scholarly journals P1002EFFECT OF VITAMIN D ON URINARY ANGIOTENSIOGEN LEVEL IN EARLY DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Himansu Mahapatra ◽  
Adarsh Kumar ◽  
Bindu Kulshreshtha ◽  
Anubhuti Chirkara
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ras Activation ◽  
R Value ◽  
25 Oh Vitamin D ◽  
Early Diabetic Nephropathy

Abstract Background and Aims UrinaryAngiotensinogen (UAGT) is supposed to be a marker of activation of intrarenalreninangiotensin system (RAS) system in early Diabetic Nephropathy (DN). Vitamin D has been studied as a negative regulator of the circulating and tissue RAS activity; so its supplementation may prevent progression of DN. This study was planned to assess the RAS activation and effect of vitamin D supplementation in early diabetic nephropathy progression by estimatingUAGT level. Method A total of 730 Diabetic subjects were screened for early DN based on Inclusion criteria(eGFR ≥ 120ml/min/1.73m2 with unrestricted ACR value eGFR of 60- 120 mL/min/1.73m2 and ACR 30-300mg) and Exclusion criteria(on ACE I or ARB, eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2, Hypercalcemia (>11.5mg%), UTI, Pregnancy, Hypertension, HbA1c (>8.0 %), vitamin D supplementation during the last 6 month).Of them 103 included subjects were underwent randomization to receive either Cholecalciferol(54) or matching Placebo(49) in a double blind method. All were subjected to routine investigations, urinary albumin: creatinine (UACR), UAGT, serum 25(OH)vitamin D, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) at the zero and six months. A total 40 healthy controls without any comorbidity were also includedfor assessment of same investigations at zero month. Comparative results at zero months of all three groups were analyzed. Results The change in levels of UACR (mg/g), UAGT (ng/ml), vitamin D (ng/ml) and iPTH(pg/ml)in Cholecalciferol group from zero to six month were [Median (IQR)] : 12.50 (-24.82 to -5.95); p<0.001, -6.60 (-20.91 to -2.63);p<0.001, 5.75 (2.07-9.70); p<0.001, -5.35 (-11.55 to -3.67) ;p<0.001, respectively. After six months, median (IQR) of UAGT and UACR levels were significantly lower in the Cholecalciferol group as compared to Placebo group (p<0.001 and p= 0.04 respectively).Significant reduction of UACR (mg/g) and UAGT (ng/ml) level corroborating with increase in 25(OH) vitamin D(ng/ml) levelfrom zero to six months (all three p<0.001). There was significant correlation of vitamin D3 level with UAGT (r value: -0.255 & p value: 0.009) and UACR level (r value: -0.28& p value: <0.01). The median UAGT level was significantly higher in patients with early DN (Cholecalciferol&Placebo Group) than Control Group at zero month (p =0.001). Conclusion Significantly higher UAGT levels in early DN supports role of intrarenal RAS activation. Significant decrease in UAGT level in cholecalciferol group supports beneficial role of vitamin D supplementation in progression of early DN.

scholarly journals MO049EFFECT OF VITAMIN D ON ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION IN EARLY DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Himansu Mahapatra ◽  
Adarsh Kumar ◽  
Bindu Kulshreshtha ◽  
Anubhuti Chirkara
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pregnancy Hypertension ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Diabetic Nephropathy

Abstract Background and Aims Diabetic Nephropathy is associated with endothelial dysfunction at an early stage. The benefit of Vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function is supported by a few studies in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, studies on its effect in early DN is scarce. Hence, the present study was planned to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function by measuring Flow mediated dilation (FMD) in patient of early DN. Method A total of 730 Diabetic subjects were screened for early DN based on Inclusion criteria (eGFR ≥ 120ml/min/1.73m2 with unrestricted ACR value eGFR of 60- 120 mL/min/1.73m2 and ACR 30-300mg) and Exclusion criteria (on ACE I or ARB, eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2, Hypercalcemia (>11.5mg%), UTI, Pregnancy, Hypertension, HbA1c (>8.0 %), vitamin D supplementation during the last 6 month). Of them 103 included subjects were underwent randomization to receive either Cholecalciferol (54) or matching Placebo (49) in a double blind method. All were subjected to routine investigations, urinary albumin: creatinine (UACR), C reactive protein (CRP), serum 25(OH)vitamin D, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and Flow mediated dilatation at the zero and six months. All subjects were subjected. Comparative results at zero and six months of both groups were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference between cholecalciferol and placebo group with respect to CRP, iPTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH) D), UACR, FMD at baseline. Median FMD after 6 month was significantly higher in cholecalciferol as compared to placebo group [Median (IQR): 24 % (21.75-26.0) and 22% (18-24) respectively, p= 0.01]. After 6 month UACR was significantly lower in the cholecalciferol group as compared to placebo group (p= 0.04). Significant association of vitamin D level was observed with CRP level. In 25(OH) D < 20 ng/ml subgroup there was significant decrease in CRP level in comparison to 25(OH) D ≥20 ng/ml subgroup (p=0.04). Conclusion There was significant improvement in endothelial function as assessed by FMD% following vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D supplementation given to early diabetic nephropathy patients may have favourable effects on cardiovascular outcome as reflected by improvement in FMD% and decrease in CRP level.

scholarly journals The Clinical Effect of Oral Vitamin D2 Supplementation on Psoriasis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wareeporn Disphanurat ◽  
Wongsiya Viarasilpa ◽  
Panlop Chakkavittumrong ◽  
Padcha Pongcharoen
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vitamin D2 ◽  
Oral Vitamin ◽  
Pasi Score ◽  
The Mean

Background. There are limited randomized controlled trials of oral vitamin D supplementation in psoriasis, especially in Asia, and the results are inconclusive. Objective. To investigate the clinical effect of oral vitamin D supplementation on psoriasis. Methods. Patients with psoriasis were randomized to receive vitamin D2 60,000 IU or similar-looking placebo pills once every 2 weeks for 6 months. The primary outcome was improvement of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at 3 and 6 months after treatment. Serum levels of 25(OH)D, calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein and adverse events were monitored. The chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t-test, and Spearman’s correlation analysis were used in statistical analysis. Results. Of 50 subjects screened, 45 were eligible and randomized to the oral vitamin D2 group (n=23) or placebo group (n=22). At enrollment, the mean PASI score was 4.45, and 26.7% of patients had vitamin D deficiency. At 3 months, the oral vitamin D2 group had significantly higher PASI improvement than the placebo group (mean PASI improvement: 1.43 versus [vs.] -0.33, p-value=0.034; mean %PASI improvement: 34.21% vs. -1.85%, p-value=0.039). The mean serum 25(OH)D level was significantly higher in the oral vitamin D group than in the placebo group (27.4 vs. 22.4 ng/mL, p-value=0.029). Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly inversely correlated with PASI scores at the 6-month follow-up. No major adverse event was observed overall. Conclusion. Oral vitamin D2 supplementation in patients with psoriasis increased the serum vitamin D level and significantly improved the treatment outcome without increasing adverse events. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20180613001.

scholarly journals Role of Vitamin D in Reducing the Frequency of Asthma Attacks in Patients with Frequent Exacerbation of Asthma

2021 ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Mubeen Ahmed Memon ◽  
Sheeba Faryal Ansari ◽  
Mumtaz Ali Lakho ◽  
Mukhtiar Hussain Jaffery ◽  
Syed Zulfiquar Ali Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
The Body ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Asthma Exacerbations ◽  
Vitamin D Levels ◽  
Interventional Group

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency is common among asthmatics with literature suggesting that its low levels in the body may trigger exacerbations and decrease the response to corticosteroid treatment. It has also shown to inhibit the production of cytokines, which in turn enhances the body’s response to corticosteroid treatment during an exacerbation. Therefore, maintenance of adequate levels of vitamin D in patients with asthma may reduce the risk of exacerbation and improve their general health. This study aims to explore the role of vitamin D supplementation in preventing asthma exacerbations. Methods: This single blind parallel arm interventional study was conducted in the pulmonology ward in a tertiary care hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. Two hundred (n= 200) participants with a history of frequent acute exacerbation of asthma were enrolled in the study via consecutive convenient non-probability technique. Participants were divided into two groups; the placebo and the interventional group that received 200,000 IU of vitamin D capsule. Results: Compared to day 0, mean episodes of exacerbation in the interventional group were significantly lower after 180 days (1.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.61 ± 0.3; p-value <0.0001). Similarly, number of asthma attacks in past 7 days was significantly lower in intervention group after 180 days (4.4 ± 2.7 vs. 3.1 ± 1.5; p-value 0.0001) Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation is a safe and cost-friendly approach to reducing asthma exacerbations. It may also help to improve the condition in severe asthmatics with low vitamin D levels.

Association between Vitamin D and Risk of Stroke: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Cen Su ◽  
Biao Jin ◽  
Haiping Xia ◽  
Kangren Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Control Analysis ◽  
25 Oh Vitamin D ◽  
Case Control Analysis ◽  
Circulating Levels

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Previous studies have shown inconsistent results for associations between vitamin D and risk of stroke. We gathered the existing published articles and conducted this meta-analysis with the aim to explore the association between vitamin D and risk of stroke. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched for articles exploring the association between vitamin D and risk of stroke and published before April 2021 in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. All statistical analyses were made using STATA 12.0 software. Q test and <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> were applied to examine heterogeneities between studies. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For the association between serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D and risks of stroke, the present analysis included 20 cohort studies (including 213,276 participants) and a case-control analysis (including 13,642 participants). Additionally, the analysis included 15 studies (including 41,146 participants given vitamin D supplementation and 41,163 participants given placebo) to evaluate the influence of vitamin D supplementation on risk of stroke. Higher circulating levels of 25(OH) vitamin D were associated with a reduced risk of stroke (odds ratio/relative risk = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70–0.86, <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 41.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.025). However, the present analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation did not influence the risk of stroke (hazard ratio = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.96–1.14, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 2.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.425). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our analysis indicated that lower circulating level of vitamin D was associated with an elevated risk of stroke, but extra supplement of vitamin D failed to show benefit in decreasing the risk of stroke. Further research and study are also needed to show the role of vitamin D in relation to stroke.

The role of vitamin D in metabolic and reproductive disturbances of polycystic ovary syndrome: A narrative mini-review

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Daniela Menichini ◽  
Gianpiero Forte ◽  
Beatrice Orrù ◽  
Giuseppe Gullo ◽  
Vittorio Unfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Embryo Quality ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Endometrial Receptivity ◽  
Metabolic Disturbances ◽  
Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Beneficial Role

Abstract. Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone that plays a pivotal role in several metabolic and reproductive pathways in humans. Increasing evidence supports the role of vitamin D deficiency in metabolic disturbances and infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Indeed, supplementation with vitamin D seems to have a beneficial role on insulin resistance and endometrial receptivity. On the other hand, exceedingly high levels of vitamin D appear to play a detrimental role on oocytes development and embryo quality. In the current review, we summarize the available evidence about the topic, aiming to suggest the best supplementation strategy in women with PCOS or, more generally, in those with metabolic disturbances and infertility. Based on the retrieved data, vitamin D seems to have a beneficial role on IR, insulin sensitivity and endometrial receptivity, but high levels and incorrect timing of administration seem to have a detrimental role on oocytes development and embryo quality. Therefore, we encourage a low dose supplementation (400–800 IU/day) particularly in vitamin D deficient women that present metabolic disturbances like PCOS. As far as the reproductive health, we advise vitamin D supplementation in selected populations, only during specific moments of the ovarian cycle, to support the luteal phase. However, ambiguities about dosage and timing of the supplementation still emerge from the clinical studies published to date and further studies are required.

scholarly journals Does vitamin D supplementation prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in military personnel? Review of the evidence

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2020-001686
Author(s):  
Iain T Parsons ◽  
R M Gifford ◽  
M J Stacey ◽  
L E Lamb ◽  
M K O'Shea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Vitamin D Status ◽  
Military Studies ◽  
Vitamin D Receptors ◽  
Area Of Interest ◽  
Military Populations ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Recruit Training

For most individuals residing in Northwestern Europe, maintaining replete vitamin D status throughout the year is unlikely without vitamin D supplementation and deficiency remains common. Military studies have investigated the association with vitamin D status, and subsequent supplementation, with the risk of stress fractures particularly during recruit training. The expression of nuclear vitamin D receptors and vitamin D metabolic enzymes in immune cells additionally provides a rationale for the potential role of vitamin D in maintaining immune homeostasis. One particular area of interest has been in the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). The aims of this review were to consider the evidence of vitamin D supplementation in military populations in the prevention of ARTIs, including SARS-CoV-2 infection and consequent COVID-19 illness. The occupational/organisational importance of reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, especially where infected young adults may be asymptomatic, presymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, is also discussed.

scholarly journals Vitamin D supplementation, COVID-19 and disease severity: a meta-analysis

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Shah ◽  
D Saxena ◽  
D Mavalankar
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Objective: Current meta-analysis aims to understand the effect of oral supplementation of vitamin D on intensive care unit (ICU) requirement and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: Databases PubMed, preprint servers, and google scholar were searched from December 2019 to December 2020. Authors searched for the articles assessing role of vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19. Cochrane RevMan tool was used for quantitative assessment of the data, where heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Q statistics and data was expressed using odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Results: Final meta-analysis involved pooled data of 532 hospitalized patients (189 on vitamin D supplementation and 343 on usual care/placebo) of COVID-19 from three studies (Two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective case-control study). Statistically (p&lt;0.0001) lower ICU requirement was observed in patients with vitamin D supplementation as compared to patients without supplementations (odds ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.210-0.626). However, it suffered from significant heterogeneity, which reduced after sensitivity analysis. In case of mortality, vitamin D supplements has comparable findings with placebo treatment/usual care (odds ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.413-2.113; p=0.87). The studies did not show any publication bias and had fair quality score. Subgroup analysis could not be performed due to limited number of studies and hence dose and duration dependent effect of vitamin D could not be evaluated. Conclusions: Although the current meta-analysis findings indicate potential role of vitamin D in improving COVID-19 severity in hospitalized patients, more robust data from randomized controlled trials are needed to substantiate its effects on mortality.

scholarly journals Using genetic variants to evaluate the causal effect of serum vitamin D concentration on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and hospitalization traits: a Mendelian randomization study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Cui ◽  
Yun Tian
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Global Test ◽  
Serum Vitamin D

Abstract Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has struck globally and is exerting a devastating toll on humans. The pandemic has led to calls for widespread vitamin D supplementation in public. However, evidence supporting the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19 pandemic remains controversial. Methods We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to analyze the causal effect of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and hospitalization traits by using summary-level GWAS data. The causal associations were estimated with inverse variance weighted (IVW) with fixed effects (IVW-fixed) and random effects (IVW-random), MR-Egger, weighted edian and MR Robust Adjusted Profile Score (MR.RAPS) methods. We further applied the MR Steiger filtering method, MR Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) global test and PhenoScanner tool to check and remove single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were horizontally pleiotropic. Results We found no evidence to support the causal associations between the serum 25(OH)D concentration and the risk of COVID-19 susceptibility [IVW-fixed: odds ratio (OR) = 0.9049, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8197–0.9988, p = 0.0473], severity (IVW-fixed: OR = 1.0298, 95% CI 0.7699–1.3775, p = 0.8432) and hospitalized traits (IVW-fixed: OR = 1.0713, 95% CI 0.8819–1.3013, p = 0.4878) using outlier removed sets at a Bonferroni-corrected p threshold of 0.0167. Sensitivity analyses did not reveal any sign of horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusions Our MR analysis provided precise evidence that genetically lowered serum 25(OH)D concentrations were not causally associated with COVID-19 susceptibility, severity or hospitalized traits. Our study did not provide evidence assessing the role of vitamin D supplementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. High-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to explore and define the role of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document