scholarly journals A new role of the Mus81 nuclease for replication completion after fork restart

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Pardo ◽  
María Moriel-Carretero ◽  
Thibaud Vicat ◽  
Andrés Aguilera ◽  
Philippe Pasero
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Molecular Level ◽  
Dna Supercoiling ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Topoisomerase ◽  
Replication Restart ◽  
Protein Crosslinks

ABSTRACTImpediments to DNA replication threaten genome stability. The homologous recombination (HR) pathway is involved in the restart of blocked replication forks. Here, we used a new method to study at the molecular level the restart of replication in response to DNA topoisomerase I poisoning by camptothecin (CPT). We show that HR-mediated restart at the global genomic level occurs by a BIR-like mechanism that requires Rad52, Rad51 and Pol32. The Mus81 endonuclease, previously proposed to cleave blocked forks, is not required for replication restart in S phase but appears to be essential to resolve fork-associated recombination intermediates in G2/M as a step necessary to complete replication. We confirmed our results using an independent system that allowed us to conclude that this mechanism is independent of the accumulation of DNA supercoiling and DNA-protein crosslinks normally caused by CPT. Thus, we describe here a specific function for Mus81 in the processing of HR-restarted forks required to complete DNA replication.

scholarly journals The Role of DNA Topoisomerase Binding Protein 1 (TopBP1) in Genome Stability in Arabidopsis

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2568
Author(s):  
Pablo Parra-Nunez ◽  
Claire Cooper ◽  
Eugenio Sanchez-Moran
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Dna Topoisomerase ◽  
Anaphase Bridges ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis

DNA topoisomerase II (TOPII) plays a very important role in DNA topology and in different biological processes such as DNA replication, transcription, repair, and chromosome condensation in higher eukaryotes. TOPII has been found to interact directly with a protein called topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TopBP1) which also seems to have important roles in DNA replication and repair. In this study, we conducted different experiments to assess the roles of TopBP1 in DNA repair, mitosis, and meiosis, exploring the relationship between TOPII activity and TopBP1. We found that topbp1 mutant seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana were hypersensitive to cisplatin treatment and the inhibition of TOPII with etoposide produced similar hypersensitivity levels. Furthermore, we recognised that there were no significant differences between the WT and topbp1 seedlings treated with cisplatin and etoposide together, suggesting that the hypersensitivity to cisplatin in the topbp1 mutant could be related to the functional interaction between TOPII and TopBP1. Somatic and meiotic anaphase bridges appeared in the topbp1 mutant at similar frequencies to those when TOPII was inhibited with merbarone, etoposide, or ICFR-187. The effects on meiosis of TOPII inhibition were produced at S phase/G2 stage, suggesting that catenanes could be produced at the onset of meiosis. Thus, if the processing of the catenanes is impaired, some anaphase bridges can be formed. Also, the appearance of anaphase bridges at first and second division is discussed.

scholarly journals DNA–protein crosslink proteases in genome stability

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annamaria Ruggiano ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Protein Component ◽  
Human Diseases ◽  
Direct Link ◽  
The Past ◽  
Protein Crosslinks ◽  
Bulky Dna Lesions

AbstractProteins covalently attached to DNA, also known as DNA–protein crosslinks (DPCs), are common and bulky DNA lesions that interfere with DNA replication, repair, transcription and recombination. Research in the past several years indicates that cells possess dedicated enzymes, known as DPC proteases, which digest the protein component of a DPC. Interestingly, DPC proteases also play a role in proteolysis beside DPC repair, such as in degrading excess histones during DNA replication or controlling DNA replication checkpoints. Here, we discuss the importance of DPC proteases in DNA replication, genome stability and their direct link to human diseases and cancer therapy.

Single-molecule binding characterization of primosomal protein PriA involved in replication restart

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Yu Lee ◽  
Yi-Ching Li ◽  
Min-Guan Lin ◽  
Chwan-Deng Hsiao ◽  
Hung-Wen Li
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Bacterial Survival ◽  
Dna Damages ◽  
Replication Restart

DNA damages lead to stalled or collapsed replication forks. Replication restart primosomes re-initiate DNA synthesis at these stalled or collapsed DNA replication forks, which is important for bacterial survival. Primosomal...

scholarly journals The Protective Role of Dormant Origins in Response to Replicative Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Valérie Bergoglio
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Entire Genome ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
A Cell ◽  
The Many

Genome stability requires tight regulation of DNA replication to ensure that the entire genome of the cell is duplicated once and only once per cell cycle. In mammalian cells, origin activation is controlled in space and time by a cell-specific and robust program called replication timing. About 100,000 potential replication origins form on the chromatin in the gap 1 (G1) phase but only 20–30% of them are active during the DNA replication of a given cell in the synthesis (S) phase. When the progress of replication forks is slowed by exogenous or endogenous impediments, the cell must activate some of the inactive or “dormant” origins to complete replication on time. Thus, the many origins that may be activated are probably key to protect the genome against replication stress. This review aims to discuss the role of these dormant origins as safeguards of the human genome during replicative stress.

scholarly journals ING2 controls the progression of DNA replication forks to maintain genome stability

EMBO Reports ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1168-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Larrieu ◽  
Damien Ythier ◽  
Romuald Binet ◽  
Christian Brambilla ◽  
Elisabeth Brambilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Maintain Genome Stability

scholarly journals The Main Role of Srs2 in DNA Repair Depends on Its Helicase Activity, Rather than on Its Interactions with PCNA or Rad51

mBio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bronstein ◽  
Lihi Gershon ◽  
Gilad Grinberg ◽  
Elisa Alonso-Perez ◽  
Martin Kupiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Srs2 Helicase

ABSTRACTHomologous recombination (HR) is a mechanism that repairs a variety of DNA lesions. Under certain circumstances, however, HR can generate intermediates that can interfere with other cellular processes such as DNA transcription or replication. Cells have therefore developed pathways that abolish undesirable HR intermediates. TheSaccharomyces cerevisiaeyeast Srs2 helicase has a major role in one of these pathways. Srs2 also works during DNA replication and interacts with the clamp PCNA. The relative importance of Srs2’s helicase activity, Rad51 removal function, and PCNA interaction in genome stability remains unclear. We created a newSRS2allele [srs2(1-850)] that lacks the whole C terminus, containing the interaction site for Rad51 and PCNA and interactions with many other proteins. Thus, the new allele encodes an Srs2 protein bearing only the activity of the DNA helicase. We find that the interactions of Srs2 with Rad51 and PCNA are dispensable for the main role of Srs2 in the repair of DNA damage in vegetative cells and for proper completion of meiosis. On the other hand, it has been shown that in cells impaired for the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways, Srs2 generates toxic intermediates that lead to DNA damage sensitivity; we show that this negative Srs2 activity requires the C terminus of Srs2. Dissection of the genetic interactions of thesrs2(1-850) allele suggest a role for Srs2’s helicase activity in sister chromatid cohesion. Our results also indicate that Srs2’s function becomes more central in diploid cells.IMPORTANCEHomologous recombination (HR) is a key mechanism that repairs damaged DNA. However, this process has to be tightly regulated; failure to regulate it can lead to genome instability. The Srs2 helicase is considered a regulator of HR; it was shown to be able to evict the recombinase Rad51 from DNA. Cells lacking Srs2 exhibit sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and in some cases, they display defects in DNA replication. The relative roles of the helicase and Rad51 removal activities of Srs2 in genome stability remain unclear. To address this question, we created a new Srs2 mutant which has only the DNA helicase domain. Our study shows that only the DNA helicase domain is needed to deal with DNA damage and assist in DNA replication during vegetative growth and in meiosis. Thus, our findings shift the view on the role of Srs2 in the maintenance of genome integrity.

scholarly journals Nucleolar Localization and Dynamic Roles of Flap Endonuclease 1 in Ribosomal DNA Replication and Damage Repair

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 4310-4319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Guo ◽  
Limin Qian ◽  
Ren Liu ◽  
Huifang Dai ◽  
Mian Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Repair Capacity ◽  
Flap Endonuclease 1 ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Dependent Endonuclease ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Cellular Compartmentalization

ABSTRACT Despite the wealth of information available on the biochemical functions and our recent findings of its roles in genome stability and cancer avoidance of the structure-specific flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), its cellular compartmentalization and dynamics corresponding to its involvement in various DNA metabolic pathways are not yet elucidated. Several years ago, we demonstrated that FEN1 migrates into the nucleus in response to DNA damage and under certain cell cycle conditions. In the current paper, we found that FEN1 is superaccumulated in the nucleolus and plays a role in the resolution of stalled DNA replication forks formed at the sites of natural replication fork barriers. In response to UV irradiation and upon phosphorylation, FEN1 migrates to nuclear plasma to participate in the resolution of UV cross-links on DNA, most likely employing its concerted action of exonuclease and gap-dependent endonuclease activities. Based on yeast complementation experiments, the mutation of Ser187Asp, mimicking constant phosphorylation, excludes FEN1 from nucleolar accumulation. The replacement of Ser187 by Ala, eliminating the only phosphorylation site, retains FEN1 in nucleoli. Both of the mutations cause UV sensitivity, impair cellular UV damage repair capacity, and decline overall cellular survivorship.

Helicases that interact with replication forks: new candidates from archaea

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1471-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Bolt
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Duplication ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Valuable Resource ◽  
Replication Restart

Overcoming DNA replication fork blocks is essential for completing genome duplication and cell division. Archaea and eukaryotes drive replication using essentially the same protein machinery. Archaea may be a valuable resource for identifying new helicase components at advancing forks and/or in replication-restart pathways. As described here, these may be relevant to understanding genome instability in metazoans.

scholarly journals p53 orchestrates DNA replication restart homeostasis by suppressing mutagenic RAD52 and POLθ pathways

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunetra Roy ◽  
Karl-Heinz Tomaszowski ◽  
Jessica W Luzwick ◽  
Soyoung Park ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Mutational Signatures ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Replication Restart ◽  
Dna Replication Restart

Classically, p53 tumor suppressor acts in transcription, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. Yet, replication-mediated genomic instability is integral to oncogenesis, and p53 mutations promote tumor progression and drug-resistance. By delineating human and murine separation-of-function p53 alleles, we find that p53 null and gain-of-function (GOF) mutations exhibit defects in restart of stalled or damaged DNA replication forks that drive genomic instability, which isgenetically separable from transcription activation. By assaying protein-DNA fork interactions in single cells, we unveil a p53-MLL3-enabled recruitment of MRE11 DNA replication restart nuclease. Importantly, p53 defects or depletion unexpectedly allow mutagenic RAD52 and POLθ pathways to hijack stalled forks, which we find reflected in p53 defective breast-cancer patient COSMIC mutational signatures. These data uncover p53 as a keystone regulator of replication homeostasis within a DNA restart network. Mechanistically, this has important implications for development of resistance in cancer therapy. Combined, these results define an unexpected role for p53-mediated suppression of replication genome instability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document