scholarly journals PWWP INTERACTOR OF POLYCOMBS (PWO1) links PcG-mediated gene repression to the nuclear lamina inArabidopsis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pawel Mikulski ◽  
Mareike L. Hohenstatt ◽  
Sara Farrona ◽  
Cezary Smaczniak ◽  
Kerstin Kaufmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Nuclear Lamina ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Gene Repression ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Peripheral Protein ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Proteins

AbstractPolycomb group (PcG) proteins facilitate chromatin-mediated gene repression through the modification of histone tails in a wide range of eukaryotes, including plants and animals. One of the PcG protein complexes, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), promotes repressive chromatin formation via tri-methylation of lysine-27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3). The animal PRC2 is implicated in impacting subnuclear distribution of chromatin as its complex components and H3K27me3 are functionally connected with the nuclear lamina (NL) - a peripheral protein mesh that resides underneath the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and consists of lamins and lamina-associated proteins. In contrast to animals, NL in plants has an atypical structure and its association with PRC2-mediated gene repression is largely unknown. Here, we present a connection between lamin-like protein, CROWDED NUCLEI 1 (CRWN1), and a novel PRC2-associated component, PWWP INTERACTOR OF POLYCOMBS 1 (PWO1), inArabidopsis thaliana. We show that PWO1 and CRWN1 proteins associate physically with each other, act in the same pathway to maintain nuclear morphology and control expression of similar set of target genes. Moreover, we demonstrate that PWO1 proteins form speckle-like foci located partially at the subnuclear periphery inNicotiana benthamianaandArabidopsis thaliana. Ultimately, as CRWN1 and PWO1 are plant-specific, our results argue that plants developed an equivalent, rather than homologous, mechanism of linking PRC2-mediated chromatin repression and nuclear lamina.

scholarly journals The Polycomb Group Protein EED Interacts with YY1, and Both Proteins Induce Neural Tissue in XenopusEmbryos

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1360-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. E. Satijn ◽  
Karien M. Hamer ◽  
Jan den Blaauwen ◽  
Arie P. Otte
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Neural Tissue ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Protein ◽  
Neural Axis ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Group Protein ◽  
Multimeric Protein

ABSTRACT Polycomb group (PcG) proteins form multimeric protein complexes which are involved in the heritable stable repression of genes. Previously, we identified two distinct human PcG protein complexes. The EED-EZH protein complex contains the EED and EZH2 PcG proteins, and the HPC-HPH PcG complex contains the HPC, HPH, BMI1, and RING1 PcG proteins. Here we show that YY1, a homolog of theDrosophila PcG protein pleiohomeotic (Pho), interacts specificially with the human PcG protein EED but not with proteins of the HPC-HPH PcG complex. Since YY1 and Pho are DNA-binding proteins, the interaction between YY1 and EED provides a direct link between the chromatin-associated EED-EZH PcG complex and the DNA of target genes. To study the functional significance of the interaction, we expressed the Xenopus homologs of EED and YY1 inXenopus embryos. Both Xeed and XYY1 induce an ectopic neural axis but do not induce mesodermal tissues. In contrast, members of the HPC-HPH PcG complex do not induce neural tissue. The exclusive, direct neuralizing activity of both the Xeed and XYY1 proteins underlines the significance of the interaction between the two proteins. Our data also indicate a role for chromatin-associated proteins, such as PcG proteins, in Xenopus neural induction.

scholarly journals Evolution of the D. melanogaster chromatin landscape and its associated proteins

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Parey ◽  
Anton Crombach
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Binary Division ◽  
Inference Methods

AbstractIn the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, genomic DNA associates with numerous protein complexes and RNAs, forming the chromatin landscape. Through a genome-wide study of chromatin-associated proteins in Drosophila cells, five major chromatin types were identified as a refinement of the traditional binary division into hetero- and euchromatin. These five types are defined by distinct but overlapping combinations of proteins and differ in biological and biochemical properties, including transcriptional activity, replication timing and histone modifications. In this work, we assess the evolutionary relationships of chromatin-associated proteins and present an integrated view of the evolution and conservation of the fruit fly D. melanogaster chromatin landscape. We combine homology prediction across a wide range of species with gene age inference methods to determine the origin of each chromatin-associated protein. This provides insight into the emergence of the different chromatin types. Our results indicate that the two euchromatic types, YELLOW and RED, were one single activating type that split early in eukaryotic history. Next, we provide evidence that GREEN-associated proteins are involved in a centromere drive and expanded in a lineage-specific way in D. melanogaster. Our results on BLUE chromatin support the hypothesis that the emergence of Polycomb Group proteins is linked to eukaryotic multicellularity. In light of these results, we discuss how the regulatory complexification of chromatin links to the origins of eukaryotic multicellularity.

scholarly journals Association of BMI1 with Polycomb Bodies Is Dynamic and Requires PRC2/EZH2 and the Maintenance DNA Methyltransferase DNMT1

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 11047-11058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Hernández-Muñoz ◽  
Panthea Taghavi ◽  
Coenraad Kuijl ◽  
Jacques Neefjes ◽  
Maarten van Lohuizen
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Pericentric Heterochromatin ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Gene Repression ◽  
Kinetic Properties ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Nuclear Structures ◽  
Stable Maintenance ◽  
Polycomb Bodies

ABSTRACT Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic chromatin modifiers involved in heritable gene repression. Two main PcG complexes have been characterized. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is thought to be involved in the initiation of gene silencing, whereas Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) is implicated in the stable maintenance of gene repression. Here, we investigate the kinetic properties of the binding of one of the PRC1 core components, BMI1, with PcG bodies. PcG bodies are unique nuclear structures located on regions of pericentric heterochromatin, found to be the site of accumulation of PcG complexes in different cell lines. We report the presence of at least two kinetically different pools of BMI1, a highly dynamic and a less dynamic fraction, which may reflect BMI1 pools with different binding capacities to these stable heterochromatin domains. Interestingly, PRC2 members EED and EZH2 appear to be essential for BMI1 recruitment to the PcG bodies. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 is necessary for proper PcG body assembly independent of DNMT-associated histone deacetylase activity. Together, these results provide new insights in the mechanism for regulation of chromatin silencing by PcG proteins and suggest a highly regulated recruitment of PRC1 to chromatin.

scholarly journals Functional characterization of human Polycomb-like 3 isoforms identifies them as components of distinct EZH2 protein complexes

2011 ◽  
Vol 434 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaylor Boulay ◽  
Claire Rosnoblet ◽  
Cateline Guérardel ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Angrand ◽  
Dominique Leprince
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Phd Finger ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Tudor Domain ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1

PcG (Polycomb group) proteins are conserved transcriptional repressors essential to regulate cell fate and to maintain epigenetic cellular memory. They work in concert through two main families of chromatin-modifying complexes, PRC1 (Polycomb repressive complex 1) and PRC2–4. In Drosophila, PRC2 contains the H3K27 histone methyltransferase E(Z) whose trimethylation activity towards PcG target genes is stimulated by PCL (Polycomb-like). In the present study, we have examined hPCL3, one of its three human paralogues. Through alternative splicing, hPCL3 encodes a long isoform, hPCL3L, containing an N-terminal TUDOR domain and two PHDs (plant homeodomains) and a smaller isoform, hPCL3S, lacking the second PHD finger (PHD2). By quantitative reverse transcription–PCR analyses, we showed that both isoforms are widely co-expressed at high levels in medulloblastoma. By co-immunoprecipitation analyses, we demonstrated that both isoforms interact with EZH2 through their common TUDOR domain. However, the hPCL3L-specific PHD2 domain, which is better conserved than PHD1 in the PCL family, is also involved in this interaction and implicated in the self-association of hPCL3L. Finally, we have demonstrated that both hPCL3 isoforms are physically associated with EZH2, but in different complexes. Our results provide the first evidence that the two hPCL3 isoforms belong to different complexes and raise important questions about their relative functions, particularly in tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Mammalian PRC1 Complexes: Compositional Complexity and Diverse Molecular Mechanisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 8594
Author(s):  
Zhuangzhuang Geng ◽  
Zhonghua Gao
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Transcription Activation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Catalytic Core ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Regulation Mechanisms ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complexes

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins function as vital epigenetic regulators in various biological processes, including pluripotency, development, and carcinogenesis. PcG proteins form multicomponent complexes, and two major types of protein complexes have been identified in mammals to date, Polycomb Repressive Complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2). The PRC1 complexes are composed in a hierarchical manner in which the catalytic core, RING1A/B, exclusively interacts with one of six Polycomb group RING finger (PCGF) proteins. This association with specific PCGF proteins allows for PRC1 to be subdivided into six distinct groups, each with their own unique modes of action arising from the distinct set of associated proteins. Historically, PRC1 was considered to be a transcription repressor that deposited monoubiquitylation of histone H2A at lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) and compacted local chromatin. More recently, there is increasing evidence that demonstrates the transcription activation role of PRC1. Moreover, studies on the higher-order chromatin structure have revealed a new function for PRC1 in mediating long-range interactions. This provides a different perspective regarding both the transcription activation and repression characteristics of PRC1. This review summarizes new advancements regarding the composition of mammalian PRC1 and accompanying explanations of how diverse PRC1-associated proteins participate in distinct transcription regulation mechanisms.

The subtype I-F CRISPR–Cas system influences pathogenicity island retention in Pectobacterium atrosepticum via crRNA generation and Csy complex formation

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1468-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna Richter ◽  
Peter C. Fineran
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Mobile Genetic Elements ◽  
Bacterial Evolution ◽  
Pectobacterium Atrosepticum ◽  
Crispr System ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Proteins

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) arrays and Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins confer acquired resistance against mobile genetic elements in a wide range of bacteria and archaea. The phytopathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum SCRI1043 encodes a single subtype I-F CRISPR system, which is composed of three CRISPR arrays and the cas operon encoding Cas1, Cas3 (a Cas2–Cas3 fusion), Csy1, Csy2, Csy3 and Cas6f (Csy4). The CRISPR arrays are transcribed into pre-crRNA (CRISPR RNA) and then processed by Cas6f to generate crRNAs. Furthermore, the formation of Cas protein complexes has been implicated in both the interference and acquisition stages of defence. In the present paper, we discuss the development of tightly controlled ‘programmable’ CRISPR arrays as tools to investigate CRISPR–Cas function and the effects of chromosomal targeting. Finally, we address how chromosomal targeting by CRISPR–Cas can cause large-scale genome deletions, which can ultimately influence bacterial evolution and pathogenicity.

scholarly journals Expression of lamina proteins Lamin Dm0 and Kugelkern suppresses stem cell proliferation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Petrovsky ◽  
Jörg Großhans
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Nuclear Lamina ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Stem Cell Proliferation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Nuclear Stability

AbstractThe nuclear lamina is involved in numerous cellular functions, such as gene expression, nuclear organization, nuclear stability, and cell proliferation. The mechanism underlying the involvement of lamina is often not clear, especially in physiological contexts. Here we investigate how the farnesylated lamina proteins Lamin Dm0 and Kugelkern are linked to proliferation control of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in adult Drosophila flies by loss-of-function and gain-of-function experiments. We found that ISCs mutant for Lamin Dm0 or Kugelkern proliferate, whereas overexpression of Lamin Dm0 or Kugelkern strongly suppressed proliferation. The anti-proliferative activity is, at least in part, due to suppression of Jak/Stat but not Delta/Notch signalling. Lamin Dm0 expression suppresses Jak/Stat signalling by normalization of about 50% of the Stat target genes in ISCs.Author summaryThe nuclear lamina is a protein meshwork that lies beneath the inner side of the nuclear membrane and interacts with nuclear pores, chromatin and the cytoskeleton. Changes in proteins of the nuclear lamina cause a wide range of diseases which are often not well understood. It is hypothesized that impairment of stem cell function, as a result of lamina changes, might play a key role in some of those diseases. Here we use the well characterized Drosophila midgut as a system to investigate the role of lamina proteins Lamin Dm0 and Kugelkern on stem cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Polycomb-group recruitment to a Drosophila target gene is the default state that is inhibited by a transcriptional activator

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (29) ◽  
pp. eabg1556
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Piao Ye ◽  
Taylor Ervin ◽  
Anni Kum ◽  
Judith Benes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Repressive Chromatin ◽  
Group Recruitment ◽  
Default State ◽  
Present Experimental Evidence

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic regulators that maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes following their initial repression by transcription factors. PcG target genes are repressed in some cells, but active in others. Therefore, a mechanism must exist by which PcG proteins distinguish between the repressed and active states and only assemble repressive chromatin environments at target genes that are repressed. Here, we present experimental evidence that the repressed state of a Drosophila PcG target gene, giant (gt), is not identified by the presence of a repressor. Rather, de novo establishment of PcG-mediated silencing at gt is the default state that is prevented by the presence of an activator or coactivator, which may inhibit the catalytic activity of Polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2).

scholarly journals Defining the Boundaries of Polycomb Domains in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-700
Author(s):  
Sandip De ◽  
Natalie D. Gehred ◽  
Miki Fujioka ◽  
Fountane W. Chan ◽  
James B. Jaynes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Transcriptional Repressors ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Transcriptional Terminator ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are an important group of transcriptional repressors that act by modifying chromatin. PcG target genes are covered by the repressive chromatin mark H3K27me3. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a multiprotein complex that is responsible for generating H3K27me3. In Drosophila, PRC2 is recruited by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and then trimethylates flanking nucleosomes, spreading the H3K27me3 mark over large regions of the genome, the “Polycomb domains.” What defines the boundary of a Polycomb domain? There is experimental evidence that insulators, PolII, and active transcription can all form the boundaries of Polycomb domains. Here we divide the boundaries of larval Polycomb domains into six different categories. In one category, genes are transcribed toward the Polycomb domain, where active transcription is thought to stop the spreading of H3K27me3. In agreement with this, we show that introducing a transcriptional terminator into such a transcription unit causes an extension of the Polycomb domain. Additional data suggest that active transcription of a boundary gene may restrict the range of enhancer activity of a Polycomb-regulated gene.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document