scholarly journals Formation of functional cell membrane domains: the interplay of lipid– and protein–mediated interactions

2003 ◽  
Vol 358 (1433) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Harder
Keyword(s):  
Cell Membrane ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Membrane Lipids ◽  
Phase Behaviour ◽  
Coat Proteins ◽  
Membrane Domains ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Numerous Cell ◽  
Functional Membrane ◽  
And Function

Numerous cell membrane associated processes, including signal transduction, membrane sorting, protein processing and virus trafficking take place in membrane subdomains. Protein–protein interactions provide the frameworks necessary to generate biologically functional membrane domains. For example, coat proteins define membrane areas destined for sorting processes, viral proteins self–assemble to generate a budding virus, and adapter molecules organize multimolecular signalling assemblies, which catalyse downstream reactions. The concept of raft lipid–based membrane domains provides a different principle for compartmentalization and segregation of membrane constituents. Accordingly, rafts are defined by the physical properties of the lipid bilayer and function by selective partitioning of membrane lipids and proteins into membrane domains of specific phase behaviour and lipid packing. Here, I will discuss the interplay of these independent principles of protein scaffolds and raft lipid microdomains leading to the generation of biologically functional membrane domains.

scholarly journals Insights into the Role of Membrane Lipids in the Structure, Function and Regulation of Integral Membrane Proteins

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 9026
Author(s):  
Kenta Renard ◽  
Bernadette Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Membrane Lipids ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Highly Hydrophobic ◽  
Dynamics Simulations ◽  
And Function

Membrane proteins exist within the highly hydrophobic membranes surrounding cells and organelles, playing key roles in cellular function. It is becoming increasingly clear that the membrane does not just act as an appropriate environment for these proteins, but that the lipids that make up these membranes are essential for membrane protein structure and function. Recent technological advances in cryogenic electron microscopy and in advanced mass spectrometry methods, as well as the development of alternative membrane mimetic systems, have allowed experimental study of membrane protein–lipid complexes. These have been complemented by computational approaches, exploiting the ability of Molecular Dynamics simulations to allow exploration of membrane protein conformational changes in membranes with a defined lipid content. These studies have revealed the importance of lipids in stabilising the oligomeric forms of membrane proteins, mediating protein–protein interactions, maintaining a specific conformational state of a membrane protein and activity. Here we review some of the key recent advances in the field of membrane protein–lipid studies, with major emphasis on respiratory complexes, transporters, channels and G-protein coupled receptors.

scholarly journals The Hypervariable Region of K-Ras4B Governs Molecular Recognition and Function

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 5718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelkarim ◽  
Banerjee ◽  
Grudzien ◽  
Leschinsky ◽  
Abushaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Membrane Lipids ◽  
Hypervariable Region ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Gtpase Domain ◽  
Ras Gtpases ◽  
And Function

The flexible C-terminal hypervariable region distinguishes K-Ras4B, an important proto-oncogenic GTPase, from other Ras GTPases. This unique lysine-rich portion of the protein harbors sites for post-translational modification, including cysteine prenylation, carboxymethylation, phosphorylation, and likely many others. The functions of the hypervariable region are diverse, ranging from anchoring K-Ras4B at the plasma membrane to sampling potentially auto-inhibitory binding sites in its GTPase domain and participating in isoform-specific protein–protein interactions and signaling. Despite much research, there are still many questions about the hypervariable region of K-Ras4B. For example, mechanistic details of its interaction with plasma membrane lipids and with the GTPase domain require further clarification. The roles of the hypervariable region in K-Ras4B-specific protein–protein interactions and signaling are incompletely defined. It is also unclear why post-translational modifications frequently found in protein polylysine domains, such as acetylation, glycation, and carbamoylation, have not been observed in K-Ras4B. Expanding knowledge of the hypervariable region will likely drive the development of novel highly-efficient and selective inhibitors of K-Ras4B that are urgently needed by cancer patients.

scholarly journals Transactivation Functions of the N-Terminal Domains of Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Protein Folding and Coactivator Interactions

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj Kumar ◽  
E. Brad Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Hormone Receptor ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
And Function ◽  
Terminal Domains

Abstract The N-terminal domains (NTDs) of many members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) family contain potent transcription-activating functions (AFs). Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of the NTD AFs has lagged, compared with that concerning other important domains of the NHRs. In part, this is because the NTD AFs appear to be unfolded when expressed as recombinant proteins. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the structure and function of the NTD AFs. Recombinant NTD AFs can be made to fold by application of certain osmolytes or when expressed in conjunction with a DNA-binding domain by binding that DNA-binding domain to a DNA response element. The sequence of the DNA binding site may affect the functional state of the AFs domain. If properly folded, NTD AFs can bind certain cofactors and primary transcription factors. Through these, and/or by direct interactions, the NTD AFs may interact with the AF2 domain in the ligand binding, carboxy-terminal portion of the NHRs. We propose models for the folding of the NTD AFs and their protein-protein interactions.

scholarly journals Multi-Omics Analysis Identifying Key Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482097667
Author(s):  
Ju-Yueh Li ◽  
Chia-Jung Li ◽  
Li-Te Lin ◽  
Kuan-Hao Tsui
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Human Protein Atlas ◽  
Copy Number Changes ◽  
And Function ◽  
Cancer Tissues

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. Here, we aimed to study the expression and function of the CREB1 gene in ovarian cancer via the bioinformatic analyses of multiple databases. Previously, the prognosis of ovarian cancer was based on single-factor or single-gene studies. In this study, different bioinformatics tools (such as TCGA, GEPIA, UALCAN, MEXPRESS, and Metascape) have been used to assess the expression and prognostic value of the CREB1 gene. We used the Reactome and cBioPortal databases to identify and analyze CREB1 mutations, copy number changes, expression changes, and protein–protein interactions. By analyzing data on the CREB1 differential expression in ovarian cancer tissues and normal tissues from 12 studies collected from the “Human Protein Atlas” database, we found a significantly higher expression of CREB1 in normal ovarian tissues. Using this database, we collected information on the expression of 25 different CREB-related proteins, including TP53, AKT1, and AKT3. The enrichment of these factors depended on tumor metabolism, invasion, proliferation, and survival. Individualized tumors based on gene therapy related to prognosis have become a new possibility. In summary, we established a new type of prognostic gene profile for ovarian cancer using the tools of bioinformatics.

scholarly journals Properties of the phage-shock-protein (Psp) regulatory complex that govern signal transduction and induction of the Psp response in Escherichia coli

Microbiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 156 (10) ◽  
pp. 2920-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Jovanovic ◽  
Christoph Engl ◽  
Antony J. Mayhew ◽  
Patricia C. Burrows ◽  
Martin Buck
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Stress Conditions ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Complex ◽  
And Function

The phage-shock-protein (Psp) response maintains the proton-motive force (pmf) under extracytoplasmic stress conditions that impair the inner membrane (IM) in bacterial cells. In Escherichia coli transcription of the pspABCDE and pspG genes requires activation of σ 54-RNA polymerase by the enhancer-binding protein PspF. A regulatory network comprising PspF–A–C–B–ArcB controls psp expression. One key regulatory point is the negative control of PspF imposed by its binding to PspA. It has been proposed that under stress conditions, the IM-bound sensors PspB and PspC receive and transduce the signal(s) to PspA via protein–protein interactions, resulting in the release of the PspA–PspF inhibitory complex and the consequent induction of psp. In this work we demonstrate that PspB self-associates and interacts with PspC via putative IM regions. We present evidence suggesting that PspC has two topologies and that conserved residue G48 and the putative leucine zipper motif are determinants required for PspA interaction and signal transduction upon stress. We also establish that PspC directly interacts with the effector PspG, and show that PspG self-associates. These results are discussed in the context of formation and function of the Psp regulatory complex.

scholarly journals Distinct activities of Scrib module proteins organize epithelial polarity

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 11531-11540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Khoury ◽  
David Bilder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Epithelial Polarity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Mutual Antagonism ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Epithelial Structure ◽  
And Function

A polarized architecture is central to both epithelial structure and function. In many cells, polarity involves mutual antagonism between the Par complex and the Scribble (Scrib) module. While molecular mechanisms underlying Par-mediated apical determination are well-understood, how Scrib module proteins specify the basolateral domain remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate dependent and independent activities of Scrib, Discs-large (Dlg), and Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) using theDrosophilafollicle epithelium. Our data support a linear hierarchy for localization, but rule out previously proposed protein–protein interactions as essential for polarization. Cortical recruitment of Scrib does not require palmitoylation or polar phospholipid binding but instead an independent cortically stabilizing activity of Dlg. Scrib and Dlg do not directly antagonize atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), but may instead restrict aPKC localization by enabling the aPKC-inhibiting activity of Lgl. Importantly, while Scrib, Dlg, and Lgl are each required, all three together are not sufficient to antagonize the Par complex. Our data demonstrate previously unappreciated diversity of function within the Scrib module and begin to define the elusive molecular functions of Scrib and Dlg.

scholarly journals Expansion of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Increases the Range of Stability of Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. 4705
Author(s):  
Adiran Garaizar ◽  
Ignacio Sanchez-Burgos ◽  
Rosana Collepardo-Guevara ◽  
Jorge R. Espinosa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Conformational Dynamics ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Phase Behaviour ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are ubiquitous within biomolecular condensates, which are liquid-like compartments within cells formed through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS). The sequence of amino acids of a protein encodes its phase behaviour, not only by establishing the patterning and chemical nature (e.g., hydrophobic, polar, charged) of the various binding sites that facilitate multivalent interactions, but also by dictating the protein conformational dynamics. Besides behaving as random coils, IDRs can exhibit a wide-range of structural behaviours, including conformational switching, where they transition between alternate conformational ensembles. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations of a minimal coarse-grained model for IDRs, we show that the role of protein conformation has a non-trivial effect in the liquid–liquid phase behaviour of IDRs. When an IDR transitions to a conformational ensemble enriched in disordered extended states, LLPS is enhanced. In contrast, IDRs that switch to ensembles that preferentially sample more compact and structured states show inhibited LLPS. This occurs because extended and disordered protein conformations facilitate LLPS-stabilising multivalent protein–protein interactions by reducing steric hindrance; thereby, such conformations maximize the molecular connectivity of the condensed liquid network. Extended protein configurations promote phase separation regardless of whether LLPS is driven by homotypic and/or heterotypic protein–protein interactions. This study sheds light on the link between the dynamic conformational plasticity of IDRs and their liquid–liquid phase behaviour.

scholarly journals Structure and function of human Vps20 and Snf7 proteins

2004 ◽  
Vol 377 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy W. PECK ◽  
Emma T. BOWDEN ◽  
Peter D. BURBELO
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Osmotic Shock ◽  
Multivesicular Body ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Endosomal Membrane ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Vacuolar Protein ◽  
And Function

Snf7p (sucrose non-fermenting) and Vps20p (vacuolar protein-sorting) are small coil-coiled proteins involved in yeast MVB (multivesicular body) structure, formation and function. In the present study, we report the identification of three human homologues of yeast Snf7p, designated hSnf7-1, hSnf7-2 and hSnf7-3, and a single human Vps20p homologue, designated hVps20, that may have similar roles in humans. Immunofluorescence studies showed that hSnf7-1 and hSnf7-3 localized in large vesicular structures that also co-localized with late endosomal/lysosomal structures induced by overexpressing an ATPase-defective Vps4-A mutant. In contrast, overexpressed hVps20 showed a typical endosomal membrane-staining pattern, and co-expression of hVps20 with Snf7-1 dispersed the large Snf7-staining vesicles. Interestingly, overexpression of both hSnf7 and hVps20 proteins induced a post-endosomal defect in cholesterol sorting. To explore possible protein–protein interactions involving hSnf7 proteins, we used information from yeast genomic studies showing that yeast Snf7p can interact with proteins involved in MVB function. Using a glutathione S-transferase-capture approach with several mammalian homologues of such yeast Snf7p-interacting proteins, we found that all three hSnf7s interacted with mouse AIP1 [ALG-2 (apoptosis-linked gene 2) interacting protein 1], a mammalian Bro1p [BCK1 (bypass of C kinase)-like resistance to osmotic shock]-containing protein involved in cellular vacuolization and apoptosis. Whereas mapping experiments showed that the N-terminus of AIP1 containing both a Bro1 and an α-helical domain were required for interaction with hSnf7-1, Snf7-1 did not interact with another human Bro1-containing molecule, rhophilin-2. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the in vivo interaction of hSnf7-1 and AIP1. Additional immunofluorescence experiments showed that hSnf7-1 recruited cytosolic AIP1 to the Snf7-induced vacuolar-like structures. Together these results suggest that mammalian Vps20, AIP1 and Snf7 proteins, like their yeast counterparts, play roles in MVB function.

scholarly journals A proline-rich sequence unique to MEK1 and MEK2 is required for raf binding and regulates MEK function.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5214-5225 ◽  
Author(s):  
A D Catling ◽  
H J Schaeffer ◽  
C W Reuter ◽  
G R Reddy ◽  
M J Weber
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
And Function

Mammalian MEK1 and MEK2 contain a proline-rich (PR) sequence that is absent both from the yeast homologs Ste7 and Byr1 and from a recently cloned activator of the JNK/stress-activated protein kinases, SEK1/MKK4. Since this PR sequence occurs in MEKs that are regulated by Raf family enzymes but is missing from MEKs and SEKs activated independently of Raf, we sought to investigate the role of this sequence in MEK1 and MEK2 regulation and function. Deletion of the PR sequence from MEK1 blocked the ability of MEK1 to associate with members of the Raf family and markedly attenuated activation of the protein in vivo following growth factor stimulation. In addition, this sequence was necessary for efficient activation of MEK1 in vitro by B-Raf but dispensable for activation by a novel MEK1 activator which we have previously detected in fractionated fibroblast extracts. Furthermore, we found that a phosphorylation site within the PR sequence of MEK1 was required for sustained MEK1 activity in response to serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. Consistent with this observation, we observed that MEK2, which lacks a phosphorylation site at the corresponding position, was activated only transiently following serum stimulation. Finally, we found that deletion of the PR sequence from a constitutively activated MEK1 mutant rendered the protein nontransforming in Rat1 fibroblasts. These observations indicate a critical role for the PR sequence in directing specific protein-protein interactions important for the activation, inactivation, and downstream functioning of the MEKs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document