scholarly journals Comparison of surgical quality and long-term outcome between hybrid trans-anal total meso-rectal excision and laparoscopic total meso-rectal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingchi Yang ◽  
Huihui Wang ◽  
Kaixin Zhao ◽  
Xiangyu Chu ◽  
Kai Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Rectal Excision ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND Laparoscopy-assisted trans-anal TME (ta-TME), or hybrid ta-TME, inherited the advantages of both trans-anal surgery and trans-abdominal surgery, and is gaining increasing acceptance from colorectal surgeons worldwide. This research aims to make a comprehensive comparison between hybrid ta-TME surgery and traditional laparoscopic TME (la-TME) surgery regarding surgical quality and long-term survival. METHODS Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science and PubMed were searched for studies comparing hybrid ta-TME with traditional la-TME. Indicators for surgical quality and long-term prognosis were extracted and pooled. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 index and was significant when p<0.1 and I2>50%. Publication bias was estimated by Egger test, where p<0.1 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS 13 studies with 992 patients were included in meta-analysis, of which 467 were in hybrid ta-TME cohorts, and 525 were in traditional la-TME cohorts. Compared with traditional la-TME, hybrid ta-TME has lower rate of positive circumferential margin (RR=0.454, 95%CI 0.240~0.862, p=0.016) and lower conversion rate (RR=0.336, 95%CI 0.134~0.844, p=0.020). On rate of positive distal resection margin, completeness/near-completeness of meso-rectum, overall complications, anal leakage, ileus, urinary dysfunction, 2-year DFS and 2-year OS, there were no significant difference between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid ta-TME is significantly superior to traditional la-TME in ensuring CRM safety and lowering intra-operative conversion rate, and is meanwhile not inferior on other major outcome indicators concerning surgical quality and long-term survival. To further understand this new surgical technique, we need high-quality RCTs, as well as previous researchers updates with results of prolonged follow-up.

O193 ROLE OF MALNUTRITION IN 0ESOPHAGEAL SURGERY FOR CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Alfieri ◽  
M Nardi ◽  
V Moretto ◽  
E Pinto ◽  
M Briarava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Oesophagogastric Junction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim To investigate whether preoperative malnutrition is associated with long term outcome and survival in patients undergoing radical oesophagectomy for oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction cancer. Background & Methods Dysphagia, weight loss, chemo-radiationtherapy frequently lead to malnutrition in patients with oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction cancer. Severe malnutrition is associated with higher risk of postoperative complications but little is known on the correlation with long term survival. We conducted a single center retrospective study on a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing oesophagectomy from 2008 and 2012 in order to evaluate the impact of preoperative malnutrition with postoperative outcome and long term survival. Preoperative malnutrition was classified as: prealbumin level less than 220 mg/dL (PL), MUST index (Malnutrition Universal Screeening Tool) >2 and weight loss >10%. Results 177 consecutive patients were considered: due to incomplete data 60 were excluded from the analysis that was performed on 117 patients. PL was reported in 52 (44%) patients, MUST index was recorded in 62 (53%), 58 (49%) patients presented more than 10% weight loss at the preoperative evaluation. PL was associated with more postoperative Clavien-Dindo 1-2 complications (p=0.048, OR 2.35 95%IC 1.001-5.50), no differences were observed in mortality, anastomotic leak, major pulmonary complications. MUST index was not correlated with postoperative complications nor mortality but resulted worse in patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy (p=0.046, OR 1.92 95%CI 1.011-3.64). Weight loss >10% was not associated with postoperative complications or mortality. Overall 7 years survival rate was 69%. and DFS was 68%. Malnourished patients did not differ from non-malnourished regarding age, sex, tumor site, tumor stage and histology. No significant difference in 7 years survival rates was observed in patients with PL <220 mg/dL ( 55 % vs 67%), neither in patients with MUST score>2 (58% vs 72%), nor in patients with weight loss >10% (53% vs 70%). Conclusions Malnutrition is more common in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy and it is associated with postoperative complications. However, both long term and disease free survival are not affected by preoperative nutritional status. Larger patient population and data on long term postoperative nutritional status will be analyzed in further studies.

Diabetes mellitus and survival of esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zheng ◽  
Xingsheng Ma ◽  
Han-Yu Deng ◽  
Panpan Zha ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

SUMMARY Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities in esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy. It is well established that DM has an unfavorable impact on short-term outcomes of patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer; however, whether DM has any impact on long-term survival of these patients remains unclear. We performed the first meta-analysis to investigate the impact of DM on survival of surgically treated esophageal cancer patients. We searched the following databases systematically to retrieve relevant studies on January 2, 2019: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The main outcome data consisting of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and hazard ratios (HRs) of OS were extracted to compare survival between patients with and without DM. We finally included for meta-analysis a total of eight cohort studies involving 5,044 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy. We found no significant difference between 3-year (risk ratio [RR] = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.73–1.21; P = 0.65) and 5-year (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80–1.08; P = 0.31) OS rates between patients with and without DM after esophagectomy. Moreover, DM was not found to be an independent predictor of OS for these patients (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.65–1.84; P = 0.72). Our study suggests that DM appears to have no significant impact on long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy. To improve the prognosis of these patients, it may be more important to control glycemic level in patients with DM who undergo esophagectomy. However, further high-quality studies with appropriate adjustment for confounding factors are needed to verify this conclusion.

The Role of Vitamin D on the Prognosis and Incidence of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Qian ◽  
Dina Guo ◽  
Rongrong Fu ◽  
Shuping Qi ◽  
Xiaojun Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Vitamin D Intake

Abstract Background: The correlation between vitamin D intake and lung cancer development is controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the relationship between vitamin D and the prognosis and incidence of lung cancer. Methods: A comprehensive database search on Pubmed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library was carried out from the beginning to November 2020. Long-term survival and the incidence rate of patients with lung cancer were the primary outcomes of the study. Results: Ten eligible studies were selected for the meta-analysis following specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four included studies, covering 5007 patients, compared the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of lung cancer patients among total vitamin D users with non-users. Significantly, the estimated pooled hazard ratio (HR) revealed that vitamin D could improve OS and RFS of lung cancer patients [HR=0.83, 95% CI (0.72-0.95); HR=0.79, 95% CI (0.61-0.97), respectively]. Vitamin D intake was inversely associated with lung cancer incidence in six studies [OR=0.90, 95% CI (0.83-0.97)]. Conclusions: The present meta-analysis shows vitamin D not only improves the long-term survival of lung cancer patients but has a beneficial effect on the incidence of lung cancer. Notwithstanding, more studies are needed to confirm the study results.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Improving Long-Term Survival of Patients with Resectable Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinlong Li ◽  
Xiangyuan Li ◽  
Rongrong Fu ◽  
Derry Ng ◽  
Tong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Resectable Rectal Cancer ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Background: The impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term prognosis of patients with resectable rectal cancer is currently unknown. Objective: This study aimed to explore the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable rectal cancer following treatment with neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Four major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library) were searched to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2020. The main outcome indicators were the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The meta-analysis revealed that 5-year OS (HR: 0.88, 95% Cl: 0.83-0.93) and DFS (HR: 0.95, 95% Cl: 0.91-0.98) were higher in patients with resectable rectal cancer after receiving neoadjuvant therapy than those treated with upfront surgery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the long-term survival of patients in Asia and Europe could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) improved the 5-year OS and DFS of patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ rectal cancer and mid/low rectal cancer. Further research found that patients with stage Ⅱ only had an increase in OS, while patients with stage Ⅲ have improved 5-year OS and DFS. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy improved the long-term survival of patients with mid/low rectal cancer in stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ (especially stage Ⅲ). Additionally, patients in Asia and Europe seemed to be more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. For the treatment, we recommend neoadjuvant SCRT and neoadjuvant CRT for resectable rectal cancer.

scholarly journals The Impact of the Expression Level of Intratumoral Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase on Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Survival of Patients in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Zhang ◽  
Hongpeng Liu ◽  
Bin Ma ◽  
Yongxi Song ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Sensitivity ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Significant Difference

The potential impact that the intratumoral expression level of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) has on chemotherapy sensitivity and long-term survival for gastric cancer (GC) patients remains controversial; therefore, this study seeks to clarify this issue. Our meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software. In vitro drug sensitivity tests, correlation coefficients between sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and expression levels of intratumoral DPD were used as effective indexes to analyse. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used as endpoints for patient outcome, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were noted as measures of effect. There were 15 eligible studies including 1805 patients for the final analysis. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the expression level of intratumoral DPD activity, DPD mRNA levels, and sensitivity to 5-FU in GC patients, with high expression levels of intratumoral DPD resulting in low sensitivity to 5-FU. However, no matter what therapeutic regimens were used, there was no significant difference for patient outcomes between high and low DPD expression groups, either in OS or in PFS. In conclusion, high levels of intratumoral DPD expression have a negative impact on sensitivity to 5-FU in GC patients, but no prognostic value for long-term survival was uncovered.

scholarly journals The Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Gastric Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199743
Author(s):  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Liu Yang ◽  
Zheling Chen
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
And Control

Background: Treatment options for advanced gastric esophageal cancer are quite limited. Chemotherapy is unavoidable at certain stages, and research on targeted therapies has mostly failed. The advent of immunotherapy has brought hope for the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and the long-term survival of patients who were diagnosed as gastric esophageal cancer and received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Method: Studies on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy of advanced gastric esophageal cancer published before February 1, 2020 were searched online. The survival (e.g. 6-month overall survival, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORR)) and adverse effects of immunotherapy were compared to that of control therapy (physician’s choice of therapy). Results: After screening 185 studies, 4 comparative cohort studies which reported the long-term survival of patients receiving immunotherapy were included. Compared to control group, the 12-month survival (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.12, P < 0.0001) and 18-month survival (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39 to 2.81, P = 0.0001) were significantly longer in immunotherapy group. The 3-month survival rate (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.06, P = 0.92) and 18-month survival rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.98 to 2.12, P = 0.07) were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group. The ORR were not significantly different between immunotherapy group and control group (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.65 to 3.66, P = 0.01). Meta-analysis pointed out that in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 sub group population, the immunotherapy could obviously benefit the patients in tumor response rates (OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.89 to 7.61, P = 0.0002). Conclusion: For the treatment of advanced gastric esophageal cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy or palliative care.

scholarly journals Is It Definitely Clear That Long-Term Survival after Breast Cancer Surgery Is Not Affected by Anaesthetics?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3390
Author(s):  
Mats Enlund
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Retrospective studies indicate that cancer survival may be affected by the anaesthetic technique. Propofol seems to be a better choice than volatile anaesthetics, such as sevoflurane. The first two retrospective studies suggested better long-term survival with propofol, but not for breast cancer. Subsequent retrospective studies from Asia indicated the same. When data from seven Swedish hospitals were analysed, including 6305 breast cancer patients, different analyses gave different results, from a non-significant difference in survival to a remarkably large difference in favour of propofol, an illustration of the innate weakness in the retrospective design. The largest randomised clinical trial, registered on clinicaltrial.gov, with survival as an outcome is the Cancer and Anesthesia study. Patients are here randomised to propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion of patients with breast cancer was completed in autumn 2017. Delayed by the pandemic, one-year survival data for the cohort were presented in November 2020. Due to the extremely good short-term survival for breast cancer, one-year survival is of less interest for this disease. As the inclusions took almost five years, there was also a trend to observe. Unsurprisingly, no difference was found in one-year survival between the two groups, and the trend indicated no difference either.

scholarly journals Long-term outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sini Luoma ◽  
Raija Silvennoinen ◽  
Auvo Rauhala ◽  
Riitta Niittyvuopio ◽  
Eeva Martelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Relapse Group

AbstractThe role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in multiple myeloma is controversial. We analyzed the results of 205 patients transplanted in one center during 2000–2017. Transplantation was performed on 75 patients without a previous autologous SCT (upfront-allo), on 74 as tandem transplant (auto-allo), and on 56 patients after relapse. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 years for upfront-allo, 11.2 years for auto-allo, and 3.9 years for the relapse group (p = 0.015). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4, 2.4, and 0.9 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-relapse mortality at 5 years was 8% overall, with no significant difference between the groups. Post-relapse survival was 4.1 years for upfront-allo and auto-allo, and 2.6 years for the relapse group (p = 0.066). Survival of high-risk patients was reduced. In multivariate analysis, the auto-allo group had improved OS and chronic graft-versus-host disease was advantageous in terms of PFS, OS, and relapse incidence. Late relapses occurred in all groups. Allo-SCT resulted in long-term survival in a small subgroup of patients. Our results indicate that auto-allo-SCT is feasible and could be considered for younger patients in the upfront setting.

scholarly journals The Prospects of Secondary Moderate Mitral Regurgitation after Aortic Valve Replacement —Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 7335
Author(s):  
Ilija Bilbija ◽  
Milos Matkovic ◽  
Marko Cubrilo ◽  
Nemanja Aleksic ◽  
Jelena Milin Lazovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis represents one of the most frequent surgical procedures on heart valves. These patients often have concomitant mitral regurgitation. To reveal whether the moderate mitral regurgitation will improve after aortic valve replacement alone, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We identified 27 studies with 4452 patients that underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and had co-existent mitral regurgitation. Primary end point was the impact of aortic valve replacement on the concomitant mitral regurgitation. Secondary end points were the analysis of the left ventricle reverse remodeling and long-term survival. Our results showed that there was significant improvement in mitral regurgitation postoperatively (RR, 1.65; 95% CI 1.36–2.00; p < 0.00001) with the average decrease of 0.46 (WMD; 95% CI 0.35–0.57; p < 0.00001). The effect is more pronounced in the elderly population. Perioperative mortality was higher (p < 0.0001) and long-term survival significantly worse (p < 0.00001) in patients that had moderate/severe mitral regurgitation preoperatively. We conclude that after aortic valve replacement alone there are fair chances but for only slight improvement in concomitant mitral regurgitation. The secondary moderate mitral regurgitation should be addressed at the time of aortic valve replacement. A more conservative approach should be followed for elderly and high-risk patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document