scholarly journals A Capped Tudor Domain within a Core Subunit of the Sin3L/Rpd3L Histone Deacetylase Complex Binds Nucleic Acids

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Dale Marcum ◽  
Joseph Hsieh ◽  
Maksim Giljen ◽  
Yongbo Zhang ◽  
Ishwar Radhakrishnan
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Tudor Domain ◽  
Unknown Structure ◽  
Sites Of Action ◽  
And Function

Chromatin-modifying complexes containing histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities play critical roles in the regulation of gene transcription in eukaryotes. These complexes are thought to lack intrinsic DNA-binding activity, but according to a well-established paradigm, they are recruited via protein-protein interactions by gene-specific transcription factors and post-translational histone modifications to their sites of action on the genome. The mammalian Sin3L/Rpd3L complex, comprising more than a dozen different polypeptides, is an ancient HDAC complex found in diverse eukaryotes. The subunits of this complex harbor conserved domains and motifs of unknown structure and function. Here we show that Sds3, a constitutively associated subunit critical for the proper functioning of the complex, harbors a type of Tudor domain that we designate the capped Tudor domain (CTD). Unlike canonical Tudor domains that bind modified histones, the Sds3 CTD binds to nucleic acids that can form higher-order structures such as G-quadruplexes, and shares similarities with the knotted Tudor domain of the Esa1 histone acetyltransferase (HAT) that was previously shown to bind single-stranded RNA. Our findings expand the range of macromolecules capable of recruiting the Sin3L/Rpd3L complex and draws attention to potentially new roles for this HDAC complex in transcription biology.

Synergistic activation of transcription is mediated by the N-terminal domain of Drosophila fushi tarazu homeoprotein and can occur without DNA binding by the protein

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1599-1609
Author(s):  
J Ananthan ◽  
R Baler ◽  
D Morrissey ◽  
J Zuo ◽  
Y Lan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Fushi Tarazu ◽  
Combinatorial Regulation ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Culture Cells ◽  
Synergistic Activation ◽  
Activation Of Transcription

Synergistic activation of transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes in tissue culture cells provides a model with which to study combinatorial regulation. We examined the synergistic activation of an engrailed-derived promoter by the pair-rule proteins paired (PRD) and fushi tarazu (FTZ). Synergistic activation by PRD requires regions of the homeodomain or adjacent sequences, and that by FTZ requires the first 171 residues. Surprisingly, deletion of the FTZ homeodomain does not reduce the capacity of the protein for synergistic activation, although this mutation abolishes any detectable DNA-binding activity. This finding suggests that FTZ can function through protein-protein interactions with PRD or other components of the homeoprotein transcription complex, adding a new layer of mechanisms that could underlie the functional specificities and combinatorial regulation of homeoproteins.

scholarly journals Synergistic activation of transcription is mediated by the N-terminal domain of Drosophila fushi tarazu homeoprotein and can occur without DNA binding by the protein.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1599-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ananthan ◽  
R Baler ◽  
D Morrissey ◽  
J Zuo ◽  
Y Lan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Fushi Tarazu ◽  
Combinatorial Regulation ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Culture Cells ◽  
Synergistic Activation ◽  
Activation Of Transcription

Synergistic activation of transcription by Drosophila segmentation genes in tissue culture cells provides a model with which to study combinatorial regulation. We examined the synergistic activation of an engrailed-derived promoter by the pair-rule proteins paired (PRD) and fushi tarazu (FTZ). Synergistic activation by PRD requires regions of the homeodomain or adjacent sequences, and that by FTZ requires the first 171 residues. Surprisingly, deletion of the FTZ homeodomain does not reduce the capacity of the protein for synergistic activation, although this mutation abolishes any detectable DNA-binding activity. This finding suggests that FTZ can function through protein-protein interactions with PRD or other components of the homeoprotein transcription complex, adding a new layer of mechanisms that could underlie the functional specificities and combinatorial regulation of homeoproteins.

scholarly journals Dissection of Functional Modules of AT-HOOK MOTIF NUCLEAR LOCALIZED PROTEIN 4 in the Development of the Root Xylem

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minji Seo ◽  
Ji-Young Lee
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Root Apical Meristem ◽  
Xylem Differentiation ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Xylem Development ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Plant Hormone Signaling

Xylem development in the Arabidopsis root apical meristem requires a complex cross talk between plant hormone signaling and transcriptional factors (TFs). The key processes involve fine-tuning between neighboring cells, mediated via the intercellular movement of signaling molecules. As an example, we previously reported that AT-HOOK MOTIF NUCLEAR LOCALIZED PROTEIN (AHL) 4 (AHL4), a member of the 29 AT-hook family TFs in Arabidopsis, moves into xylem precursors from their neighbors to determine xylem differentiation. As part of the effort to understand the molecular functions of AHL4, we performed domain swapping analyses using AHL1 as a counterpart, finding that AHL4 has three functionally distinctive protein modules. The plant and prokaryotes conserved (PPC) domain of AHL4 acts as a mediator of protein–protein interactions with AHL members. The N-terminus of AHL4 is required for the regulation of xylem development likely via its unique DNA-binding activity. The C-terminus of AHL4 confers intercellular mobility. Our characterization of modules in the AHL4 protein will augment our understanding of the complexity of regulation and the evolution of intercellular mobility in AHL4 and its relatives.

scholarly journals Transactivation Functions of the N-Terminal Domains of Nuclear Hormone Receptors: Protein Folding and Coactivator Interactions

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj Kumar ◽  
E. Brad Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Hormone Receptor ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
And Function ◽  
Terminal Domains

Abstract The N-terminal domains (NTDs) of many members of the nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) family contain potent transcription-activating functions (AFs). Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of the NTD AFs has lagged, compared with that concerning other important domains of the NHRs. In part, this is because the NTD AFs appear to be unfolded when expressed as recombinant proteins. Recent studies have begun to shed light on the structure and function of the NTD AFs. Recombinant NTD AFs can be made to fold by application of certain osmolytes or when expressed in conjunction with a DNA-binding domain by binding that DNA-binding domain to a DNA response element. The sequence of the DNA binding site may affect the functional state of the AFs domain. If properly folded, NTD AFs can bind certain cofactors and primary transcription factors. Through these, and/or by direct interactions, the NTD AFs may interact with the AF2 domain in the ligand binding, carboxy-terminal portion of the NHRs. We propose models for the folding of the NTD AFs and their protein-protein interactions.

scholarly journals Multi-Omics Analysis Identifying Key Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482097667
Author(s):  
Ju-Yueh Li ◽  
Chia-Jung Li ◽  
Li-Te Lin ◽  
Kuan-Hao Tsui
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Human Protein Atlas ◽  
Copy Number Changes ◽  
And Function ◽  
Cancer Tissues

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors. Here, we aimed to study the expression and function of the CREB1 gene in ovarian cancer via the bioinformatic analyses of multiple databases. Previously, the prognosis of ovarian cancer was based on single-factor or single-gene studies. In this study, different bioinformatics tools (such as TCGA, GEPIA, UALCAN, MEXPRESS, and Metascape) have been used to assess the expression and prognostic value of the CREB1 gene. We used the Reactome and cBioPortal databases to identify and analyze CREB1 mutations, copy number changes, expression changes, and protein–protein interactions. By analyzing data on the CREB1 differential expression in ovarian cancer tissues and normal tissues from 12 studies collected from the “Human Protein Atlas” database, we found a significantly higher expression of CREB1 in normal ovarian tissues. Using this database, we collected information on the expression of 25 different CREB-related proteins, including TP53, AKT1, and AKT3. The enrichment of these factors depended on tumor metabolism, invasion, proliferation, and survival. Individualized tumors based on gene therapy related to prognosis have become a new possibility. In summary, we established a new type of prognostic gene profile for ovarian cancer using the tools of bioinformatics.

scholarly journals Properties of the phage-shock-protein (Psp) regulatory complex that govern signal transduction and induction of the Psp response in Escherichia coli

Microbiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 156 (10) ◽  
pp. 2920-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Jovanovic ◽  
Christoph Engl ◽  
Antony J. Mayhew ◽  
Patricia C. Burrows ◽  
Martin Buck
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Stress Conditions ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Complex ◽  
And Function

The phage-shock-protein (Psp) response maintains the proton-motive force (pmf) under extracytoplasmic stress conditions that impair the inner membrane (IM) in bacterial cells. In Escherichia coli transcription of the pspABCDE and pspG genes requires activation of σ 54-RNA polymerase by the enhancer-binding protein PspF. A regulatory network comprising PspF–A–C–B–ArcB controls psp expression. One key regulatory point is the negative control of PspF imposed by its binding to PspA. It has been proposed that under stress conditions, the IM-bound sensors PspB and PspC receive and transduce the signal(s) to PspA via protein–protein interactions, resulting in the release of the PspA–PspF inhibitory complex and the consequent induction of psp. In this work we demonstrate that PspB self-associates and interacts with PspC via putative IM regions. We present evidence suggesting that PspC has two topologies and that conserved residue G48 and the putative leucine zipper motif are determinants required for PspA interaction and signal transduction upon stress. We also establish that PspC directly interacts with the effector PspG, and show that PspG self-associates. These results are discussed in the context of formation and function of the Psp regulatory complex.

scholarly journals Distinct activities of Scrib module proteins organize epithelial polarity

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 11531-11540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Khoury ◽  
David Bilder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Epithelial Polarity ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Mutual Antagonism ◽  
Discs Large ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Epithelial Structure ◽  
And Function

A polarized architecture is central to both epithelial structure and function. In many cells, polarity involves mutual antagonism between the Par complex and the Scribble (Scrib) module. While molecular mechanisms underlying Par-mediated apical determination are well-understood, how Scrib module proteins specify the basolateral domain remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate dependent and independent activities of Scrib, Discs-large (Dlg), and Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) using theDrosophilafollicle epithelium. Our data support a linear hierarchy for localization, but rule out previously proposed protein–protein interactions as essential for polarization. Cortical recruitment of Scrib does not require palmitoylation or polar phospholipid binding but instead an independent cortically stabilizing activity of Dlg. Scrib and Dlg do not directly antagonize atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), but may instead restrict aPKC localization by enabling the aPKC-inhibiting activity of Lgl. Importantly, while Scrib, Dlg, and Lgl are each required, all three together are not sufficient to antagonize the Par complex. Our data demonstrate previously unappreciated diversity of function within the Scrib module and begin to define the elusive molecular functions of Scrib and Dlg.

scholarly journals Regulation of Transcription Factors and Repression of Sp1 by Prolactin Signaling Through the Short Isoform of Its Cognate Receptor

Endocrinology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (7) ◽  
pp. 3327-3335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Sangeeta Devi ◽  
Aurora Shehu ◽  
Carlos Stocco ◽  
Julia Halperin ◽  
Jamie Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
In Vivo Model ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Signaling Mechanism ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
And Function

Prolactin (PRL) affects the development and function of the reproductive system by binding to two types of receptors, which differ by the size of their intracellular domain in rodents. Whereas the signaling pathway through the long form of the receptor (PRL-RL) is well characterized, signaling through the short form (PRL-RS) remains obscure. In this investigation, we examined transcription factors regulated by PRL in the ovary and decidua of mice expressing only PRL-RS in a PRL receptor null background. These mice provide a powerful in vivo model to study the selective signaling mechanism of PRL through PRL-RS independent of PRL-RL. We also examined the regulation of transcription factors in ovarian and uterine cell lines stably transfected with PRL-RS or PRL-RL. We focused our investigation on transcription factors similarly regulated in both these tissues and clearly established that signaling through PRL-RS does not activate the JaK/Stat in vivo but leads to severe down-regulation of Sp1 expression, DNA binding activity, and nuclear localization, events that appear to involve the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase pathway. Our in vivo and in culture data demonstrate that the PRL-RS activates a signaling pathway distinct from that of the PRL-RL.

scholarly journals Structure and function of human Vps20 and Snf7 proteins

2004 ◽  
Vol 377 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy W. PECK ◽  
Emma T. BOWDEN ◽  
Peter D. BURBELO
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Osmotic Shock ◽  
Multivesicular Body ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Endosomal Membrane ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Vacuolar Protein ◽  
And Function

Snf7p (sucrose non-fermenting) and Vps20p (vacuolar protein-sorting) are small coil-coiled proteins involved in yeast MVB (multivesicular body) structure, formation and function. In the present study, we report the identification of three human homologues of yeast Snf7p, designated hSnf7-1, hSnf7-2 and hSnf7-3, and a single human Vps20p homologue, designated hVps20, that may have similar roles in humans. Immunofluorescence studies showed that hSnf7-1 and hSnf7-3 localized in large vesicular structures that also co-localized with late endosomal/lysosomal structures induced by overexpressing an ATPase-defective Vps4-A mutant. In contrast, overexpressed hVps20 showed a typical endosomal membrane-staining pattern, and co-expression of hVps20 with Snf7-1 dispersed the large Snf7-staining vesicles. Interestingly, overexpression of both hSnf7 and hVps20 proteins induced a post-endosomal defect in cholesterol sorting. To explore possible protein–protein interactions involving hSnf7 proteins, we used information from yeast genomic studies showing that yeast Snf7p can interact with proteins involved in MVB function. Using a glutathione S-transferase-capture approach with several mammalian homologues of such yeast Snf7p-interacting proteins, we found that all three hSnf7s interacted with mouse AIP1 [ALG-2 (apoptosis-linked gene 2) interacting protein 1], a mammalian Bro1p [BCK1 (bypass of C kinase)-like resistance to osmotic shock]-containing protein involved in cellular vacuolization and apoptosis. Whereas mapping experiments showed that the N-terminus of AIP1 containing both a Bro1 and an α-helical domain were required for interaction with hSnf7-1, Snf7-1 did not interact with another human Bro1-containing molecule, rhophilin-2. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the in vivo interaction of hSnf7-1 and AIP1. Additional immunofluorescence experiments showed that hSnf7-1 recruited cytosolic AIP1 to the Snf7-induced vacuolar-like structures. Together these results suggest that mammalian Vps20, AIP1 and Snf7 proteins, like their yeast counterparts, play roles in MVB function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document