scholarly journals RADT-34. PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL IN SURGICAL CASES OF GLIOMATOSIS CEREBRI FROM THE NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii188-ii189
Author(s):  
Adham Khalafallah ◽  
Srujan Kopparapu ◽  
Debraj Mukherjee

Abstract Gliomatosis Cerebri (GC) is a rare, aggressive, diffusely infiltrating cerebral tumor. Prognostic indicators and management strategies are currently poorly characterized. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with histologically confirmed GC between 2004 and 2016. Demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics were collected, including the Charlson/Deyo score, a comorbidity index adapted from the Charleston Comorbidity Index. Allowable values for the Charlson/Deyo score are 0 (no recorded comorbidities), 1, 2, and 3+ (most severe). Factors associated with overall survival were identified via bivariate log-rank tests and multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazards models. The query returned 108 GC patients. The median age was 60.0 years, males were predominantly affected (63%), and most patients were white (86%). While 12% of cases achieved near/gross total resection and 27% of cases achieved partial resection, most surgeries were for biopsy (61%). Treatments included radiation therapy in 64% and chemotherapy in 63% of patients. The median overall survival was 15.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]=11.1-24.8) months. On bivariate analysis, chemotherapy improved overall survival (p=0.01) while radiation therapy (p=0.07) and extent of resection (p=0.48) did not. On multivariate analysis, older patients (hazard ratio [HR]=1.07, CI=1.03-1.11, p< 0.01) and Charlson/Deyo scores of ≥1 versus 0 (HR=3.47, CI=1.40-8.60, p< 0.01) had significantly increased mortality risk following surgery. In particular, the Charlson/Deyo score is a novel prognostic factor for GC that may guide clinical and surgical decision-making for this rare, rapidly fatal tumor. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify the effects of chemotherapy versus radiation as treatment modalities for GC.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 417-417
Author(s):  
Johannes Uhlig ◽  
Cortlandt Sellers ◽  
Sajid A. Khan ◽  
Charles Cha ◽  
Hyun S. Kevin Kim

417 Background: To assess the impact of hospital volume and type on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Patients with histopathological or imaging-based diagnosis of HCC were identified from the 2003-2015 National Cancer Database (NCDB). First-line treatment was stratified as liver transplant, surgical resection, interventional oncology (IO) and chemotherapy. Hospital volume was stratified as high (ranking among top 10% in case numbers) and low volume, separately for each treatment modality. Hospital type was categorized as academic and non-academic. Overall survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 63,877 patients were included (transplant n = 10,596, surgical resection n = 11,132, IO n = 12,286, chemotherapy n = 29,863). Of 1,261 hospitals systems which treated HCC, 226 (17.9%) were academic centers and 1,035 (82.1 %) were non-academic centers. Mean number of cases treated annually was higher in academic centers (55.2; 34.6; 40.7; 79.9) versus non-academic centers (10.7; 6.25; 6.6; 11.9 for transplant; surgical resection; IO and chemotherapy; p < 0.001, respectively). Young African American patients and those with private insurance, high income and education were more likely to receive treatment at academic centers. Geographical difference were evident among US regions, with highest proportion of HCC treated at academic centers in New England states (83.6%) and lowest in South Atlantic states (48.6%). Overall survival was superior for academic versus non-academic centers (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91, p < 0.001) and high versus low volume centers (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.81, p < 0.001), after multivariable adjustment for potential confounders. These effects were evident among all HCC treatment modalities. Conclusions: HCC treatment in academic centers shows distinct patterns according to patient demographics and US geography. Among all treatment modalities, both academic setting and hospital volume independently affected HCC outcomes, with highest patient survival observed in high-volume academic centers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii390-iii391
Author(s):  
Aaron Mochizuki ◽  
Anna Janss ◽  
Sonia Partap ◽  
Paul Fisher ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastoma is one of the most common malignant brain tumors in children. To date, the treatment of average-risk (non-metastatic, completely resected) medulloblastoma includes craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Modern treatment modalities and now risk stratification of subgroups have extended the survival of these patients, exposing the long-term morbidities associated with radiation therapy. METHODS We performed a single-arm, multi-institution study, seeking to reduce the late effects of treatment in patients with average-risk medulloblastoma prior to advances in molecular subgrouping. To do so, we reduced the dose of craniospinal irradiation by 25% to 18 gray with the goal of maintaining the therapeutic efficacy as described in CCG 9892 with maintenance chemotherapy. RESULTS 28 patients aged 3–30 years were enrolled across three institutions between April 2001 and December 2010. Median age at enrollment was 9 years with a median follow-up time of 11.7 years. The 3-year relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 78.6% (95% CI 58.4% to 89.8%) and 92.9% (95% CI 74.4% to 98.2%), respectively. The 5-year RFS and OS were 71.4% (95% CI 50.1% to 84.6%) and 85.7% (95% CI 66.3% to 94.4%), respectively. Toxicities were similar to those seen in other studies; there were no grade 5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Given the known neurocognitive adverse effects associated with cranial radiation therapy, studies to evaluate the feasibility of dose reduction are needed. In this study, we demonstrate that select patients with average-risk medulloblastoma may benefit from reduced craniospinal radiation dose of 18 gray without impacting relapse-free or overall survival.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
M. V. Mishra ◽  
S. W. Keith ◽  
X. Shen ◽  
T. Biswas

303 Background: Primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) is a rare disease, accounting for only 0.5% of all pancreatic masses. The clinical presentation of PPL is similar to that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and the two are difficult to distinguish radiographically. A paucity of literature exists on the epidemiology and outcomes of PPL. Given the limited case reports published on PPL, a comparison of the different treatment modalities has previously not been possible. Here, we present a series of 523 cases of PPL obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the tumor characteristics and compare the different treatment modalities. Methods: Patients diagnosed with a primary pancreatic lymphoma from 1973-2007 were identified. Data on patient and tumor characteristics as well as initial treatment with surgery or radiation was extracted. Chemotherapy information is not available through SEER. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent prognostic factors predicting for survival using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Fifty-eight percent of patients identified were male. The median age range at diagnosis was 65-69 years (range, 10-14 years – greater than 85 years). The most common histologic subtype in the present series was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which accounted for 71% of all patients. The 5-year overall survival for the group was 47%. Multivariate analysis indicates that age >60 and a marital status of single were predictive of a decreased cause-specific and overall-survival specific survival (p<0.05). Radiation therapy, but not surgery, was predictive of an improved overall survival (p<0.05). Conclusions: PPL is a rare form of extra-nodal NHLs of the GI tract. Adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with a PPL should be strongly considered and a surgical treatment should be avoided if an early diagnosis is established. A prospective study evaluating this patient population will be difficult given the rarity PPL. We hope that this case series will provide a context in evaluating and treating patients with PPL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 360-360
Author(s):  
David G. Brauer ◽  
Kian-Huat Lim ◽  
Maria Majella Doyle ◽  
William G. Hawkins ◽  
William C. Chapman ◽  
...  

360 Background: The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC) is based on limited evidence. Since prospective trials are not generally practical for GBC, we sought to evaluate current best evidence to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in multiple clinical scenarios by analyzing data from the U.S. National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Patients who underwent resection for GBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 were identified in the NCDB. The effect of adjuvant therapy on overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: 10,402 patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 14 months. Median survival was 16 months. One- and five-year OS were 57% and 23%, respectively. 3,509 patients (34%) received any modality of adjuvant therapy. Receipt of adjuvant therapy improved one-year OS (63% vs 55%, p < 0.01), but median OS was minimally changed (17 vs 15 months, NS). Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved one-year OS in T3 and T4N1 disease (Table 1). Only chemoradiation therapy was associated with improved one-year OS for T2 disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse one-year OS in T1N0 disease. Conclusions: Using data from the US NCDB, adjuvant therapy for resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma is associated with improved one-year overall survival with the exception of T1N0 disease. In the absence of prospective studies in this rare disease, retrospective data can provide insights into successful treatment strategies and guidelines for GBC. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Zachary D. Horne ◽  
Ryan P Smith ◽  
Sushil Beriwal ◽  
Ronny Kalash ◽  
Ashwin Shinde ◽  
...  

9 Background: Small cell prostate cancer (SCPC) is a rare entity with treatment patterns extrapolated from small cell cancer of the lung. Outcomes have been evaluated in small series but prognostic factors are relatively poorly defined. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Data Base to analyze men diagnosed with SCPC from 2004-2015. Only men with known clinical TNM staging, treatment modalities, and follow up were included. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed and compared with Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox proportional hazards ratios. Associations with baseline and tumor properties were performed with Chi-squared, independent t-test, and bivariate regression analyses. Results: 800 men with SCPC were identified. Median PSA was 79.0 ng/dL. 55.6% of men had cM1 disease at diagnosis, 31.4% had cN0M0 disease, and 13.0% were cN1M0. Median follow up was 12.4 months for all patients and 19.3 months for cM0 patients. Median survival for cM1, cN0M0, and cN1M0 patients was 9.8, 28.5, and 17.1 months, respectively (p<0.001). In cM0 patients, 66 (18.7%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), 177 (50.1%) received radiation therapy (XRT), and 195 (45.2%) received chemotherapy (CT). Median survival for men undergoing RP was not reached vs those who did not undergo RP (p<0.001). XRT also showed a trend towards improved median OS (25.2 vs. 19.1 months, p=0.139). On multivariable analysis for cM0 men, only age (HR 1.044 [95% CI 1.025-10.64] p<0.001), cN1 (HR 1.378 [95% CI 1.001-1.898] p=0.050, RP (HR 0.429 [95% CI 0.259-0.709] p=0.001), and XRT (HR 0.520 [95% CI 0.384-0.704] p<0.001) were predictive for overall survival. When examining only men who received systemic therapy, XRT was the only additional treatment modality to exhibit a survival benefit (HR 0.623 [95% CI 0.425-0.912] p=0.015). Of men with cM1 disease, 78 (17.5%) underwent definitive local therapy (RP/XRT), but no difference in OS was observed. Conclusions: Small cell prostate cancer is an aggressive disease with the majority of men presenting with metastases. In those with pelvis-confined disease who are fit for systemic therapy, radiation therapy to the primary should be considered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13633-e13633
Author(s):  
Danielle Cerbon ◽  
Matthew Schlumbrecht ◽  
Camille Ragin ◽  
Priscila Barreto Coelho ◽  
Judith Hurley ◽  
...  

e13633 Background: Caribbean-born black immigrants (CBI) represent 57% of all black immigrants in the US; they come mainly from Haiti, Jamaica, Dominican Republic (DR), and Cuba. Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women living in the Caribbean, however, our previous retrospective cohort of 1131 black women with BC shows that CBI have a better overall survival compared with US-born black (USB). The Caribbean has a majority of African ancestry; nonetheless, different ancestral populations differ in genetic composition, making the Caribbean a distinct population with several health disparities within it. Therefore, we stratified our study by each Caribbean country compared to USB patients with the objective of further studying the difference in BC outcomes between USB patients and CBI. Methods: We identified BC patients through a Safety Net and Private Hospital Tumor Registries. We selected the most populace sites: Haiti, Jamaica, Bahamas, Cuba and DR; and used data from 1,082 patients to estimate hazard rations (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan Meier analysis for overall survival; Chi Squared and independent sample t-test to verify associations in categorical variables. Results: The study has 250 Haitian, 89 Jamaican, 43 Bahamian, 38 Dominican, 38 Cuban and 624 USB women. Haitians underwent less surgery (HB 61.2% vs USB 72.9%; P = 0.001) and had less triple negative BC (18% vs USB 27.8%; P = 0.006). Bahamians were the youngest at diagnosis (50.5 years vs. USB 57.6 P < 0.001) and presented at more advanced stages (stage 3/4, 54.3% vs USB 35.3%; P = 0.02). Jamaicans and DR underwent more radiation therapy (43.8%, P = 0.002 and 44.7%, P = 0.028 vs. USB 28%). Jamaican women had a better overall survival compared to USB patients (median of 154.93 months, 95% CI: 114.1-195.5 vs 98.63 months, 95% CI: 76.4-120.8; Log-Rank Mantel Cox P = 0.034). Favorable factors for survival were: radiation therapy in Haitian and USB (aHR = 0.45, 95% 0.27-0.77; P = 0.004); and surgery in USB (aHR = 0.26 (0.19-0.36), p < 0.001), Bahamians (aHR = 0.05 (0.01-0.47), p = 0.008) and Jamaicans (aHR = 0.08 (0.03-0.24), p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study underlines the vast heterogeneity in the Caribbean population and demonstrates that Jamaican immigrants with BC have a higher overall survival compared to USB patients, proposing that genetic and other cancer related factors inherent to country of origin impact survival within Caribbean immigrants and highlighting the need for further studies in this immigrant sub-group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19253-e19253
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Blessing Elimimian ◽  
Thomas A. Samuel ◽  
Hong Liang ◽  
Nadeem Bilani ◽  
Leah Elson ◽  
...  

e19253 Background: The literature on rare triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) histology types is sparse; herein we present the clinical demographic and treatment patterns as well as overall survival (OS) for rare (< 10%) types of breast cancers that typically present as TNBCs: Medullary carcinoma (MedC), Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), and Metaplastic breast cancer (MetC). Methods: Records of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MedC, ACC, and MetC between 2010 and 2016 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were analyzed. Patients with an unknown stage were excluded. Univariate analyses and multivariable Cox-regression models were performed in SAS v. 9.4. Results: A total of 8,479 records were analyzed. MetC was the most commonly diagnosed histologic type in our cohort with 6,867 (81%) patients versus 255 (3.0%) MedC patients and 1,357 (16%) ACC patients. MedC presented earlier in life, with a median age of 53 years versus 62 years for ACC patients, and 63 years for MetC patients. The proportion of TNBC varied by histology type for MedC (70.4%), ACC (77.0%), and MetC (79.0 %). Patients with ACC were less likely to receive radiotherapy (52.4%) and chemotherapy (12.9%) compared to MedC (61.2%, 74.5%) and MetC (49.7%, 68.6%) respectively. On Cox multivariate regression, age ≥60 (HR 4.7), stage ≥3 [compared to patients with stage 0&1] (HR 5.7), and not receiving radiotherapy (HR 2.0) or chemotherapy (HR 1.25) conferred worse overall survival for MedC. Similarly, among patients with ACC, age ≥60 (HR 3.5), stage ≥3 (HR 5.3), and lymph node involvement (HR 4.8) were adverse prognostic indicators as well as not receiving radiation therapy (HR 1.47). Among MetC, lung metastasis (HR 2.6), stage ≥3 (HR 4.5), but also not receiving chemotherapy (HR 1.8) or radiation therapy (HR 1.47) was associated with worse survival outcomes. All p-values for cox regression is <0.0001. The 5-year OS was 92.6% for patients with MedC, 92.0% for ACC patients, 69.3% for MetC patients; all p-values <0.0001. Conclusions: This analysis describes rare types of TNBCs: MedC (most common), ACC, and MetC. We noted heterogeneity among these 3 rare types of TNBC, with the worst 5-year OS noted for MetC. Poor prognostic factors for MetC include advanced stage, lung metastasis, older age, and not receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Future research focusing on rare subtypes of breast cancer is desirable and would potentially inform the optimal management of these breast carcinomas.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanbing Liu ◽  
Xiaowei Qin ◽  
Liyan Zhao ◽  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Yubo Wang

BackgroundBrainstem glioma is a primary glial tumor that arises from the midbrain, pons, and medulla. The objective of this study was to determine the population-based epidemiology, incidence, and outcomes of brainstem gliomas.MethodsThe data pertaining to patients with brainstem gliomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were extracted from the SEER database. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate the distribution and tumor-related characteristics of patients with brainstem gliomas. The possible prognostic indicators were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThe age-adjusted incidence rate was 0.311 cases per 100,000 person-years between 2004 and 2016. A total of 3387 cases of brainstem gliomas were included in our study. Most of the patients were white and diagnosed at 5-9 years of age. The most common diagnosis confirmed by histological review was ependymoma/anaplastic ependymoma. The median survival time was 24 months. Patients with tumors less than 3 cm in size had a better prognosis. Surgery was effective at improving overall survival. There was no evidence that radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved overall survival.ConclusionBrainstem gliomas can be diagnosed at any age. Ependymoma/anaplastic ependymoma is the most common pathological diagnosis. The prognosis is poor, and timely diagnosis and surgery are effective at improving the prognosis. We suggest that more attention should be given to the treatment of patients with brainstem gliomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document