scholarly journals Polycomb-group recruitment to a Drosophila target gene is the default state that is inhibited by a transcriptional activator

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (29) ◽  
pp. eabg1556
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Piao Ye ◽  
Taylor Ervin ◽  
Anni Kum ◽  
Judith Benes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Repressive Chromatin ◽  
Group Recruitment ◽  
Default State ◽  
Present Experimental Evidence

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic regulators that maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes following their initial repression by transcription factors. PcG target genes are repressed in some cells, but active in others. Therefore, a mechanism must exist by which PcG proteins distinguish between the repressed and active states and only assemble repressive chromatin environments at target genes that are repressed. Here, we present experimental evidence that the repressed state of a Drosophila PcG target gene, giant (gt), is not identified by the presence of a repressor. Rather, de novo establishment of PcG-mediated silencing at gt is the default state that is prevented by the presence of an activator or coactivator, which may inhibit the catalytic activity of Polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2).

scholarly journals The PRDM14–CtBP1/2–PRC2 complex regulates transcriptional repression during the transition from primed to naïve pluripotency

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (15) ◽  
pp. jcs240176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiko Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshiaki Suwa ◽  
Kohta Sugiyama ◽  
Naoki Okashita ◽  
Masanori Kawaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Core Component ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Pr Domain ◽  
Pluripotency Maintenance

ABSTRACTThe pluripotency-associated transcriptional network is regulated by a core circuitry of transcription factors. The PR domain-containing protein PRDM14 maintains pluripotency by activating and repressing transcription in a target gene-dependent manner. However, the mechanisms underlying dichotomic switching of PRDM14-mediated transcriptional control remain elusive. Here, we identified C-terminal binding protein 1 and 2 (CtBP1 and CtBP2; generically referred to as CtBP1/2) as components of the PRDM14-mediated repressive complex. CtBP1/2 binding to PRDM14 depends on CBFA2T2, a core component of the PRDM14 complex. The loss of Ctbp1/2 impaired the PRDM14-mediated transcriptional repression required for pluripotency maintenance and transition from primed to naïve pluripotency. Furthermore, CtBP1/2 interacted with the PRC2 complexes, and the loss of Ctbp1/2 impaired Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and H3K27me3 enrichment at target genes after Prdm14 induction. These results provide evidence that the target gene-dependent transcriptional activity of PRDM14 is regulated by partner switching to ensure the transition from primed to naïve pluripotency.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper

scholarly journals Histone H2AK119 Mono-Ubiquitination is Essential for Polycomb-Mediated Transcriptional Repression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Tamburri ◽  
Elisa Lavarone ◽  
Daniel Fernández-Pérez ◽  
Marika Zanotti ◽  
Daria Manganaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Talk ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Human Tumors ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Proteins ◽  
Major Function ◽  
Cellular Identity

ABSTRACTThe major function of Polycomb group proteins (PcG) is to maintain transcriptional repression to preserve cellular identity. This is exerted by two distinct repressive complexes, PRC1 and PRC2, that modify histones by depositing H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3, respectively. Both complexes are essential for development and are deregulated in several types of human tumors. PRC1 and PRC2 exist in different variants and show a complex regulatory cross-talk. However, the contribution that H2AK119ub1 plays in mediating PcG repressive functions remains largely controversial. Coupling an inducible system with the expression of a fully catalytic inactive RING1B mutant, we demonstrated that H2AK119ub1 deposition is essential to maintain PcG-target genes repressed in ESC. Loss of H2AK119ub1 induced a rapid displacement of PRC2 activity and a loss of H3K27me3 deposition. This affected both PRC2.1 and PRC2.2 variants and further correlated with a strong displacement and destabilization of canonical PRC1. Finally, we find that variant PRC1 forms can sense H2AK119ub1 deposition, which contributes to their stabilization specifically at sites where this modification is highly enriched. Overall our data place H2AK119ub1 deposition as central hub that mount PcG repressive machineries to preserve cell transcriptional identity.

scholarly journals Differential Contributions of DNA-Binding Proteins to Polycomb Response Element Activity at the Drosophila giant Gene

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 214 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-634
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Kristina Lackey ◽  
Vicki Wong ◽  
Katie T. Thompson ◽  
Evan G. Caston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Element Activity

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic regulators whose primary function is to maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes. Recruitment of Drosophila melanogaster PcG proteins to target genes requires the presence of one or more Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). The functions or necessity for more than one PRE at a gene are not clear and individual PREs at some loci may have distinct regulatory roles. Various combinations of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins are present at a given PRE, but only Pleiohomeotic (Pho) is present at all strong PREs. The giant (gt) locus has two PREs, a proximal PRE1 and a distal PRE2. During early embryonic development, Pho binds to PRE1 ∼30-min prior to stable binding to PRE2. This observation indicated a possible dependence of PRE2 on PRE1 for PcG recruitment; however, we find here that PRE2 recruits PcG proteins and maintains transcriptional repression independently of Pho binding to PRE1. Pho-like (Phol) is partially redundant with Pho during larval development and binds to the same DNA sequences in vitro. Although binding of Pho to PRE1 is dependent on the presence of consensus Pho-Phol-binding sites, Phol binding is less so and appears to play a minimal role in recruiting other PcG proteins to gt. Another PRE-binding protein, Sp1/Kruppel-like factor, is dependent on the presence of Pho for PRE1 binding. Further, we show that, in addition to silencing gene expression, PcG proteins dampen transcription of an active gene.

scholarly journals Mel-18, a Polycomb Group Protein, Regulates Cell Proliferation and Senescence via Transcriptional Repression of Bmi-1 and c-Myc Oncoproteins

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Jian Guo ◽  
Sonal Datta ◽  
Vimla Band ◽  
Goberdhan P. Dimri
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Protein ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Group Protein ◽  
Bona Fide

Polycomb group (PcG) protein Bmi-1 is an important regulator of cell proliferation. It regulates cellular senescence and proliferation of cells via the transcriptional repression of INK4a/ARF locus and other target genes. Here, we report that Mel-18, a PcG ring finger protein (PCGF) transcriptionally down-regulates Bmi-1. Furthermore, the expression of Bmi-1 and Mel-18 inversely correlates in proliferating and senescent human fibroblasts. Bmi-1 down-regulation by Mel-18 results in accelerated senescence and shortening of the replicative life span in normal human cells. Importantly, using promoter-reporter, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and quantitative real-time primary transcript RT-PCR assays, and an RNA interference approach, we demonstrate that Bmi-1 is a bona fide target of c-Myc oncoprotein. Finally, our data suggest that Mel-18 regulates Bmi-1 expression during senescence via down-regulation of c-Myc. These studies link c-Myc and polycomb function in cell proliferation and senescence.

scholarly journals Defining the Boundaries of Polycomb Domains in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-700
Author(s):  
Sandip De ◽  
Natalie D. Gehred ◽  
Miki Fujioka ◽  
Fountane W. Chan ◽  
James B. Jaynes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Transcriptional Repressors ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Transcriptional Terminator ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
Polycomb Response Elements

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are an important group of transcriptional repressors that act by modifying chromatin. PcG target genes are covered by the repressive chromatin mark H3K27me3. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a multiprotein complex that is responsible for generating H3K27me3. In Drosophila, PRC2 is recruited by Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and then trimethylates flanking nucleosomes, spreading the H3K27me3 mark over large regions of the genome, the “Polycomb domains.” What defines the boundary of a Polycomb domain? There is experimental evidence that insulators, PolII, and active transcription can all form the boundaries of Polycomb domains. Here we divide the boundaries of larval Polycomb domains into six different categories. In one category, genes are transcribed toward the Polycomb domain, where active transcription is thought to stop the spreading of H3K27me3. In agreement with this, we show that introducing a transcriptional terminator into such a transcription unit causes an extension of the Polycomb domain. Additional data suggest that active transcription of a boundary gene may restrict the range of enhancer activity of a Polycomb-regulated gene.

scholarly journals Lamin A/C sustains PcG protein architecture, maintaining transcriptional repression at target genes

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Cesarini ◽  
Chiara Mozzetta ◽  
Fabrizia Marullo ◽  
Francesco Gregoretti ◽  
Annagiusi Gargiulo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Talk ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Myogenic Differentiation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Lamin A ◽  
Epigenetic Factors ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Myogenic Program

Beyond its role in providing structure to the nuclear envelope, lamin A/C is involved in transcriptional regulation. However, its cross talk with epigenetic factors—and how this cross talk influences physiological processes—is still unexplored. Key epigenetic regulators of development and differentiation are the Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins, organized in the nucleus as microscopically visible foci. Here, we show that lamin A/C is evolutionarily required for correct PcG protein nuclear compartmentalization. Confocal microscopy supported by new algorithms for image analysis reveals that lamin A/C knock-down leads to PcG protein foci disassembly and PcG protein dispersion. This causes detachment from chromatin and defects in PcG protein–mediated higher-order structures, thereby leading to impaired PcG protein repressive functions. Using myogenic differentiation as a model, we found that reduced levels of lamin A/C at the onset of differentiation led to an anticipation of the myogenic program because of an alteration of PcG protein–mediated transcriptional repression. Collectively, our results indicate that lamin A/C can modulate transcription through the regulation of PcG protein epigenetic factors.

scholarly journals RBP-Jκ/SHARP Recruits CtIP/CtBP Corepressors To Silence Notch Target Genes

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 10379-10390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Oswald ◽  
Michael Winkler ◽  
Ying Cao ◽  
Kathy Astrahantseff ◽  
Soizic Bourteele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Corepressor Complex ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Repression Domain

ABSTRACT Notch is a transmembrane receptor that determines cell fates and pattern formation in all animal species. After ligand binding, proteolytic cleavage steps occur and the intracellular part of Notch translocates to the nucleus, where it targets the DNA-binding protein RBP-Jκ/CBF1. In the absence of Notch, RBP-Jκ represses Notch target genes through the recruitment of a corepressor complex. We and others have identified SHARP as a component of this complex. Here, we functionally demonstrate that the SHARP repression domain is necessary and sufficient to repress transcription and that the absence of this domain causes a dominant negative Notch-like phenotype. We identify the CtIP and CtBP corepressors as novel components of the human RBP-Jκ/SHARP-corepressor complex and show that CtIP binds directly to the SHARP repression domain. Functionally, CtIP and CtBP augment SHARP-mediated repression. Transcriptional repression of the Notch target gene Hey1 is abolished in CtBP-deficient cells or after the functional knockout of CtBP. Furthermore, the endogenous Hey1 promoter is derepressed in CtBP-deficient cells. We propose that a corepressor complex containing CtIP/CtBP facilitates RBP-Jκ/SHARP-mediated repression of Notch target genes.

scholarly journals Mapping the evolving landscape of super-enhancers during cell differentiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Kai ◽  
Bin E. Li ◽  
Ming Zhu ◽  
Grace Y. Li ◽  
Fei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Target Gene Expression ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Super Enhancer

Abstract Background Super-enhancers are clusters of enhancer elements that play critical roles in the maintenance of cell identity. Current investigations on super-enhancers are centered on the established ones in static cell types. How super-enhancers are established during cell differentiation remains obscure. Results Here, by developing an unbiased approach to systematically analyze the evolving landscape of super-enhancers during cell differentiation in multiple lineages, we discover a general trend where super-enhancers emerge through three distinct temporal patterns: conserved, temporally hierarchical, and de novo. The three types of super-enhancers differ further in association patterns in target gene expression, functional enrichment, and 3D chromatin organization, suggesting they may represent distinct structural and functional subtypes. Furthermore, we dissect the enhancer repertoire within temporally hierarchical super-enhancers, and find enhancers that emerge at early and late stages are enriched with distinct transcription factors, suggesting that the temporal order of establishment of elements within super-enhancers may be directed by underlying DNA sequence. CRISPR-mediated deletion of individual enhancers in differentiated cells shows that both the early- and late-emerged enhancers are indispensable for target gene expression, while in undifferentiated cells early enhancers are involved in the regulation of target genes. Conclusions In summary, our analysis highlights the heterogeneity of the super-enhancer population and provides new insights to enhancer functions within super-enhancers.

scholarly journals Impact of Genome Architecture Upon the Functional Activation and Repression of Hox Regulatory Landscapes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie Rodríguez-Carballo ◽  
Lucille Lopez-Delisle ◽  
Nayuta Yakushiji-Kaminatsui ◽  
Asier Ullate-Agote ◽  
Denis Duboule
Keyword(s):  
Gene Cluster ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Chromatin Domain ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Distal Limb ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Enhancer Sequences ◽  
Regulatory Landscapes

BackgroundThe spatial organization of the mammalian genome relies upon the formation of chromatin domains of various scales. At the level of gene regulation in cis, collections of enhancer sequences define large regulatory landscapes that usually match with the presence of topologically associating domains (TADs). These domains are largely determined by bound CTCF molecules and often contain ranges of enhancers displaying similar or related tissue specificity, suggesting that in some cases such domains may act as coherent regulatory units, with a global on or off state.ResultsBy using the HoxD gene cluster as a paradigm, we investigated the effect of large genomic rearrangements affecting the two TADs flanking this locus, including their fusion into a single chromatin domain. We show that, within a single hybrid TAD, the activation of both proximal and distal limb enhancers initially positioned in either TADs globally occurred as when both TADs are intact. We also show that the timely implementation of distal limb enhancers depends on whether or not target genes had previously responded to proximal enhancers, due to the presence or absence of H3K27me3 marks.ConclusionsFrom this work, we conclude that antagonistic limb proximal and distal enhancers can exert their specificities when positioned into the same TAD and in the absence of their genuine target genes. We also conclude that removing these target genes reduced the coverage of a regulatory landscape by chromatin marks associated with silencing and thus prolonged its activity in time. Since Polycomb group proteins are mainly recruited at the Hox gene cluster, our results suggest that Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) can extend its coverage to far-cis regulatory sequences as long as confined to the neighboring TAD structure.

Epigenetic Regulation of Cell Cycle-Promoting Genes By Ikaros and HDAC1 in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3571-3571
Author(s):  
Sunil Muthusami ◽  
Chunhua Song ◽  
Xiaokang Pan ◽  
Chandrika S. Gowda ◽  
Kimberly J Payne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Repressive Chromatin

Abstract B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood leukemia. Expression profiling has identified IKZF1 (Ikaros) as a major tumor suppressor in B-ALL and established reduced Ikaros function as a poor prognostic marker for this disease. Ikaros regulates expression of its target genes via chromatin remodeling. In vivo, Ikaros can form a complex with histone deacetylases HDAC1 and/or HDAC2 as well as the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex. The mechanisms by which Ikaros exerts its tumor suppressor function and regulates gene expression in B-ALL are unknown. Here we report the use of chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with next generation sequencing (ChIP-SEQ) to identify genes that are regulated by Ikaros in vivo and to determine the role of Ikaros in chromatin remodeling in B-ALL. Results reveal that Ikaros binds to the promoter regions of a large number of genes that are critical for cell cycle progression. These include CDC2, CDC16, CDC25A, ANAPC1, and ANAPC7. Overexpression of Ikaros in leukemia cells resulted in transcriptional repression of Ikaros target genes. Results from luciferase reporter assays performed using the respective promoters of Ikaros target genes support a role for Ikaros as a transcriptional repressor of these genes. Downregulation of Ikaros by siRNA resulted in increased expression of Ikaros target genes that control cell cycle progression. These results suggest that Ikaros functions as a negative regulator of cell cycle progression by repressing transcription of cell cycle-promoting genes. Next, we studied how Ikaros binding affects the epigenetic signature at promoters of Ikaros target genes. Global epigenetic mapping showed that Ikaros binding at the promoter region of cell cycle-promoting genes is associated with the formation of one of two types of repressive epigenetic marks – either H3K27me3 or H3K9me3. While these epigenetic marks were mutually exclusive, they were both associated with the loss of H3K9 acetylation and transcriptional repression. Serial qChIP assays spanning promoters of the Ikaros target genes revealed that the presence of H3K27me3 is associated with Ikaros and HDAC1 binding, while the H3K9me3 modification is associated with Ikaros binding and the absence of HDAC1. ChIP-SEQ analysis of HDAC1 global genomic binding demonstrated that over 80% of H3K27me3 modifications at promoter regions are associated with HDAC1 binding at surrounding sites. The treatment of leukemia cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor – trichostatin (TSA) resulted in a severe reduction of global levels of H3K27me3, as evidenced by Wesern blot. These data suggest that HDAC1 activity in leukemia is essential for the formation of repressive chromatin that is characterized by the presence of H3K27me3. Our data suggest that Ikaros binding at the promoters of its target genes can result in the formation of repressive chromatin by two distinct mechanisms: 1) direct Ikaros binding resulting in increased H3K9me3 or 2) Ikaros recruitment of HDAC1 with increased H3K27me3 modifications. These data suggest distinct mechanisms for the regulation of chromatin remodeling and target gene expression by Ikaros alone, and Ikaros in complex with HDAC1. In conclusion, the presented data suggest that HDAC1 has a key role in regulating cell cycle progression and proliferation in B-ALL. Our results identify novel, Ikaros-mediated mechanisms of epigenetic regulation that contribute to tumor suppression in leukemia. Supported by National Institutes of Health R01 HL095120, and the Four Diamonds Fund Endowment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document