Project Work Division in Agile Distributed Student Teams - Who Develops What?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Bosnic ◽  
Igor Cavrak
Keyword(s):  
Project Work ◽  
Student Teams

Cross-University Collaborative Learning

2011 ◽  
pp. 333-347
Author(s):  
Anne P. Massey ◽  
Mitzi M. Montoya ◽  
Valerie Bartelt
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Web 2.0 ◽  
Virtual Teams ◽  
Virtual Worlds ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Collaborative Tools ◽  
Successful Student ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
University Course

Over the last two decades, communication and collaboration tools to support student project work have evolved significantly, with an expanding array of options. Most recently, 3D virtual worlds (VW) have emerged. This chapter explores the use of collaborative tools in a cross-university course where student (“virtual”) teams engaged in a multi-week project. The student project teams had access to a collaborative toolkit that included Web 1.0 (traditional) and Web 2.0 tools, as well as collaboration spaces in a VW. Findings suggest that more successful student teams were better able to match Web 2.0 and VW collaborative technologies to project activities, while other lower performing teams defaulted to more familiar Web 1.0 technologies. The VW played a key role in facilitating relationship building in the collaborative learning process. The findings are particularly relevant to instructors seeking to integrate and use VWs in the classroom for collaborative project work and distance learning settings.

scholarly journals A positive student experience of collaborative project work in upper-year undergraduate chemistry

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 340-357
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Knox ◽  
Elizabeth A. L. Gillis ◽  
Gregory R. Dake
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Group Project ◽  
Transferable Skills ◽  
Instructional Activity ◽  
Undergraduate Chemistry ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Informed Group ◽  
High Degree

Demands are placed on undergraduate courses in chemistry to develop transferable skills, such as teamwork, alongside subject content and technical skills. Such skills can be developed by implementing pedagogies which involve students working together. Such pedagogies can, however, pose various challenges, including unfavourable student perceptions and experiences including the occurrence of dysfunctional student teams. This article presents a research-informed group project assignment delivered as part of an upper-year undergraduate chemistry course which has been found to overcome these challenges. The instructional activity is characterized by a high degree of structure and support for teamwork. Student perceptions, collected by survey and interview, and peer- and self-evaluations of contributions to the work of the groups reveal that students have experienced the activity positively. Many perceived disadvantages of working in a team to complete a project were either reportedly not experienced or could be overcome by the students, while perceived advantages were often reported to be experienced. Dysfunction within teams did not represent a significant issue.

The Use of Interest-Inventory Measurements in Marketing Education: Improving MBA Student Team Effectiveness

2019 ◽  
pp. 027347531987223
Author(s):  
Russell Lemken ◽  
Judy A. Siguaw
Keyword(s):  
Group Formation ◽  
Experimental Methodology ◽  
Team Formation ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Interest Inventory ◽  
Mba Students ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Inventory Survey ◽  
Career Options

Business schools face the dual challenge of keeping students highly engaged in courses with exceptionally broad scope, like the introduction to marketing principles, while simultaneously instructing them in the increasingly specific and technical skills that are demanded by employers. In this article, the authors describe the use of an interest-inventory survey for MBA students that allows instructors to measure students’ interest in the subareas of marketing, while communicating the range of career options available in the marketing discipline. The effectiveness of using the interest-inventory survey for team formation is demonstrated through empirical data gathered through an experimental methodology. The article details how this measurement of student interests is constructed, administered at the beginning of the term, reported and discussed, and then used throughout the term in team formation, exercises, assignments, and project work to simulate the multidisciplinary group structures most students will encounter in their careers. The article also reveals how the multidisciplinary team approach created using the survey provides the means to manage tactical challenges presented by student teams, like allocating project work within teams, and grading team outcomes transparently and equitably. Data reveal that use of this pedagogical approach for group formation increases the effectiveness of student teams.

scholarly journals Projects of Consequence: Interdisciplinary WIL Projects Designed to Meet the Needs of Partners and Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
Leanne Piggott ◽  
◽  
Theresa Winchester-Seeto ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Curriculum Design ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Pedagogical Practices ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Work Integrated Learning ◽  
Additional Support

The focus of this paper is the design and development of an innovative project-based work-integrated learning (WIL) course that enables undergraduate students from all faculties to work in interdisciplinary teams with partner organisations from the public, private, and community sectors. Projects are codesigned with partners interested in students from multiple disciplines bringing insights to problems that might not otherwise be resourced by their organisation. These ‘projects of consequence’ are unstructured, ambiguous and complex, requiring student teams to synthesise their different disciplinary knowledge. Student learning is supported by course curriculum design that includes proven pedagogical practices such as: ongoing feedback from partners; students working in autonomous small teams; academic supervision of teamwork; learning support before and during project work; debriefing; providing a safe, supportive space to experiment with new ideas, embracing the prospect of failure and to develop resilience; all underpinned by reflection so as to process, understand and integrate students’ experiences. The versatility of the course design was demonstrated by the rapid change from face-to-face delivery to an entirely online learning environment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The challenges and adaptations include changes to the way student teams worked, the additional support needed by students, and adjustment in the mode of interactions with partners.

scholarly journals Ground Rules in Team Projects: Findings from a Prototype System to Support Students

10.28945/3300 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice Whatley
Keyword(s):  
Project Work ◽  
Work Place ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Prototype System ◽  
Team Projects ◽  
Team Working ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Limited Support ◽  
Team Project ◽  
Student Team

Student team project work in higher education is one of the best ways to develop team working skills at the same time as learning about the subject matter. As today’s students require the freedom to learn at times and places that better match their lifestyles, there is a need for any support for team project work to be also available online. Team working requires that the task roles as well as the maintenance roles are taken into consideration, in that social interactions are just as important as carrying out the tasks of the project. The literature indicates that groupware, whilst effective in supporting the task roles, provides limited support for the maintenance roles of team working in the work place. As groupware was not specifically designed for student team working, it provides limited support for maintenance roles in student team projects. Virtual learning environments similarly provide support for completing the task roles. Many researchers have found that students experience difficulties with their team project work that reduce the perceived benefits of working in a team. It is proposed that helping students to agree on ground rules at the start of a project will improve team cohesion. This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a prototype system to help students to agree on ground rules as they start their team projects. The system was tested with teams of students carrying out information systems team projects, using an interpretive case study research approach. In this case the teams had the additional problem of being composed of students from across three years of their undergraduate degree programmes, so they did not always have prior knowledge of each other’s preferences. We were trying to establish how useful this software tool would be to these student teams, in starting their project work. The findings showed that some of the student teams did find the ground rules function useful, but the team leaders were the ones who most appreciated its potential. The students may use the outputs in very different ways, but even just looking at the ground rules appeared to get team members thinking about their expectations for team working. Student teams do not often start by thinking about norms, but this study shows a positive benefit of encouraging teams to agree on ground rules at the start of their projects.

IMPACT OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION BASED ON HYBRID LEARNING AND JIGSAW TOWARD HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 560
Author(s):  
Arief Rahman Yusuf ◽  
Sandi Kurniawan ◽  
Eddy Sutadji ◽  
Imam Sudjono
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Hybrid Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
High Order ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
High Order Thinking

The background of the research is the low assessment of high order thinking skills of students due to the conventional methods used by the school. The aims of this study are: (1) how student learning activities when using hybrid learning Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and jigsaw, (2) how student learning activities when taught using the direct learning model, and (3) the effect of hybrid learning Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and jigsaw towards high order thinking skills. This study used a quasi experimental nonequivalent control group design with the sample of 50 students from a population of vocational high school students in Ponorogo. Data collection techniques used instruments in the form of high order tests and non-test instruments in the form of observation sheets. Data analysis used was independent sample t-test. The results showed: (1) the use of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) based on hybrid learning and jigsaw made 28% of students were very active, 28% of students active, and 44% of students quite active in the learning process, this was evidenced by an average value of 70.56, (2) the use of direct learning models in learning made 24% of students quite active, 36% of students less active, and 40% of students passive in the learning process, which can be seen from the acquisition of an average value of 51.52, and (3) there was a significant effect of Student Learning Achievement Division (STAD) based on hybrid learning and jigsaw on students' high order thinking skills.

PENGGUNAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STAD (STUDENT TEAMS-ACHIEVMENT DIVISIONS) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS SURAT DINAS SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI SE-KECAMATAN PANYINGKIRAN KABUPATEN MAJALENGKA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 447
Author(s):  
Iyay Robia Khoerudin ◽  
Neneng Titin ◽  
Eki Kiyamudin
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Test Control

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan menulis surat dinas siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negeri Se-Kecamatan Panyingkiran Kabupaten Majalengka, mengetahui kemampuan menulis surat dinas dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran STAD (Student Teams-Achievment Divisions) siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negeri Se-Kecamatan Panyingkiran Kabupaten Majalengka, serta menjelaskan efektifitas model pembelajaran STAD (Student Teams-Achievment Divisions) untuk meningkatkan  pengajaran menulis surat dinas siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Negeri Se-Kecamatan Panyingkiran Kabupaten Majalengka.Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan metode eksperimen Pre test-Post test Control Group Design, populasinya yaitu SMP Negeri Se-Kecamatan Panyingkiran Kabupaten Majalengka tahun ajaran 2013/2014, sedangkan  sampelnya ditentukan melalui teknik simple random sampling yaitu kelas VIII G SMP Negeri 2 Panyingkiran sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas VIII B SMP Negeri 1 Panyingkiran sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen pengumpulan data yang digunakan tes tertulis tes awal dan tes akhir, kuesioner, lembar observasi guru dan siswa, setelah data diperoleh maka dilakukan analisis data. Data kuesioner dan observasi dianalisis dalam bentuk uraian sedangkan data tes dianalisis dengan statistik dan di deskripsikan.Berdasarkan perhitungan statistik program SPSS 16.0 diperoleh hasil uji t pretes pada kedua kelas tersebut memiliki nilai t=5.429 derajat kebebasan (df)=n-1=38 nilai probability (sig 2-tailed) sebesar 0,000.  Hal ini berarti t hitung <0,005. Artinya 0,000<0,05, pada uji t ini bahwasanya pretes pada kedua kelas terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen dengan kelas kontrol.  Apabila ditinjau dari segi rata-rata pretes eksperimen lebih efektif daripada kelas kontrol. Hal ini terbukti dari rata-ratanya pretes kelas eksperimen 64,8 kelas kontrol 62,3 selisih rata-rata 2,5. Sedangkan rata-rata postes kelas eksperimen 81,2 dan kelas kontrol 69 terjadi selisih postes 12,2.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS MODIFIKASI PENEMUAN TERBIMBING TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN VERBAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Verbal Ability ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Verbal Skills ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both onstudents who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing,baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document