scholarly journals NanoDam identifies novel temporal transcription factors conserved between the Drosophila central brain and visual system

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn L. Y. Tang ◽  
Anna Hakes ◽  
Robert Krautz ◽  
Takumi Suzuki ◽  
Esteban Contreras ◽  
...  

Temporal patterning of neural progenitors is an evolutionarily conserved strategy for generating neuronal diversity. Type II neural stem cells in the Drosophila central brain produce transit-amplifying intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) that exhibit temporal patterning. However, the known temporal factors cannot account for the neuronal diversity in the adult brain. To search for new temporal factors, we developed NanoDam, which enables rapid genome-wide profiling of endogenously-tagged proteins in vivo with a single genetic cross. Mapping the targets of known temporal transcription factors with NanoDam identified Homeobrain and Scarecrow (ARX and NKX2.1 orthologues) as novel temporal factors. We show that Homeobrain and Scarecrow define middle-aged and late INP temporal windows and play a role in cellular longevity. Strikingly, Homeobrain and Scarecrow have conserved functions as temporal factors in the developing visual system. NanoDam enables rapid cell type-specific genome-wide profiling with temporal resolution and can be easily adapted for use in higher organisms.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Averbukh ◽  
Sen-Lin Lai ◽  
Chris Q. Doe ◽  
Naama Barkai

AbstractBiological timers synchronize patterning processes during embryonic development. In the Drosophila embryo, neural progenitors (neuroblasts; NBs) produce a sequence of unique neurons whose identities depend on the sequential expression of temporal transcription factors (TTFs). The stereotypy and precision of the NB lineages indicate reproducible temporal progression of the TTF timer. To examine the basis of this robustness, we combine theory and experiments. The TTF timer is commonly described as a relay of activators, but its regulatory circuit is also consistent with a repressor-decay timer, in which expression of each TTF begins once its repressor is sufficiently reduced. We find that repressor-decay timers are more robust to parameter variations compared to activator-relay timers. This suggests that the in-vivo TTF sequence progresses primarily by repressor-decay, a prediction that we support experimentally. Our results emphasize the role of robustness in the evolutionary design of patterning circuits.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen T. Walsh ◽  
Chris Q. Doe

ABSTRACTDrosophila neuroblasts are an excellent model for investigating how neuronal diversity is generated. Most brain neuroblasts generate a series of ganglion mother cells (GMCs) that each make two neurons (type I lineage), but sixteen brain neuroblasts generate a series of intermediate neural progenitors (INPs) that each produce 4-6 GMCs and 8-12 neurons (type II lineage). Thus, type II lineages are similar to primate cortical lineages, and may serve as models for understanding cortical expansion. Yet the origin of type II neuroblasts remains mysterious: do they form in the embryo or larva? If they form in the embryo, do their progeny populate the adult central complex, as do the larval type II neuroblast progeny? Here we present molecular and clonal data showing that all type II neuroblasts form in the embryo, produce INPs, and express known temporal transcription factors. Embryonic type II neuroblasts and INPs undergo quiescence, and produce embryonic-born progeny that contribute to the adult central complex. Our results provide a foundation for investigating the development of the central complex, and tools for characterizing early-born neurons in central complex function.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Bordet ◽  
Niraj Lodhi ◽  
Danping Guo ◽  
Andrew Kossenkov ◽  
Alexei V. Tulin

AbstractPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is a nuclear enzyme involved in DNA repair and transcription regulation, among other processes. Malignant transformations, tumor progression, the onset of some neuropathies and other disorders have been linked to misregulation of PARP-1 activity. Despite intensive studies during the last few decades, the role of PARP-1 in transcription regulation is still not well understood. In this study, a transcriptomic analysis in Drosophila melanogaster third instar larvae was carried out. A total of 602 genes were identified, showing large-scale changes in their expression levels in the absence of PARP-1 in vivo. Among these genes, several functional gene groups were present, including transcription factors and cytochrome family members. The transcription levels of genes from the same functional group were affected by the absence of PARP-1 in a similar manner. In the absence of PARP-1, all misregulated genes coding for transcription factors were downregulated, whereas all genes coding for members of the cytochrome P450 family were upregulated. The cytochrome P450 proteins contain heme as a cofactor and are involved in oxidoreduction. Significant changes were also observed in the expression of several mobile elements in the absence of PARP-1, suggesting that PARP-1 may be involved in regulating the expression of mobile elements.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. SCI-21-SCI-21
Author(s):  
Steven Henikoff

Abstract The protein complexes that package our genomes must be mobilized for active processes to occur, including replication and transcription, but until recently we have only had a static, low resolution view of the "epigenome". Genomes are packaged into nucleosomes, octamers of four core histones wrapped by 147 base pairs of DNA. Nucleosomes present obstacles to transcription, which over genes is the RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) complex, and one current challenge is to understand what happens to a nucleosome when RNAPII transcribes through the DNA that it occupies. We study this process by developing methods for following nucleosomes as they are evicted and replaced. Among the factors that we have implicated in the process is torsional stress, which we can now measure genome-wide. RNAPII movement can unwrap nucleosomes and thus destabilize them, causing them to be occasionally evicted and replaced. Interestingly, we find that destabilization of nucleosomes during transcription is enhanced by anthracycline compounds, widely used chemotherapeutic drugs that intercalate between DNA base pairs, thus suggesting a new mechanism for cell killing during chemotherapy. We are also interested in what happens to RNAPII during its encounter with a nucleosomes. In vitro, RNAPII cannot transcribe completely through a nucleosome, but rather stalls as it tries to unwrap the DNA from around the core. We have been studying this process in vivo, and have developed a simple method for precisely mapping RNAPII genome-wide. We have used this method to show exactly where RNAPII stalls as it unwraps a nucleosome in vivo, surprisingly in a different place in vivo from where it stalls in vitro. We also have discovered that a variant histone, H2A.Z, which is found in essentially all eukaryotes, helps to reduce the nucleosome barrier to transcription, and in this way may modulate transcription. Other protein components of the epigenome involved in dynamic processes are nucleosome remodelers, which use the energy of ATP to slide or even evict nucleosomes from DNA. Some remodelers help RNAPII get started and others help it overcome the nucleosome barrier to transcription, and by mapping them at base-pair resolution, we can gain insight into how they act. We have also applied our high-resolution mapping tools to transcription factors, which bind DNA at specific sites to regulate transcription and other processes. Our ability to achieve high spatial and temporal resolution mapping of the binding and action of nucleosomes, transcription factors, remodelers and RNAPII provides us with a detailed picture of epigenome dynamics. By using these tools we are beginning to understand how DNA sequence and conformation are recognized for regulation of transcription and other epigenomic processes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orkun Akin ◽  
Bryce T. Bajar ◽  
Mehmet F. Keles ◽  
Mark A. Frye ◽  
S. Lawrence Zipursky

SummaryStereotyped synaptic connections define the neural circuits of the brain. In vertebrates, stimulus-independent activity contributes to neural circuit formation. It is unknown whether this type of activity is a general feature of nervous system development. Here, we report patterned, stimulus-independent neural activity in the Drosophila visual system during synaptogenesis. Using in vivo calcium, voltage, and glutamate imaging, we found that all neurons participate in this spontaneous activity, which is characterized by brain-wide periodic active and silent phases. Glia are active in a complementary pattern. Each of the 15 examined of the over 100 specific neuron types in the fly visual system exhibited a unique activity signature. The activity of neurons that are synaptic partners in the adult was highly correlated during development. We propose that this cell type-specific activity coordinates the development of the functional circuitry of the adult brain.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Mesrouze ◽  
Gustavo Aguilar ◽  
Fedir Bokhovchuk ◽  
Typhaine Martin ◽  
Clara Delaunay ◽  
...  

AbstractThe most downstream elements of the Hippo pathway, the TEAD transcription factors, are regulated by several cofactors, such as Vg/VGLL1-3. Earlier findings on human VGLL1 and here on human VGLL3 show that these proteins interact with TEAD via a conserved amino acid motif called the TONDU domain. Surprisingly, our studies reveal that the TEAD-binding domain of Drosophila Vg and of human VGLL2 is more complex and contains an additional structural element, an Ω-loop, that contributes to TEAD binding and in vivo function. To explain this unexpected structural difference between proteins from the same family, we propose that, after the genome-wide duplications at the origin of vertebrates, the Ω-loop present in an ancestral VGLL gene has been lost in some VGLL variants. These findings illustrate how structural and functional constraints can guide the evolution of transcriptional cofactors to preserve their ability to compete with other cofactors for binding to transcription factors.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Konstantinides ◽  
Anthony M. Rossi ◽  
Aristides Escobar ◽  
Liébaut Dudragne ◽  
Yen-Chung Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractThe brain consists of thousands of different neuronal types that are generated through multiple divisions of neuronal stem cells. These stem cells have the capacity to generate different neuronal types at different stages of their development. In Drosophila, this temporal patterning is driven by the successive expression of temporal transcription factors (tTFs). While a number of tTFs are known in different animals and across various parts of the nervous system, these have been mostly identified by informed guesses and antibody availability. We used single-cell mRNA sequencing to identify the complete series of tTFs that specify most Drosophila medulla neurons in the optic lobe. We tested the genetic interactions among these tTFs. While we verify the general principle that tTFs regulate the progression of the series by activating the next tTFs in the series and repressing the previous ones, we also identify more complex regulations. Two of the tTFs, Eyeless and Dichaete, act as hubs integrating the input of several upstream tTFs before allowing the series to progress and in turn regulating the expression of several downstream tTFs. Moreover, we show that tTFs not only specify neuronal identity by controlling the expression of cell type-specific genes. Finally, we describe the very first steps of neuronal differentiation and find that terminal differentiation genes, such as neurotransmitter-related genes, are present as transcripts, but not as proteins, in immature larval neurons days before they are being used in functioning neurons; we show that these mechanisms are conserved in humans. Our results offer a comprehensive description of a temporal series of tTFs in a neuronal system, offering mechanistic insights into the regulation of the progression of the series and the regulation of neuronal diversity. This represents a proof-of-principle for the use of single-cell mRNA sequencing for the comparison of temporal patterning across phyla that can lead to an understanding of how the human brain develops and how it has evolved.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 2138-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Tachibana ◽  
Jane Y. Yoo ◽  
Jean-Basco Tagne ◽  
Nataly Kacherovsky ◽  
Tong I. Lee ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, glucose depletion causes a profound alteration in metabolism, mediated in part by global transcriptional changes. Many of the transcription factors that regulate these changes act combinatorially. We have analyzed combinatorial regulation by Adr1 and Cat8, two transcription factors that act during glucose depletion, by combining genome-wide expression and genome-wide binding data. We identified 32 genes that are directly activated by Adr1, 28 genes that are directly activated by Cat8, and 14 genes that are directly regulated by both. Our analysis also uncovered promoters that Adr1 binds but does not regulate and promoters that are indirectly regulated by Cat8, stressing the advantage of combining global expression and global localization analysis to find directly regulated targets. At most of the coregulated promoters, the in vivo binding of one factor is independent of the other, but Adr1 is required for optimal Cat8 binding at two promoters with a poor match to the Cat8 binding consensus. In addition, Cat8 is required for Adr1 binding at promoters where Adr1 is not required for transcription. These data provide a comprehensive analysis of the direct, indirect, and combinatorial requirements for these two global transcription factors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 456-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Boyle ◽  
L. Song ◽  
B.-K. Lee ◽  
D. London ◽  
D. Keefe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document