scholarly journals Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Z. Watling ◽  
Julie A. Schmidt ◽  
Yashvee Dunneram ◽  
Tammy Y. N. Tong ◽  
Rebecca K. Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Prospective Analysis ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Background: Following a vegetarian diet has become increasingly popular and some evidence suggests that being vegetarian may be associated with a lower risk of cancer overall. However, for specific cancer sites, the evidence is limited. Aim: To assess the associations of vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets with risks of all cancer, colorectal cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, and prostate cancer, and to explore the role of potential mediators between these associations. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of 472,377 UK Biobank participants who were free from cancer at recruitment. Participants were categorised into regular meat-eaters (n=247,571), low meat-eaters (n=205,385), fish-eaters (n=10,696), and vegetarians (n=8,685) based on dietary questions completed at recruitment. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all cancer incidence and separate cancer sites across diet groups. Results: After an average follow-up of 11.4 years, 54,961 incident cancers were identified, including 5,882 colorectal, 7,537 postmenopausal breast, 9,501 prostate cancer cases. Compared with regular meat-eaters, being a low meat-eater, fish-eater, or vegetarian were all associated with a lower risk of all cancer (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00; 0.90, 0.84-0.96; 0.86, 0.80-0.93, respectively). Being a low meat-eater was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer in comparison to regular meat-eaters (0.91, 0.86-0.96); there was heterogeneity in this association by sex (p=0.007), with an inverse association across diet groups in men, but not in women. Vegetarian postmenopausal women had a lower risk of breast cancer (0.82, 0.68-0.99), which was attenuated and non-significant after adjusting for body mass index (BMI; 0.87, 0.72-1.05); in mediation analyses, BMI was found to possibly mediate the observed association. In men, being a fish-eater or a vegetarian was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (0.80, 0.65-0.99 and 0.69, 0.54-0.89, respectively). Conclusion: Low and non-meat-eaters had a lower risk of being diagnosed with cancer in comparison to regular meat-eaters. We also found that low meat-eaters had a lower risk of colorectal cancer, vegetarian women had a lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, and vegetarians and fish-eaters had a lower risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. The lower risk of colorectal cancer in low meat-eaters is consistent with previous evidence suggesting an adverse impact of meat intake. The lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in vegetarian women may be explained by their lower BMI. It is not clear whether the other differences observed, for all cancers and for prostate cancer, reflect any causal relationships or are or due to other factors such as residual confounding or differences in cancer detection.

scholarly journals The Association of Nighttime Fasting Duration and Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the Multicase-Control (MCC) Study in Spain

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2662
Author(s):  
Anna Palomar-Cros ◽  
Ana Espinosa ◽  
Kurt Straif ◽  
Beatriz Pérez-Gómez ◽  
Kyriaki Papantoniou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Night Shift ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Meal Timing ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
Fasting Duration ◽  
Population Controls ◽  
Reduced Risk

Nighttime fasting has been inconclusively associated with a reduced risk of cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate this association in relation to prostate cancer risk. We examined data from 607 prostate cancer cases and 848 population controls who had never worked in night shift work from the Spanish multicase-control (MCC) study, 2008–2013. Through an interview, we collected circadian information on meal timing at mid-age. We estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with unconditional logistic regression. After controlling for time of breakfast, fasting for more than 11 h overnight (the median duration among controls) was associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer compared to those fasting for 11 h or less (OR = 0.77, 95% 0.54–1.07). Combining a long nighttime fasting and an early breakfast was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer compared to a short nighttime fasting and a late breakfast (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.27–1.04). This study suggests that a prolonged nighttime fasting duration and an early breakfast may be associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer. Findings should be interpreted cautiously and add to growing evidence on the importance of chrononutrition in relation to cancer risk.

scholarly journals Hematologic Markers and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Prospective Analysis in UK Biobank

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1615-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor L. Watts ◽  
Aurora Perez-Cornago ◽  
Jaimal Kothari ◽  
Naomi E. Allen ◽  
Ruth C. Travis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Analysis ◽  
Uk Biobank

scholarly journals Neither Hormonal Factors Nor AGEs Explain Lower Prostate Cancer Risk in Older Men With Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 6017-6024
Author(s):  
Yi X Chan ◽  
Helman Alfonso ◽  
P Gerry Fegan ◽  
Leon Flicker ◽  
Bu B Yeap
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Sex Hormone ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Metabolic Disturbances ◽  
Hormonal Factors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Context Diabetes mellitus is conventionally associated with an increased risk of cancer; however, inverse associations of diabetes with prostate cancer are well described. Mechanisms are unclear, although hormonal factors, including alterations in sex hormone and IGF1 concentrations due to metabolic disturbances, have been hypothesized to play a role. Objective To assess sex hormones, IGF1, glucose, and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) as potential mediators of the association between diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer. Design and Participants Longitudinal cohort study. The association of baseline diabetes with prostate cancer incidence was assessed using proportional hazards competing risks analysis in 3149 men followed for 12 years. Baseline hormone, glucose, and carboxymethyllysine (CML) levels were examined as potential mediators of this association. Results Diabetes was associated with a lower prostate cancer risk (fully adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.92; P = 0.017). This association was unchanged after accounting for testosterone, DHT, estradiol, or SHBG. Similarly, the addition of IGF1 or its binding proteins 1 and 3, or glucose, did not alter this association. CML was not associated with the risk of prostate cancer, and additional correction for CML in the fully adjusted model did not alter the inverse association of diabetes and prostate cancer risk. Conclusions In this study, alterations in sex hormone, IGF1, glucose, and CML levels did not account for the inverse association of diabetes and prostate cancer risk. Further studies are required to provide more insight into underlying causes of this association.

Meta-analysis of cancer risk among users of insulin glargine.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1510-1510
Author(s):  
Alice Koechlin ◽  
Mathieu Boniol ◽  
Chris Robertson ◽  
Geremia Bolli ◽  
Julio Rosenstock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Short Exposure ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

1510 Background: The association between diabetes, its risk factors and treatments, and cancer risk and death is now high on the clinical and research agenda. Methods: All data regarding cancer risk and use of insulin glargine has been assembled and meta-analyses performed using state-of-the-art statistical methodology. Glargine is the most studied insulin in this regard. A random effects model was employed with tests for heterogeneity (I2) and publication bias. These meta-analyses are based on reports from epidemiological studies involving a total of 907,008 diabetic subjects and 2,597,602 person-years of observation. Results: Based on independent estimates from 14 studies, the Summary Relative Risk (SRR) for all forms of cancer was (SRR=0.90, 95% CI (0.82, 0.98)) and for breast cancer SRR=1.14 (95% CI (1.00, 1.29)). For new users of glargine, from 7 studies, the SRR for breast cancer was SRR=1.20 (95% CI (0.90, 1.58)). Based on independent estimates for 9 studies, for colorectal cancer the SRR was 0.73 (95% CI (0.59, 0.91)) and for prostate cancer SRR=1.16 (95% CI (1.03, 1.30)). Overall, the risk of developing cancer among users of insulin glargine is reduced compared to the risk of users of other insulins. Similarly, the risk of colorectal cancer is reduced among users of glargine. While above unity, the risks of breast cancer and prostate cancer are increased marginally. Potential limitations to this meta-analysis include that the comparison group was not the same in all studies but this could also be seen as a strength. This is not likely to invalidate the findings of this analysis nor would the fact that different adjustments were made in the individual studies. Conclusions: The current evidence gives no support to the hypothesis that insulin glargine is associated with an increased risk of cancer as compared to other insulins and should give reassurance to physicians and their patients. Given the short exposure time possible to glargine (less than 5 years maximum), it is not biologically plausible to have a causal link to common forms of cancer.

scholarly journals A 25-Year Prospective Study of Plasma Adiponectin and Leptin Concentrations and Prostate Cancer Risk and Survival

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haojie Li ◽  
Meir J Stampfer ◽  
Lorelei Mucci ◽  
Nader Rifai ◽  
Weiliang Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
High Grade

Abstract Background: Adipocytokines may mediate the association between adiposity and lethal prostate cancer outcomes. Methods: In the Physicians’ Health Study, we prospectively examined the association of prediagnostic plasma concentrations of adiponectin and leptin with risk of developing incident prostate cancer (654 cases diagnosed 1982–2000 and 644 age-matched controls) and, among cases, risk of dying from prostate cancer by 2007. Results: Adiponectin concentrations were not associated with risk of overall prostate cancer. However, men with higher adiponectin concentrations had lower risk of developing high-grade or lethal cancer (metastatic or fatal disease). The relative risk (95% CI) comparing the highest quintile to the lowest (Q5 vs Q1) was 0.25 (95% CI 0.07–0.87; Ptrend = 0.02) for lethal cancer. Among all the cases, higher adiponectin concentrations predicted lower prostate cancer–specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR)Q5 vs Q1= 0.39; 95% CI 0.17–0.85; Ptrend = 0.02], independent of body mass index (BMI), plasma C-peptide (a marker of insulin secretion), leptin, clinical stage, and tumor grade. This inverse association was apparent mainly among men with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (HRQ5 vs Q1= 0.10; 95% CI 0.01–0.78; Ptrend = 0.02), but not among men of normal weight (Ptrend = 0.51). Although the correlation of leptin concentrations with BMI (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) was stronger than that of adiponectin (r = −0.17, P < 0.001), leptin was unrelated to prostate cancer risk or mortality. Conclusions: Higher prediagnostic adiponectin (but not leptin) concentrations predispose men to a lower risk of developing high-grade prostate cancer and a lower risk of subsequently dying from the cancer, suggesting a mechanistic link between obesity and poor prostate cancer outcome.

scholarly journals Risk of 16 cancers across the full glycemic spectrum: a population-based cohort study using the UK Biobank

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001600
Author(s):  
Christopher T Rentsch ◽  
Ruth E Farmer ◽  
Sophie V Eastwood ◽  
Rohini Mathur ◽  
Victoria Garfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
The Uk

IntroductionDiabetes is observed to increase cancer risk, leading to hypothesized direct effects of either hyperglycemia or medication. We investigated associations between glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) across the whole glycemic spectrum and incidence of 16 cancers in a population sample with comprehensive adjustment for risk factors and medication.Research design and methodsLinked data from the UK Biobank and UK cancer registry for all individuals with baseline HbA1c and no history of cancer at enrollment were used. Incident cancer was based on International Classification of Diseases – 10th Edition diagnostic codes. Age-standardized incidence rates were estimated by HbA1c category. Associations between HbA1c, modeled as a restricted cubic spline, and cancer risk were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsAmong 378 253 individuals with average follow-up of 7.1 years, 21 172 incident cancers occurred. While incidence for many of the 16 cancers was associated with hyperglycemia in crude analyses, these associations disappeared after multivariable adjustment, except for pancreatic cancer (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.98 for 55 vs 35 mmol/mol), and a novel finding of an inverse association between HbA1c and premenopausal breast cancer (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.60 for 25 vs 35 mmol/mol; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.94 for 45 vs 35 mmol/mol), not observed for postmenopausal breast cancer. Adjustment for diabetes medications had no appreciable impact on HRs for cancer.ConclusionsApart from pancreatic cancer, we did not demonstrate any independent positive association between HbA1c and cancer risk. These findings suggest that the potential for a cancer-inducing, direct effect of hyperglycemia may be misplaced.

Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening rates are lower than for breast cancer even in individuals at high risk of cancer

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A741-A741
Author(s):  
P ANG ◽  
D SCHRAG ◽  
K SCHNEIDER ◽  
K SHANNON ◽  
J JOHNSON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Knowledge ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

TGFBR1 Polymorphism and Risk of Breast Cancer in Iranian Women

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elahe Kamali ◽  
Simin Hemmati ◽  
Forouzan Safari ◽  
Manoochehr Tavassoli
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Beta ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Iranian Women ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between transforming growth factor beta receptor type 1 ( TGFBR1) polymorphisms and the risk of cancer; however, the results remain inconclusive and controversial. To determine the association between breast cancer risk and the *6A polymorphism of the TGFBR1 gene, a case-control study of 280 breast cancer patients and 280 controls was performed in Iranian women. Our study demonstrates that women who carry the TGFBR1*6A allele are at lower risk of developing breast cancer. The highest protection against breast cancer was observed in 6A/6A homozygotes (OR = 0.32, p = 0.04). A lower frequency of the TGFBR1*6A allele in breast cancer patients may be an important genetic determinant that contributes to a lower risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. The results also showed that the allelic length of TGFBR1 polymorphisms had no significant association with the age at onset or the grade of disease, nor with the expression of progesterone and estrogen receptors and HER2.

scholarly journals Lack of Association between Common Polymorphisms in Selenoprotein P Gene and Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer, Breast Cancer, and Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hanjiang Xu ◽  
Fan Mo ◽  
Jun Zhou ◽  
Zongyao Hao ◽  
Xianguo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Selenoprotein P ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Cancer Breast ◽  
P Gene ◽  
Breast And Prostate Cancer

Background and Objective. Selenoprotein P (SEPP1) is the major selenoprotein in plasma. Previous studies have demonstrated that SEPP1 expression was reduced in human prostate and colon tumors. Nowadays, studies concerning SEPP1 gene polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility have been extensively investigated, whereas results from these studies remain debatable rather than conclusive. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the association between two common polymorphisms (rs3877899 and rs7579) in SEPP1 and cancer susceptibility. Method. We search the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Wanfang (China) databases (up to December 1, 2020) to identify all eligible publications. The pooled odds ratio (OR) correspondence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the associations. Results. Finally, nine eligible studies with 7,157 cases and 6,440 controls and five studies with 2,278 cases and 2,821 controls were enrolled in rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms, individually. However, a null significant association was detected between the two polymorphisms in SEPP1 and susceptibility to colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer in all comparison models. Subsequently, subgroup analysis based on tumor type, no significant association was identified for prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer. In addition, when the stratification analyses were conducted by the source of control, HWE status, and ethnicity, yet no significant association was found. Conclusions. The current meta-analysis shows that SEPP1 rs3877899 and rs7579 polymorphisms may not be associated with susceptibility to colon cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, and further well-designed studies with a larger sample size are warranted to validate our findings.

Prostate cancer risk calculators for healthy population: A systematic review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Bandala-Jacques ◽  
Kevin Daniel Castellanos Esquivel ◽  
Fernanda Pérez-Hurtado ◽  
Cristobal Hernández-Silva ◽  
Nancy Reynoso-Noverón
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Screening for prostate cancer has long been a debated, complex topic. The use of risk calculators for prostate cancer is recommended for determining patients’ individual risk of cancer and the subsequent need for a prostate biopsy. These tools could lead to a better discrimination of patients in need of invasive diagnostic procedures and for optimized allocation of healthcare resources OBJECTIVE To systematically review available literature on current prostate cancer risk calculators’ performance in healthy population, by comparing the impact factor of individual items on different cohorts, and the models’ overall performance. METHODS We performed a systematic review of available prostate cancer risk calculators targeted at healthy population. We included studies published from January 2000 to March 2021 in English, Spanish, French, Portuguese or German. Two reviewers independently decided for or against inclusion based on abstracts. A third reviewer intervened in case of disagreements. From the selected titles, we extracted information regarding the purpose of the manuscript, the analyzed calculators, the population for which it was calibrated, the included risk factors, and the model’s overall accuracy. RESULTS We included a total of 18 calculators across 53 different manuscripts. The most commonly analyzed ones were they PCPT and ERSPC risk calculators, developed from North American and European cohorts, respectively. Both calculators provided high precision for the diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer (AUC as high as 0.798 for PCPT and 0.91 for ERSPC). We found 9 calculators developed from scratch for specific populations, which reached diagnostic precisions as high as 0.938. The most commonly included risk factors in the calculators were age, PSA levels and digital rectal examination findings. Additional calculators included race and detailed personal and family history CONCLUSIONS Both the PCPR and the ERSPC risk calculators have been successfully adapted for cohorts other than the ones they were originally created for with no loss of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, designing calculators from scratch considering each population’s sociocultural differences has resulted in risk tools that can be well adapted to be valid in more patients. The best risk calculator for prostate cancer will be that which was has been calibrated for its intended population and can be easily reproduced and implemented CLINICALTRIAL CRD42021242110

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document