RNA protein complexes, which are considered to serve as the true regulatory units for post-transcriptional gene expression. To understand how RNAs are modified, transported, and regulated therefore requires specific knowledge of their interaction partners. To this end, multiple techniques have been developed to characterize the interaction between RNAs and proteins. In this review, we briefly summarize the common methods to study RNA–protein interaction including crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP), and aptamer- or antisense oligonucleotide-based RNA affinity purification. Following this, we focus on in vivo proximity labeling to study RNA–protein interactions. In proximity labeling, a labeling enzyme like ascorbate peroxidase or biotin ligase is targeted to specific RNAs, RNA-binding proteins, or even cellular compartments and uses biotin to label the proteins and RNAs in its vicinity. The tagged molecules are then enriched and analyzed by mass spectrometry or RNA-Seq. We highlight the latest studies that exemplify the strength of this approach for the characterization of RNA protein complexes and distribution of RNAs in vivo.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals Architecture of RNA influences plant biology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaying Zhu ◽  
Changhao Li ◽  
Xu Peng ◽  
Xiuren Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mirna Biogenesis ◽  
Plant Responses ◽  
Tertiary Structures ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
Environmental Variations ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
Processing Stability

Abstract The majority of the genome is transcribed to RNA in living organisms. RNA transcripts can form astonishing arrays of secondary and tertiary structures via Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or wobble base pairing. In vivo, RNA folding is not a simple thermodynamics event of minimizing free energy. Instead, the process is constrained by transcription, RNA binding proteins (RBPs), steric factors and micro-environment. RNA secondary structure (RSS) plays myriad roles in numerous biological processes, such as RNA processing, stability, transportation and translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Emerging evidence has also implicated RSS in RNA trafficking, liquid-liquid phase separation and plant responses to environmental variations such as temperature and salinity. At the molecular level, RSS is correlated with regulating splicing, polyadenylation, protein systhsis, and miRNA biogenesis and functions. In this review, we summarized newly reported methods for probing RSS in vivo and functions and mechanisms of RSS in plant physiology.

scholarly journals Identification of mRNAs Associated with αCP2-Containing RNP Complexes

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 7055-7067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly A. Waggoner ◽  
Stephen A. Liebhaber
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Posttranscriptional Gene Regulation ◽  
Direct Binding

ABSTRACT Posttranscriptional controls in higher eukaryotes are central to cell differentiation and developmental programs. These controls reflect sequence-specific interactions of mRNAs with one or more RNA binding proteins. The α-globin poly(C) binding proteins (αCPs) comprise a highly abundant subset of K homology (KH) domain RNA binding proteins and have a characteristic preference for binding single-stranded C-rich motifs. αCPs have been implicated in translation control and stabilization of multiple cellular and viral mRNAs. To explore the full contribution of αCPs to cell function, we have identified a set of mRNAs that associate in vivo with the major αCP2 isoforms. One hundred sixty mRNA species were consistently identified in three independent analyses of αCP2-RNP complexes immunopurified from a human hematopoietic cell line (K562). These mRNAs could be grouped into subsets encoding cytoskeletal components, transcription factors, proto-oncogenes, and cell signaling factors. Two mRNAs were linked to ceroid lipofuscinosis, indicating a potential role for αCP2 in this infantile neurodegenerative disease. Surprisingly, αCP2 mRNA itself was represented in αCP2-RNP complexes, suggesting autoregulatory control of αCP2 expression. In vitro analyses of representative target mRNAs confirmed direct binding of αCP2 within their 3′ untranslated regions. These data expand the list of mRNAs that associate with αCP2 in vivo and establish a foundation for modeling its role in coordinating pathways of posttranscriptional gene regulation.

scholarly journals Current Understanding of Circular RNAs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjiang Liu ◽  
Yundong Zou ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Yundi Tang ◽  
Jianping Guo
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Circular Rnas ◽  
Systemic Lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common and potentially fatal autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs. To date, its etiology and pathogenesis remains elusive. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of endogenous non-coding RNAs with covalently closed loop structure. Growing evidence has demonstrated that circRNAs may play an essential role in regulation of gene expression and transcription by acting as microRNA (miRNA) sponges, impacting cell survival and proliferation by interacting with RNA binding proteins (RBPs), and strengthening mRNA stability by forming RNA-protein complexes duplex structures. The expression patterns of circRNAs exhibit tissue-specific and pathogenesis-related manner. CircRNAs have implicated in the development of multiple autoimmune diseases, including SLE. In this review, we summarize the characteristics, biogenesis, and potential functions of circRNAs, its impact on immune responses and highlight current understanding of circRNAs in the pathogenesis of SLE.

scholarly journals Systematic discovery of endogenous human ribonucleoprotein complexes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Mallam ◽  
Wisath Sae-Lee ◽  
Jeffrey M. Schaub ◽  
Fan Tu ◽  
Anna Battenhouse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Human Protein ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Factor C

AbstractRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play essential roles in biology and are frequently associated with human disease. While recent studies have systematically identified individual RBPs, their higher order assembly intoRibonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes has not been systematically investigated. Here, we describe a proteomics method for systematic identification of RNP complexes in human cells. We identify 1,428 protein complexes that associate with RNA, indicating that over 20% of known human protein complexes contain RNA. To explore the role of RNA in the assembly of each complex, we identify complexes that dissociate, change composition, or form stable protein-only complexes in the absence of RNA. Importantly, these data also provide specific novel insights into the function of well-studied protein complexes not previously known to associate with RNA, including replication factor C (RFC) and cytokinetic centralspindlin complex. Finally, we use our method to systematically identify cell-type specific RNA-associated proteins in mouse embryonic stem cells. We distribute these data as a resource, rna.MAP (rna.proteincomplexes.org) which provides a comprehensive dataset for the study of RNA-associated protein complexes. Our system thus provides a novel methodology for further explorations across human tissues and disease states, as well as throughout all domains of life.SummaryAn exploration of human protein complexes in the presence and absence of RNA reveals endogenous ribonucleoprotein complexes

scholarly journals In vivo stabilization of endogenous chloroplast RNAs by customized artificial pentatricopeptide repeat proteins

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Manavski ◽  
Louis-Valentin Meteignier ◽  
Margarita Rojas ◽  
Andreas Brachmann ◽  
Alice Barkan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Functional Capabilities ◽  
Ppr Protein ◽  
Repeat Proteins ◽  
Ppr Proteins ◽  
Physical Barriers

ABSTRACTPentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are helical repeat-proteins that bind RNA in a modular fashion with a sequence-specificity that can be manipulated by the use of an amino acid code. As such, PPR repeats are promising scaffolds for the design of RNA binding proteins for synthetic biology applications. However, the in vivo functional capabilities of artificial PPR proteins built from consensus PPR motifs are just starting to be explored. Here, we report in vivo functions of an artificial PPR protein, dPPRrbcL, made of consensus PPR motifs that were designed to bind a sequence near the 5’ end of rbcL transcripts in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. We used a functional complementation assay to demonstrate that this protein bound its intended RNA target with specificity in vivo and that it substituted for a natural PPR protein by stabilizing processed rbcL mRNA. We targeted a second protein of analogous design to the petL 5’ UTR, where it substituted for the native stabilizing PPR protein PGR3, albeit inefficiently. These results showed that artificial PPRs can be engineered to functionally mimic the class of native PPR proteins that serve as physical barriers against exoribonucleases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document